Inshore Scallop - Maritimes Region
Appendix 13
C&P Summary for 2009-2013
Year | Enforcement (hrs) | Shared Stewardship and Other Program Activities Related to Inshore Scallops (hrs) |
---|---|---|
2009 | 4164 | 205 |
2010 | 4452 | 256 |
2011 | 3606 | 325 |
2012 | 4077 | 263 |
2013 | 5763 | 464 |
Year | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Violation Type | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Grand Total |
OTHER LEGISLATION | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
AREA / TIME | 7 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 16 | 42 |
ASSAULT/ OBSTRUCT | 1 | 1 | ||||
GEAR - ILLEGAL/ USED ILLEGALLY | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | ||
GEAR CONFLICT | 1 | 6 | 7 | |||
ILLEGAL BUY/SELL/POSSESS | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 28 |
INSPECTION | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||
QUOTA / BAG LIMITS | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
REGISTRATION / LICENCE | 42 | 28 | 43 | 24 | 25 | 162 |
REPORTING | 12 | 30 | 15 | 22 | 49 | 128 |
SPECIES / SIZE LIMIT | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 13 | |
TOTALS | 67 | 80 | 79 | 58 | 110 | 394 |
Year | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Management Area | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Grand Total |
Scallop Fishing Area 28 A, B, C, D | 22 | 33 | 60 | 25 | 81 | 221 |
Scallop Fishing Area 29 | 45 | 47 | 18 | 33 | 29 | 172 |
Other* | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
TOTALS | 67 | 80 | 79 | 58 | 110 | 394 |
*NAFO 4X entry with SFA unspecified. |
Year | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Action | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Grand Total |
CHARGES LAID | 38 | 24 | 20 | 9 | 45 | 136 |
CHARGES NOT APPROVED | 3 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 19 | |
CHARGES PENDING/UNDER REVIEW | 4 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 14 | 56 |
WARNING ISSUED | 22 | 35 | 48 | 29 | 49 | 183 |
TOTALS | 67 | 80 | 79 | 58 | 110 | 394 |
Year | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Grand Total | |
Number of Convictions | 14 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 59 |
Total Fines | $13,350 | $34,700 | $20,630 | $11,300 | $17,950 | $97,930 |
Average Fine | $954 | $2,041 | $2,063 | $1,614 | $1,632 | $8,304 |
Min. Fine Amount | $150 | $200 | $200 | $300 | $350 | $1,200 |
Max. Fine Amount | $7,000 | $5,000 | $6,500 | $4,000 | $5,500 | $28,000 |
*Recorded in the year the fines were levied. |
Management Area | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scallop 28 | 176 trips* | ||||
Scallop 29 | 21 trips* | 13 trips | 18 trips | 14 trips | 13 trips |
*Elevated number of observed trips is due to a by-catch study year. |
Appendix 14
Summary of Maritimes Region EAM Framework
This appendix summarizes the framework adopted by DFO Maritimes Region for implementing an Ecosystem Approach to Management (EAM) in all activities for which the department has management responsibility. It also discusses application of the framework more specifically to fisheries management.
Introduction to EAM
An ecosystem approach to managing human activity requires consideration of an activity’s impact on all components of the ecosystem – including its structure, function and overall quality – and not just on the resource being used. It also means accounting for the cumulative effects of multiple uses, and accounting for how environmental forces, such as climate change, might be affecting how we should manage.
Fully implementing EAM will be a large undertaking. Progress will happen in a step-by-step, evolutionary way. In the short-term, the Department will work on implementing EAM in the context of discrete activities, such as fishing. In the long-term, a diversity of ocean users and regulators will need to come together to draw up plans for the integrated management of all ocean activities. First attention will be given to impacts of the highest importance and offering the greatest scope for improvement.
EAM in the Context of Fisheries Management
Consensus is growing within Canada and internationally that the sustainability of fish stocks and fisheries requires an ecosystem approach to management. Traditionally, fisheries management has focused on regulating the impact of fishing on the targeted species. Under an ecosystem approach, managers consider impacts not only on the target species but also on non-target species and habitat. Some of these impacts will be direct, such as impacts on the populations of non-target species that suffer mortality incidentally because of interactions with fishing gear. Other impacts may be indirect, such as the effects of mortality on predator-prey relationships. IFMPs will document the main impacts on the ecosystem from fishing activities and outline how these pressures will be managed.
Main Elements of the Framework
EAM is a management planning framework. Management planning requires the specification of objectives (what you want to achieve), of strategies (what you will do to manage human-induced pressures so that you can achieve your objectives), and tactics (how you will implement your strategies). These elements are presented in the table overleaf. They are the foundation of the Region’s EAM framework and have been developed to cover the full range of potential impacts on the ecosystem resulting from the various activities managed by the Department. (Not all strategies will be relevant to all activities.)
