Canada’s existing and proposed marine protected and conserved areas
In 2022, Canada agreed to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, a global target to protect 30% of the world's lands and oceans by 2030. Protecting the ocean within the Exclusive Economic Zone is a vital contribution if the world is to reach that collective goal.
As of March 30, 2026
17.5%
of Canada’s marine and coastal areas are conserved
1,010,000 km2
of Canada’s marine and coastal areas are conserved
On this page
- Types of marine protected and conserved areas
- Establishment, recognition and management processes for marine protected and conserved areas
- Proposed marine protected and conserved areas (DFO)
- Existing marine protected and conserved areas (DFO)
- Map of Canada’s existing protected and conserved areas
- Related information
Types of marine protected and conserved areas
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) include:
- Oceans Act MPAs established by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO)
- MPAs established under the Oceans Act can be designated either by a ministerial order regulation (with protection for up to 5 years) or by regulations made by the Governor-in-Council (for long-term designation). Learn more about establishing MPA
- National Marine Conservation Areas established by Parks Canada (PC)
- Marine National Wildlife Areas and National Wildlife Areas with marine components established by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)
- Provincial protected areas
Other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs), including marine refuges
- OECM is a term used for area-based measures other than MPAs that provide long-term biodiversity outcomes. To date, all areas that qualify as OECMs have been fisheries closures. Fisheries closures that meet OECM criteria are known as marine refuges.
Please consult the About federal marine conservation tools for detailed information about the types of federal marine protected and conserved areas.
Establishment, recognition and management processes for marine protected and conserved areas
DFO, PC and ECCC work to identify marine areas that need protection or areas where long-term conservation outcomes can be achieved through effective management measures. To do this, DFO, PC and ECCC work in collaboration with the following partners:
- provincial and territorial governments
- Inuit and Indigenous governments and communities
- industry
- stakeholders
- environmental organizations
- other interested Canadians
When an area needs protection, an MPA can be established under the Oceans Act or the area may be recognized as a marine OECM.
A series of steps are taken to establish and manage MPAs under the Oceans Act, whether designated by ministerial order (MO) or by Governor‑in‑Council (GiC) regulations. Similarly, the process to recognize and manage OECMs involves five steps. Consultation and engagement occur at each stage of the process.
Proposed marine protected and conserved areas (DFO)Footnote 1
The proposed sites listed in the table below are areas that are actively being considered for marine conservation through consultation with Indigenous Peoples, partners and stakeholders. To support Canada’s commitment to protect 30% of its oceans by 2030, additional sites may be considered prior to 2030. This table will be updated on a regular basis to reflect new and pending proposals as they emerge.
| Ocean | Name | Type of site | Size (km2) | Proposed % contribution to marine conservation target | Current step of establishment process |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arctic | Southampton Island | Proposed MPA (GiC) | 93,087 | 1.6 | ![]() Step 2: Site design and policy development |
| Arctic | Tuvaijuittuq | Proposed for long-term protection (currently designated as a ministerial order MPA) | 319,411 | 0.00Footnote 2 | ![]() Step 2: Site design and policy development |
| Arctic | Qikiqtait | Proposed for long-term protection (currently designated as a ministerial order MPA) | 42,700 | 0.00Footnote 2 | ![]() Step 2: Site design and policy development |
| Arctic | Sarvarjuaq | Proposed for long-term protection (currently designated as a ministerial order MPA) | 73,700 | 0.00Footnote 2 | ![]() Step 2: Site design and policy development |
| Atlantic | Eastern Shore Islands | Proposed Governor-in-Council Oceans Act MPA | 2,000 | 0.03 | ![]() Step 2: Site design and policy development |
| Atlantic | Fundian Channel-Browns Bank | Proposed Governor-in-Council Oceans Act MPA | 6,270 | 0.11 | ![]() Step 3: Regulatory development |
| Atlantic | Northern Gulf of St. Lawrence | Proposed Governor-in-Council Oceans Act MPA | 7,802 | 0.00Footnote 3 | ![]() Step 2: Site design and policy development |
| Pacific | Kitkatla Inlet | Proposed Governor-in-Council Oceans Act MPA | 400 | 0.007 | ![]() Step 2: Site design and policy development |
Existing marine conservation areas (DFO)Footnote 1
| Ocean | Name | Type of site | Size (km2) | Current % contribution to marine conservation targets | Current step of establishment process |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arctic | Anguniaqvia Niqiqyuam | MPA (GiC) | 2,358 | 0.04 | ![]() Step 4: Management planning |
| Arctic | Davis Strait Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 17,298 | 0.30 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Arctic | Disko Fan Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 7,485 | 0.13 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Arctic | Hatton Basin Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 42,459 | 0.74 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Arctic | Qikiqtait | MPA (MO) | 42,700 | 0.74 | The footprint of human activities is frozen and additional analysis and consultations are underway to determine the long-term conservation approach. |
| Arctic | Sarvarjuaq | MPA (MO) | 73,700 | 1.28 | The footprint of human activities is frozen and additional analysis and consultations are underway to determine the long-term conservation approach. |
| Arctic | Tarium Niryutait | MPA (GiC) | 1,750 | 0.03 | ![]() Step 5: Ongoing management |
| Arctic | Tuvaijuittuq | MPA (MO) | 319,411 | 5.55 | The footprint of human activities is frozen and additional analysis and consultations are underway to determine the long-term conservation approach. |
| Atlantic | Banc-des-Américains | MPA (GiC) | 1,000 | 0.02 | ![]() Step 5: Ongoing management |
| Atlantic | Basin Head | MPA (GiC) | 9 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 5: Ongoing management |
| Atlantic | Bay of Islands Salmon Migration closure | Marine refuge | 218 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 3: Establishment of area-based measure & subsequent OECM recognitionFootnote 5 |
| Atlantic | Beaugé Bank Sponge Conservation Area | Marine refuge | 215 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 3 |
| Atlantic | Central Gulf of St. Lawrence Sponge Conservation Area | Marine refuge | 1,284 | 0.02 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Corsair and Georges Canyons Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 8,797 | 0.15 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Division 3O Coral closure | Marine refuge | 10,422 | 0.18 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | East of Anticosti Sponge Conservation Area | Marine refuge | 939 | 0.02 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Eastern Canyons Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 43,976 | 0.76 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Eastern Gulf of St. Lawrence Coral Conservation Area | Marine refuge | 423 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Eastern Honguedo Strait Coral and Sponge Conservation Area | Marine refuge | 2,338 | 0.04 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Eastport | MPA (GiC) | 2 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 5: Ongoing management |
| Atlantic | Emerald Basin and Sambro Banks Sponge Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 260 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Funk Island Deep closure | Marine refuge | 7,274 | 0.13 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 3 |
| Atlantic | Gilbert Bay | MPA (GiC) | 62 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 5: Ongoing management |
| Atlantic | Hawke Channel closure | Marine refuge | 8,837 | 0.15 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Hopedale Saddle closure | Marine refuge | 15,411 | 0.27 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Jacques-Cartier Strait Sponge Conservation Area | Marine refuge | 346 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Jordan Basin Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 49 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Laurentian Channel | MPA (GiC) | 11,580 | 0.20 | ![]() Step 5: Ongoing management |
| Atlantic | Les Demoiselles nursery (Plaisance Bay), Magdalen Islands closure | Marine refuge | 0.3 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Lobster Area closures (Trout River, Shoal Point, Penguin Islands, Gooseberry Island, Glovers Harbour, Mouse Island and Gander Bay) | Marine refuge | 95 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 3: Establishment of area-based measure & subsequent OECM recognitionFootnote 5 |
| Atlantic | Magdalen Island Lagoons Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 136 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Miramichi Bay closure | Marine refuge | 1,468 | 0.03 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Musquash Estuary | MPA (GiC) | 7 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 5: Ongoing management |
| Atlantic | North of Bennett Bank Coral Conservation Area | Marine refuge | 821 | 0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Northeast Channel Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 391 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Northeast Newfoundland Slope closure | Marine refuge | 55,353 | 0.96 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Parent Bank Sponge Conservation Area | Marine refuge | 530 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Saguenay Fjord Upstream closure | Marine refuge | 109 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 3: Establishment of area-based measure & subsequent OECM recognitionFootnote 5 |
| Atlantic | Scallop Buffer Zones (SFA 21, 22, 24) | Marine refuge | 5,425 | 0.10 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Slope of Magdalen Shallows Coral Conservation Area | Marine refuge | 335 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | South-East of Anticosti Island Sponge Conservation Area | Marine refuge | 845 | 0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | St. Anns Bank | MPA (GiC) | 4,364 | 0.08 | ![]() Step 5: Ongoing management |
| Atlantic | The Gully | MPA (GiC) | 2,363 | 0.04 | ![]() Step 5: Ongoing management |
| Atlantic | Western and Emerald Banks Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 10,234 | 0.18 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Atlantic | Western Honguedo Strait Coral Conservation Area | Marine refuge | 496 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Pacific | Banks Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 436 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Pacific | G̱aw Ḵaahlii Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 22 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Pacific | Gwaxdlala/Nalaxdlala (Lull/Hoeya) Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 21 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Pacific | Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound Glass Sponge Reefs | MPA (GiC) | 2,410 | 0.04 | ![]() Step 4: Management planning |
| Pacific | SG̲áan K̲ínghlas-Bowie Seamount | MPA (GiC) | 6,103 | 0.11 | ![]() Step 5: Ongoing management |
| Pacific | Strait of Georgia and Howe Sound Glass Sponge Reefs (17 fisheries area closures) | Marine refuge | 33 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
| Pacific | Tang.ɢ̱wan – ḥačxwiqak – Tsig̱is | MPA (GiC) | 133,017 | 2.31 | ![]() Step 4: Management planning |
| Pacific | X̲aana K̲aahlii Marine Refuge | Marine refuge | 7 | <0.01 | ![]() Step 4: Management planningFootnote 4 |
Map of Canada’s existing protected and conserved areas
Related information
Page details
- Date modified:





