Terms of Reference

DFO Maritimes Region Review of the Proposed Marine Finfish Aquaculture Sites and Boundary Amendment, Liverpool Bay, Queens County, Nova Scotia

Regional Science Response Process – Maritimes Region

February 24-25, 2021
Virtual Meeting

Chairperson: Lottie Bennett

Context

Kelly Cove Salmon has made an application to the Province of Nova Scotia to amend their existing Liverpool site (#1205) and implement two new sites, Mersey Point (#1433) and Brooklyn (#1432), in Liverpool Bay, Queens County, Nova Scotia.  As per the Canada-Nova Scotia Memorandum of Understanding on Aquaculture Development, the Nova Scotia Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture has forwarded this application to Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) for review and advice in relation to DFO’s legislative mandate.  DFO Science has been asked for a review of the predicted exposure zones associated with the range of aquaculture activities and the predicted impacts on species and the habitats that support them.

Objectives

To help inform DFO’s review of Kelly Cove Salmon’s application for additional marine finfish aquaculture sites and an amendment to their existing site, the Maritimes Region’s Aquaculture Management Program has asked DFO Science the following questions:

1. Based on the available data for each site and the scientific information, what is the predicted exposure zone from the use of approved fish health treatment products in the marine environment, and the predicted consequences to susceptible species?
2. Based on the available information for each site, what are the Ecologically and Biologically Significant Areas, Species listed under Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act,  fishery species, Ecologically Significant Species, and their associated habitats that are within the predicted benthic exposure zone and vulnerable to exposure from the deposition of organic matter? How does this compare to the extent of these species and habitats in the surrounding area (i.e., are they common or rare)? What are the anticipated impacts to these sensitive species and habitats from the proposed aquaculture activity?
3. How do the impacts on these species from the proposed aquaculture site compare to impacts from other anthropogenic sources (including existing finfish farms)? Do the zones of influence overlap with these activities and if so, what are the potential consequences?
4. To support the analysis of risk of entanglement with the proposed aquaculture infrastructure, which pelagic aquatic Species at Risk make use of the area, and for what duration and when?
5. Which populations of conspecifics are within a geographic range that escapees are likely to migrate to? What are the size and status trends of those conspecific populations in the escape exposure zone for the proposed sites? Are any of these populations listed under Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act?

Expected Publications

• Science Response Report

Expected Participation

• DFO Science
• DFO Aquaculture Management  
• DFO Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Program