ATTRIBUTES | OBJECTIVES - STRATEGIES with associated pressures |
MANAGED ACTIVITIES | TACTICS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Groundfish Fishery |
Herring Fishery |
Salmon Aquaculture |
etc. | ||||
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS | |||||||
E X P A N S I O N O F A T T R I B U T E S C O N S I D E R E D |
air quality biomass breeding behavior community assemblage genetic structure habitat structure organism health population richness forage predators primary production recruitment sediment quality size spectrum size/age structure spatial extent spatial occupancy ‘special places’ ‘special species’ trophic structure water quality yield traditional Aboriginal use efficiency market access |
Productivity: Do not cause unacceptable reduction in productivity so that components can play their role in the functioning of the ecosystem | E X P A N S I O N O F P E S S U R E S C O N S I D E R E D |
catch control effort control gear specification, size-based release area/season closure ballast water control recreational fisheries awards FSC licences community quota management transferable quotas license combining exempted licenses multi-licensing certification data stabilized fisheries transparency in ministerial decisions |
|||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Biodiversity: Do not cause unacceptable reduction in biodiversity in order to preserve the structure and natural resilience of the ecosystem | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Habitat: Do not cause unacceptable modification to habitat in order to safeguard both physical and chemical properties of the ecosystem | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Culture & Sustenance: Respect Aboriginal and treaty rights to fish | |||||||
|
|||||||
Prosperity: Create the circumstances for economically prosperous fisheries | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
Note: Elements associated with culture, sustenance and prosperity are provisional and at present are being applied only in fisheries management
Objectives
Under EAM, management planning within the Region will be guided by three ecosystem objectives:
- Productivity: Do not cause unacceptable reduction in productivity so that components can play their role in the functioning of the ecosystem.
- Biodiversity: Do not cause unacceptable reduction in biodiversity in order to preserve the structure and natural resilience of the ecosystem.
- Habitat: Do not cause unacceptable modification to habitat in order to safeguard both physical and chemical properties of the ecosystem.
It is impractical to pursue conservation in isolation from the economic, social and cultural aspirations of users, and these must be recognized in any plan if it is to be successful. The Region intends to develop a set of economic, social and cultural objectives in the near future that will be common to all activities managed by the Department. In the meantime, Resource Management has developed the following, provisional objectives for application in fisheries management:
- Culture and Sustenance: Respect Aboriginal and treaty rights to fish.
- Prosperity: Create the circumstances for economically prosperous fisheries.
Attributes
Attributes are traits of the ecosystem that we value. They are the means by which the broadly stated objectives are given specificity. We might be interested in the condition of many ecosystem attributes. Those listed in the first column of Table 1A are ones that respond to human induced pressures. Examples of attributes of fish populations are yield, breeding behaviour, biomass and genetic structure. Examples of ecosystem attributes are population richness, spatial occupancy and trophic structure. There are initiatives also by DFO to identify ecologically or biologically sensitive areas (EBSAs), ecologically or biologically sensitive species (EBSSs), Depleted Species and Degraded Areas. These too can be viewed as attributes of an ecosystem.
Strategies and References
As stated, objectives are very general statements that are translated into practical terms through the definition of strategies. Strategies state “what” will be done to manage pressures from human activities. Common pressures from fishing activities are fishing mortality, incidental mortality, and disturbance of bottom habitat. The strategies aim to control the impact of these pressures on the valued ecosystem attributes.
Strategies define how the pressures imposed by human activities will be managed. For example, what level of fishing mortality is viewed as acceptable? How much bottom habitat disturbance is too much? This is done by using references that define pressure levels that cause unacceptable or undesirable impacts on the attributes. The basis for determining references will vary depending on the state of knowledge. Some may be chosen fairly arbitrarily when knowledge is weak, perhaps based on historical trends. When more is known, their determination may involve evaluation of alternative population/ecosystem dynamics models, ranging from 'single species' to 'full ecosystem' models. There are many gaps in scientific knowledge of ecosystem structure and function, and, no matter how references are determined, they will need revision as the human and environmental factors affecting ecosystems become better understood.
Tactics
Tactics are sometimes referred to as tactical management measures. They are “how” the strategies will be implemented to manage the pressures imposed by fishery activities. Examples of common tactics in fisheries management are total allowable catches, individual or community quotas, seasonal closures, gear restrictions, minimum fish sizes and dockside monitoring.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and evaluation are necessary for ensuring management plans are working as intended. Monitoring involves collecting data that will provide information on how well or badly the various features of the plan are performing. Evaluation involves determining whether strategies are being implemented adequately and whether they are doing their job in meeting the plan objectives. Evaluation also involves assessing whether the plan identifies and addresses all the important impacts on the ecosystem.
In fisheries management plans, strategies and references for pressures are likely to remain unchanged for the duration of the plan. However, as new understanding is gained, or when prevailing conditions alter the productivity of the resource, review and evaluation of strategies and references may be warranted. Tactics may be specified for the duration of the plan, or they may require regular intervention to set appropriate levels.
