Language selection

Search

First Annual Progress Report on Accessibility at Fisheries and Oceans Canada 2023

On this page

General

Executive summary

This document, prepared in accordance with the Accessible Canada Act, reports on progress towards the goals outlined in the Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s (DFO) Accessibility Action Plan. In collaboration with employees of the organization, particularly those with lived experiences in the area of accessibility, our primary achievements in this first year have been in establishing the basis to support, measure, and report on activities across the department.

For example, we:

Similarly, sectors of the department who are responsible for specific goals of the plan have laid the foundation for achieving those goals.

For example, we:

This report includes information about the feedback received, barriers reported, and what the department is doing with this information.

As an organization, we have retained several lessons from this first year’s experiences, for example:

Introduction

Purpose

This report summarizes progress towards the goals outlined in DFO’s Accessibility Action Plan. The plan was made to identify and address accessibility issues, and remove barriers to persons with disabilities (PwD) in these important areas:

In our first year, in partnership with key stakeholders including our community of persons with disabilities, the main objectives have been:

Definitions of terms

Definitions of terms used in this report can be found in the Glossary of the Accessibility Strategy for the Public Service of Canada.

Contact information for feedback

The Director General of Workforce Development and Inclusion is designated to receive feedback on behalf of DFO and the Canadian Coast Guard. The Accessibility Secretariat tracks all feedback and responds to all non-anonymous accessibility-related concerns and feedback.

Feedback on barriers encountered at DFO, the Accessibility Action Plan 2022-2025 or the First Annual Report on Accessibility at Fisheries and Oceans Canada 2023 can be shared in the following ways:

Alternate formats

You can request an alternate version of our progress report, Accessibility Action Plan, or our feedback process by email at DFO.Publications.MPO@dfo-mpo.gc.ca or telephone at 1-833-212-1438.

Formats available:

Accessibility at DFO

The Accessibility Secretariat

DFO created an Accessibility Secretariat in January 2023. The secretariat is responsible for:

The Accessibility Network

DFO has had a volunteer network of employees with disabilities and their allies since 2017. The network:

The Accessibility Secretariat and the network work closely together to drive and support actions and content created to promote accessibility at DFO.

The accessibility champions

DFO currently has two co-champions, Supriya Edwards, Assistant Deputy Minister, People and Culture, and Marc-André Meunier, Assistant Commissioner, Central region, Canadian Coast Guard, who:

We wish to recognize the work of the outgoing accessibility champion and Commissioner of the Canadian Coast Guard, Mario Pelletier, who completed his tenure as accessibility champion in 2022 to 2023, and who led by publicly sharing his own experience of disability.

Regional efforts to promote accessibility

In addition to specific departmental goals under the plan, regional efforts made towards promoting accessibility continue, and best practices promoted across the organization.

Examples of work done in the regions include:

Persons with disabilities (PwD) at DFO

Based on data from the departmental Human Resources Management System (HRMS) and the Public Service Employment Survey (PSES), we track and monitor representation of PwD at DFO.

Representation at DFO has improved over the past year

In 2022 to 2023, 4.9% of employees at DFO self-identified as PwD, as compared to 4.3% in 2021 to 2022.

Note that these numbers are likely higher in reality as more than half of survey respondents within DFO who said they were PwD reported that they hadn’t self-identified as PwD and therefore wouldn’t be included in the numbers taken from the Human Resource Management System.

The workforce availability in 2022 to 2023 was 8.3%, resulting in a gap in representation of 3.5% at DFO. In other words, the department has a gap of 457 PwD employees (Source: DFO Human Resources Management System).

Figure 1: Representation of persons with disabilities in the DFO workforce
Bar chart showing the representation of persons with disabilities in the DFO workforce from 2020 to 2023. Text version below.
Figure 1 - Text version

Number of employees who are persons with disabilities:

  • 2020 to 2021: 555
  • 2021 to 2022: 595
  • 2022 to 2023: 722
  • Workforce availability1 in 2022 to 2023: 1,179

1 Number of PwD who would be employed at DFO if the rate of employment matched how many PwD are available in the general Canadian workforce.

Hiring of persons with disabilities at DFO

In 2022 to 2023, the percentage of new hires who are PwD was 5.1%, compared to 4.1% in 2021 to 2022 and 1.6% in 2020 to 2021. Source: DFO Human Resources Management System.

Figure 2: Proportion of hires who are persons with disabilities
Bar chart showing the number of PwD hired as a percentage of the total number of people hired. Text version below.
Figure 2 - Text version

Percentage of new hires who are PwD:

  • 2020 to 2021: 1.6%
  • 2021 to 2022: 4.1%
  • 2022 to 2023: 5.1%

Promotion of persons with disabilities at DFO

In 2022 to 2023, 10% of PwD received promotions compared with 15% of the general population. Source: DFO Human Resources Management System.

Figure 3: Rates of promotion for persons with disabilities compared to the DFO workforce
A bar chart that displays the promotion rates of employees with disabilities in comparison to the promotion rates of the entire workforce at DFO. Text version below.
Figure 3 - Text version
Rates of promotion for persons with disabilities compared to the DFO workforce
- 2020 to 2021 2021 to 2022 2022 to 2023
Number of PwD promoted as a percentage of the total number of PwD employed 5.6% 8.2% 10.0%
Number of employees promoted as a percentage of the total number of employees 9.4% 10.7% 15.0%

Harassment and discrimination of persons with disabilities at DFO

In 2022, 20% of PwD at DFO indicated they were victims of harassment on the job compared to 11% of persons without a disability. In 2020, 30% of PwD reported harassment.

In 2022, 18% of PwD at DFO indicated they were victims of discrimination on the job compared to 6% of persons without a disability. This is slightly worse than in 2020, when 16% of PwD reported discrimination. Source: Public Service Employment Survey.

Figure 4: Rates of reported harassment and discrimination
A bar chart illustrating how often harassment and discrimination are reported at DFO, comparing people with disabilities to those without disabilities. Text version to follow.
Figure 4 - Text version
Rates of reported harassment and discrimination
- 2021 2022
Proportion of PwD at DFO reporting harassment 30% 20%
Proportion of DFO employees without disabilities reporting harassment 12% 11%
Proportion of PwD at DFO reporting discrimination 16% 18%
Proportion of DFO employees without disabilities reporting discrimination 6% 6%

Progress on implementing the departmental Accessibility Action Plan

Governance

Major accomplishments

To ensure the implementation of the Accessibility Action Plan at DFO, we:

Next year

DFO will set up an advisory committee including sectoral and regional accessibility advocates to provide subject matter expertise and coordination. These will help review all the department's policies, guidelines, services, and programs, with support from the Accessibility Secretariat. The evaluation of all departmental policies, guidelines, services, and programs will also begin. Consultation with networks and bargaining agents will continue to ensure actions taken are appropriate and properly prioritized.

Culture

Snapshot of 2022 to 2023

Through the first annual DFO Accessibility Questionnaire carried out in 2023, and the 2022 Public Service Employment Survey (PSES), we collected the following baseline data for comparison in future years.

Rates of self-identification include employees submitting in the MyGCHR application (a human resources product) plus those submitting paper forms.

Survey findings

Major accomplishments

To improve awareness, knowledge, and inclusion with respect to accessibility:

Next year

The new self-identification form and platform, expected to be launched by Treasury Board Secretariat in the near future, will be promoted. DFO continues to seek advice from the Accessibility Network to implement solutions towards improving the rate of self-ID for PwD. Privacy around the use of the data will remain central.

Employment

Snapshot of 2022 to 2023

Through the first annual DFO Accessibility Questionnaire implemented in May of 2023, and the 2022 Public Service Employment Survey (PSES), we collected the following baseline data for comparison in future years.

Survey findings

Major accomplishments

The gap between the representation of persons with disabilities at DFO and the workforce availability has fallen from 521 to 457 individuals.

Mandatory training on inclusive hiring practices was introduced and promoted to all supervisors, managers, executives, and staffing advisors.

To increase employment opportunities for PwD at DFO and contribute to the goal of hiring 5000 PwD in the federal public service by 2025:

To ensure opportunities for career development for persons with disabilities:

See Annex 1 for progress towards the specific goals related to employment outlined in the Accessibility Action Plan.

Next year

Built environment

Snapshot of 2022 to 2023

Through the first annual DFO Accessibility Questionnaire implemented in 2023, the 2022 Public Service Employment Survey (PSES), and information from those responsible for the built environment at DFO, we collected the following baseline data for comparison in future years.

Survey findings

Major accomplishments

To address barriers in the built environment:

See Annex 1 for progress towards the specific goals related to the built environment outlined in the Accessibility Action Plan.

Next year

Information and communication technologies (ICT)

Snapshot of 2022 to 2023

Through the first annual DFO Accessibility Questionnaire implemented in 2023, the 2022 Public Service Employment Survey (PSES), and the program responsible for accommodations, we collected the following baseline data for comparison in future years.

Survey findings

Major accomplishments

To support the availability of accessible ICT required to work efficiently, DFO created a dedicated User Experience (UX) unit specializing in digital accessibility to research, design, and test digital products with accessibility in mind. The team makes sure that digital products and services are easy to use for everyone, especially PwD. To date, the UX team has tested the following for accessibility: the Enterprise Data Hub, the Mental Health Support Launchpad, and the Registry for External Science Experts.

To increase the knowledge of our information technology (IT) workforce in the area of adaptive technology, ongoing learning is planned within the sector with emphasis around the importance of involving a diverse group of people in the research process when creating products. This goal is to ensure IT remains abreast of emerging tools and technology, as well as ensuring DFO products are naturally designed to be accessible to everyone. In addition, training on “Procuring Accessible Information and Communication Technologies” is mandatory for all employees working in IT.

See Annex 1 for progress towards the specific goals related to information and communications technologies outlined in the Accessibility Action Plan.

Next year

With input from the Accessibility Network, coupled with industry tools and information, DFO will host information sessions, guiding the organization in how to ensure the accessibility of information and communication technologies (ICT). These sessions are meant to help all employees learn about the importance of accessibility in ICT.

Communication (other than information and communication technologies)

Snapshot of 2022 to 2023

Through the first annual DFO Accessibility Questionnaire implemented in 2023, the 2022 Public Service Employment Survey (PSES), and the program responsible for communications, we collected the following baseline data for comparison in future years.

Survey findings

Major accomplishments

To overcome the general lack of knowledge on how to create accessible documents and communications:

To ensure that communications products are accessible:

To reduce stigma associated with disabilities:

See Annex 1 for progress towards the specific goals related to communication, other than information and communication technologies, outlined in the Accessibility Action Plan.

Next year

DFO will continue promoting the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport and will continue to work with stakeholders to ensure continued communication around accessibility, as well as to ensure the accessibility of communication products overall.

Procurement of goods, services and facilities

Snapshot of 2022 to 2023

No feedback received during 2023 related to barriers at DFO was related to procurement.

The ability to report on rates of accessibility for procurement documents has not yet been developed.

Major accomplishments

To address lack of knowledge in accessible procurement of goods, services, and facilities, training has been updated for procurement officers.

To increase the accessibility of documents and procedures in procurement an internal intake form has been developed to ensure that a record for accessibility was provided and justification for non-inclusion is on file.

See Annex 1 for progress towards the specific goals related to procurement of goods, services, and facilities outlined in the Accessibility Action Plan.

Next year

An accessibility toolkit for staff involved in procurement will be launched in the first months of 2024. The toolkit will ensure that procurement tools are accessible and will provide information on how to assess products and services for accessibility.

Design and delivery of programs and services

Snapshot of 2022 to 2023

Through the first annual DFO Accessibility Questionnaire implemented in 2023, and the 2022 Public Service Employment Survey (PSES), we collected the following baseline data for comparison in future years.

Survey findings

Major accomplishments

To increase knowledge regarding designing and delivering accessible programs and services:

To address inconsistently accessible programs and services, the Accessibility Action Plan calls for the regular assessment of all policies, guidelines, programs, and services to proactively identify barriers.

To support this work sectors and regions were asked for their input in creating committees to organize the work described in the Accessibility Action Plan including:

See Annex 1 for progress towards the specific goals related to design and delivery of programs and services outlined in the Accessibility Action Plan.

Next year

The advisory committee for accessibility at DFO will begin meeting. In late 2023 and early 2024, program analysts will receive training on how to assess accessibility so that programs and sectors can conduct assessments for all policies, guidelines, programs, and services they are responsible for.

Transportation

Snapshot of 2022 to 2023

Major accomplishments

A Real Property accessibility action plan has been approved, which will address the transportation goals.

See Annex 1 for progress towards the specific goals related to transportation outlined in the Accessibility Action Plan.

Next year

DFO will begin an accessibility assessment of parking available at departmental workspaces and public-facing spaces to identify opportunities to make them more accessible and inclusive for everyone.

Consultations

Bi-weekly meetings between the Accessibility Secretariat and the Chair of the grassroots Accessibility Network allow for opportunities to collaborate, discuss potential accessibility concerns, and maintain an open discussion on accessibility. These discussions and consultations contributed to the actions underway, and results achieved to date. Feedback received from both the network and a focus group of PwD are reflected within.

The purpose of the focus group was to collect feedback on the draft report. The meeting took place on August 31, 2023, and included persons with disabilities from regions and sectors across the organization. The 86 members of the Accessibility Network were invited to provide further feedback through their preferred method of communication. Finally, the Accessibility Network Chair reviewed the final draft of the report.

What we heard from consultations

What is working

Barriers

Barriers reported in the consultations focused on:

Further Work

Suggestions for further work included more promotion of the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport and improved awareness of accommodation options.

Feedback

As required by the Accessible Canada Act, the departmental accessibility feedback process was carried out to obtain feedback concerning our Accessibility Action Plan, experiences of accessibility with or within the department, or any other matter related to accessibility.

The feedback received

From January 1, 2023, to September 20, 2023, the secretariat received a total of 66 submissions, 25% of which were received anonymously.

62% of the submissions were received via email, and the remainder through the online feedback form. None was received by phone, mail, TTY teletypewriter, or any other method.

Only two were received from individuals who were not DFO employees. The lack of feedback from external persons may indicate that more promotion of accessibility and the feedback process outside of the department are required.

Information received through the feedback process

Of the 66 submissions received, the Accessibility Secretariat received 28 reports of barriers, 27 of which were received from employees of DFO.

Also, DFO received feedback (30) related to the common hybrid work model, recommendations for accessibility improvements, and requests for information about accessibility.

Some of the feedback received show that people might not understand what a barrier is. This shows that more work to raise awareness about the types of barriers is needed, even among persons with disabilities.

Information received through other channels

Apart from the official feedback process, the Accessibility Secretariat has obtained feedback informally, for example via social media platforms such as Viva Engage, and formally, by conducting the first annual Accessibility Questionnaire of DFO employees.

The questionnaire was designed to assess employee awareness about accessibility in the workplace and how confident they feel about it. It also collected information about the experiences and attitudes of employees with disabilities. We collected responses from 1,682 employees out of around 14,000, which is about 12% of the total DFO workforce.

Of the employees who completed the questionnaire, 38% self-identified as persons with disabilities, and 50% of them reported experiencing barriers.

See Annex 2 for more detailed information about kinds of barriers reported through the feedback process and other channels.

How the organization has considered that feedback

DFO values feedback and aims to respond quickly. We acknowledged all feedback within 5 business days. We established a network of contacts in functional areas within the department to provide subject matter expertise and to take responsibility for eliminating or mitigating the barriers identified.

To date, 57% of the barriers identified have been addressed, 25% are unresolved, and the remainder are under review. Those that are still under review are largely issues with the built environment or technologies that will require more time to address, and support from Public Services and Procurement Canada (largely due to complexity and cost). We remain committed to removing barriers as they are identified.

How we are addressing barriers

Attitudinal barriers are being addressed by:

Organizational barriers are being addressed by:

Physical barriers are being addressed by:

Technological barriers are being addressed by:

Communications barriers are being addressed by:

Common themes emerging from the feedback received

Some common themes emerged from the feedback received. For further discussion of these themes, see Annex 2.

Conclusions and lessons learned

During the first year of putting the DFO accessibility plan into action, tremendous progress has been made. Accessibility is now top of mind and more and more at the forefront of how we deliver our programs and services. Certainly, as an organization we have learned a lot, particularly through the engagement of our managers and employees, including those with disabilities. Feedback has been instrumental in shaping our action plan, which remains evergreen, and continues to drive us towards creating a fully accessible organization for our workforce and Canadians overall. Key observations that will help DFO elaborate future accessibility actions include the following.

Eliminating barriers can be complex

Over the course of the first year responding to reports of accessibility barriers, DFO has successfully eliminated a variety of issues, while continuing to make progress on barriers with greater complexity that require deeper intervention.

Here are some examples of situations where barrier mitigation continues to require further intervention.

DFO remains committed to eliminating barriers and ensuring an accessible organization for all, including in the face of complex barriers. As an organization we will work collaboratively with our stakeholder networks, industry partners and central agencies, and have confidence that with every step, we will together overcome existing and emerging challenges. For example, participating in interdepartmental forums would improve coordination between departments to eliminate barriers at the outset or implement solutions more effectively. As a next step, we will be working with the Office of Public Service Accessibility (OPSA) to share our insights and recommendations based on what we have learned to date.

Additionally, we expect that best practices will evolve over time and that we will benefit from the experience of everyone in the public service consulting with PwD and working to eliminate barriers, as well as guidance from lead departments. We look forward to the work of Accessibility Standards Canada to establish standards and best practices based on broad public consultations.

Awareness and education are critical

We have learned that we cannot underestimate the effort required to make cultural changes within a large department. Although our departmental plan has very specific actions and goals that require significant engagement including the implementation of education and awareness activities, further emphasis will be made in this area in the coming year to accelerate cultural change.

Awareness and education are critical to the successful implementation of the department plan, specifically the comprehensive, proactive and systematic identification of barriers across the 7 priority areas, each of which will have a profound change to accessibility at DFO.

Data for measuring progress is essential

DFO is committed to gathering data, tracking this, and reporting transparently on progress towards our goals. To do so, establishing data availability as well as understanding where data gaps exist is imperative. We need to ensure that we have appropriate data sources for measuring progress. For example, based on guidance provided by the Office of Public Service Accessibility (OPSA) on reporting on employment processes, we are working to create methods to collect the required data that will better allow us to proactively identify barriers to employment of PwD.

We also identified that some key measures of progress are required to easily track how well we are doing. We have developed 5 indicators which are described in Annex 3.

Accommodations are an integral component of accessibility

The processes for obtaining accommodations and the attitudes of managers in providing accommodations was a theme within the feedback. This was echoed in the Study of Causes and Impacts of Harassment and Discrimination of Persons with Disabilities in the Federal Public Service prepared for the Office of Public Service Accessibility (PDF 925 KB) in which they found that harassment and discrimination tended to arise in the context of accommodations.

To deal with the report's findings, the accessibility champions sent messages to front line managers to draw attention to the study and to the specific actions and attitudes managers can take to improve in this area. Additionally, work on a government-wide platform for the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport will be helpful.

DFO will continue to drive action towards reducing the time it takes to accommodate employees so they may fully participate. Efforts include, establishing an accommodation framework that identifies key stakeholders in the delivery of accommodation services, establishing service standards and tracking compliance with these, ensuring funds are available and developing specific feedback mechanisms. The development and implementation of these measures will be undertaken collaboratively with networks and bargaining agents. Further education for managers and employees will be offered as well as training for those delivering the services.

As an organization, we remain committed to ensuring the full participation of not only our workforce but of Canadians as they engage with our programs and services. We are dedicated to creating and maintaining a culture of inclusion, which recognizes the value that accessibility brings for us all when it is woven into all that we do.

Annex 1: Progress towards the specific goals of the Accessibility Action Plan 2022-2025 – Shaping our Accessible Future

The Accessibility Action Plan 2022-2025 includes goals and specific strategies to achieve them. The list of goals below shows the work that has been done to carry out these specific strategies.

Employment

Goal: E.1 Employees are aware of accessibility considerations in employment

Goal: E.2 Improve hiring, promotion and retention of persons with disabilities

Goal: E.3 Employees have barrier-free access to employment and are supported and able to contribute to the department

Return to the Employment section

Built environment

Goal: B.1 Employees are aware of accessibility considerations in the built environment opportunities

Goal: B.2 Clients and employees have barrier-free access to and use of the federally owned and leased built environment and workplaces

Return to the Built environment section

Information and communication technologies

Goal: I.1 Employees are aware of accessibility considerations in information and communication technologies (ICT) opportunities

Goal: I.2 Clients and employees have access to information and communication technologies that are barrier-free

Goal: I.3 Employees with disabilities have barrier-free access to tools and technologies

Return to the Information and communication technologies section

Communication, other than information and communication technologies

Goal: C.1 Employees are aware of accessibility considerations in communication

Goal: C.2 Clients and employees have barrier-free access to all communication

Goal: C.3 Reduce stigma associated with accessibility

Return to the Communication section

Procurement of goods, services and facilities

Goal: P.1 Employees and contractors are aware of accessibility considerations in procurement

Goal: P.2 Reporting limitations are eliminated

A working group has been created to identify the report(s) and data that are available.

Goal: P.3 Solicitation documents are fully accessible and usable by persons with disabilities, and contractual language outlining Government of Canada contracting responsibilities with respect to accessibility in procurement is added

Updates to template documents ensuring that they are accessible and respect elements outlined by Shared Services Canada’s Accessibility, Accommodation and Adaptive Computer Technology Program are underway at Public Services and Procurement Canada.

Return to the Procurement section

Design and delivery of programs and services

Goal: D.1 Employees are aware of accessibility considerations in design and delivery of programs and services

Goal: D.2 Clients and employees have access to programs and services that are barrier-free

Return to the Design and delivery of programs and services section

Transportation

Goal: T.1 Employees are aware of accessibility considerations in transportation

The creation of trial information sessions is underway.

Goal: T.2 Clients and employees have barrier-free access to parking available at federally owned and leased workspaces and public-facing spaces

Goal: T.3 Employees have barrier-free access to transportation in order to accomplish their work

Canadian Coast Guard is considering accessibility in vessel design through the Fleet renewal and procurement process. For example, console layouts, seating arrangements, and windscreen construction of newest class of Search and Rescue lifeboats were redesigned to take into consideration different physical requirements.

Return to the Transportation section

Annex 2: Information about the kind of barriers reported through the feedback process and through other channels

Return to the Feedback section

The kinds of barriers reported through the feedback process

5 were attitudinal barriers, mostly related to lack of manager support and obtaining acceptable accommodations.

7 were organizational barriers, related to:

All of these have been addressed (see How we are addressing barriers) except for one which is still being reviewed.

12 were physical barriers, mostly related to:

4 of these have been addressed (see How we are addressing barriers), the rest are still being reviewed.

7 were technological barriers, related to:

5 of these have been addressed (see How we are addressing barriers), the rest are still being reviewed.

1 was a communications barrier, related to the use of acronyms in documents.

This has been addressed (see How we are addressing barriers).

The kinds of barriers reported through the employee experience questionnaire

Return to the Feedback section

Common themes emerging from the feedback received

Self-identification does not accurately reflect the number of persons with disabilities employed at DFO

Only 56% of employees with disabilities who completed the questionnaire have self-identified using the departmental Human Resources Management System (HRMS) or the self identification form, suggesting that the information in the HRMS may not correctly show the numbers of PwD in the department.

Persons with disabilities responded most often that they didn’t self-identify formally because they felt it might negatively affect their career, or the way colleagues and managers treated them.

It is a known problem that the current form for self-identification needs to be improved. Employees might not find options that match their situations in the form, and there is evidence that employees are not completing or updating the self-identification information on file every time they switch Government of Canada departments.

This information tells us that we need to do more to make people with disabilities feel confident that we won't share their information with their colleagues or managers. We also need to find a better way to collect this information. The Treasury Board Secretariat is working on a new form and platform that will securely collect self-identification data independently from the department, which should make the information more accurate.

Employees are not consistently reporting barriers

Only 31% of employees with disabilities who experienced barriers reported them. Others didn’t report the barriers they experienced because:

The majority (63%) of employees who reported barriers informed their managers or supervisors. Only 2% reported the barriers they experienced to the Accessibility Secretariat. 47% said the barriers they reported remain unresolved. This information suggests that employees and managers are not yet aware of the role of the Accessibility Secretariat.

The implementation of the Common Hybrid Work Model affected persons with disabilities differently than other employees

The impact of the implementation of the Common Hybrid Work Model and the return to the workplace was different for persons with disabilities than for persons without disabilities. Employees reported that, at home, they were able to design their work environment to meet their own needs. In the workplace, it took effort and persistence to obtain the accommodations they had at home. As persons with disabilities often have limited energy, some felt that coming to the office “used up” energy that could have been spent at work or in their personal lives. They also felt better able to control their privacy about their disabilities. Finally, mandatory in-person meetings created barriers for some employees. Given the emphasis that the senior leadership of the public service put on ensuring employees returned to the workplace, front line managers may have thought that the requirement to return to the office was more important than the need to accommodate employees with disabilities.

In order to address this issue, we provided managers guidance on how to handle accommodations and made sure that people with disabilities weren't unfairly affected by the new hybrid work model. Managers received this information from the departmental accessibility champions.

Negative attitudes towards disabilities and accommodations still exist among managers

Some employees found it hard to get the accommodations they needed because their managers:

The work to ensure that all managers understand their roles in accommodating their employees with disabilities is critical. While the Accessibility Action Plan addresses promotion of the GC Workplace Accessibility Passport, and general ideas about stigma and inclusion, it does not specifically address obtaining accommodations as a barrier to allowing persons with disabilities to participate fully to their best potential. This should be included in the next Accessibility Action Plan in 2025.

Return to the Feedback section

Annex 3: Simple markers of progress on accessibility

To make sure we are improving, we developed 5 markers to track overall progress as we go forward.

Representation: Are we closing the gap in representation for persons with disabilities (PwD) at DFO?

Ideally, the percentage of PwD at DFO would be at least as high as the availability of PwD in the workforce. This would appear as a representation gap of zero employees.

Figure 11: Gap in representation of PwD at DFO
Column graph showing the gap between the number of employees with disabilities employed at DFO and the number we expect based on the availability in the workforce for 2020-21 through the second quarter of 2023-24. Text version below.

Source: DFO HR Data Bank reporting data from the DFO Human Resources Management System.

Figure 11 - Text version

Gap between number of PwD at DFO and the number expected at DFO based on availability in the workforce:

  • 2020 to 2021: -502
  • 2021 to 2022: -510
  • 2022 to 2023: -547
  • 2023-2024 to date: -380

Promotion: Are PwD promoted as often as others in the DFO workforce?

Ideally, PwD would be promoted at the same rate as everyone else and this would appear as a difference of zero.

Figure 12: Difference in promotion rates between PwD and the DFO workforce
Line graph showing the difference in promotion rates between DFO employees with disabilities, and the general DFO workforce. Text version below.

Source: DFO HR Data Bank reporting data from the DFO Human Resources Management System.

Figure 12 - Text version

Difference between the rate of promotion of persons with disabilities and the DFO workforce:

  • 2020 to 2021: 3.8%
  • 2021 to 2022: 2.4%
  • 2022 to 2023: 5.1%
  • 2023-24 to date: 3.4%

Retention: Are PwD leaving at a higher rate than others in the DFO workforce?

Ideally, PwD would have the same opportunities and experience as everyone else and would not be more likely to leave than everyone else, and this would appear as a difference of zero.

Figure 13: Difference in rates of departure between persons with disabilities and the DFO workforce
Line graph showing the difference between the rate of leaving the department for persons with disabilities and the rate for the general DFO workforce for the years 2020-21 though 2023-24. Text version below.

Source: DFO HR Data Bank reporting data from the DFO Human Resources Management System.

Figure 13 - Text version

Difference in rates of departure between persons with disabilities and the DFO workforce:

  • 2020 to 2021: 1.9%
  • 2021 to 2022: 1.7%
  • 2022 to 2023: 0.2%

Inclusion: Do PwD feel they are discriminated against?

Ideally, there would be no discrimination at DFO, and this number would be zero.

Figure 14: Rate of discrimination for PwD at DFO
Column graph showing the relative rate of discrimination reported by persons with disabilities for the years 2020 and 2022. Text version below.

Source: Public Service Employment Survey results for PwD at Fisheries and Oceans Canada responding to Question 64: Having carefully read the definition of discrimination, have you been the victim of discrimination on the job in the past 12 months?

Figure 14 - Text version

Rate of discrimination reported by persons with disabilities:

  • 2020: 16%
  • 2022: 18%

Accommodations: How many PwD feel that accessibility and accommodations issues have negatively affected their career?

Ideally, anyone requiring accommodations would have them, DFO would be fully accessible and this number would be zero.

Figure 15: PwD at DFO reporting that accessibility or accommodations issues have adversely affected their career

Source: Public Service Employment Survey results for PwD at Fisheries and Oceans Canada responding to Question 43d. To what extent have the following adversely affected your career progress in the federal public service over the last 12 months? Accessibility or accommodation issues?

Figure 15 - Text version

How many PwD believe that accessibility and accommodations issues negatively affected their career to a large or very large extent:

  • 2020: 14%
  • 2022: 10%
Date modified: