Sustainability Survey for Fisheries – 2020 Questions

Section 1

Implementation of the Fishery Decision-Making Framework Incorporating the Precautionary Approach

Some of these questions are used to report on indicators in the:

These questions are designed to evaluate the implementation of the Fishery Decision-Making Framework Incorporating the Precautionary Approach.

1 – Stock Reference Points

1.1a – Is there an Upper Stock Reference? (point dividing the cautious and the healthy zones)

1.1b – How was the USR developed?

Non-peer review process
Scientific peer review process
Combination of non-peer review and scientific peer review process

1.1c – What is the USR? (basis for the USR (e.g. 80% Bmsy), estimated value and unit of measurement along with the year that the USR was calculated. Additional information on how the USR was developed should be included where possible)
1.2a – Is there a Limit Reference Point? (point dividing the critical and cautious zones)
- Yes

1.2b – How was the LRP developed?

Non-peer review process
Scientific peer review process
Combination of non-peer review and scientific peer review process

1.2c – Please provide a rationale for using non-peer review process for developing a LRP
1.2d – What is the LRP? (Basis for the LRP (e.g. 40% Bmsy), value and unit of measurement, along with the year that the LRP was calculated. Provide this for individual LRPs if they are developed for sub-units)
1.3a – If this stock is a marine mammal, does it have a Potential Biological Removal?

Yes, developed – A Potential Biological Removals (PBRs) has been developed for this stocks, but has either not been approved for use, or is not yet used for the fishery(ies) on this stock.
Yes, developed and implemented – A Potential Biological Removal(s) has been developed, has been approved by the relevant parties and is used for the fishery(ies) on this stock.
Not Developed – A Potential Biological Removal has not been developed or are NOT used for the fishery(ies) on this stock.

1.3b – What is the Potential Biological Removal?
1.4a – For the fishery(ies) on this stock, have any mortality rates been calculated?

1.4b – Please indicate the mortality rate(s) calculated for fisheries on this stock. If the mortality rate or exploitation rate is not for all the fisheries on this stock, please indicate so. Provide links to any online documents that reference these rates.

1.5a – For the fishery(ies) on this stock, have any abundance, density, or biomass values been calculated?

1.5b – Please indicate the abundance or biomass values calculated for fisheries on this stock. Provide links to any online documents that reference these values.

2 – Stock Status

2.1a - What is the current stock status zone for this stock?:

Critical Zone
Cautious Zone
Healthy Zone
Uncertain

Selecting “Uncertain” does not mean that that status of the stock is unknown. DFO has sufficient information to manage the fisheries on these stocks.

2.1b – Briefly explain the rationale for there being an uncertain status for this stock
2.2a – How was the stock status zone determined?

Scientific peer review process
Expert judgement

2.2b – Provide a rationale for using Expert Judgement
2.2c – How recently did this peer review process occur? Provide a link to the peer review document if one is available.
2.3a – Where the stock status is Uncertain, what is the possibility of serious harm occurring to the stock?:

Serious harm likely
Serious harm possible
Serious harm unlikely

2.3b – (Where serious harm likely, serious harm possible, or serious harm unlikely) Provide a rationale for assigning this possibility of serious harm occurring to the stock.

3 – Removal References

3.1a – Has a removal reference been identified for when the stock is in the Healthy Zone?

3.1b – Enter the value and unit of measurement for the Healthy Zone removal reference. Provide details about how the removal reference was established (peer review process, non-peer review process) and any (online) documents where the removal reference is identified.
3.2a – Has a removal reference been identified when the stock is in the Cautious Zone?

3.2b – Enter the value and unit of measurement for the Cautious Zone removal reference. Provide details about how the removal reference was established (peer review process, non-peer review process) and where the removal reference is identified
3.3a – Has a removal reference been identified when the stock is in the Critical Zone?

3.3b – Enter the value and unit of measurement for the Critical Zone removal reference. Provide details about how the removal reference was established (peer review process, non-peer review process) and where the removal reference is identified
3.4a – Has a removal reference been identified while the stock status is uncertain?

3.4b – Enter the value and unit of measurement for the stock while the stock status is uncertain. Provide details about how the removal reference was established (peer review process, non-peer review process) and where the removal reference is identified

4 – Harvest Decision Rules

4.1 - For this stock, harvest decision rules that aim to control exploitation:

Have not been developed
Have been developed, but not implemented or evaluated
Have been developed, implemented but not evaluated
Have been developed, implemented and evaluated

4.2 - Please provide the details (or a link to the details) of the harvest decision rules.

5 – Harvest Rate

5.1 – What was the fishing harvest rate or harvest level in relation to the removal reference for the zone that the stock currently occupies (in 2020)?

Harvest rate/level at or below removal reference
Harvest rate/level above removal reference
No removal reference

5.2 – Where no removal reference is present for the current stock status zone, what is the harvest in relation to approved levels?

The stock is harvested within approved rates/levels
The stock is harvested not within approved rates/levels

6 – Rebuilding Plan

6.1a – Is there a rebuilding plan in place for this stock?

Yes
Under Development
No

6.1b – Is the Rebuilding Plan posted online?

6.1c – (If yes) Please include the link for the Rebuilding Plan online
6.1d – (If no) Please provide an explanation why there is no Rebuilding Plan in place or being developed.
6.2 – When are the expected due dates for the completion and publication of the Rebuilding Plan?

7 – Moratorium

A moratorium is the suspension of fishing activity, commercially or otherwise, for a given fishery(ies) on the stock. For the purpose of the survey, a stock under moratorium is one that is closed to directed commercial fishing but is intercepted as bycatch in other commercial fisheries.

7.1a – Is there a moratorium for the commercial fishery(ies) on this stock?
7.1b – (If Yes) Please provide a short description of the nature of the moratorium. (open text entry)
7.2 – Is the stock caught incidentally in other fisheries as bycatch (Commercial, Recreational, FSC)?

Yes
Non
Uncertain

Section 2

The status of fishery management plans

The primary goal of an Integrated Fisheries Management Plan (IFMP) is to provide a planning framework for the conservation and sustainable use of fisheries resources and the process by which a given fishery will be managed for a period of time.

8 - Integrated Fisheries Management Plans

8.1a – Is this stock part of an Integrated Fisheries Management Plan (IFMP)?

Yes, Up to Date
Yes, Out of Date
No

8.1b – Please provide the title of the IFMP and date range for effectiveness where applicable.
8.2a – Is the IFMP posted online?

Yes, Full IFMP
Yes, Summary of IFMP
No

8.2b – Please provide the link for the online IFMP, or if an IFMP has not been developed, indicate when the IFMP will be posted online.
8.3 – Is there an annual process to review the performance of the IFMP, including assessing the effectiveness of the management measures?

8.4a – Is a new IFMP or version of the IFMP currently under development?

8.4b – Please indicate when development of the IFMP will be complete

Harvest Plan

Harvest Decision Rules (aka. Harvest Control Rules) are defined under the Guidance for the Development of Rebuilding Plans under the Precautionary Approach Framework: Growing Stocks out of the Critical Zone policy document.

Conservation Harvest Plans (CHP) are fishing plans submitted by all gear sectors which identify harvesting methods aimed at minimizing the harvest of small fish and by-catch of groundfish. Plans typically include measures to control and monitor both target and bycatch species, bycatch and discarding protocols, gear restrictions, monitoring and logbook requirements, and time and area closures.

9 – Harvest Plan

9.1a – In the absence of an IFMP, is there a harvest plan in place for this stock? (E.g. Harvest Decision Rules, Conservation Harvesting Plan, or other fishing plans)

9.1b – Is there an annual review process to review the harvest plan, including assessing the effectiveness of the management measures?

Implementation of the Policy for Managing Bycatch

These questions are designed to evaluate the implementation of the Policy for Managing Bycatch.

10 – Bycatch

10.1a – Is there retained, non-directed bycatch in this fishery(ies)?

10.2a – Has the risk of fishery(ies) to the following categories of bycatch been evaluated for retained, non-directed species?

Yes
Partially
No

10.3a – Are there bycatch management measures in place to address the risk identified for retained, non-directed species?

Yes
Partially
No
No Risk Identified

10.4a – Please provide a rationale for selecting that measures are in place when the risk has not been evaluated for retained, non-directed species
10.5a – Has an assessment of the bycatch management measures determined that the measures are working to achieve their objectives for the retained, non-directed species of bycatch?

Yes
Partially
No
No Assessment

10.1b – Is there non-retained, non-directed bycatch in this fishery(ies)?

10.2b – Has the risk of fishery(ies) to the following categories of bycatch been evaluated for Non-retained, non-directed species?

Yes
Partially
No

10.3b – Are there bycatch management measures in place to address the risk identified for Non-retained, non-directed species?

Yes
Partially
No
No Risk Identified

10.4b – Please provide a rationale for selecting that measures are in place when the risk has not been evaluated for non-retained, non-directed species
10.5b – Has an assessment of the bycatch management measures determined that the measures are working to achieve their objectives for the non-retained, non-directed species of bycatch?

Yes
Partially
No
No Assessment

Species at Risk Management

These questions are designed to evaluate the integration of SARA requirements into fisheries management approaches for stocks that interact with SARA listed species. This includes mitigation measures that support recovery objectives and/or satisfy SARA permit or exemption requirements. For more information on Schedule 1 listed species, please visit the Species at Risk registry.

11 – Species at Risk

11.1a – Do fisheries for this stock interact with one or more SARA-listed species?

"Interact" means intercept in gear or a likelihood of intercepting SARA-listed species.

11.1b – Did fisheries on this stock interact with one or more SARA-listed species in the fishing season covered by this survey?

Yes
No
Uncertain

11.1c – Are mitigation measures in place to reduce or avoid harm, mortality, or harassment of SARA-listed species that are normally, or have at times, been intercepted in the fishery(ies) on this stock?

Yes
Partially
No

11.1d – Select which of the following mitigation measures are in place (Select all that apply):

Altered mesh sizes of nets
Fishery closures of seasons where interactions would be most likely to occur
Fishery closure of areas where interactions would be most likely to occur
Hook Size alteration
Separator grates
Single line mooring
Other

11.1e – Indicate other mitigation measure(s) in place.
11.2a – Has the stock been assessed by COSEWIC as at-risk?

11.2b – What was the stock’s assessment status assigned by COSEWIC?

Extinct (X)
Extirpated (XT)
Endangered (E)
Threatened (T)
Special Concern (SC)
Data Deficient (DD)

11.2c – What is the status of the SARA listing process for the species (of the stock of focus)?

Listed
No status
Decision not to list

General Comments (<100 words)

This section, found at the end of the survey, is intended for further explanations for a given stock, clarifications of how the survey is applied to multiple fisheries for the same stock, elaborate on how questions were answered for aggregate stocks, etc.

Date modified:: 2022-03-28

Language selection

Search