Plan Enhancement
Developing a robust plan that addresses the full range of ecosystem impacts of a given activity will take time and resources, and it is unlikely that data to support all elements will be available at the outset. In recognition of this, management plans should identify the main weaknesses of the plan, including weaknesses in the data needed for setting references for strategies, evaluating pressures relative to the references, and checking compliance with tactics.
Management plans should also outline any data collection that is underway and the research required to make advances, noting the risks if not done.
Appendix 15
Glossary Terms
Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge (ATK): Knowledge that is held by, and unique to Aboriginal peoples. It is a living body of knowledge that is cumulative and dynamic and adapted over time to reflect changes in the social, economic, environmental, spiritual and political spheres of the Aboriginal knowledge holders. It often includes knowledge about the land and its resources, spiritual beliefs, language, mythology, culture, laws, customs and medicines.
Abundance: Number of individuals in a stock or a population.
Age Composition: Proportion of individuals of different ages in a stock or in the catches.
Area/Subarea:
Biomass: total weight of all individuals in a stock or a population.
Bycatch: The unintentional catch of one species when the target is another.
Catch per Unit Effort (CPUE): The amount caught for a given fishing effort. Ex: tons of shrimp per tow, kilograms of fish per hundred longline hooks.
Communal Commercial Licence: Licence issued to Aboriginal organizations pursuant to the Aboriginal Communal Fishing Licences Regulations for participation in the general commercial fishery.
Conservation Harvesting Plan (CHP): Fishing plans submitted by all gear sectors which identify harvesting methods aimed at minimizing the harvest of small fish and bycatch of groundfish.
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC): Committee of experts that assess and designate which wild species are in some danger of disappearing from Canada.
Discards: Portion of a catch thrown back into the water after they are caught in fishing gear.
Dockside Monitoring Program (DMP): A monitoring program that is conducted by a company that has been designated by the Department, which verifies the species composition and landed weight of all fish landed from a commercial fishing vessel.
Ecosystem-Based Management: Taking into account of species interactions and the interdependencies between species and their habitats when making resource management decisions.
Fishing Effort: Quantity of effort using a given fishing gear over a given period of time.
Fishing Mortality: Death caused by fishing, often symbolized by the Mathematical symbol F.
Fixed Gear: A type of fishing gear that is set in a stationary position. These include traps, weirs, gillnets, longlines and handlines.
Food, Social and Ceremonial (FSC): A fishery conducted by Aboriginal groups for food, social and ceremonial purposes.
Growth Overfishing: Occurs when too many small fish are being harvested too early, through excessive fishing effort and poor selectivity (e.g. too small mesh sizes) and the fish are not given enough time to grow to the size at which the maximum yield-per-recruit from the stock would be obtained. A reduction of fishing mortality on juveniles, or their outright protection, would lead to an increase in yield from the fishery.
Landings: Quantity of a species caught and landed.
Natural Mortality: Mortality due to natural causes, symbolized by the mathematical symbol M.
Observer Coverage: When a licence holder is required to carry an officially recognized observer onboard their vessel for a specific period of time to verify the amount of fish caught, the area in which it was caught and the method by which it was caught.
Population: Group of individuals of the same species, forming a breeding unit, and sharing a habitat.
Precautionary Approach: Set of agreed cost-effective measures and actions, including future courses of action, which ensures prudent foresight, reduces or avoids risk to the resource, the environment, and the people, to the extent possible, taking explicitly into account existing uncertainties and the potential consequences of being wrong.
Quota: Portion of the total allowable catch that a unit such as vessel class, country, etc. is permitted to take from a stock in a given period of time.
Recruitment: Amount of individuals becoming part of the exploitable stock e.g. that can be caught in a fishery.
Research Survey: Survey at sea, on a research vessel, allowing scientists to obtain information on the abundance and distribution of various species and/or collect oceanographic data. Ex: bottom trawl survey, plankton survey, hydroacoustic survey, etc.
Species at Risk Act (SARA): The Act is a federal government commitment to prevent wildlife species from becoming extinct and secure the necessary actions for their recovery. It provides the legal protection of wildlife species and the conservation of their biological diversity.
Spawner: Sexually mature individual.
Spawning Stock: Sexually mature individuals in a stock.
Stock: Describes a population of individuals of one species found in a particular area, and is used as a unit for fisheries management.
Stock Assessment: Scientific evaluation of the status of a species belonging to a same stock within a particular area in a given time period.
Total Allowable Catch (TAC): The amount of catch that may be taken from a stock.
Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK): A cumulative body of knowledge and beliefs, handed down through generations by cultural transmission, about the relationship of living beings (including humans) with one another and with their environment.
Tonne: Metric tonne, which is 1000kg or 2204.6lbs.
Validation: The verification, by an observer, of the weight of fish landed.
Vessel Size: Length overall.
Year-class: Individuals of a same stock born in a particular year. Also called "cohort".
- Date modified: