Language selection

Search

House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans (FOPO)
Minister’s Appearance on Main Estimates 2023-2024

Appearance:
March 27, 2023
12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. EST

Table of contents

Opening Remarks

Good morning, Mr. Chair. I’m pleased to be here today on the traditional unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishnaabeg People.

I’m happy to be joined by:

Mr. Chair, today, I’m appearing before the Committee to present the 2023-24 Main Estimates on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Canadian Coast Guard.

And at the end, I will happily answer any questions you have.

Mr. Chair, for the 2023-24 fiscal year, I’m seeking a total of 4.1 billion dollars in planned spending. This requested amount represents an increase of 124.5 million dollars compared to the 2022-23 Main Estimates.

This increase in expenditures is a result of changes to funding requirements for several existing and new departmental initiatives.

These Key Initiatives include:

It’s important to note that 433.4 million dollars’ worth of decreases in other spending have offset this increase.

This includes a number of planned funding profile changes – or previously approved funding – related to Indigenous programs, the modernization of the Fisheries Act, several Fisheries Funds, and the protection of Canada’s nature, parks and wild spaces. This is in addition to sunsetting funding for the small craft harbours program from Budget 2021.

Mr. Chair, it’s important to address one of the decreases in our Main Estimates, which is the previously approved 86.8 million dollar funding change for Indigenous programs.

While this change appears significant, it is explained mainly by a planned reprofiling of funding from one year to the next and does not reflect a change in this government’s commitment to reconciliation. Instead, the difference relates to planned spending on modern treaties and other constructive rights and reconciliation agreements.

This type of spending varies from year to year, depending on the stage of negotiations and other influences. In this case, a large amount of planned spending for 2021-22 was reprofiled into 2022-23, resulting in a relatively high level of planned spending for 2022-23 and an apparent decrease in 2023-24.

Mr. Chair, Hurricane Fiona devastated small craft harbours in Atlantic Canada and Eastern Quebec. After the storm hit, I joined Covehead Port Authority President and lobster fisherman Allan Coady in PEI, and saw first-hand how shocking – and extensive – the damage was at that harbour.

I’m glad our government is doing its part to support the ongoing recovery from Hurricane Fiona, with funding to repair crucial infrastructure, retrieve lost fishing gear, and help offset costs with engineering assessments, so that future infrastructure and harbours can withstand this current reality of extreme climate change – and the severe storms that will unfortunately accompany this reality.

Mr. Chair, there’s no question that the demands on Canada’s oceans and marine resources are higher than ever. Because of this, in 2016, our government announced the Oceans Protection Plan, and Budget 2022 set aside a historic investment of 1.1 billion dollars over nine years and more than 70 million dollars in ongoing funding to renew the Plan and build on its successes.

The Oceans Protection Plan is improving marine safety and environmental response on all coasts, with initiatives like the Marine Training Program to help underrepresented groups access marine training. We co-launched the Coastal Nations Coast Guard Auxiliary, which currently has eight First Nations participating. The OPP has given us the opportunity to partner with Indigenous communities. All these important investments contribute to keeping the waters safe and the environment protected.

And finally, Mr. Chair, you’ll notice spending on the Canadian Coast Guard fleet is the largest item in my department’s Main Estimates.

This 314 million dollars is a combination of new and reprofiled funding that is delivering new ships to the Canadian Coast Guard, while also allowing them to do the necessary work to keep existing ships operational. This isn’t just providing the Coast Guard with the necessary equipment, but constructing these vessels is helping to provide good jobs here in Canada.

The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to delays and higher costs in some cases. As a result, some projects are not advancing as quickly as planned, and the Canadian Coast Guard has carried forward funding to better align with the realities of shipyard construction schedules.

Mr. Chair, the funding that I am seeking through the Main Estimates will ensure my department can fulfill its mandate on behalf of all Canadians.

Thank you.

Departmental Information – Main Estimates 2023-2024

Main Estimates – Briefing Deck

Overview in Support of the 2023-24 Main Estimates
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Chief Financial Officer
March 2023

Introduction

2023-24 Main Estimates

2023-24 Main Estimates
2023-24 Main Estimates ($ millions) 2022-23 Main Estimates 2022-23 Estimates to Date 2023-24 Main Estimates Increase / Decrease
Operating Vote 1 1,945.6 2,138.4 2,011.0 65.4
Salary 1,141.5 1,184.5 1,171.9 30.4
O&M 844.1 993.9 879.1 35.0
VNR (40.0) (40.0) (40.0) 0.0
Capital Vote 5 1,241.3 1,247.2 1,381.6 140.3
Capital Salary 57.2 57.6 53.4 (3.7)
Capital 1,184.2 1,189.6 1,328.2 144.0
Grants and contributions Vote 10 620.1 967.4 532.4 (87.7)
Grants 8.5 21.7 11.1 2.6
Contributions 611.6 945.7 521.3 (90.3)
Statutory 179.9 191.4 186.3 6.5
Contributions to employee benefit plans 179.8 191.3 186.2 6.5
Minister of Fisheries and Oceans - Salary and motor car allowance 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0
Total Main Estimates 3,986.9 4,544.4 4,111.4 124.5
Table note

Note: Totals may not add due to rounding.

Main Estimates are approved at the vote level.
Allotment information for the 2022-23 Main Estimates / Estimates to Date and the 2023-24 Main Estimates are presented for information only.

Key Changes Between 2022-23 and 2023-24 Main Estimates

Fisheries and Oceans’ 2023-24 Main Estimates total $4,111.4 million, which is $124.5 million more than the 2022-23 Main Estimates ($3,986.9 million).

Key Changes Between 2022-23 and 2023-24 Main Estimates
Key increases included in the 2023-24 Main Estimates ($557.9 million)
Planned funding profile change for Canadian Coast Guard's fleet projects - $314.0 million
New funding to support recovery efforts and resilience following Hurricane Fiona - $89.8 million
Planned funding profile change for the Oceans Protection Plan - $73.1 million
Planned funding profile change for the national marine conservation area in the high Arctic - $16.9 million
New funding to implement the Impact Assessment Act - $16.2 million
Planned funding profile change related to conservation targets - $15.9 million
Various other initiatives - $32.0 million
Key decreases included in the 2023-24 Main Estimates ($433.4 million)
Sunsetting funding for the small craft harbours program (Budget 2021) - $149.5 million
Planned funding profile change for Indigenous programs - $86.8 million
Planned funding profile change to modernize the Fisheries Act - $75.5 million
Planned funding profile change for the Fish Funds - $37.7 million
Planned funding profile change to protect Canada's nature, parks and wild spaces - $37.0 million
Planned funding profile change to conserve Canada’s lands and freshwater, protect species, advance Indigenous reconciliation and increase access to nature - $15.8 million
Various other initiatives - $31.1 million
Table note

Note: All increases/decreases exclude accommodations and Shared Services Canada costs.

Next Steps

Annex – Items for inclusion in the Proposed schedules to the Appropriation Bill

Annex A: 2023-24 Main Estimates by Core Responsibility
Annex A: 2023-24 Main Estimates by Core Responsibility ($ millions)
Core Responsibility Amount (millions)
Marine Operations and Response 1,740.9
Fisheries 1,096.5
Aquatic Ecosystems 374.2
Marine Navigation 315.2
Internal Services
Real Property 275.6
Management and Oversight 75.9
Financial Management 62.9
Information Technology 63.2
Human Resources Management 42.3
Legal Services 19.7
Communications 19.2
Information Management 14.2
Acquisitions and Materiel 11.7
Total Internal Services 584.6
Grand Total Core Responsibilities 4,111.4
Annex B: 2023-24 Main Estimates by Standard Object
Annex B: 2023-24 Main Estimates by Standard Object ($ millions)
Budgetary Authorities Amount (millions)
Personnel 1,411.7
Transportation and Communications 97.3
Information 4.2
Professional and special services 747.6
Rentals 51.3
Purchased repair and maintenance 200.0
Utilities, materials and supplies 144.7
Acquisition of land, buildings and works 303.0
Acquisition of machinery and equipment 621.1
Transfer Payments 532.4
Other subsidies and payments 38.1
Total Gross Budgetary Authorities 4,151.4
Revenues netted against expenditures (40.0)
Net Budgetary Authorities 4,111.4

The standard object breakdown, excluding personnel and transfer payments, is calculated using historical spending.

Personnel includes Vote 1 ($1,171.9 million), Vote 5 Personnel ($53.4 million) and Statutory ($186.3 million for EBP and the Minister’s salary and car allowance).

Annex C: 2023-24 Main Estimates Transfer Payment Programs
Annex C: 2023-24 Main Estimates Transfer Payment Programs ($ millions)
Grants Amount (millions)
Grants in Support of Aquatic Species and Aquatic Habitat 4.1
Grants in Support of the Sustainable Management of Canada’s Fisheries 2.0
Grants in support of Salmon Enhancement Programming 1.6
Grants in Support of the Canadian Coast Guard Integrated Program 1.5
Grants in Support of Asset Disposal Programming 1.0
Grants in Support of Indigenous Reconciliation Priorities 0.7
Grants in Support of Organizations Associated with Research, Development, Management and Promotion of Fisheries and Oceans-related Issues 0.3
Total Grants 11.1
Contributions
Contributions in Support of Aquatic Species and Aquatic Habitat 121.8
Contributions in Support of the Integrated Aboriginal Programs Management Framework 121.3
Contributions in Support of the Integrated Fish and Seafood Sector Management Framework 100.9
Contributions in Support of Indigenous Reconciliation Priorities 53.3
Contributions in Support of the Sustainable Management of Canada’s Fisheries 44.8
Contributions in Support of the Canadian Coast Guard Integrated Program 37.0
Contributions in Support of Ecosystems and Oceans Science 31.1
Contributions in Support of Salmon Enhancement Programming 6.6
Contributions in Support of the Small Craft Harbours Class Program 2.4
Contribution in Support of the Pacific Salmon Foundation 1.6
Contribution in Support of the Salmon Sub-Committee of the Yukon Fish and Wildlife Management Board 0.3
Contributions in Support of Organizations Associated with Research, Development, Management and Promotion of Fisheries and Oceans-related Issues 0.2
Contribution in Support of the T. Buck Suzuki Environmental Foundation 0.0
Total Contributions 521.3
Total Transfer Payments 532.4
Table note

Note: Totals may not add due to rounding.

Annex D: 2023-24 Main Estimates – A-base (permanent) versus B-base (temporary)
Annex D: 2023-24 Main Estimates – A-base (permanent) versus B-base (temporary)
Vote ($ millions) A-Base B-Base Total
Operating Vote 1 1,711.9 299.1 2,011.0
Salary 1,065.6 106.3 1,171.9
O&M 686.4 192.7 879.1
VNR (40.0) 0.0 (40.0)
Capital Vote 5 1,046.1 335.5 1,381.6
Salary 47.7 5.8 53.4
Capital 998.5 329.7 1,328.2
Grants and contributions Vote 10 304.8 227.6 532.4
Grants 6.9 4.3 11.1
Contributions 298.0 223.3 521.3
Statutory 169.3 17.0 186.3
Contributions to employee benefit plans 169.2 17.0 186.2
Minister of Fisheries and Oceans - Salary and motor car allowance 0.1 0.0 0.1
Total Reference Levels 3,232.2 879.1 4,111.4
Table note

Note: Totals may not add due to rounding.

Page Proofs – DFO Details

2023-24 Interim Supply Requirements (not included on Canada.ca website)

2023-24 Main Estimates
Interim Supply Requirements
Department of Fisheries and Oceans
Approved and Pending Items (dollars) (triage items included)

2023-24 Interim Supply Requirements (not included on Canada.ca website)
Vote No. Vote wording and explanation(s) of Additional Twelfths Total Main Estimates Amount Granted
1
  • Operating expenditures
  • Canada’s share of expenses of the international fisheries commissions
  • Authority to provide free office accommodation for the international fisheries commissions
  • Authority to make recoverable advances in the amounts of the shares of the international fisheries commissions of joint cost projects
  • Authority to make recoverable advances for transportation, stevedoring and other shipping services performed for individuals, outside agencies and other governments in the course of, or arising out of, the exercise of jurisdiction in navigation, including aids to navigation and shipping
  • Authority, as referred to in paragraph 29.1(2)(a) of the Financial Administration Act, to expend in the fiscal year — in order to offset expenditures that it incurs in that fiscal year — revenues that it receives in that fiscal year
    1. in the course of, or arising from, the activities of the Canadian Coast Guard; and
    2. from the provision of internal support services under section 29.2 of that Act
  • The payment to each member of the King’s Privy Council for Canada who is a minister without portfolio, or a minister of State who does not preside over a ministry of State, of a salary — paid annually or pro rata for any period less than a year — that does not exceed the salary paid under the Salaries Act, rounded down to the nearest hundred dollars under section 67 of the Parliament of Canada Act, to ministers of State who preside over ministries of State

No additional twelfths beyond the normal three-twelfths

2,010,994,201 502,748,551
5
  • Capital expenditures
  • Authority to make payments to provinces, municipalities and local or private authorities as contributions towards construction done by those bodies
  • Authority for the purchase and disposal of commercial fishing vessels

No additional twelfths beyond the normal three-twelfths

1,381,611,297 345,402,825
10
  • The grants listed in any of the Estimates for the fiscal year
  • Contributions

No additional twelfths beyond the normal three-twelfths

532,401,762 133,100,441

Main Estimates Issue Note

Background

The Main Estimates list the resources required by individual departments and agencies for the upcoming fiscal year in order to deliver the programs for which they are responsible.

Due to timing, it is not always possible to include items announced in the Government’s federal budget. Additional funding stemming from the upcoming Budget would therefore be sought through Supplementary Estimates later in the fiscal year.

These Main Estimates were tabled on February 15, 2023, with the Interim Supply bill receiving Royal Assent prior to the start of the fiscal year. The remaining voted authorities will be received once Full Supply is granted in June.

Issues Notes – Key Increases

CCG Fleet Renewal– New and Reprofiled Funding

If pressed on new funding

Background

Renewal of the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) fleet is underway. Funded replacement plans are currently in place for the large vessel fleet:

Ongoing media attention has focused on increasing costs and ongoing procurement delays of CCG’s large vessel fleet. CCG has been working closely with shipyards and internal stakeholders to manage and address ongoing issues. Detailed costing for these projects will be released once negotiations and contract awards have occurred with the shipyard.

CCG is also renewing its small fleet:

CCG is putting in place interim measures and investing in vessel life extension (VLE) work to ensure continued delivery of critical services until new ships are delivered. This includes:

Through Main Estimates, Fisheries and Oceans Canada is seeking access to an additional $314 million, to support the renewal of the CCG fleet and related interim measures. More specifically:

Announcements

The Prime Minister announced (May 22, 2019), the renewal of the CCG fleet with up to 18 new large ships built in Canadian shipyards, helping to deliver its important services, and creating good, middle class jobs across the country. Total funding for the 18 large ships is $15.7 billion: Irving Shipbuilding will build two non-combat AOPS; VSY will build up to 16 MPV; a competitive process for the design of a Mid-Shore Multi-Mission ship will be run, which would complement the work of the large fleet in shallow areas and deliver mid-shore science activities.

The Government of Canada announced (August 2, 2019), that the six new PIB would be constructed through the addition of the third Canadian Shipyard. The Request for Proposal was released to Chantier Davie in late July 2020 and concluded in July 2021. An Umbrella Agreement (UA) will be finalized in spring of 2023.

Canada announced (May 6, 2021) the procurement of two Polar Icebreakers. One will be built at Vancouver Shipyards and the other is expected to be constructed at Chantier Davie.

Hurricane Fiona (Small Craft Harbour Program and Ghost Gear Fund)

Background

On September 24, Hurricane Fiona hit Atlantic Canada and eastern Quebec, impacting various types of infrastructure including DFO-owned small craft harbours (SCH), and producing substantial fishing gear-related debris, not only from fisheries and aquaculture operations that were active during the storm, but also as a result of heavy damage to harbour storage facilities, with gear and structures being swept into the ocean.

On October 17, Ministers Murray and Petitpas Taylor announced that $100 million from the new Hurricane Fiona Recovery Fund will be used to repair SCH infrastructure and to retrieve lost fishing and aquaculture gear. Specifically, $70 million was allocated to support recovery efforts at SCH damaged by Hurricane Fiona. Another $30 million was allocated to support retrieval and responsible disposal of lost fishing gear through the Ghost Gear Fund.

The SCH Program has worked diligently to determine the impacts Fiona had on the Program’s infrastructure. Clean up activities have taken place and, for the most part, initial repairs have been completed. DFO staff are now working with harbour authorities and others to plan and execute and necessary longer term repairs at impacted harbours.

With respect to ghost gear, $1.5 million has already been allocated to support 11 partners for emergency clean-up and recovery efforts of the hardest hit areas, currently underway. Other projects are expected to be announced in the coming weeks.

The Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency announced on January 20, 2023, that it will provide up to $40 million through the Hurricane Fiona Recovery Fund to the shellfish sector in Atlantic Canada to assist shellfish operators and non-profit organizations that provide services to them with immediate needs like storm damage repairs, equipment replacement, cleanup, product loss, as well as longer-term projects for adaptations against extreme weather. This funding supplements other federal measures to cover costs not covered by private insurance and other federal and provincial programs, such as Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements.

Oceans Protection Program

Background

Marine traffic continues to increase in support of Canada’s growing economy, and the Government is taking additional steps to strengthen marine safety, protect marine ecosystems, and create stronger partnerships with Indigenous and coastal communities.

The renewal of the Oceans Protection Plan (OPP) was announced by the Prime Minister on July 19, 2022.

Budget 2022 announced an additional $2 billion to protect Canada’s coasts and waterways during our economic recovery and beyond. This new funding is in addition to the $1.5 billion initially announced in 2016 and brings the total invested in support of the plan to $3.5 billion. The OPP is the largest investment ever made to protect Canada’s coasts and waterways, while also growing our economy.

The renewed and expanded plan will help make further progress to:

The implementation of the OPP is a whole-of-government effort, with responsibilities shared across Transport Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), Canadian Coast Guard (CCG), Environment and Climate Change Canada, Natural Resources Canada, and Health Canada.

Under the first phase of OPP (2017-22), DFO and CCG had the following accomplishments:

Since the launch of the OPP in 2016, the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change have impacted our economy, our marine environment, and the resiliency of our supply chain.

As risks associated with marine traffic and impacts to marine ecosystems evolve, further strengthening and expanding OPP implementation across the country is required to ensure Canada’s marine safety and environmental protection system is able to withstand disruption and to adapt to changes in the sector.

The 2023-24 Main Estimates include new funding of $134.1 million for the OPP Renewal for DFO and CCG, with an additional amount of $12.96 million for the Employee Benefit Plan, for a total of $146.9 million.

High Arctic Marine Conservation - Tallurutiup Imanga National Marine and Tuvaijuittuq Marine

If pressed on status of small craft harbour construction

Background

The waters of Tallurutiup Imanga are abundant with nutrients and support a wide variety of marine species. It is thought to be one of the most productive areas in the Arctic and Inuit have depended on this area for millennia. Tuvaijuittuq, which means “the ice never melts” in Inuktitut, is an area of ecological importance that contains old, thick, multi-year pack ice. The area’s importance is expected to become more critical as a changing climate reduces the amount of summer sea ice across the Arctic.

In 2016, less than 1 per cent of Canada’s marine and coastal areas was conserved. In August 2019, Canada surpassed the 2020 target to protect 10 per cent of Canada’s coastal and marine area, following the designation of the Tuvaijuittuq Marine Protected Area (MPA) in the High Arctic Basin and the operational designation of Tallurutiup Imanga National Marine Conservation Area (TINMCA). These two sizeable areas (amounting to approximately 7.4 per cent of ocean coverage) were instrumental to reaching Canada’s current level of 13.81 per cent marine conservation. The Tuvaijuittuq MPA was designated as a Ministerial Order MPA in 2019 which provides interim protection for up to five years. There are plans to renew the Ministerial Order for another five years allowing for better consideration of long-term designation as an Indigenous Protected and Conserved Area.

On August 1, 2019, the Qikiqtani Inuit Association (QIA) and the Government of Canada (GoC), led by the Parks Canada Agency, established an Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement (IIBA) for TINMCA and the Tuvaijuittuq MPA. An IIBA is required under the Nunavut Agreement before establishing a federal or territorial park or conservation area in the Nunavut Settlement Area. It was signed by QIA and the GoC (i.e., Parks Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada [DFO], and Transport Canada). As part of the IIBA and associated agreements, DFO has primary responsibility in three key areas: small craft harbour (SCH) development; fisheries exploration; and, in conservation area governance and management.

The Aulattiqatigiit Board, a joint Inuit and GoC management board and operations committee were established by the signatories of the IIBA, where the signatories shall work together in reaching consensus decisions to guide management of TINMCA and the Tuvaijuittuq MPA. DFO is a member of the Board and operations committee. DFO also has representation on the planning team tasked with the development of interim and long-term management plans related to activities occurring within the boundaries of the TINMCA. Formal members of the planning team include representatives from the QIA, the Government of Nunavut, and Parks Canada. DFO and Transport Canada are contributors to the planning process.

Under the IIBA, DFO is also responsible for exploring fisheries potential in and around the five TINMCA associated communities. As part of this work, DFO coordinated a community inshore fisheries engagement workshop, the week of February 27, which provided information sharing opportunities and an understanding of interests, opportunities, and needs related to potential inshore fisheries development. Linked to the IIBA negotiations, DFO also entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with the QIA that committed the Department to constructing Small Craft Harbours in the communities of Clyde River and Arctic Bay within approved funding levels. Transport Canada is responsible for funding the construction of two other harbours in Grise Fiord and Resolute Bay.

The GoC and the QIA have worked in partnership to advance marine conservation in the Qikiqtani Region of Canada’s Arctic. After the success of TINMCA and the Tuvaijuittuq MPA, QIA and the GoC, led by DFO, began work to advance marine conservation of the Sarvarjuaq and Qikiqtait marine areas. Conservation of these two areas will contribute approximately two per cent towards the 25 per cent by 2025 marine conservation target. A GoC financial IIBA negotiation on behalf of the GOC and led by DFO. A whole of government approach is being taken that involves the Canadian Coast Guard, Transport Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Parks Canada, Department of Justice, and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada.

Implementation of the Impact Assessment Act

Background

The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada and 12 partner departments and agencies, including DFO, received $1.28 million over six years, starting in 2022-23, to continue implementing the Impact Assessment Act and complete assessments started under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012.

Over the next six years, DFO will receive $91.9 million in new funding starting in 2022-23, and $2.4 million ongoing after that funding will enable the Department to fulfill its obligations under the Impact Assessment Act. More concretely, it will ensure that the environmental, health, social, and economic implications of major development projects are rigorously assessed and that they meet Canadians’ standards and expectations for responsible development.

The funding will support staffing of the equivalent 98 program employees over six years to support four different program areas (Ecosystems and Ocean Science, Fish and Fish Habitat Protection, Fisheries Management, and Environmental Response (Canadian Coast Guard)), with 77 per cent of positions in the regions.

Conservation Targets

Background

Canada’s Marine Conservation Targets

Canada currently protects 14.66 per cent of its ocean territory, and is taking action towards achieving its ambitious conservation targets of conserving 25 per cent of Canada’s oceans by 2025 and 30 per cent by 2030 through increasing collaboration with partners and making historic financial investments.

This includes 14 marine protected areas (MPAs) established by DFO under the Oceans Act and 60 marine refuges.

In order to achieve the 25 per cent by 2025 marine conservation target, a five-point plan has been established, which includes:

Newly Announced Sites and Policies

Canada made a number of announcements at the Fifth International Marine Protected Areas Congress (IMPAC5) in Vancouver in February 2023. These included Canada’s pathway to 2025, the publication of the Northern Shelf Bioregion MPA Network Action Plan, a new marine refuge at Gwaxdlala/Nalaxdlala – also known as Lull Bay and Hoeya Sound, and the pre-publication of the Tang.ɢwan — ḥačxwiqak — Tsig̱is MPA regulations in Canada Gazette, Part I, for a 30-day public comment period.

In order to increase the effectiveness of new conservation areas, Canada announced additional details of the 2019 MPA Protection Standard, which strengthens protection for all federal MPAs established since April 2019, and prohibits:

Also under the protection standard, Transport Canada will consult with partners and stakeholders on how to enhance restrictions on certain vessel discharges that occur within MPAs.

About 5.67 per cent of conserved marine territory in Canada is protected under OECMs. In December 2022, DFO released its marine OECM guidance to align with United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) guidance, and to implement Canada’s 2019 protection standard for OECMs.

Montreal-Kunming Targets and the United Nation’s Convention on Biological Diversity

In December 2022 at the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP15) to the CBD in Montreal, Canada and 195 member nations agreed on a historical framework to safeguard nature and halt and reverse biodiversity loss. This framework aligns with Canada’s main goals of protecting 30 per cent of lands and waters by 2030, respecting the rights of Indigenous peoples, and addressing key drivers of biodiversity loss, such as pollution and overexploitation of nature.

In support of the global marine conservation target of protecting 30 per cent by 2030, at IMPAC5, Canada announced $69.5 million to support four nature-based-solutions projects in developing countries. Three of the four projects support climate change adaption (e.g., a Regenerative Seascapes project in Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique, Comoros and Madagascar), while the fourth is a Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Adaptation - Monitoring and Impact project, which supports partners of Canada’s nature-positive climate finance programming in several developing countries.

Project Finance for Permanence

In December 2022, the Prime Minister announced up to $800 million over seven years, starting in 2023-24, to support up to four Indigenous-led conservation initiatives. This will drive progress toward Canada’s ambitious goals of conserving 25 per cent of land and waters by 2025, and 30 per cent of each by 2030, and support reconciliation efforts.

The investment will support the establishment of protected areas through an innovative funding model – Project Finance for Permanence – which is based on partnership. It brings together Indigenous organizations, governments, and the philanthropic community to identify shared goals for conserving nature, Indigenous stewardship of lands and waters, a community well-being. It is focused on four key areas: Northwest Territories, the Northern Shelf Bioregion in British Columbia, the Qikiqtani Region in Nunavut, and in Ontario’s Hudson Bay and southwestern James Bay region.

Issues Notes – Key Decreases

Small Craft Harbour Sunsetting Fund

Background

As of February 2023, the Small Craft Harbours (SCH) Program was responsible for 973 harbours:

SCH provide key support to the commercial fishing industry. The SCH Program keeps the harbours that are critical to the fishing industry open and in good repair.

In Budget 2021, the Government announced it would provide $300 million over two years to repair, renew, and replace SCH.

Hurricane Fiona impacted 142 of the 184 SCH that were in its path. Since the passing of Fiona, the Prime Minister announced the $300 million Hurricane Fiona Recovery Fund, on October 4, 2022.

On October 17, 2022, Ministers from Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency  announced that, to support immediate recovery efforts, $100 million from the fund had been set aside to repair essential infrastructure at harbours and to retrieve lost fishing gear. Of this sum, $70 million was earmarked to the SCH Program.

For SCH, climate change has meant reduced formation of shore ice and more coastal erosion and flooding. The main impacts for the SCH network are on harbour infrastructure and sedimentation within harbours.

For the program, this creates an increased need to address repairs at harbours in a timely manner as well as increased dredging pressures.

The SCH Program has already begun to adapt its conception standards to this reality, as well as to enhance its regional dredging program.

The SCH Program's annual regular budget has been stable at about $90 million (includes salaries and administrative costs) since 2007-08. Since 2008-09, the Government of Canada has provided the SCH Program with more than $1.3 billion in temporary funding.

Indigenous Programs

Background

Spending on the implementation of treaties and other constructive reconciliation agreements varies from year to year, depending on the stage of negotiations, timing of one-time payments, and other influences. The Department is committed to getting these arrangements right through consultations and negotiation and, as such, the conclusion of agreements can take time to complete.

Planned spending on the implementation of treaties and other constructive reconciliation agreements is typically included in the Main Estimates once negotiation mandates and financial authorities have been secured, in the first year that the funding is expected to be needed. This is important to ensure the funding is available when needed. Funding is then reprofiled to future years if negotiations take more time to get things right.

This practice of including amounts in planned spending in the first year they might be required and then reprofiling from year to year has resulted in apparent decreases in planned spending over the past few years as funds are spent and the remaining is reprofiled to the next year.

For example, in 2020-21, $598 million of funding related to reconciliation agreements was reprofiled into 2021-22. In 2021-22, $103 million was reprofiled into 2022-23 in time to be reflected in the 2022-23 Main Estimates, with additional funds being reprofiled into 2022-23 at year-end. In 2022-23, only limited funds have been reprofiled into 2023-24 to date, but it is expected that there will be a reprofile into 2023-24 at year-end. Additional amounts will be included in future years’ planned spending as negotiation mandates and authorities are approved.

In 2021-22, Fisheries and Oceans Canada concluded several significant reconciliation agreements including with the Coastal First Nations (comprised of Haida, Gitzaala, Metlakatla, Gitga’at, Kitasoo/Xai’xais, Heiltsuk, Nuxalk, and Wuikinuxv First Nations) and Listiguj First Nation (financial data for individual agreements is confidential). Other new reconciliation funding agreements were in respect of smaller amounts related to agreement implementation. In 2022-23, negotiations have been advanced at a number of tables, with several close to completion.

Implementation of the Modernized Fisheries Act

If pressed on funding

Background

The Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard’s mandate letter was published December 16, 2021. It included a commitment to work to support sustainable, stable, prosperous fisheries through the continued implementation of the modernized Fisheries Act, which restores lost protections, rebuilds fish populations, and incorporates modern safeguards so that fish and fish habitats are protected for future generations and Canada’s fisheries can continue to grow the economy and sustain coastal communities.

To support ongoing implementation of the modernized Fisheries Act, important engagement activities continue into their third year with Indigenous peoples, partners, stakeholders, and the public on development of policies, frameworks, instruments, and guidance. These include:

Additional future rounds of engagement will be undertaken on implementation of the fish and fish habitat protection provisions of the Fisheries Act, including: the Department’s approach to engagement and additional Codes of Practice aimed at avoiding impacts to fish and fish habitat.

In 2018, the Government allocated $284.2 million over five years (2018-19 to 2022-23) to implement the changes to the Fisheries Act. Part of this allocation included a new $50 million grants and contributions program also covering the period 2018-19 to 2022-23 that provides for increased participation of Indigenous peoples in the conservation and protection of fish and fish habitat. The Indigenous Habitat Participation Program (IHPP) supports Indigenous participation in consultation on project authorization decisions under the Fisheries Act, participation in the development of policy and regulatory initiatives, and collaborative projects and capacity building for communities.

As the $284.2 million in funding sunsets, ongoing resource needs are being assessed in order to continue delivering this vital work, which is a mandate commitment.

[Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.]

Fisheries Fund: Quebec

Background

The Quebec Fisheries Fund is designed to support the fisheries and aquaculture sector, spark innovation and support the development and sustainable growth of the industry. The two levels of government have committed $40 million, including $27 million from Fisheries and Oceans Canada. To date, more than 130 projects have been or are in the process of being approved under this program, for a total of $20.8 million.

This reprofiling of funds is necessary to comply with the provisions of the Bilateral Agreement for the Implementation of the Quebec Fisheries Fund, especially following numerous delays caused by the pandemic and the slowdown in the supply chain. It will also extend the program by two years (2024–25 and 2025–26) to support the development of a healthy and sustainable fisheries and aquaculture industry to meet the growing demand for high-quality seafood from sustainable sources.

The reprofiling of funds is also necessary so that beneficiaries can be reimbursed for project costs incurred after March 31, 2024. Without the reprofiling of funds, and given that it takes 12 to 18 months on average to implement and reimburse eligible expenses, the QFF would have to stop approving new projects by the end of 2022–23. The reprofiling of funds and the program extension would thus allow projects to be approved until March 31, 2024, for implementation and conclusion by March 31, 2026. This period is necessary to allow recipients enough time to complete their projects and be reimbursed, particularly in the case of multi-year projects.

Note that, unlike the QFF, the Atlantic Fisheries Fund will have two additional years to fund projects in their industry. The reprofiling of funds will make it possible to commit the remaining funds granted by the governments of Quebec and Canada, thereby giving the Quebec industry the same opportunities as the Atlantic industry to support the sustainable development of the fisheries and aquaculture sector.

Fisheries Fund: Atlantic

If pressed

Background

The Atlantic Fisheries Fund (AFF) is a fund of over $400 million over seven years (2017-18 to 2023-24) cost shared with provincial partners, 70/30 (federal/provincial) over the life of the program. The Atlantic component of the AFF was launched on August 31, 2017, and its national marketing pillar, the Canadian Fish and Seafood Opportunities Fund (CFSOF) was launched December 5, 2018. To date, 70 per cent of the total available federal/provincial contribution budget for the $379.8 million ($265.86 million of which is federal) of the Atlantic component of AFF has been committed, on over 1015 approved projects. Currently, there are 122 applications in-house seeking funding of over $75.1 million with new applications being received daily. This, along with a number of large-scale project proposals under development, positions AFF well to commit the remaining funds by March 31, 2024.[Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.]

[Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.]

The AFF focuses on supporting innovation in the fish and seafood sector throughout Atlantic Canada by investing in projects that help the sector to better meet growing demands for sustainably- and legally-sourced, high-quality fish and seafood products. Its ultimate objective is that “sustainable economic growth will be realized in the fish and seafood sector” through innovative investments under its three strategic Atlantic Pillars: Infrastructure, Innovation, and Science Partnerships. Eligible applicants include Indigenous groups, commercial enterprises (including fish harvesters, aquaculturalists, and seafood processors), universities and academics, industry associations and other non-profits, and other organizations such as research institutions and provincial crown corporations. Other eligibility criteria includes residence in a participating province; being active in or supporting activities related to the fish and seafood harvesting, processing, or aquaculture industries; and, being able to demonstrate that maximum economic benefits will accrue to the Atlantic Region. All proposed projects are also assessed for whether they will trigger a Duty to Consult or Impact Assessment (previously known as an environmental assessment) to ensure that all regulatory requirements are met.

To date, the majority of approvals (90 per cent of total projects and 73.6 per cent of investment dollars) have fallen under the Infrastructure Pillar. The technology adoption and adaptation investments under the Infrastructure pillar have been pivotal in promoting the benefits of innovation and automation in the fish and seafood sector. The sector has been traditionally hesitant to invest in innovation as it was perceived as too financially risky but the AFF, through these investments has started to shift that perspective by reducing the barriers to innovate and allowing the benefits of innovation to be realized by recipients.

Protecting Canada’s Nature, Park and Wild Spaces

Background

Environment and Climate Change Canada, Parks Canada Agency, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) are the competent departments responsible for implementation of the Species at Risk Act (SARA).

Species at risk conservation under SARA is built on a cycle of: (1) arms-length assessment; (2) legal protections for the more at-risk species through automatic prohibitions triggered upon listing under SARA; (3) recovery planning or management planning; (4) recovery measure implementation; (5) monitoring; and, (6) evaluation.

Overall implementation is informed by several principles, such as: the importance of biodiversity; scientific, social, and economic research; stewardship, engagement, and cooperation; and, consultation with Indigenous groups and stakeholders.

Since the implementation of SARA in 2003, DFO has been provided with limited A-base funding, supplemented by sunsetting B-base funding—primarily through various sunsetting initiatives like the Protecting Canada’s Nature, Parks and Wild Spaces initiative —to protect and recover species at risk and promote stewardship.

In 2018, DFO and its federal partners received funding to enable a baseline level of core programming to meet SARA requirements beyond the listing phase. This funding, provided under the “Canada’s Nature Legacy: Protecting our nature” initiative, was an essential core investment that helped to address long-standing unfunded pressures and enabled the transition to multi-species and ecosystem approaches with the goal of advancing Canada’s international and domestic biodiversity goals.

Canada’s Nature Legacy funding was approved for five years and sunsets in March 2023. In 2021, DFO and its partners received additional funding under the “Enhanced Nature Legacy” initiative to support new programming elements to address gaps in mapping, information management, and engagement.

Funding to conserve Canada’s lands and freshwater, protect species, advance Indigenous reconciliation, and increase access to nature

Background

Actions to support the recovery and protection of aquatic species at risk in both oceans and freshwater directly support biodiversity and in turn, ocean and aquatic ecosystem health.

The Nature Legacy for Canada Initiative, announced in Budget 2018, sets out a roadmap to protect Canada’s biodiversity through the protection of lands and waters and the conservation of species at risk. This investment provided approximately $155 million of new and renewed funding necessary for Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) to implement its statutory Species at Risk Act obligations. This funding also included $55 million over five years to support the Canada Nature Fund for Aquatic Species at Risk (CNFASAR). This funding sunsets in March 2023.

Building on this momentum, Budget 2021 announced an Enhanced Nature Legacy, providing DFO with $173 million in funding over five years. This included an additional $29.5 million for the CNFASAR. This funding sunsets in March 2026.

The CNFASAR aims to support the recovery and protection of aquatic species at risk by enabling multi-species, place-based, and threat-based approaches to recovery and protection. This contribution funding supports over 80 multi-year stewardship projects that take multi-species approaches to address threats to aquatic species at risk in the marine environment and to support multi-species recovery actions in freshwater areas across Canada. Consideration of Indigenous knowledge and support for Indigenous capacity-building related to these approaches are components of this fund.

The 2021 funding envelope also supports the development of a new approach for conserving Canada’s aquatic species at risk. This ‘Framework for Aquatic Species at Risk Conservation’ will serve as a policy guide for applying multi-species approaches, such as place- and threat-based approaches, to conserve and recover Canada’s aquatic biodiversity from coast-to-coast-to-coast.

Issue Note - New Funding

Ghost Gear Program

Background

‘Ghost gear’ refers to abandoned, lost, or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG). It is one of the deadliest forms of marine plastic debris, and has a damaging impact on marine animals including endangered whale populations, the coastal and marine environment, and global fish stocks.

In 2019, the Government announced the Ghost Gear Fund to assist Indigenous groups, fish harvesters, the aquaculture industry, non-government organizations, and communities to take concrete action in the fight against ghost gear. Prior to Hurricane Fiona in September 2022, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) had distributed $26.7 million in funding for 91 projects domestically and abroad.

In 2022, through funding for advancing a circular economy for plastics in Canada, the Ghost Gear Program was renewed for five years (fiscal years 2022-23 through 2026-27, with $25 million in funding)  and has a mandate commitment to create a Canadian National Ghost Gear Strategy that addresses long-term prevention, mitigation, and response for Ghost Gear.

In addition, Canada will continue to demonstrate international leadership on ghost gear through engagement with the Regional Fisheries Management Organizations and other recognized bodies, and hosting a second international Gear Innovation Summit coinciding with Canada’s planned G7 presidency in 2025. All of these initiatives will culminate in the drafting of a Canadian Ghost Gear Action Plan to be finalized by 2027.

Budget 2022 also saw an additional one year of support for the Ghost Gear Fund, with $10 million being allocated for projects in fiscal year 2022-2023. Building on work and capacity created from projects completed in the 2020-22 years of the fund, the Ghost Gear Fund supported 42 projects, 38 domestic and four international. Retrieval projects for 22-23 accounted for over 345 tonnes of ghost gear retrieved, including 8,887 units of gear and 170km of rope.

In response to Hurricane Fiona, on October 17, 2022, Ministers Murray and Petitpas Taylor, confirmed $100 million in funding for DFO to support the immediate and urgent work currently being carried out on the recovery of lost fishing gear and repairs of small craft harbours damaged by Hurricane Fiona. Of the $100 million, $1.5 million in emergency funding was allocated towards immediate cleanup and recovery efforts of the hardest hit areas for 22-23, and resulted in 11 Ghost Gear Fund projects. A call for proposals closed on January 6th, 2023, for the remaining $28.4 million  available specifically for Hurricane Fiona fishing gear cleanup activities in 2023-2024. Applicants were advised of the results of their applications on March 2nd.

Net-pen Transition – Indigenous Partners and Stakeholders

If pressed on progress towards the transition plan

Background

On June 22, 2022, the Minister announced next steps towards development of a plan for transitioning from open-net pen salmon aquaculture in coastal British Columbia.

The Government of Canada previously undertook engagement in 2020 and 2021 and collected views on transitioning the salmon aquaculture sector in British Columbia.

On July 29, 2022, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) released a discussion framework which outlines a proposed vision for transitioning from open-net pen salmon aquaculture in British Columbia. The proposed framework will help guide engagement with the Government of British Columbia, First Nations, industry, local governments, stakeholders, and British Columbians.

Engagement on the discussion framework will run until early 2023. A “what we heard” report on phase two of engagement will be circulated in February 2023 to inform and guide continued engagement through the spring of 2023.

The feedback and input received during this engagement will be instrumental in the development of the final transition plan, expected to be completed in the spring of 2023.

$20 million in funding was secured through Budget 2021 to support engagement and the development of the transition plan was released in Supps B 2022.

A key component of the funding sought is to support capacity building and engagement with Indigenous partners in British Columbia, as well as resourcing to support engagement and research activities that will help inform input during the engagement process.

Haida Nations Initiative – Advance reconciliation

Background

On August 13, 2021, Canada, Haida Nation, and British Columbia signed "Changing Tide," a non-binding agreement that includes standard framework agreement commitments and establishes an incremental process by which the parties can negotiate reconciliation agreements on priority topics identified by the Haida Nation.

Changing Tide also contains several elements that advance reconciliation, including:

Canada and British Columbia’s provision of early deliverables is a key condition of the Haida Nation’s participation in reconciliation negotiations and is the first negotiation priority in the framework agreement. Early deliverables will support the Haida Nation’s pre-implementation activities for future governance arrangements, will be used to address community priorities identified by the Haida Nation, and will address the Haida Nation’s interest in fisheries.

Great Lakes Fisheries Commission

Background

The Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC) was established by the 1954 Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between Canada and the United States of America, with the objective of protecting and sustaining the Great Lakes fishery.

Pursuant to the 1954 Convention, the GLFC is funded by both the Canadian and U.S. federal governments, with Canada contributing 31 per cent towards the transboundary sea lamprey control work and 50 per cent of the Commission’s overall operations, with the United States funding the balance.

As part of Budget 2022, the Government invested an incremental funding of $44.9 million over five years and $9 million ongoing in the work of the Commission. This will ensure that Canada is able to meet its funding share under the bilateral treaty with the United States - bringing Canada’s contribution up to over $19 million in 2022 and moving forward. This funding will help to augment Canadian sea lamprey control activities (primarily consisting of DFO’s Sea Lamprey Control Program), and support the GLFC’s scientific research and coordination of binational fisheries management across the Great Lakes.

In recent years, the GLFC secretariat, including its Executive Secretary, has been lobbying key stakeholders in the U.S. and Canada, including Members of Parliament (MPs), and US Senators and Representatives, with their request for federal leadership and responsibility for the Commission to be moved from DFO to GAC. Such decisions are the prerogative of the Prime Minister.

On October 20, 2022, two new Commissioners, nominated by the Government of Ontario, were approved by the Governor in Council to represent Canada at the GLFC.

The funding announced in Budget 2022 was accessed through the Supplementary Estimates C process. The first payment of new funding (~$9.5 million) was made to the Commission in February 2023.

The GFLC’s 2022 Interim Meeting, originally scheduled for November 30, was postponed.

The GLFC Secretariat now has the information it required to set the budget for the upcoming year and is actively working with Canadian and American Commissioners to schedule the interim meeting.

Discussions with the Secretariat continues regarding the 2023 transfers (which comes from our 23-24 FY) to determine what funding is required for the Sea Lamprey Control Program and to deliver on other important aspects of the GLFC’s mandate.

Of note, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans adopted a motion on March 9th, 2023 as follows:

That, given the factual inaccuracy provided by Mr. Richard Goodyear, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Deputy Minister, in his testimony to the committee on December 2, 2022, and raised in correspondence to the committee dated December 14, 2022, from Mr. Gregory McClinchey, Policy and Legislative Affairs Director of the Great Lakes Fisheries Commission, and considering the harm done to Canada's relationship with the United States through Canada’s continued lack of fiscal accountability towards the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and the numerous bi-lateral initiatives that would be jeopardized by the termination of the Great Lakes Fisheries Convention, the committee report to the House on this inaccuracy and recall Mr. Goodyear to the committee to rectify his testimony.

Consequently, the committee has invited Mr. Richard Goodyear to appear on Monday, March 27, during its study of the Supps C and Main Estimates. The Department welcomes the opportunity to provide committee members with an update of its progress on this file.

Trans Mountain Expansion Project – Canada Energy Regulator’s Recommendations

Background

The Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMX) would expand the existing Trans Mountain pipeline system between Edmonton, Alberta, and Burnaby, British Columbia. It includes approximately 987 km of new pipeline, and the reactivation of 193 km of existing pipeline. The project includes an expansion of the Westridge Marine Terminal to accommodate 29 additional tankers per month (34 total).

In Budget 2022, Natural Resources Canada received $27.9 million over two years to support the TMX and Line 3 Indigenous Advisory and Monitoring Committees (IAMC). Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) received $17 million over three years to fulfill commitments enshrined in the 2019 approval of TMX.

DFO and the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) funding includes: $4.43 million to DFO and $2.88 million to CCG over three years to support capacity and administration functions including DFO’s regulatory role and whole of government coordination (2022-23 – 2024-25); to continue to deliver accommodation measures for an additional year through fiscal year 2024-25, $3 million for the Salish Sea Initiative, $2.32 million for the Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund and $0.17 million for the Terrestrial Cumulative Effects Initiative; $1.1 million in funding to support DFO-CCG participation in the TMX IAMC for two additional years to fiscal year 2023-24; and, $3.14 million in funding to support one year (bridge funding) in fiscal year 2022-23 for the CCG Marine Traffic and Communication Services Marine Mammal Desk.

Trans Mountain Corporation indicates that the project will become operational in the third quarter of 2023, and that additional permits may be required in advance of line-fill and operation.

DFO has regulatory responsibilities under the Fisheries Act and Species at Risk Act for the protection of fish and fish habitat, including marine mammals. In collaboration with the proponent and Canada Energy Regulator (CER), DFO delivers regulatory review services for pipeline watercourse crossings.

DFO issued a Fisheries Act authorization for the expansion of the Westridge Marine Terminal on September 12, 2019. In January 2020, and again in November 2022, DFO issued an amended Fisheries Act authorization.

[Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.] the Government committed to implement a series of Indigenous accommodation measures and responses to recommendations from the CER.

DFO manages three accommodation measures: the Salish Sea Initiative, the Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund, and the Terrestrial Cumulative Effects Initiative (co-managed with Environment and Climate Change Canada and Natural Resources Canada). These programs are currently funded to March 2025. CCG manages the Co-Developing Community Response Initiative. 

In its review of the project, the CER found that there would be significant adverse effects to the Southern Resident killer whale (SRKW), Indigenous cultural use associated with the SRKW, and direct greenhouse gas emissions related to increases in marine shipping.

The CER made 16 recommendations [Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.] to avoid, mitigate, or lessen effects of project-related marine shipping.

Recommendation 5, call for an Offset Program to offset the additional underwater noise and strike risk created by project-related marine vessels. The CER found that the offset approach could bring the significant adverse effects finding on SRKW to a finding of non-significant if and when project-related shipping effects have been effectively reduced to net-zero in each section of the shipping route.

The IAMC was established in 2017, when the project was first approved, to provide advice to federal regulators and monitor project construction and operations. The Advisory Committee includes 13 Indigenous members from the 129 communities impacted by the project (Indigenous Caucus) and six federal representatives.

Aquatic Invasive Species

Background

Aquatic invasive species (AIS) are non-native organisms that pose a serious and growing threat to Canada’s freshwater and marine ecosystems, economy, and society. Preventing the introduction, establishment, and spread of AIS, including early detection and response activities, is the most effective and cost-efficient strategy for limiting their harm.

The Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations came into force in 2015 under the Fisheries Act to provide tools for federal action and partnerships with provincial and territorial governments, setting significant expectations regarding Canada’s collective ability to manage AIS. Six species are subject to prohibitions against their importation under the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations: Zebra & Quagga mussels and the four Asian carp species.

Budget 2017 provided $43.8 million in funding over five years and $10.8 million ongoing (i.e., permanent A-base funding) for national AIS management to: establish an AIS National Core Program (AIS NCP); expand and make permanent the Department’s Asian Carp Program; and, expand the Sea Lamprey Control Program and increase Canada’s commitment to the Great Lakes Fisheries Commission from $8.1 million to $10.6 million ongoing.

The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development conducted an audit of Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s (DFO) AIS efforts and released its findings on April 2, 2019. The report cited insufficient efforts from DFO and the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) in enforcing the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations at the international border, and preventing the introduction or spread of AIS (e.g., zebra mussels., tunicates, European Green Crab). In response, DFO, the CBSA, and other partners have developed new protocols, tools, and procedures to improve enforcement of the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations at international borders, among other initiatives undertaken under DFO’s management action plan related to the audit.

The new funding (i.e., B-base) announced in the Fall Economic Statement (2022) will give DFO flexibility in addressing short-term emergencies and for long-term monitoring and prevention, and strengthen relationships with provinces and territories, Indigenous peoples, and key stakeholders by addressing priorities in a collaborative fashion.

Issue Notes – Transfers

Interdepartmental Maritime Command, Control and Communications Program (DND to DFO)

If pressed on the outcomes of the project

Background

The Government of Canada's "Securing an Open Society: Canada's National Security Policy" (2004) directed an improvement to information sharing between federal departments in the area of domestic maritime security. Vessels from different departments could not securely exchange maritime situational awareness information in an automated, near real-time environment to establish a common understanding of the domestic maritime situation. To address this situation, the Interdepartmental Maritime Integrated Command, Control and Communications (IMIC3) project was conceived.

The project was first identified as a requirement, based on the events following 9/11 in the United States, and was [Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.] and the requirement released to the public for bidding with the final contract signed with Thales in 2011. Implementation soon began and full operational capability and migration from project to program was finalized in 2021.

The objective of IMIC3 was to create a deployable interagency information exchange tool to enhance situational awareness, improve informed decision making and facilitate coordinated action between the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) and the Department of National Defence (DND) vessels at sea. The IMIC3 project will deliver an information distribution system that supports the planning and execution of maritime operations by providing coordination and decision making aids and domestic maritime situational awareness.

Through previous arrangements, DND has been identified as the lead department accountable for implementing the IMIC3 project. DND has been provided with funds for all project capital, personnel and operation and maintenance including satellite costs through the security contingency reserve to undertake the IMIC3 project and is responsible to cash manage those funds on behalf of both collaborating departments. This funding is to cover the use of fitted, as well as deployable systems, to 12 KINGSTON Class ships, 44 sea-going CCG vessels, seven shore stations, and seven portable operator consoles.

DND recognized that funds allocated to CCG were to cover the installation, operation, and maintenance of the IMIC3 system on board 44 of its sea-going vessels, the three Regional Operations Centres, in St. John’s, NL., Montréal, QC., and Victoria, BC. The three Marine Security Operations Centre in Halifax, NS., Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON., and Victoria, BC. Finally, the CCG National Command Centre in Ottawa. The systems are installed and are utilized.

When the IMIC3 project was established, DND was provided with an annual budget of $8.6M and was identified as the lead department for both the implementation and in-service-support phases and its life cycle. It was provided funding to cash manage for the benefit of both DND and CCG. Through common accord and as approved by respective project leads, DND would transfer a portion of the funds to CCG at a rate of 45.4 per cent for DND and 54.6 per cent for CCG. After 2022, when entering the full operational phase and subsequent migration from project to program, the share of the budget allocation will now be directly provided to CCG, at an increased rate of 78.9 per cent vs 21.1 per cent for DND bringing the all-inclusive sum of $4.697M per annum for five years to CCG.

IMIC3 was used during the G7 summit in 2018 to provide distributed situational awareness and multi-node communication tools for CCG as well as the multiple law enforcement agencies, including those located at the Maritime Cell at the Unified Command Centre at Canadian Forces Base Val Cartier.

Canadian Positioning, Navigation and Timing Board (various Department to Department of Industry)

Background

The Canadian Positioning, Navigation and Timing Board (PNTB) is a Director General level cross-government board for the coordination of federal civilian Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) activities and international liaison as no single Government of Canada department or agency has an overall mandate for PNT activities or policy development.

The Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) is hosting the Canadian PNT Office which is the supporting office that carries out the day-to-day activities required to fulfill the objectives and priorities of the PNTB.

In addition to DFO/CCG, the following sponsoring Departments and Government Organizations are each contributing $80K in 2023-24 in support of the PNTB:

Enabled by Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), such as the United States’ Global Positioning System (GPS), Canadians have come to rely on PNT technologies and services to support a diverse set of systems and applications. Looking forward, innovative PNT technologies will likely fuse a number of sensors and sources of PNT to provide, for example, reliable and safe navigation in autonomous applications, location-based visualization and analysis for consumer applications, business intelligence and emergency response, geolocation for logistics management, and asset tracking or timing technologies to deliver network synchronization or traceable time for events recording and digital forensics.

At the same time, GNSS and PNT systems and users continue to face a broad range of threats, including increasing malicious activity such as GNSS jamming and spoofing. Threat actors are becoming more sophisticated as they access advanced technologies aimed at disrupting GPS and other GNSS signals. Nations are investing in infrastructure, strategies, and technologies to both exploit the supply chain economic opportunities and to mitigate the impact of sustained GNSS disruptions.

As Canada’s dependence on GNSS for PNT information has grown, threats affecting GNSS use have also increased. The PNTB was established to address these threats for the Government of Canada. As well, the PNTB is the central body for the exchange of information with foreign governments and organizations on civilian PNT matters.

Financial Management Transformation (various Departments to TBS)

Background

In 2012, a policy decision was made regarding standards on Enterprise Resource Planning, where SAP became the system of choice for Financial and Materiel Management for the whole of government. 

Since then, the Digital Comptrollership Program (DCP) has governed and transformed financial management in the Government of Canada (GoC) by facilitating the gradual transition to SAP.

The current version of SAP will cease by the end of 2030, creating an opportunity to position the Government of Canada toward full migration to the new SAP S/4 HANA, which will generate efficiencies for Canadian taxpayers.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) has already significantly contributed towards the development of the DCP through its implementation of SAP S/4HANA and will continue to benefit from participating in the GoC common governance process, while maintaining its influence for the setting of priorities and the development of new GoC functionalities

The primary benefits for DFO are as follows:

Greening Government Fund

Background

The Greening Government Fund, [Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.], has been established as part of the Government of Canada’s response to climate change. This initiative provides project funding to federal government departments and agencies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in their operations, and promotes and shares innovative approaches to reducing GHGs.

Departments and agencies that generate GHG emissions in excess of 1 kilotonne per year from air travel are required to contribute annually to the Greening Government Fund. A three-year average of the emissions for each department is calculated and converted to the contribution amount. These amounts are established by the Centre for Greening Government (CGG) within the Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada (TBS), which administers the Fund.

The contribution amounts are set at $65/tonne emissions for fiscal year 23-24, and $80/tonne emissions for fiscal year 24-25, and $95/tonne for fiscal year 2025-26.

Based on these contribution amounts, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) contributed $373,710 to the GGF in fiscal year 2022-23 at a rate of $50/tonne. Moving forward, DFO is required to contribute the following amounts to the GGF: $485,823 in fiscal year 2023-24, $597,936 in fiscal year 2024-25, and $421,033 in fiscal year 2025-26.

Funds are transferred to TBS through the Annual Reference Level Update. Departments must ensure the technical adjustment worksheet for the Department includes a line for the “Greening Government Fund” and transfers this amount to TBS.

Departments that contribute to the Greening Government Fund are eligible for project funding and can submit proposals when a call for proposals is issued. Through three funding cycles, the Greening Government Fund has awarded approximately $31.9M to 45 projects in 12 departments.

To date, DFO has successfully been awarded funding for four projects totalling $4,392,955, including:

Issue Notes – Reprofiles

Pacific Salmon Program

Background

The Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative (PSSI) was launched by the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard in June 2021, with the goal of stemming the severe decline of Pacific salmon stocks and restoring them to a sustainable level for future generations of Canadians.

The PSSI is a transformative investment of over $740M to conserve and restore wild Pacific salmon stocks and their ecosystems through a series of immediate and long-term activities. Activities to advance this work are organized under four pillars: Conservation and Stewardship, Salmon Enhancement, Harvest Transformation, and Integration and Collaboration.

Year one (2021-22) of PSSI was focused on engagement with Indigenous peoples, partners, and stakeholders regarding early program design and implementation. Year two (2022-23) initiatives are underway and focus on salmon rebuilding, including prioritizing stocks that need urgent support. The below summarizes updates for PSSI initiatives, organized by the four pillars:

Conservation and Stewardship

Salmon Enhancement

Harvest Transformation

Integration and Collaboration

The 2018 Fall Economic Statement also reiterated the Government’s commitment to the sustainability of wild Pacific salmon, and made two key announcements: 1) to support stock assessment and rebuilding efforts for priority Pacific salmon stocks, including $107.4 million over five years, starting in 2019–20, and $17.6 million per year ongoing, to support the implementation of stock assessment and rebuilding provisions in a renewed Fisheries Act for priority fish stocks across Canada, including priority Pacific salmon stocks; and, 2) $105 million over six years, starting in 2018–19, to create a BC Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund (BCSRIF), which includes a contribution to the Pacific Salmon Endowment Fund of $5 million in 2018–19.  

Indigenous Habitat Participation Program

Background

The Indigenous Habitat Participation Program (IHPP) is a grants and contributions program, announced in June 2019, that provides up to $50 million over five years (2018-2023). The IHPP supports the increased participation of Indigenous peoples in the conservation and protection of fish and fish habitat. The funding was provided through B-base funding to support the implementation of the amended Fisheries Act and the modernization of the Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Program, including enhancing reconciliation with Indigenous peoples.

The IHPP funding supports four areas:

Over 300 applications for contribution funding were received between 2019-20 (138) and 2020-21 (163), totaling requests for over $60 million over four years. The largest numbers of applications came from Pacific and Ontario & Prairie regions, reflecting the greater number of Indigenous groups in those regions. Specifically, over 40 per cent of applications received were from Indigenous organizations in Ontario and Prairie Region, where capacity building funding was specifically targeted. As of February 2023, over 170 contribution agreements have been approved, valued at over $28 million, as well as more than 132 grants, valued at over $2 million.

Several challenges have affected the implementation of the IHPP, including a delay in the original launch of the contribution component in June 2019, as well as COVID-19 related delays that affected applications in 2020 and ongoing project activities. [Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.]

Despite this, IHPP funds were not fully used, resulting in the re-profiling of funding each year. Most recently, almost $9 million was re-profiled to ensure ongoing IHPP projects in 2023-24, in anticipation of a funding renewal decision to support the ongoing implementation of the modernized Fisheries Act.

IHPP funding in 2023-24 will be used to support key priorities, including Indigenous participation in consultation (duty to consult), engagement initiatives on new policies related to fish and fish habitat protection, and capacity funding for Indigenous organizations with whom DFO works closely.

The IHPP was a component of the recent Horizontal Evaluation of the Impact Assessment and Regulatory Processes Horizontal Initiative. The evaluation highlighted the importance of capacity funding, and the need for improvements to delivery and streamlining requirements. Indigenous peoples noted that the continuation and increase of this type of funding are critical to support involvement of and capacity building within communities.

As a result of feedback received through the evaluation and feedback during the ongoing implementation of the IHPP, planned changes to the program in coming years could include:

Trans Mountain Expansion – Accommodation Measure (Aquatic Ecosystems)

Background

The Government of Canada developed eight accommodation measures to address the concerns of Indigenous groups potentially impacted by the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMX). Of these eight, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is responsible for the Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund (AHRF), the Salish Sea Initiative (SSI), and the Terrestrial Cumulative Effects Initiative (TCEI).

AHRF – Through the AHRF, DFO is collaborating with Indigenous groups to develop an initiative that will provide funding for community capacity and Indigenous-led aquatic habitat restoration activities in freshwater and marine ecosystems. A total of $75 million is available between 2019 and 2024. $10 million was available immediately, in part to support the collaborative development of the AHRF. Beginning in 2021, $65 million was made available for aquatic habitat restoration activities through until 2024.

SSI – The SSI supports eligible Indigenous groups to monitor cumulative impacts of human activities on local marine ecosystems. Through the initiative, DFO is co-developing processes with eligible Indigenous groups to ensure long-term funding to support capacity building, monitoring, research, systems infrastructure and knowledge acquisition, integration and sharing to inform adaptive management. Until March 2024, DFO will continue to collaboratively develop processes for stewardship activities with eligible Indigenous groups to identify and implement projects that could address valued ecosystem components and issues of concern related to the Salish Sea, as well as collaboratively develop a structure for the $50 million long-term arms-length fund to support stewardship activities over the long-term.

TCEI – Built through direct collaboration with Indigenous groups, the TCEI will provide funding for community capacity and Indigenous-led cumulative effects studies in freshwater and terrestrial environments. A total of $65.5 million is available to Indigenous groups between 2019 and 2024. Of that total, up to $23.5 million in capacity funding is currently available, in part to support collaborative development of the TCEI. The initiative is led by Environment and Climate Change Canada and Natural Resources Canada, with support from DFO. It is part of the Government of Canada’s commitment to protect aquatic ecosystems.

To enable Indigenous communities’ continued participation in TMX initiatives, $75.1 million in funding for the AHRF, SSI, and TCEI has been re-profiled. This funding will support capacity building and project implementation for these Indigenous accommodation programs. The total amount is broken down among the following initiatives as follows:

Trans Mountain Expansion Project (Canadian Coast Guard)

If pressed on the Marine Safety Centre

Background

Communication Portal for Integrated Incident Response

The Communication Portal for Integrated Incident Response (CPIIR) initiative aims to establish a national communications tool to improve information sharing and enhance collaboration for on-water emergencies and exercises. This web-based tool will focus on improving the communication and partnership between the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) and Indigenous and coastal communities to improve marine incident situational awareness and response.

CCG is working closely with Indigenous communities along the Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) to identify the requirements of such system. The CPIIR project will contribute to the TMX Co-Developing Community Response accommodation measure and will empower our Indigenous partners in response planning by increasing their involvement in all aspects of preparedness and response to marine environmental incidents.

The CPIIR project is looking to implement one or more technical solutions to modernize incident management within CCG and transition the organization to a digital incident management system, while enhancing collaboration between response partners during on-water emergencies, events, and exercises.

Multi-Purpose Marine Response Facility – Marine Safety Centre

The Port Renfrew Marine Safety Centre (MSC) began as a CCG search and rescue (SAR) station in Port Renfrew, British Columbia, approved under the 2016 Oceans Protection Plan.

During TMX consultations, Pacheedaht First Nation (PFN) identified multiple ways in which the project would adversely impact their rights, including the risk of marine pollution.

An accommodation measure under the 2019 reconsideration of the TMX project expanded the scope of the MSC to include environmental response (ER) services to address PFN’s concerns over oil spills.

[Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.]

CCG’s operational requirements for the MSC include four SAR personnel, four ER personnel, as well as equipment to support provision of SAR and ER services.

PFN has been very clear that in addition to the TMX accommodation, the MSC must enable the much-needed economic development opportunities for the Nation to advance reconciliation (e.g., tourism, employment, lease revenues). The MSC, in PFN’s opinion, must also enable PFN to regain control of and protect sacred burial caves with historical and cultural significance to the Nation.

Discussions with PFN to advance the project have focused on structuring a real estate deal in which PFN would purchase a parcel of land that is privately owned, and the Crown would commit to a long-term lease. The Crown would design, finance, build and operate a real property facility on this leased property.

A working level meeting between CCG and PFN occurred in early February 2023 to further discuss land acquisition and review lease options. This was the latest of over a dozen face-to-face engagements. A PFN decision related to the terms for the Crown to lease the property is expected in the coming weeks.

Once PFN communicates a decision and confirms their plans for land acquisition, CCG will confirm the funding requirements with respect to the leasing terms and the cost to build the facility on the land that will be purchased. CCG priorities include respecting the budget and assuring operational capability, while PFN priorities include owning land, developing a long-term lease for CCG, and enabling economic opportunities.

CCG remains committed to co-developing the MSC in Port Renfrew and continues to work closely with PFN to identify a real estate option that is satisfactory to all parties.

Advancing Reconciliation

Background

Spending on the implementation of treaties and other constructive reconciliation agreements varies from year to year, depending on the stage of negotiations, timing of one-time payments, and other influences. The Department is committed to getting these arrangements right through consultations and negotiation and, as such, the conclusion of agreements can take time to complete.

Planned spending on the implementation of treaties and other constructive reconciliation agreements is typically included in the Main Estimates once negotiation mandates and financial authorities have been secured, in the first year that the funding is expected to be needed. This is important to ensure the funding is available when needed. Funding is then reprofiled to future years if negotiations take more time to get things right.

This practice of including amounts in planned spending in the first year they might be required and then reprofiling from year to year has resulted in apparent decreases in planned spending over the past few years as funds are spent and the remaining is reprofiled to the next year.

For example, in 2020-21, $598 million of funding related to reconciliation agreements was reprofiled into 2021-22. In 2021-22, $103 million was reprofiled into 2022-23 in time to be reflected in the 2022-23 Main Estimates, with additional funds being reprofiled into 2022-23 at year-end. In 2022-23, only limited funds have been reprofiled into 2023-24 to date, but it is expected that there will be a reprofile into 2023-24 at year-end. Additional amounts will be included in future years’ planned spending as negotiation mandates and authorities are approved.

In 2021-22, Fisheries and Oceans Canada concluded several significant reconciliation agreements including with the Coastal First Nations (comprised of Haida, Gitzaala, Metlakatla, Gitga’at, Kitasoo/Xai’xais, Heiltsuk, Nuxalk, and Wuikinuxv First Nations) and Listiguj First Nation (financial data for individual agreements is confidential). Other new reconciliation funding agreements were in respect of smaller amounts related to agreement implementation. In 2022-23, negotiations have been advanced at a number of tables, with several close to completion.

Vessel Life Extension 2020

Background

In May 2019, the Prime Minister announced over $2 billion for a comprehensive program over two decades to conduct Vessel Life Extension (VLE) work on approximately 76 ships to extend the operational life of the Canadian Coast Guard fleet in anticipation of new vessels to be acquired through the Fleet Renewal Plan.

[Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.]

VLE helps extend the service life of a ship. The work includes rebuilding and improving significant portions of both the exterior and interior of a vessel. Vessels undergoing VLE are out of service for an extended period of up to two years so that they can remain in safe and reliable condition for continued service.

Small Craft Acquisition Program (SCAP)

Background

The Small Craft Acquisition Program (SCAP) is responsible for procuring small crafts, associated outboard motors and trailers, for all of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) and Canadian Coast Guard (CCG), through a historical annual envelope of $4.5 million. SCAP had previously received one-time investments in the past, however, despite these, more than half of the current fleet of small craft are well beyond their expected operational life of 12 years. Approximately 80 per cent of the small craft fleet is over nine years old and 60 per cent are beyond 12 years. As part of annual lifecycle planning exercise, SCAP carries out prioritization and a purchase planning process, provides technical support, and the procurement of assets required to carry out DFO/CCG programs nationwide. Budget 2021 provided new funding to ensure the Department has the resources and vessels needed to continue delivering on this broad mandate and to stabilize the program. This investment will bridge the funding gap in the existing annual funding and allow for timely replacement of aging assets that are past their prescribed lifecycle.

Renewing the aging fleet of DFO’s small crafts as they become less safe and reliable will significantly decrease the risk of breakdowns, maintenance costs, and non-operational time, which heavily impacts CCG and DFO programs. DFO programs that rely on small craft include, but are not limited to: CCG Operational Fleet, Search and Rescue, Aids to Navigation, and Environmental Response; DFO’s Oceans and Science activities such as Hydrographic Products and Services and Ocean Forecasting; Conservation and Protection; Habitat Management; and, the Sustainable Aquaculture Program. Small craft are also required to deliver other federal government activities, such as performing security patrols for the Maritime Security Enforcement Team program, are used extensively for training purposes, and also serve as general purpose workboats. The small crafts procured under SCAP include, but are not limited to: rigid hull inflatable boats, barges, work boats, scientific boats, patrol boats, and fast rescue craft.

[Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.] As the increase in funds for this project has been significant and the timeline to initiate procurement for this fiscal year has been limited, the project team has developed a procurement schedule that factors in Public Service and Procurement Canada support requirements, procurement timelines, and supply chain limitations. Given these elements, a reprofile is requested to reprofile funds into 2023-24 ($11.7 million) and 2024-25 ($11.7 million). This includes loan repayment to fuel management and Vessels of Concern. As a result of the increased requirements, communications with small craft suppliers and builders throughout Canada have commenced so that any supply chain issues are identified and included into the project team's risk matrix.

Questions and Answers

FOPO Report – West Coast Fisheries

How is DFO responding to the FOPO report, West Coast Fisheries: Sharing Risks and Benefits, which was tabled over three years ago?
  • The Government of Canada’s response to the report, West Coast Fisheries: Sharing Risk and Benefits, outlines DFO’s position and planned approach. The response acknowledges:
    • The Minister has the authority to consider social, economic and cultural factors in decision-making.
    • Future policies and programs should not negatively impact conservation objectives, and may consider ways to support viability of fishing enterprises.
    • The needs, rights and capacities of Indigenous harvesters and their communities must be respected.
  • DFO is currently developing an engagement plan prior to proposing or amending licensing policies.
What has DFO done to implement the recommendations from FOPO’s report?
  • The Department has taken immediate actions on some recommendations, and is developing an engagement plan to ensure a broad cross-section of fisheries perspectives are considered on the balance of the recommendations.
  • DFO has conducted preliminary engagement with industry associations, the First Nations Fisheries Council, and fisheries advisory boards.
  • DFO has also launched the Beneficial Ownership Survey to establish a baseline understanding of the current level of foreign ownership and concentration of access in select commercial fisheries. The results are anticipated to be available this spring.
  • DFO has completed a comparative analysis of Atlantic and Pacific licensing policies, and the report is available on DFO’s website.
  • DFO implemented a cost and earnings survey of fish harvesters in November 2022, and is currently analyzing the results, with plans to review and discuss the data with industry representatives in summer 2023.
  • A survey is also being conducted on the annual prices harvesters receive for their landed catch. This work should also be completed by Fall 2023.
  • A publicly accessible Marine Atlas was launched this February that shows ecological and human use data for Pacific and Atlantic Canada.  
  • An analysis has also been completed on policies, practices and terms of reference for establishing commercial fishery advisory boards. New best practices guidance is under development and will be available for stakeholder engagement this spring.

Marine Cargo Spills – Government Response

How will the Canadian Coast Guard respond to the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, Marine Cargo Container Spills Report?
  • The Canadian Coast Guard has worked with Transport Canada, and other partner departments, to provide a comprehensive response to the Marine Cargo Container Spills report. This response was tabled on February 1, 2023.
  • Building on work initiated under the first phase of the Oceans Protection Plan, the Canadian Coast Guard will continue protecting Canada’s environment by exploring and implementing tools and programs that enhance a coordinated pollution response system and developing a network of trained emergency responders from multiple levels of government, Indigenous Peoples, and coastal communities to strengthen marine emergency response, to meet today’s modern shipping issues.

Fleet Renewal and Project Delays (Lapsed funding)

How many ships and helicopters does the Coast Guard plan to procure?
  • Coast Guard has been working since 2005 to procure its future fleet of 31 large vessels, 95 small vessels and 26 helicopters.
How much funding has been committed to date?
  • To date, over $35B has been committed to advance Coast Guard fleet renewal and sustain operations until new ships arrive.
What has been delivered so far?
  • To date, Coast Guard has taken delivery of:
    • 3 large vessels;
    • 19 small vessels for the fleet renewal plan;
    • 23 helicopters; and
    • 4 Interim Icebreakers.
Why is it taking so long to get the new ships?
  • When the National Shipbuilding Strategy (NSS) was launched in 2010, Canadian shipyards had never constructed vessels of this size and complexity before.
  • The shipyards needed to ramp up capacity to meet the pace of deliveries that Canada needed. This required:
    • Large multi-year modernization and infrastructure projects; and
    • Unprecedented levels of hiring, to find the number of skilled tradespeople needed to build the ships.
  • While this ramp-up period has taken longer than planned, the NSS is starting to hit it’s stride:
    • Vancouver Shipyards have delivered all three Offshore Fisheries Science Vessels to Coast Guard;
    • Irving Shipbuilding has delivered the first three Arctic and Offshore Patrol Ships for the Royal Canadian Navy; and
    • The smaller shipyards across Canada have been busy building and delivering Coast Guard’s small vessels.
  • While progress on the NSS has had its challenges, including impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, much progress has been made and we have come a long way.
What is Canada doing to improve ship delivery timelines?
  • NSS partner departments are actively working to improve delivery timelines, including:
    • Working with shipyards to improve their capacity and productivity levels;
    • Working with shipyards to develop more accurate schedules;
    • Engaging experts to track and report on shipyard performance; and
    • Using contractual measures to incentivize shipyard performance.
  • Both Canada and the shipyards now have over a decade of experience under our belt. We have confidence that all of these measures will result in positive improvements.
What is the status of the third NSS shipyard?
  • After some initial delays in finalizing the qualification process, the Umbrella Agreement to formalize Chantier Davie as the third NSS shipyard is expected to be signed in spring 2023.
  • Coast Guard is encouraged by this important milestone and is ready to get to work on our Icebreaker projects.
Why do costs keep increasing?
  • As work advances on projects and NSS shipyards gain more experience, a number of key costing drivers become more certain with time. For example:
    • Estimates for key pieces of equipment are replaced with actual amounts paid on invoices; and,
    • Estimates for the number of labour hours required to build a ship are refined with more precision as work occurs in real time.
  • There is also a need to reflect current economic drivers that could not have been foreseen at the time of the original costing, such as the impacts of the pandemic on global labour and supply chains, as well as high inflation. Initial cost estimates were established in a fundamentally different economic climate than we are currently experiencing today.
What is Canada doing to contain costs?
  • We consistently challenge shipyard partners to find efficiencies and increase productivity.
  • Some projects appear to take longer than anticipated because negotiators are working behind the scenes to ensure that contracts contains incentives to keep costs down and generate value for Canadians.
  • While it has been challenging at times, we have accomplished a lot in the last 10 years and are now benefiting from gained experience.
Why did the Coast Guard lapse funds when funding is always required?
  • A significant portion of project timelines have been extended, which did lead to lapsed funding in fiscal year 2021-22. However, all funding was carried forward to future years so no funding was lost to the projects.
  • Significant contributors to this lapse were the schedules of:
    • Arctic Offshore Patrol Ships
    • Light and Medium Icebreakers
    • Vessel Life Extension Programs
    • Offshore Oceanographic Science Vessel
  • The COVID-19 pandemic was a significant contributor to schedule loss in 2021/22, leading to the lapsed funding for these projects - continued testing, distancing and shut-downs of the shipyards contributed to overall production shortfalls, and in turn resulted in delays to pre-established spending plans. Other contributors were contracting issues with suppliers, supply chain issues, and overall labour market conditions.
  • We continue to work with the shipyards and Public Services and Procurement Canada Schedule to improve the monitoring and oversight of schedules, and we are making progress.

Marine and Aviation Fuel Costs

How much fuel does the Department’s fleet consume each year?
  • In a typical year of operations, the marine fleet consumes 59.0 million litres (including the Emergency Towing Vessels), and up to 1.9 million litres for the aviation fleet (Helicopters).
How is the fuel purchased/stored?
  • The majority of marine and aviation fuel is procured using standing offers, with the exception of remote or rural locations. In these locations, fuel is purchased from a local supplier.
  • Vessels/helicopters purchase fuel based on the annual fleet operational plan, but throughout the year, purchases are adjusted based on their operational schedule and tempo.
  • There are more than 80 fueling locations for marine fuel across the country. Prices for each location are updated weekly using industry reference markers. Approximately 60 percent of the search and rescue stations have storage tanks for fuel; however, their use is limited to small vessels and lifeboats. Depending on class, large vessels can take on between 100,000 and 2,000,000 litres. DFO does not own any large-scale fuel storage facilities.
  • Fuel for the helicopter fleet for the six bases across Canada, and for vessel-based operations and activities, is purchased by Transport Canada’s Air Services Directorate, who operates and maintains helicopters on Coast Guard’s behalf, and cost recovers through a Memorandum of Understanding.
What impacts or mitigation strategies were identified before submitting the funding request?
  • The Canadian Coast Guard explored several mitigation strategies to operate within the allotted fuel operating budget, however, they all resulted in either significant reductions to programs such as icebreaking, or funds being reallocated from other Departmental priorities. 
  • When exploring potential scalability, a blanket approach (e.g., 50 percent reduction in fuel across the board) is generally not operationally feasible given the fuel demands of individual vessels. For example, the most fuel-intensive operations are generally the heavy icebreakers, which also undertake search and rescue operations. These vessels require the weight of a near-full fuel tank in order to break the ice effectively through critical economic seaways. Due to the fuel not only providing propulsion, but also the weight needed for effective ice breaking, they cannot be half-fueled.
  • Many of the vessels are also multitasked, meaning that if a vessel becomes non-operational due to lack of funds for fuel, it has significant impacts on multiple programs across the Department. Limiting operations not only impacts Coast Guard operations; it reduces capacity related to the coverage of Marine Conservation Targets and Marine Protected Areas (MCT/MPA), fulfilling Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) commitments, and monitoring of ongoing commercial and recreational fisheries.
What is DFO doing to mitigate this pressure?
  • The rising cost of fuel is likely to persist beyond the current fiscal year. Across the Government of Canada, the only comparable department impacted in the same way from high fuel costs would be National Defence and its Royal Canadian Navy fleet. National Defence has some protection against the current increase in fuel prices due to a built-in escalator; DFO does not have such protection but could consider this mechanism if high fuel costs persist in future years.

Trans Mountain Expansion Project and Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund

Why was additional time/funding required to support Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMX) Initiatives?
  • DFO-CCG required more time to implement TMX initiatives. Some initiatives sunset in fiscal year 2021-22, and there were unforeseen challenges that have delayed or limited implementation such as the COVID-19 pandemic and extreme weather events in British Columbia.
  • These events collectively brought about unique challenges that required Indigenous groups to re-prioritize resources to focus on ensuring the safety and wellbeing of their communities.
  • At the same time construction of the TMX project has been delayed, and the pipeline is not expected to be completely constructed until late 2023.
Does the renewed Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund (AHRF) funding change the amount of funding available to Indigenous communities through accommodation measures?
  • The renewed funding does not change the amount of funding available to Indigenous communities through TMX accommodation measures and initiatives.
  • The renewed funding supports the Department’s administration of the initiatives which will enable Indigenous communities to access funding and implement projects for an additional year through fiscal year 2024-25.
How was the AHRF collaboratively developed?
  • Communities were invited to participate in an engagement process that included working groups, meetings and other methods to inform the development of program governance, structure and delivery model.
  • DFO and interested Indigenous communities collaboratively identified priority marine and freshwater habitat restoration activities.
  • DFO and interested Indigenous communities undertook a joint planning exercise to determine funding amounts.
Does the renewed funding signal further delays in the construction of the TMX project?
  • No, the renewed funding provides the Department additional time to continue to implement TMX initiatives, including TMX accommodation measures, responses to recommendations, and government capacity and coordination functions.

Aquatic Invasive Species Funding

What is DFO doing to respond to AIS at the international border, and how will the new funding support these efforts?
  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is working closely with the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) to improve enforcement of the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations (AIS Regulations) at international borders, with a focus on preventing prohibited species from entering Canada.
  • In March of 2021, DFO conducted emergency response activities in partnership with the CBSA and provincial and territorial governments to stop the importation and distribution of invasive mussel infested aquarium products across Canada. DFO continues to work with the CBSA to prevent illegal imports of such products into Canada.
  • Through the summer and fall of 2022, DFO launched the Overland Watercraft Transportation Protection Pilot. At the Emerson Port of Entry in Manitoba, DFO and CBSA staff developed and tested the procedures and tools necessary for using the AIS Regulations and other legislative tools to improve biosecurity at international borders related to contaminated watercrafts.
  • The 2022 Fall Economic Statement identified $36.6 million over five years starting in fiscal year 2022-23 to DFO for the expansion of the Aquatic Invasive Species Program.
  • The new funding will allow DFO to better implement and enforce the AIS Regulations to prevent AIS from entering and spreading in Canada, particularly at international borders by, for example, increasing the number of dedicated AIS Fisheries Officers responsible for collaboration between DFO and the CBSA, establishing an accredited eDNA laboratory to efficiently detect AIS in commercial plant and animal products, and conduct analyses to effectively prioritize ports of entry, waterways, and pathways of concern for AIS introductions.
How will the new funding create new partnerships to facilitate on-the-ground preventative action against AIS?
  • The new funding will improve relationships with provinces and territories, Indigenous peoples, and key stakeholders by providing funding that helps partners address their AIS priorities while meeting broader national objectives.

Recent Fisheries Management Decisions

How do the Fish Stock Provisions protect species that have been assessed as at risk?
  • The Fish Stocks Provisions in the amended Fisheries Act came into force through amendments to the Fishery (General) Regulations on April 4, 2022.
  • Under these amendments, DFO is legally required to implement measures to maintain all prescribed major fish stocks at or above the level necessary to promote the sustainability of the stock, and to develop rebuilding plans for major stocks that have fallen to or below their limit reference point.
  • The limit reference point marks the boundary between the cautious and critical zones of a fishery within the Department’s Precautionary Approach Framework.
  • There are currently 30 major fish stocks identified in the first batch, with 13 of those requiring rebuilding plans.
  • DFO is currently in the process of prescribing a second batch of major stocks and undertook a public consultation in the fall of 2022.
Why did DFO decide to close the Atlantic mackerel commercial and bait fisheries on March 30, 2022?
  • The mackerel stock is in the critical zone and, as a result, I made the difficult decision to close the commercial and bait fisheries for Atlantic mackerel. This measure was taken to rebuild this important forage stock, which plays a key role in the ecosystem.
  • I recognize the importance of the Atlantic mackerel fishery and am optimistic that this stock can rebuild and be available for future generations.
  • A new stock assessment took place on February 20 to23, 2023. This assessment will help to inform our next steps.
  • I recently received a letter from the Chair of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, and I would like to thank the committee for a thorough summary of Committee discussions and the Committee’s thoughtful recommendations. The Department is currently preparing a response to the Chair’s letter.
Why did DFO decide to close the southern Gulf spring herring commercial and bait fisheries on March 30, 2022?
  • The Gulf spring herring stock has been in the critical zone since 2002. A number of management measures have been applied since then to arrest the stock’s decline.
  • Closing fisheries reduces the pressure on this stock, giving it the best chance at rebuilding. As a forage stock, its health is critically important to the overall health of the ecosystem.
  • The next scientific assessment of this stock will occur in 2024. Updated management measures will be considered following the assessment.
In April 2022, why did DFO reduce the Estuary and Gulf shrimp total allowable catch for both 2022 and 2023?
  • The current environmental and ecosystem conditions in the estuary and Gulf of St-Lawrence are unfavourable for shrimp.
  • While recognizing the economic challenges harvesters are facing, a cautious approach was needed to mitigate potential threats to conservation.
  • Taking into account socio-economic factors, the reduction was implemented gradually over two years.
In spring of 2022, why did you decide to not implement the management strategy evaluation for Southwest Nova Scotia/Bay of Fundy herring, yet reduced the annual total allowable catch by 33 percent?
  • I established a total allowable catch for 2022 that represented a 33 percent reduction from 2021. I took this action to protect this vulnerable fish stock while giving time to further evaluate a harvest strategy for the longer term.
  • Looking forward, I will weigh the results of that evaluation and take a decision on this fishery this spring.
What is the Department undertaking, other than closing fisheries, to help Pacific salmon stocks?
  • As we consider different stocks in decline, we are looking at not only harvest levels but also habitat conservation and restoration, as well as enhancement.
  • Through the Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative, we are increasing our science and understanding of salmon ecosystems, investing in work with partners on integrated planning, and developing rebuilding plans for key stocks of concern.
  • We are also renewing the British Columbia Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund  (BCSRIF), which doubles our investment to support groups or applicants with ideas to address salmon declines.
  • And recently, I announced that I will not be renewing aquaculture licenses in the Discovery Islands.
Why did you choose to close the directed fishery for Winter flounder and Yellowtail flounder in NAFO Division 4T?
  • Winter flounder and yellowtail flounder stocks have been in the critical zone, as per the precautionary approach framework, since 2004 and 2009 respectively, and no signs of recovery have been observed in the most recent scientific assessments.
  • In the directed yellowtail flounder fishery, significant amounts of bycatch of winter flounder have been reported. A combined approach is therefore needed to ensure the recovery of these stocks.
  • This conservation-based closure recognizes the importance of these fisheries to coastal communities.
Why have you chosen to approve some fisheries for Pacific herring while others will not be permitted?
  • Beyond direct human needs, Pacific herring fulfills a vital role in the ecosystem; its conservation for the long-term benefit of future generations will always be my primary objective.
  • Decisions to open Pacific herring fisheries are based on the best available science and take into account the rights of First Nation communities.
  • I recognize the importance of Pacific herring to Indigenous Peoples and will take those steps available to me to ensure Indigenous communities can exercise their fishing rights.
Why did DFO decide to reduce the TAC in 0A/0B Greenland halibut for the 2023/24 season?
  • To balance both the health of the stock and the economic needs of Indigenous and industry interests, Canada has reduced the Subarea 0 total allowable catch levels for Greenland Halibut by 9.25 percent for the 2023 fishing season.
  • This decision was made based on the consideration of advice of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Scientific Council (SC), which recommended that catches for the stock in NAFO Subareas 0 and 1 not exceed 29,640 t in 2023 and 2024.
Will there be a commercial fishery for Unit 1 Redfish for 2023/24?
  • I have not yet made a decision on an appropriate access and allocation key for Unit 1 Redfish for the pending commercial fishery.
  • Given this, and the additional work required to operationalize the commercial fishery, there will not be a commercial fishery for Unit 1 Redfish for 2023/24.
When will decisions be made on Snow crab fisheries in Atlantic Canada and Quebec?
  • Snow crab fisheries in Atlantic Canada and Quebec begin as early as late March, depending on the ice conditions. As a result of less ice coverage in 2023, the season will likely begin at the earliest possible dates, as long as safety concerns are addressed.
  • Consultations on these fisheries have now concluded and some Total Allowable Catch decisions have been announced, including increases in some areas such as Crab Fishing Area 12 in the Southern Gulf.
  • As with all our fisheries decisions, the total allowable catch levels are based on the best available science and the application of the harvest decision rules, and in consultation with Indigenous groups, industry, processors and other stakeholders.
For Newfoundland and Labrador’s Snow crab fishery, will the Department reconsider its precautionary approach framework which significantly reduces opportunities for 3L inshore harvesters?
  • The precautionary approach framework represents a best practice in fisheries management, helping to ensure sustainable harvest while providing predictability in decision making for harvesters.
  • The Precautionary approach for Newfoundland and Labrador Snow crab was achieved through extensive consultation and collaboration with harvesters.
  • We know that some harvesters are upset with the results of the implementation of the precautionary approach framework. These views are important to the Department and we remain committed to working with harvesters on the implementation of the precautionary approach.
How will the Department allocate elvers to Maritimes harvesters in 2023?
  • As an interim measure, this year the Department has reallocated approximately 14% of existing elver licence holders’ 2021 quota (excluding We’koqma’q First Nation) to support increased Indigenous participation in the fishery without increasing overall effort.
  • The same approach was taken in the 2022 season and resulted in the Department reaching interim understandings with nine First Nations in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, which saw designated harvesters from these communities fishing commercially for elver.
  • This year, the Department has again reached interim understandings with the same First Nations, and with the additional community of Glooscap. In these renewed understandings, the quotas allocated to both groups of First Nations are increasing, without increasing overall effort in the fishery because the full allocation set aside in 2022 to increase Indigenous participation in the commercial elver fishery was not used.
  • For the 2023 season, the Kespukwitk District First Nations have been issued 450 kg of quota (up from 400 kg in 2022) and the Wolastoqey Nations in New Brunswick have been issued 750 kg of quota (up from 200 kg in 2022).
  • DFO will closely monitor the fishery to support authorized harvesters, deter and disrupt unauthorized harvesting and to ensure that the amount of elver harvested remains within the overall authorized total allowable catch.

Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative

What has PSSI achieved since its launch two years ago?
  • 2022-23 is the second year of the Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative, with numerous sub-initiatives now implemented focusing on immediate salmon rebuilding efforts and long term transformative actions to support Pacific salmon stocks.
  • Most PSSI activities encompass Pacific salmon stocks across both British Columbia and Yukon. However, there are targeted efforts for the Yukon, including funding for projects led by Yukon First Nations and the joint Yukon Salmon Sub-Committee.
What is the total amount spent to date in 2022-23?
  • Year-to-date expenditures for 2022-23 is $32.6M, with $24.6M for operational expenses, $3M for capital, and $5M for Grants and Contributions.
  • $33M for major capital projects is reprofiled from 2022-23 into future years to meet the updated project timelines for Pacific salmon hatchery constructions, and retrofits to existing hatchery infrastructure.
  • [Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.]

Mackerel Closure and Inclusion as Transboundary Stock

Given the recent (Feb 2023) assessment, what is the status of mackerel and next steps for addressing industry concerns?
  • Atlantic mackerel has been in or near the critical zone for over a decade – and the 2023 Canadian stock assessment found that Atlantic mackerel declined further in the critical zone since the last assessment in 2021, with spawning stock biomass (SSB) at its lowest-observed values.
  • An Atlantic Mackerel Science Working Group was established in 2020 and includes industry participants from each region. The working group has been used to identify additional sampling opportunities or sources of data that could contribute to a better understanding of mackerel stock dynamics. This group continues to be engaged to inform science planning.
Does the Minister intend to maintain the mackerel commercial and bait closure established in 2022?
  • The most recent stock assessment took place February 20 to 23, 2023. This assessment will help inform our next steps.
  • The previous assessment indicated the mackerel stock was in the critical zone and I made the difficult decision to close the commercial and bait fisheries for Atlantic mackerel. This measure was taken to rebuild this forage stock, which plays a key role in the ecosystem and is an important fishery for harvesters in Atlantic Canada and Quebec.
What was the economic impact of the closure of commercial and bait fisheries for Atlantic mackerel?
  • We know that while mackerel represents an important fishery, economic dependence on the stock is relatively low. However, without fresh mackerel available, harvesters were forced to buy bait and that bait prices were also relatively high in 2022.
  • In implementing the closure of this fishery, I understand the economic impact of this decision and I did not take it lightly.
  • Atlantic mackerel has been in the critical zone for a decade. Despite significant reductions in total allowable catch and other measures meant to foster growth during this period, Atlantic mackerel did not respond and severe actions were required to rebuild the stock.
Will DFO compensate harvesters impacted by the closure?
  • My department will not provide compensation for the closure of these fisheries. We will continue to work with stakeholders and Indigenous partners to ensure the recovery of these stocks and the resumption of activities.
What assurances is the department offering to ensure harvesters won’t lose their license when the fishery re-opens?
  • Mackerel commercial licenses previously issued will continue to be recorded and tracked in DFO licensing systems with no yearly renewal or fee payment required as long as the fishery remains closed for conservation reasons.
  • Future access to the fishery will be dependent, on the duration of the closure and the health of the stock when the closure is lifted. At that point in time, any new management decisions will be communicated.
  • Fishing licenses are a privilege that provide an exclusive access to valuable public resources. As provided under subsection 16(2) of the Fishery (General) Regulations, the issuance of a document of any type, which includes fishing licenses, does not imply or confer any future right or privilege. All licenses are issued at the discretion of the Minister.
What are the implications of mackerel being a “transboundary stock”?
  • A transboundary stock moves between the fisheries waters of two or more countries, meaning those countries need to cooperate to keep their fishing to sustainable levels.
  • For Atlantic mackerel, Canada and the US cooperate informally to coordinate each country’s mackerel management.
What is DFO doing to address ongoing US harvesting of mackerel?
  • Although the US commercial fishery for Atlantic mackerel remains open, the US did significantly reduce its allowable commercial catch in 2022 and has further reduced its 2023 limit.
  • Canada and the US have good collaboration between scientists and fisheries managers on mackerel.
  • In November, I met with Dr. Richard Spinrad, Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, and I expressed the importance of more closely aligning approaches to managing this stock. I also indicated our concerns about foregone catch in Canada going to the U.S. commercial industry.
  • We will continue our collaborative efforts with the US on mackerel management and will explore additional ways to strengthen our approach.
Will your Department be following up on the November 2022 discussions of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans and the resulting recommendations?
  • I recently received a letter from the Chair of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, and I would like to thank the committee for a thorough summary of Committee discussions and the Committee’s thoughtful recommendations.
  • The Department is currently preparing a response to the Chair’s letter.

Closure of the Yellowtail Flounder and Winter Flounder Fisheries in the Gulf of St. Lawrence

Why has DFO decided to close the only remaining bait fishery in the Magdalen Islands? What is DFO going to do to ensure the supply of fresh bait that lobster fishers require?
  • Winter flounder and Yellowtail flounder stocks have been in the critical zone for more than 15 years and have shown no signs of recovery.
  • Rebuilding of these stocks, which have been in the critical zone of the precautionary approach for over a decade, is a priority for the Department.
  • Urgent actions needs to be taken in the short term to give these stocks a chance to rebuild, and to ensure the sustainability and long-term prosperity of these fisheries.
What is DFO planning to do to compensate fishers affected by the closure of these fisheries?
  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada recognizes the importance of these fisheries for coastal communities and has made the conservation of these stocks a priority.
  • I am aware that many fishers are dependent on these fisheries and that their livelihood will be affected by these difficult decisions.
  • A federal-provincial working group, co-chaired by DFO, is currently working with the provincial governments and gathering information from the industry across Atlantic Canada, in order to examine the issues related to baits and alternative baits.

Review of the Precautionary Approach and Quota Decreases for Gulf of St. Lawrence Shrimp Fishers

Shrimp fishers are facing an increase in operating costs and quota reductions, what is DFO going to do to ensure that fishers can continue to operate profitably?
  • I am very concerned about the state of shrimp stocks in the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence.
  • To consider the unfavourable environmental context that exists at present, the Department has initiated, in consultation with industry, a review of the precautionary approach implemented in 2012 for the management of these stocks.
  • This review should be completed before the start of the 2024 season in order to establish sustainable and predictable harvest strategies for the resource that will make it possible to avoid undesirable outcomes.
  • The Department is currently assessing whether administrative measures can be put in place to give fishers more flexibility and promote the economic viability of fishing enterprises.
Is DFO planning to give shrimp fishers privileged access to the Redfish fishery to compensate for their losses?
  • I am sympathetic to the difficult situation shrimp fishers face.
  • I am aware that the reopening of the commercial Redfish fishery has generated a great deal of interest, particularly among shrimpers.
  • I am currently examining all the recommendations in order to make a decision regarding access to the Redfish fishery and allocations.
  • The Department will work with industry representatives and Indigenous groups to agree on, as appropriate, an equitable distribution of allocations and to identify management measures.
  • No date has been set for the reopening of the commercial Redfish fishery.

Aquaculture: Open-Net Pen Transition Plan in British Columbia

How is the transition plan being developed?
  • In July 2022 I released a discussion framework that outlines a proposed vision for open-net pen aquaculture transition in British Columbia.
  • The framework is being used to guide engagement with partners and stakeholders. Engagement started in July 2022 and will continue until the plan is released.
  • The input received during engagement will inform the final transition plan.
What work has Fisheries and Oceans Canada done so far?
  • We are making good progress.
  • My discussion framework provides a vision and objectives for the plan, and I and my Department have met with hundreds of First Nations and stakeholders to discuss the content of the framework.
  • The first and second rounds of engagement have been completed, and further in-depth consultation and engagement will continue this spring.
Will the transition plan consider support for affected workers and communities?
  • The Government of Canada recognizes that the aquaculture sector is a key employer in many coastal and remote communities.
  • As the transition plan is developed, and its full implications become apparent, DFO is working with other federal departments to explore options for transition support and investments in new models for aquaculture.

Aquaculture: Discovery Islands Decision

What was the decision and when was the decision made?
  • On February 17, 2023, I announced my decision to not renew 15 aquaculture licenses in the Discovery Islands area of British Columbia.
What informed this decision and what was the consultation process?
  • Since June 2022 I conducted extensive consultations with license holders and First Nations in the Discovery Islands area and more broadly to inform this decision.
  • Pacific salmon have significant cultural, social, and ecological importance to First Nations and British Columbians.
  • Given the unprecedented threats that wild Pacific salmon are facing, we must take action to conserve and protect them.
Will there be economic support?
  • I acknowledge that this decision affects the local economy.
  • The Government of Canada offers a strong suite of supports for workers and communities. There is already a strong partnership in place with British Columbia, including through the Canada-British Columbia Workforce and Labour Market Development Agreements.
  • Additionally, Budget 2021 established a new regional development agency for British Columbia to support economic development and help develop businesses to create good jobs.
How will you reconcile these licensing decisions with your mandate commitment for transitioning from open-net pen salmon farming in BC?
  • Many First Nations and British Columbians expect me to take timely, decisive action in the Discovery Islands to protect wild salmon.
  • My licensing decision is grounded in what I heard in consultations.
  • I remain committed to working with First Nations, industry, and other stakeholders to implement an transition plan that provides a future for environmentally sustainable aquaculture that minimizes or eliminates interactions with wild salmon.

Sea Lice: Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Science Response

Why were more sea lice experts not included in preparing the most recent Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Science Response on Sea Lice?
  • The Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) is coordinating a multi-step process to provide advice on the impacts of sea lice on wild salmon populations.
  • The first step was a CSAS Science Response Process which took place in June 2022. This meeting included DFO staff with expertise in both sea lice and aquaculture management, and an international expert on sea lice.
  • This type of meeting is an efficient way for experts to generate science advice when the scope of the work is narrow, builds upon existing information, or when there is a need for science advice within a short timeframe.
  • A full national CSAS peer review meeting is planned for 2024 and will be a comprehensive analysis including additional participants and multiple external experts.
If Science Response Processes are meant to provide science advice within a relatively short timeframe, why did it take so long to publish the document?
  • Science advice generated through the CSAS Science Response process is compiled into reports that are then published on DFO’s website.
  • Before they can be published, reports go through a series of steps to ensure the content reflects the peer review discussions and any associated consensus-based advice. The documents must also be formatted, translated, and prepared for publication.
How is self-reported industry sampling a reliable data source for sea lice monitoring?
  • Aquaculture farms in BC are required to report on-farm sea lice counts to DFO as part of their aquaculture licence conditions. They are also required to report when thresholds are exceeded as well as when treatments occur. All data are reviewed frequently by Departmental officials, including a team of biologists and veterinarians. Additionally, DFO performs routine, random on-site audits to make sure the numbers reported are accurate.

Exports of Canadian Snow Crab to Japan

What is the government doing to promote Canadian exports of Snow Crab to Japan?
  • I am aware of issues impacting Canada’s trade in snow crab, including our trade with Japan.
  • I recognize that although there may be fluctuations with trade in snow crab with Japan over time, we must not lose sight of the almost three-fold increase in the dollar-value of trade we have seen in snow crab with the rest of the world over the past 10 years, having exported $1.4 billion in 2022.
  • Regardless, Japan is an important market for Canadian snow crab - being the third largest importer after the United States and China – and my department is looking into this issue with Global Affairs Canada.
  • In addition to Canada’s Ambassador to Japan raising this issue with counterparts in Japan, senior officials from my department have also met with the Deputy Head of the Japanese Embassy in February and raised this issue.
  • We will continue to follow up with Japan to better understand the issue and to promote enhanced market access for Canadian snow crab to Japan.
What is the government doing to help the snow crab industry in Atlantic Canada, which is facing a possible loss of $100 million dollar worth of unsold snow crabs from last season?
  • We understand the situation facing the snow crab industry. DFO continues to work with Global Affairs and Agriculture and Agri-food Canada to explore other markets for Canadian snow crab in addition to supporting market access and marketing initiatives related to Japan.
  • As part of the Government’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, we have invested $31.8 million for the creation of the Indo-Pacific Agriculture and Agri-Food Office (IPAAO) to increase and diversify Canada's agriculture and agri-food exports including fish and seafood positioning Canada as a preferred supplier to the region, and strengthening trade on both sides of the Pacific.

Hurricane Fiona - Small Craft Harbour Program and Ghost Gear Fund

What has DFO done to address the impacts of Hurricane Fiona on impacted Small Craft Harbours?
  • Immediately following the storm, DFO staff worked with Harbour authorities and communities where impacted harbours are located to assess damages and carry out initial repairs.
  • On October 4, 2022, the Prime Minister announced the $300 million Hurricane Fiona Recovery Fund.
  • On October 17, in support of immediate recovery efforts, I announced that $100 million from the fund has been set aside to repair essential infrastructure at harbours and to retrieve lost fishing gear.
  • Staff is also planning and preparing to execute longer term repairs at impacted harbours as required. This includes working with harbour authorities to determine the scope and budget of work. The Department has determined that only a few of the impacted small craft harbours will not be operational when fishing resumes in the spring, and all fish harvesters impacted will be accommodated.
What were the impacts to Canadian fisheries, specifically as it relates to gear loss, due to Hurricane Fiona?
  • Hurricane Fiona produced substantial fishing gear-related debris from fisheries and aquaculture.
  • Several fisheries were active during this period and have reported significant loss of set gear that could not be removed in advance of the storm.
  • In total, 1,782 lost units of gear, 100 ft of nets, and 95,691 ft of lost rope were reported between September 23 and January 31, 2022.
  • The Department has funded 11 projects which have resulted in the retrieval of almost 130 tonnes of ghost gear in impacted areas. Other similar efforts are being planned for the coming months.

Hurricane Fiona – Impacts on Real Property Assets

What were Fiona’s impacts on DFO/CCG infrastructure?
  • Following Hurricane Fiona, the cost of repair and clean up at real property custodial sites amounted to ~$650K (revised from $370K due to moderate cost increases across all our impacted regions). The majority of damages have been repaired and work at the CCG College is well underway.

Small Craft Harbours – Divestiture

Resources in the Supplementary Estimates C have been reallocated for the disposal of Small Craft Harbours. What does that mean?
  • Resources are being reallocated to support the divestiture of two harbours currently owned by the Department’s Small Craft Harbours Program.
  • The harbours, located in Mattawa, Ontario and Cold Lake, Alberta will be divested to the Town of Mattawa and to the City of Cold Lake.
  • One of the main objectives of the Small Craft Harbours program is to divest harbours that are considered non-essential to the commercial fishing industry. Since 1995, the program has divested more than 1,100 non-core harbours.
  • Divestiture of these non-core harbours provides economic opportunities for communities, while also removing non-core infrastructure from the Department's portfolio and therefore reducing liability.
What will the money be used for?
  • The funds are intended for repair and upkeep of the harbours, ensuring that they remain safe and accessible to users after they have been divested.

Executives at DFO: Second Language Level Proficiency

What are the linguistic profiles of executive positions within Fisheries and Oceans Canada?
  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada has a total of 372 executive positions, of which 280* are presently encumbered. Of these encumbered positions, 219 (78 per cent) are bilingual and 61 (22 per cent) are unilingual.

*There are 287 executive employees; however, there are 280 executive positions that are encumbered.

How many executives meet the language profile of their positions?
  • All executives are required to meet the linguistic profile of their position upon appointment and maintain it thereafter.

Indigenous Employment

How many Indigenous People are employed by the Department, specifically in the Arctic Region, and what is their level of seniority?
  • Twenty-five percent of CCG employees and fourteen percent of DFO employees in the Arctic Region have self-identified as Indigenous.
  • Department-wide, 16 of the Department’s 287* employees at the executive level (nearly six percent) have self-identified as Indigenous.
  • Participation of Inuit, First Nations, and Métis peoples in the workforce is critical to Canada’s efforts toward reconciliation and increasing diversity.
  • It is essential as part of Canada’s overall efforts toward reconciliation, and to increase diversity in the public service, which will ensure that quality programs are delivered by a workforce that is representative of the peoples and communities being served.

*There are 287 executive employees; however, there are 280 executive positions that are encumbered.

Consulting Firms

Why is DFO contracting firms to provide consulting services?
  • DFO uses consulting firms for different purposes, especially when it does not have the expertise or immediate resources to perform the work.
  • DFO adheres to Government of Canada procurement practices and standards, and we are continuously assessing contracts to ensure value for money.

Recovery Efforts of Unidentified High Altitude Object in Lake Huron

What has been the relationship with our American counterparts in the recovery efforts of the debris from the American downed unidentified flying object?
  • The United States led recovery efforts through the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
  • The Canadian Coast Guard’s Central Region supported the Government of Canada’s recovery efforts through the provision of a ship, the CCGS Griffon, two helicopters and a drone.
  • The bi-national command centre assigned search areas to the Canadian Coast Guard and the United States Coast Guard within their own territorial waters.
  • The key participating agencies in the bi-national command team included the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), the Canadian Coast Guard, the United States Coast Guard and the FBI.
How much has the Government of Canada spent to undertake this recovery effort?
  • From the initiation of this activity on February 13th, to the suspension of the search on February 15th, the full costs incurred by the Canadian Coast Guard for the search was $176,000.
  • These costs are attributed principally to the search efforts of the CCGS Griffon and the two helicopters.
  • If pressed, there was no cost associated with the use of the drone.
What mandated activities were the Coast Guard unable to deliver as a result of redirecting its resources to this debris recovery activity?
  • The CCGS Griffon is currently deployed in the Great Lakes to deliver icebreaking services.
  • Due to a light ice year, the re-allocation of the CCGS Griffon did not affect Canada’s icebreaking program; the same is true of the two helicopters, which were redirected from their ice surveillance mission for this activity.

Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC)

How will the new funding secured under Budget 2022 be used?
  • Budget 2022 provides the Department with $44.9 million over five years, starting in 2022-2023, and $9 million ongoing in order to directly support and ensure the Commissions’ continued success in contributing to the health and management of the Great Lakes fisheries.
  • This increased funding takes Canada’s annual contribution to the Commission to over $19 million, and ensures that Canada is meeting its international treaty obligations to the Commission.
  • This funding will help to:
    • Continue Canadian sea lamprey control activities, including the purchase of lampricide treatment;
    • Upgrade and refurbish critical infrastructure, primarily related to sea lamprey control; and,
    • Support the GLFC’s fishery science research agenda and its coordination of binational fisheries management efforts across the Great Lakes.
What is the Department doing to ensure effective engagement with the Commission?
  • Departmental officials at the highest level are actively engaged with the GLFC Secretariat to ensure there is a mutual understanding of plans and priorities, with a focus on renewing and improving the relationship.
  • The Department is working very closely with Commission staff to bolster Canadian contributions to eradicate sea lamprey in the Great Lakes, and to ensure that the GLFC has the financial security to plan and deliver on its important mandate.
  • The GLFC Secretariat now has the information it requires to set the budget for the upcoming year and is actively working with Canadian and American Commissioners to schedule the interim meeting.

Funding for the Implementation of the Impact Assessment Act

Why did DFO not seek additional resources earlier (i.e. in Budget 2018) to support its new and enhanced roles and responsibilities under the Impact Assessment Act?
  • DFO sought limited funding to advance marine spatial planning in 2018 but otherwise, the Department decided to wait to seek additional resources when the level of effort required to fulfill these new and expanded responsibilities was better understood. With the experience gained since 2018, DFO was in a much better place to predict the implications on the Department of implementing the Impact Assessment Act.
Why does DFO need funding now, when it didn’t need funding earlier?
  • In order to meet the timelines and expanded responsibilities required under the Impact Assessment Act up to now, DFO has been reallocating resources and deferring some activities in order to prioritize its contributions to impact and regional assessments. Some items that have been deferred or delayed include the development of internal guidance documents, training, and on-site visits.
  • While DFO has been able to meet its obligations to provide expert advice to inform impact and regional assessments to date, continued reallocation of resources is not sustainable in the long term.
What results will DFO achieve with these resources?
  • Resources allotted to DFO will feed into eight specific departmental results. Those results are directly linked to expertise provided by various DFO sectors to impacts assessments, for example:
    • Provision of timely expert and scientific advice to support impact assessment and regional assessment processes
    • DFO participation in Impact Assessment Crown consultation process as requested.

Canada’s Nature Legacy: Protecting Canada’s Nature, Parks and Wildlife

What are the key accomplishments that DFO has achieved with the “Canada’s Nature Legacy: Protecting our nature” initiative?
  • The 2018 Canada’s Nature Legacy initiative was an essential core investment that helped to address long-standing unfunded pressures and enabled the transition to multi-species and ecosystem approaches with the goal of advancing Canada’s international and domestic biodiversity goals.
  • For instance, in the last four years, DFO has increased the number of critical habitat orders from 13 species in 2018 to 56 species as of February 2023, and it has, in collaboration with stakeholders and partners, increased implementation of measures to achieve recovery objectives for 52 multi-species projects across Canada.
What is the difference between Canada’s Nature Legacy and the Enhanced Nature Legacy initiatives?
  • The 2018 Nature Legacy (NL) initiative was an essential core investment that helped to address long-standing unfunded pressures and enabled the transition to multi-species and ecosystem approaches with the goal of advancing Canada’s international and domestic biodiversity goals.
  • In 2021, DFO and its partners received additional funding under the Enhanced Nature Legacy initiative to supplement the NL by investing in new programming elements to address gaps in mapping, information management, and engagement.

Interdepartmental Maritime Integrated Command, Control and Communications (IMIC3) Program (DND to DFO)

What is IMIC3?
  • IMIC3 is an information gathering and distribution system that supports planning and execution of maritime operations by providing coordination and decision-making aids and domestic maritime situational awareness.

Quebec Fisheries Fund

How does the Quebec Fisheries Fund support businesses in the Quebec fisheries sector that are affected by moratoria and fisheries closures?
  • The program supports the development and testing of fishing gear designed to reduce North Atlantic right whale entanglements. This fishing gear helps make the snow crab and lobster fisheries more sustainable and the industry more resilient in light of new standards and regulations.
  • The program supports innovative projects that put less pressure on and make optimal use of limited fishery resources.
  • The program supports projects to develop new fisheries.

Marine Renewable Energy

What is the Minister doing to ensure that tidal energy projects are supported in the Bay of Fundy region?
  • DFO recognizes the potential for tidal energy projects in the Bay of Fundy to provide clean energy and create economic opportunities.
  • In the Maritimes Region, DFO has issued six Fisheries Act authorizations and Species at Risk Act (SARA) permits related to tidal power projects over the past five years. However, not all marine renewable energy (MRE) projects can be supported in all environments.
  • The Minas Passage and Minas Basin are part of an ecologically and biologically-significant area, characterized by the world’s highest tides. There are currently 85 different fish species, multiple species of marine mammals, and marine invertebrates known to use this area. The Minas Passage acts as a major migratory corridor for many of these species, including numerous species of economic and cultural significance.
  • DFO provides expert advice and information regarding a variety of research projects that are funded through organizations such as Net Zero Atlantic and Fundy Ocean Research Center for Energy (FORCE).
  • DFO officials have also participated in numerous workshops, webinars and meetings with industry groups such as Marine Renewables Canada to clarify DFO’s regulatory role and provide feedback on study design.
  • Internally, DFO has established an In-stream Tidal Working Group that is coordinated on an as-needed basis during project reviews and acts as a venue where tidal research projects can receive DFO’s expert advice.
  • DFO will continue to consider issuing approvals for tidal energy demonstration projects in lower-risk areas of the Bay of Fundy, as well as lower-risk tidal energy devices in Minas Passage.
How does DFO communicate regulatory requirements under the Fisheries Act and Species at Risk Act to proponents?
  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is responsible for the protection of fish, fish habitat, and aquatic species at risk under the Fisheries Act and the Species at Risk Act (SARA).
  • The Department reviews applications from proponents of tidal energy projects on a case-by-case basis to ensure the conservation and protection of fish, fish habitat, and aquatic species at risk.
  • DFO has communicated a clear regulatory pathway with projected timelines to support a staged approach for tidal energy developments that have the potential to impact marine life, including species at risk.
  • DFO participates in one-window committees, attends meetings with perspective projects in advance of their applications, communicates the information requirements in workshops, meetings and seminars.
  • DFO communicates regulatory requirements to proponents as early as possible in their project planning stage. With respect to the Minas Passage, DFO advised all tidal energy proponents on the regulatory requirements and specific issues and concerns regarding Minas Passage years before applications were submitted.
What is the Minister doing to ensure coordination and alignment within the federal government, with provinces / territories and with Indigenous people?
  • A collaborative approach that draws upon the knowledge and expertise of subject matter experts, Indigenous groups, and stakeholders who are familiar with the ecology and biology of Canada’s productive marine environments is required to develop the marine renewable energy sector.
  • DFO Maritimes Region’s Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Program has been working with the Province of Nova Scotia and the tidal energy sector on marine renewable energy projects, and continues to support a staged approach to tidal energy development that balances technology demonstration with effects monitoring and research.
  • A staged approach allows proponents to demonstrate the ability to monitor for potential impacts and verify devices do not present a risk to fish prior to deploying multiple devices or platforms.
  • Decisions on whether or not to issue a Fisheries Act authorization are guided by the best available scientific information and departmental objectives; and decisions are made in consultation with Indigenous partners. The precautionary principle is followed when there are uncertainties.
  • This approach is meant to ensure that Canada’s aquatic ecosystems remain healthy for future generations while also developing a successful marine renewable energy industry.
  • My department has coordinated a senior-level working group for non-designated projects to discuss the various federal regulatory requirements and how funding can be better aligned. In-stream tidal was used as a case study in this group.
  • DFO is also working with Natural Resources Canada and the provinces to support future offshore wind development. Marine spatial planning will be used to support intergovernmental coordination in the development of this emerging sector.

Question Period Cards

Canadian Coast Guard FOPO Marine Cargo Container Spills Report

Issue

The Canadian Coast Guard response to the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, Marine Cargo Container Spills Report.

Response

If pressed on Zim Kingston

Background

Zim Kingston

October 21, 2021, the ZIM KINGSTON reported having lost 40 containers when encountering adverse weather and heavy swells, approximately 38 nautical miles west of the entrance to the Juan de Fuca Strait, off the coast of Vancouver Island, BC. The ship later reported that 109 containers had been lost; two of which contained hazardous chemicals that were prone to combustion when exposed to water.

On October 23, 2021, damaged cargo still on board the ship caught fire. Sixteen (16) crew members were evacuated by the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) and 5 crew members stayed aboard to fight the fire. The owner of the vessel contracted two commercial tugs to assist in firefighting activities. Since it was known that two more containers containing hazardous chemicals that were prone to combustion remained in the damaged cargo, fire suppression and cooling of the remaining cargo tactics were used to reduce the risk of fire or explosion. The CCG’s Atlantic Raven was tasked to support fire suppression and towing operations.

The 109 containers went overboard in Cape Flattery. Containers drifted north and 4 containers beached at 4 locations on the northwest tip of Vancouver Island.

The containers were mostly general cargo ( toys, games, sports equipment, furniture, electrical machinery, general household goods, footwear/clothing, photography/optical equipment and vehicle parts).

Two of the containers that fell overboard were known to contain hazardous materials – non marine polluting.

While the CCCG managed the overall response to the Zim Kingston incident, including the cargo debris cleanup, the owner of the vessel took a proactive role throughout the response and hired a salvage contractor to track and remove the beached containers. They also hired private industry, nonprofit organizations and First Nations to support beach cleanup operations.

Sonar scans to locate the sunken containers have been conducted by the ship owner at Constance Bank anchorage and at Cape Flattery. No containers were found at Constance Bank. Results were inconclusive in identifying container-sized objects at Cape Flattery. The CCG continues to work with the ship’s representative to remediate reports of possible Zim Kingston debris.

Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans Report on Marine Cargo Container Spills

The Committee on Fisheries and Oceans (the committee) agreed to undertake a study of the effects of “cargo container spills on Canada’s marine environment with regard to

  1. the environmental impacts of cargo container spills;
  2. improving response times and efficacy to cargo spills;
  3. addressing jurisdictional gaps to improve collaboration with volunteer, charitable organizations, provincial and territorial agencies, municipalities, and Indigenous communities during spill responses;
  4. improving polluter responsibility and financial accountability.”

From March 2022 to June 2022, the Committee held six meetings on the subject of Marine Cargo Container Spills with government officials and industry, Indigenous community, and non-profit organizations representatives.

As a result of those meetings, the Committee has made twenty-nine (29) recommendations directed at the Government of Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), and Transport Canada.

The scope of recommendations encompasses establishing marine debris monitoring and cleanup capacity; investing in research and monitoring to understand the impacts of polystyrene and other plastics; establishing marine cargo spill response capacity; expanding container ship regulations; building regulations for ships’ manifest information; establishing Hazardous and Noxious Substance spill response; establishing marine firefighting capacity; expanding emergency towing capacity; examining alternate funding mechanisms beyond the polluter-pays mechanism; championing the ban on the use of polystyrene foam in international fora; and collaborating with Indigenous communities to ensure they are active partners in marine cargo clean-up efforts.

The 29 recommendations include 5 on environmental impacts; 15 on incident response; 8 on cross jurisdiction collaboration; and, 1 on polluter responsibility and financial accountability.

The majority of recommendations were directed to DFO and Transport Canada. Input on a number of recommendations was also required from Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canada Border Services Agency (manifests) and Innovation Science and Economic Development (cellular and broadband for coastal communities).

Budget 2022 announced the intention to propose amendments to the Canada Shipping Act 2001 to enable the proactive management of marine emergencies and to cover more types of pollution.

Amendments to Canada Shipping Act 2001 would address a number of the Standing Committee’s recommendations.

Oceans Protection Plan renewal, launched in 2022, also includes new funding to enhance Hazardous and Noxious Substances preparedness and response and improving overall coordination for all marine spills.

The Government of Canada submitted its responses to the 29 recommendations to the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans on February 1, 2023.

The Government’s Response can be found on the House of Commons website.

Standing House Committee on Fisheries and Ocean’s Report on Science at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Issue

Will the government fully implement the recommendations detailed in the Standing House Committee on Fisheries and Oceans Report on Science at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans?

Response

Background

On March 6, 2023, [to be confirmed] the Standing House Committee on Fisheries and Oceans (FOPO) tabled its report on Science at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

Departmental staff are reviewing the report and will be preparing a government response to the recommendations in the report.

The report follows 14 meetings of the Committee between April 26, 2022 and February 13, 2023.

The committee heard from 57 witnesses, including Departmental officials, the Office of the Chief Science Advisor, Indigenous organizations, academics and fisheries scientists, fisheries and aquaculture organizations, conservation organizations, and others.

DFO officials were invited to appear before the Committee on two occasions, on April 26, 2022, (the first meeting of the study) and on October 7, 2022.

Scientific Processes and Excellence at Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Issue

How is DFO’s science considered in fisheries management decisions?

Response

If pressed on release of unpublished data

Background

As a science-based department, scientific integrity is essential to the work at DFO and of its employees. Scientific integrity is critical to the decision-making process, from the planning and conduct of research to the production of advice and the application of advice to the departmental decision-making processes.

This Scientific Integrity Policy recognizes the importance of high quality science, free from political, commercial and client interference and the importance of this in the decision-making processes utilized by the Department. The policy applies to all who plan, produce, support or utilize science to make well-informed decisions.

The Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) coordinates the production of peer-reviewed science advice for DFO. Science advice is prepared both nationally and through DFO’s regional offices.

The CSAS provides a systematic process for the delivery of science advice to the department’s decision makers. Advice might relate to the state of an ecosystem, the impacts of a human activity, the effectiveness of a mitigation strategy or another subject related to DFO’s mandate.

Fish Stock Rebuilding

Issue

What is Canada doing to rebuild its key harvested fish stocks that have become depleted?

Response

If pressed

Background

Status of Rebuilding Plans and Critical Zone Stocks

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) annually surveys 192 key harvested stocks in its Sustainability Survey for Fisheries.

Currently, 22 stocks of the 192 are in the Critical zone, which means these stocks are below their limit reference point (LRP), which is the point at which serious harm is occurring to the stock. Stocks in the Critical zone are considered depleted.

Under DFO’s 2009 Precautionary Approach Policy, stocks in the Critical zone require rebuilding plans.

DFO is working to ensure there are complete rebuilding plans for all priority stocks, in accordance with the Sustainable Fisheries Framework Work Plan that DFO publishes on its website annually.

DFO has completed rebuilding plans for six of the 22 stocks, and a further 11 plans are under development. One of the stocks (Northern shrimp SFA 7) in the Critical zone is managed by the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) and is subject to moratorium and thus DFO will not be developing a rebuilding plan.

Fish Stocks Provisions

Amendments made to the Fisheries Act in 2019 include the Fish Stocks provisions which require the Minister of DFO and the Canadian Coast Guard to implement management measures to maintain major stocks listed in regulation at levels necessary to promote sustainability and to develop and implement rebuilding plans for depleted major fish stocks.

These provisions came into effect on April 4, 2022, when amendments to the Fishery (General) Regulations(FGR) were finalized which prescribed the first batch of major fish stocks to be subject to the provisions.

Schedule IX of the FGR sets out the first batch of 30 major stocks subject to the Fish Stocks provisions, of which 14 stocks are in the Critical zone and will require rebuilding plans. These stocks were selected from the 180 key harvested stocks included in DFO’s 2020 Sustainability Survey for Fisheries, with the exception of two Pacific salmon stocks (Chinook salmon – Okanagan and Coho Salmon – Interior Fraser) which were not on the survey at the time of prescription.

The FGR set out the required contents (e.g., stock status and trends, probable causes for the stock’s decline, measurable objectives aimed at rebuilding the stock) of rebuilding plans as well as timelines to develop rebuilding plans for stocks subject to the Fish Stocks provisions.

DFO is currently working on a section batch of 62 proposed major fish stocks to be prescribed under the Fish stocks provisions. Of these, 3 stocks re in the Critical zone and would require rebuilding plans and 10 do not currently have Limit Reference Points. DFO is working to establish these reference points before the stocks would be prescribed. Once they are established, DFO can then determine whether they require rebuilding plans.

Investments for Rebuilding Plans

To support the development of rebuilding plans, the Government of Canada invested $940,000 over four years, starting in 2017-18. This funding was provided in response to the 2016 report “Sustaining Canada’s Major Fish Stocks—Fisheries and Oceans Canada” by the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development.

The Government of Canada also invested an additional $107.4 million over five years, starting in 2019 and $17.6 million ongoing to support the implementation of the Fish Stocks provisions of the amended Fisheries Act. A large portion these resources are being used to increase scientific capacity for stock assessment of Canada’s fish stocks, including the development of reference points (like the limit reference point) to identify stock status and to inform the development of rebuilding plans.

Oceana 2022 Fishery Audit

On 22 Nov. 2022, Oceana Canada released its sixth annual Fishery Audit assessing the health of fish stocks and fisheries management. The audit recommended DFO list all remaining Critical and Cautious zone stocks under the Fish Stocks provisions and complete rebuilding plans in a timely manner. As described above, DFO is on track to complete rebuilding plans for fish stocks subject to the Fish Stocks provisions and is working to prescribe an additional 62 stocks.

Fisheries Decision-making

Issue

How are fisheries management measures determined, including the total allowable catch?

Response

If pressed on harvest level reductions, particularly those related to missed surveys and stock assessments

Background

The Government of Canada has federal jurisdiction over coastal and inland fisheries, and the Fisheries Act gives the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard authority over fish harvesting decisions. The Minister has the authority to determine: how much is fished, who gets to fish, when and how stocks can be fished.

The Department also has international fisheries responsibilities with more than 20 per cent of Canada’s fish stocks managed in cooperation with international counterparts.

Fisheries management decisions have a range of impacts on coastal communities and Canadians as a whole. These include:

Decision(s) must adhere to the following key principles: 1.Conservation, 2. Legally-binding agreements, 3. Indigenous and Treaty rights, and 4. Orderly management.

Decision-making is informed by:

The Precautionary Approach involves taking cautious decisions to avoid serious harm to the resource in the absence of scientific information or when scientific information is uncertain, unreliable or inadequate. This approach is widely accepted as an essential part of sustainable fisheries management. Applying the precautionary approach to fisheries management decisions entails establishing a harvest strategy that:

Fish Harvester Benefit and Grant Program

Issue

What is Fisheries and Oceans Canada doing to help the fishing sector through COVID-19?

Response

If pressed on reminder outreach

Background

The Fish Harvester Benefit and Grant (FHBG) Program was part of the Government of Canada’s COVID response strategy. Since its launch in 2020, it has provided support for non-deferrable business expenses and income support to self-employed fish harvesters and self-employed crew.

The FHBG Program has been delivered in two-phases:

The benefit payment covered up to 75 per cent of income losses beyond a 25 per cent threshold for the 2020 tax year when compared to 2018 or 2019. The maximum benefit is $10,164.

During phase one, applicants attested to their income, estimated losses, and employment status. The Program issued payments in phase one based on the attested information from applicants.

Prior to the launch of phase two, the Program received Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) data and was able to compare attested information with tax filing information that applicants had provided to CRA. The Program deferred to information filed with CRA.

During this validation process, in some cases it was found that attested information did not align with the information that applicants had previously filed with CRA, meaning that in some cases individuals had received FHBG funds for which they were not eligible.

For example, individuals who attested to being self-employed, but who had filed information with CRA indicating that they were employees, received overpayment letters pertaining to for their phase-one payment, since wage-earning employees were not eligible for the Program.

Sometimes applicants’ income losses as reflected in CRA data were found not meet the minimum loss threshold required for the benefit. Other times individual income losses reflected in CRA data were simply less than forecast in an applicant’s attestation.

In all cases, there was a right to appeal overpayment findings.

In February 2022, the Program waived interest charges on overpayment amounts owing until January 1, 2023. The Program extended the waiver period by a further three months. The revised interest waiver period will end on March 31, 2023.

At the end of January, the Program launched a reminder outreach effort to recipients of Program funds who have repayment obligations.

This effort has involved DFO sending reminder emails, letters, and account statements to individuals. In February, Service Canada started making reminder telephone calls to individuals with overpayments amounts owing. Individuals are encouraged to make repayment before March 31 to avoid interest charges.

This follow-up work to make reasonable efforts to recover Program overpayments is a requirement under the Directive on Public Money and Receivables.

Approximately 6,600 individuals have some level of overpayment owing. The total overpayment amount owing is approximately $33.6 million.

NAFO 4T Winter and Yellowtail Flounder Decision

Issue

Why did the Department decide to close the winter and yellowtail flounder fisheries?

Response

If pressed on the rebuilding plan

If pressed on compensation

Background

Yellowtail and winter flounder harvested in NAFO Division 4T are primarily used as bait in the lobster fishery ensuring a fresh bait source for the lobster fishing industry that operates in the Magdalen Islands.

Winter and yellowtail flounder have remained in the critical zone of the Precautionary Approach Framework since 2004 and 2009 respectively; their spawning biomasses were at 24 per cent and 39 percent of its limit reference point in 2020. No signs of recovery have been observed in the most recent scientific assessments

While the commercial fishery accounts only for a small proportion of the stock’s total mortality, it is important to limit and maintain fishing removals at the lowest possible level as this is one of the only controllable factors to ensure the species conservation.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) recognizes the importance of these fisheries to coastal communities, and therefore makes the conservation of these stocks a priority. Hence the Department’s to significantly reduce the TAC from 300 t to 150 t for winter flounder in 2022 and from 225 to 150 t for yellowtail flounder in 2021.

A rebuilding plan for winter flounder, that is consistent with the Fisheries Act’s new fish stock provisions (FSP’s), is being finalized and will be delivered this coming spring (2023).

The yellowtail flounder was recently proposed for a listing under “Batch 2” of the Fisheries Act’s FSP’s. The FSP’s came into force on April 4, 2022, which requires DFO, according to section 6.2 (1), to develop and implement a rebuilding within 24 months when a stock has fell below its limit reference point (i.e., critical zone) to promote the growth of this stock.

DFO plans to develop and implement a rebuilding plan for yellowtail flounder.

The affected harvesters (8) have proposed a number of options to help supplement the loss of this quota, including access to other fishing opportunities in the area. The Department is reviewing their request.

Pacific Salmon

Issue

Why are we not doing more to recover Pacific salmon?

Response

If Pressed on the Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative

If Pressed on Flooding

If Pressed on Discovery Islands

Background

Budget 2021 provided a transformational investment starting in 2021-22, to Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) to stabilize and conserve wild Pacific salmon populations as part of the Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative (PSSI).

The PSSI was launched by the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard in June 2021, with the goal of stemming the severe and ongoing decline of key Pacific salmon stocks on Canada’s West Coast and restoring them to a sustainable level for future generations of Canadians. The long-term initiative is unprecedented in both value and scope, and the work will require the efforts of not only the Department, but of those whose lives and interests are affected by the state of Pacific salmon.

This investment is to implement initiatives over the next five years (2021/22 – 2025/26) organized under four pillars: Conservation and Stewardship (habitat and rebuilding-related work); Salmon Enhancement (hatcheries-related work); Harvest Transformation (harvest-related work); and, Integration and Coordination (internal and external integration of planning and collaboration with others).

Under the Conservation and Stewardship pillar, recent work underway includes BC Flood Recovery and the renewal of the British Columbia Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund, Pacific high seas inspection for illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, and Pacific salmon rebuilding planning.

Through the Salmon Enhancement pillar, the Department has focused on development and engagement on a new policy framework for salmon enhancement, which will guide DFO’s work on hatchery investments to support conservation priorities.

The Harvest Transformation pillar’s activities include recent longer-term conservation-based closures for commercial fisheries, preparations of the Pacific Salmon Commercial Licence Retirement Program, and engagement on the mass marking and mark selective fisheries.

Lastly, work advancing under the Integration and Collaboration pillar is intended to advance integration and collaboration with Indigenous peoples, harvest groups, environmental groups and others to support Pacific salmon conservation. This included the creation of the PSSI Secretariat and ongoing engagement with First Nations, as well as BC, Yukon, and other stakeholders, on approaches for collaborative processes moving forward.

The 2018 Fall Economic Statement reiterated the Government’s commitment to the sustainability of wild Pacific salmon, supporting stock assessment and rebuilding efforts through a renewed Fisheries Act for priority fish stocks, and announcing the launch of the first iteration of the British Columbia Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund (BCSRIF).

The federal-provincial joint BCSRIF was officially launched on March 15, 2019 originally allocating $142.85 million over five years: $100 million from Canada and $42.85 million from BC. The second phase of the BCSRIF was announced in August 2022, with an additional $100M funded via PSSI. This brings the total funding of BCSRIF to $285 million ($85 million from BC), with an extended program end date of March 31, 2026.

As part of the Government’s commitment to protecting wild Pacific salmon, on February 17, 2023, the Minister announced that licenses for Atlantic salmon farms in the Discovery Islands would not be reissued as an enhanced precautionary approach.

Pinniped Predation on Salmon in Pacific Region

Issue

What is the Department doing about the predation by pinnipeds on Pacific salmon?

Response

If pressed

Background

Context

The rebound in pinniped populations to historic levels has coincided with the recent decline in salmon populations, leading several First Nations groups to request management action to address the large numbers of pinnipeds and their perceived impacts on salmon populations.

Attention to this issue has grown significantly in recent years among these groups. This has included calls for increased harvests, culls, and/or sterilization to reduce the size of pinniped populations. The issue is divisive; there has also been vocal opposition to pinniped removals from environmental groups and animal rights advocacy groups.

There are concerns among numerous commercial and recreational fishing groups and numerous Indigenous groups in Pacific Region that pinnipeds, particularly Steller and California sea lions, and harbour seals, are impacting economically valuable and culturally important fish stocks.

There is a high degree of scientific uncertainty regarding the extent of pinniped predation on wild salmon stocks, including Steelhead. While seals and sea lions do eat salmon, salmon represent a small proportion on average of their diet. Seals and sea lions also eat predators of salmon and herring, such as hake.

Seals and sea lions are an important food source for Transient killer whales, also known as Biggs killer whales, whose numbers have been increasing in inshore waters along the British Columbia (BC) Coast in recent years. This population of killer whale has been listed as Threatened under the Species at Risk Act (SARA) since 2003.

In Canada, Steller sea lions are listed under SARA as a species of special concern based on its sensitivity to human disturbance while on land and vulnerability to catastrophic events (such as major oil spills) due to its highly concentrated breeding aggregations.

Management Approach

Government of Canada’s approach to the management of the harvest of pinnipeds (i.e. seals and sea lions) on the west coast focuses on a sustainable and humane Indigenous harvest for food, social, and ceremonial purposes and continuing ongoing scientific research to further Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s (DFO) understanding of the salmon-pinniped interaction. DFO does not undertake any active management of pinnipeds beyond this in the Pacific region.

DFO is not considering a cull at this time and commercial fisheries are not a tool to management population levels.

There continues to be a wide variation amongst technical experts on the interpretation of scientific results, the potential efficacy of potential mitigation actions (such as lethal removals), and the level of acceptable risk associated with possible actions.

Commercial Pinniped Fishery Interests

There are currently no commercial fisheries for pinnipeds on the west coast. Any proposals for a potential commercial pinniped fishery are assessed under the New Emerging Fishery Policy (NEFP). Over the past three years, DFO has received three proposals for a commercial pinniped fishery with the objective to reduce pinniped population levels. All proposals were assessed under the NEFP and remain unapproved.

As a proponent driven process, additional information is required to consider further assessment against the NEFP and address the feedback provided by DFO. The objective of such proposals should focus on commercial benefits and should not be linked to salmon conservation. None of the proposals were submitted by a First Nation.

Science

DFO is working to evaluate seal and sea lion diets in Pacific Region. Estimating the amount of prey consumed by seals requires a number of different types of data that are difficult to obtain given that marine mammals are a wide ranging, diving predator and distributed in remote locations.

DFO Science is conducting research on the population dynamics and diets of pinnipeds to better understand pinniped‑salmon interaction. This work includes updating assessments (including trends and current status) for Pacific harbour seal, Steller sea lion, and overwintering California sea lion populations, based on aerial survey data. DFO Science is also analyzing data collected from scat samples to better understand the diet composition for these three species. Research indicates that there is a large degree of uncertainty about the role of pinnipeds in salmon abundance trends.

Private Members Bill C-251

“An Act respecting the development of a federal framework on the conservation of fish stocks and management of pinnipeds”, was introduced in the House of Commons on February 9, 2022. Following a vote on June 15, the bill was defeated and will not be referred to the House of Commons FOPO; accordingly, the bill will not proceed for further consideration.

The Government of Canada opposed Bill C-251 for several reasons, including that the Bill lacked a scientific basis for the requirement of the proposed measures and their efficacy; the Bill duplicates existing authorities under the Fisheries Act and Marine Mammal Regulations, and finally the Bill could have threatened the Canadian fish and seafood industry’s access to key export markets.

DFO’s fish and seafood trade with key partners, including the United States (US), needs to be supported by management decisions that are based on the best available scientific evidence and internationally recognized practices and provisions aimed at ensuring the sustainable use and conservation of marine species.

If enacted, Bill C-251 would have risked violation of international legal obligations under the US Marine Mammal Protection Act import provisions, the Canada-US-Mexico Agreement, and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.

Seal Predation

Issue

Is seal predation having an impact on Canada’s commercial fish stocks and how is the Government addressing the issue?

Response

If pressed on species-specific impacts

Background

Currently, DFO manages commercial harvests for grey, hooded, and harp seals in the Atlantic region; there are currently no fisheries for seals or sea lions in the Pacific region.

There is concern from the fishing industry on both the east and west coast regarding the potential impacts of seal and sea lion predation on commercially valuable fish stocks. There are currently active DFO research projects in Maritimes, Quebec, Newfoundland and Pacific region to look at diet of key seal and/or sea lion species. The Department is also investing in a new research program on the West Coast and is working with partners on the potential impacts of seals and sea lions on fish populations.

Scientific evidence to date suggests that grey seals are having an impact on the recovery of cod and other groundfish in the Southern Gulf of St Lawrence. Conversely, there is no scientific evidence to date to demonstrate that harp seals are significantly impacting commercially valuable fish stock off the coast of Newfoundland. The impact of Pacific seals or sea lions on commercially important fish stocks on the west coast of Canada has not been evaluated and is currently unknown.

The Department uses the best available scientific information to make appropriate seal related management decisions.

Aquaculture - Open-Net Pen Transition Plan in British Columbia

Issue

How does the government intend to transition marine finfish aquaculture in British Columbia?

Response

If pressed on progress towards transition plan

Background

On June 22, 2022, the Minister announced next steps towards development of a plan for transitioning from open-net pen salmon aquaculture in coastal British Columbia.

The Government of Canada previously undertook engagement in 2020 and 2021 and collected views on transitioning the salmon aquaculture sector in British Columbia.

On July 29, 2022, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) released a discussion framework which outlines a proposed vision for transitioning from open-net pen salmon aquaculture in British Columbia. The framework will help guide engagement with the Government of British Columbia, First Nations, industry, local governments, stakeholders, and British Columbians.

Engagement on the discussion framework will run until early 2023. A “what we heard” report on phase two of engagement, which comprised intensive engagement and the development of plan elements, will be circulated in February 2023 to inform and guide continued engagement through the spring of 2023.

The feedback and input received during this engagement will be instrumental in the development of the final transition plan, expected to be completed in the spring of 2023.

Aquaculture - Discovery Islands Salmon Aquaculture Licences Decision

Issue

Why have you made the decision to close 15 salmon farms in the Discovery Islands area of British Columbia?

Response

If pressed on justification for decision

If pressed on the economic impact of the decision

If pressed on the judicial review application

Background

In November 2009, Canada established the Commission of Inquiry into the Decline of Sockeye Salmon in the Fraser River to investigate the decline of Sockeye salmon stocks and to provide recommendations (the Cohen Commission).

The final report of the Cohen Commission was released October 2012. The report did not find any single factor leading to decreased Sockeye salmon stocks.

The report made 75 recommendations, the majority of which focused on Pacific salmon fisheries management, fisheries science, salmon habitat protection, and the implementation of the Wild Salmon Policy. Action has been taken to address all 75 of the recommendations.

In response to the Cohen Commission’s Recommendation 19, DFO considered the risk to Fraser River Sockeye salmon from diseases that occur in Atlantic salmon farms. The scientific risk assessments focused on farms located in the Discovery Islands area.

The nine peer-reviewed, scientific risk assessments concluded that the transfer of these pathogens pose, at most, a minimal risk to migrating Fraser River Sockeye salmon in the area.

The risk assessments were published in November 2019, which was linked to the expiration date of the annual licences in the Discovery Islands.

On December 17, 2020, then Minister Bernadette Jordan announced her intention to phase out existing salmon farming licences in the Discovery Islands by June 30, 2022.

In January 2021, Mowi, Cermaq, and Grieg Seafood each filed an application for judicial review of the decision in the Federal Court.

On April 22, 2022, the Federal Court released its decision on judicial review applications, deeming the December 2020 policy decision to be a licensing decision and quashing it because it failed to comply with procedural fairness requirements.

The Federal Court decision meant that individualized decisions had to be made on whether to renew salmon aquaculture licences in the Discovery Islands, which were all due to expire on June 30, 2022.

On June 22, 2022, Minister Murray announced next steps towards development of a plan for transitioning from open-net pen salmon aquaculture in coastal British Columbia. At the same time, the Minister made a decision to approve a two-year reissuance of marine finfish licences across British Columbia, with the exception of the Discovery Islands. Following the Federal Court’s decision, the Minister directed the Department not to reissue licences for 15 Atlantic salmon facilities in the Discovery Islands, and to issue six-month licences for two remaining chinook facilities.

Consultations with five licence holders and seven First Nations in the area were subsequently conducted to inform a decision on reissuance or non-reissuance for all 17 licences, which the Minister intended to make in January 2023.

In January 2023, the Minister granted a one-month licence renewal to a small chinook salmon facility whose licence would have expired otherwise, with fish present in the water. In February 2023, the chinook facility was a granted a six-month licence renewal. Another facility no longer required a licence as it was being decommissioned.

On February 17, 2023, the Minister announced her decision to not renew licences for fifteen open-net pen Atlantic salmon aquaculture sites in the Discovery Islands.

On March 20, 2023, Mowi, Cermaq, Grieg, as well as the We Wai Kai and Wei Wei Kum First Nations filed an application for a judicial review of the decision. Grieg Seafood has also filed a second separate motion.

Sea Lice and Aquaculture

Issue

What is the government doing to prevent the proliferation of sea lice?

Response

If pressed on sea lice Science Response process

If pressed on sea lice on the east coast

Background

Sea lice are naturally occurring parasites in Canada’s coastal waters. While sea lice generally do not harm adult fish, they can harm small juvenile salmon as they emerge from river systems when they are quite small and without complete scale development for protection.

Farmed fish are free of sea lice when they enter the ocean, but can pick them up in the marine environment. If not properly managed, sea lice levels can become elevated and wild juvenile salmon can be exposed to higher than natural levels during the spring out-migration period.

Over the last couple of decades, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) scientists have worked to build understanding and knowledge about sea lice, their relationship to the marine environment and fish, along with improved understanding of treatments and methods used to reduce their abundance on farmed fish, to inform improvements in management measures.

One of the methods used to control sea lice is a Health Canada approved drug called SLICE. Due to some localized resistance to this drug, there is a push for the use of alternative methods to manage sea lice, including mechanical, thermal, freshwater, and other non-chemical treatments.

DFO is exploring options to encourage innovation, including in non-chemical options to treat sea lice.

In British Columbia (BC), the Department requires sea lice management, treatment, and mitigation measures at farms when sea lice levels are high. These measures have been very effective; most years, more than 90 per cent of sites are below the regulatory thresholds for sea lice during the out-migration period (March 1 to June 30). Any evidence of population-level harm to wild salmon resulting from salmon farms would prompt the immediate revision of aquaculture licences to ensure the conservation of wild salmon stocks.

On the east coast, where the provinces are the lead regulators, information on sea lice management practices is not readily available to DFO, as sea lice monitoring is provincially mandated. Each province regulates the industry differently and relies on individual companies to submit management plans, which are not made public.

In January 2023, DFO Science published new Science Advice on the association between sea lice from Atlantic salmon farms and sea lice infestations on juvenile wild Pacific salmon in British Columbia.

The Science Response Report revealed a statistically nonsignificant association between sea lice infestation on Atlantic salmon farms and sea lice levels on wild juvenile Pacific salmon populations in BC.

The study used data from multiple Atlantic salmon farms, reported to DFO by industry and subject to DFO auditing, and sea lice counts on wild fish collected and publicly available by a third party company for the industry sampled at specific distances from nearby farms in the four study areas.

Analyses undertaken as part of the study include varying degrees of uncertainty and were limited by not taking into account certain factors, such as the influence of hydrodynamic processes in the vicinity of salmon farms and alternative sources of sea lice, which could potentially influence sea lice counts.

Although concerns raised in media articles allege that industry under reports sea lice counts, DFO undertakes audits of the reported sea lice counts.

DFO Science intends to continue to assess risks associated with farmed sea lice, which will continue to inform DFO’s approach to managing sea lice on farmed salmon in BC.

The have been several recent media reports from some Canadian university academics critiquing the interim science advice provided in the CSAS Science Response on sea lice.

Following-up on this interim science advice, a more comprehensive sea lice risk assessment that focuses on the impacts of sea lice on both coasts is planned for 2024.

North Atlantic Right Whale

Issue

What is the government doing to help protect North Atlantic right whales?

Response

If pressed on economic impacts on harvesters

If pressed on recent entanglement cases in the United States

If pressed on 2022 red-listing of Canadian lobster and Snow crab by Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch

Background

In January 2023, two North Atlantic Right Whales were successfully disentangled by marine mammal response experts in the United States.

There were no reported NARW mortalities and 4 new entanglements (first sighting and gear present) in Canadian waters in 2022.

The Annual NARW Advisory Committee meeting was held on November 22, 2022 followed by a targeted meeting with Indigenous groups on November 25, 2022.

Closure statistics from 2022, as of November 15, 2022:

As of November 15, 2022, there were 1,173 recorded detections of right whales in Canadian waters. Of these detections 136 individual whales have been identified.

On October 25, 2022 the North Atlantic Right Whale Consortium released the most recent population estimate of 340 whales, which indicates a slowing in decline.

The first North Atlantic right whale of 2022 was detected on May 3. The single right whale was sighted by surveillance aircraft in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, north of the Magdalen Islands. The detection triggered a 15-day fishing closure in crab fishing area 12.

In February 2022, the Minister announced the 2022 NARW fisheries management measures. DFO’s measures remain unchanged from 2021. The measures for 2022 will take effect in the Gulf of St. Lawrence as soon as the Gulf crab fisheries open this year (as early as April 1).

In 2022 DFO continued to apply adaptive measures to preventing fishing gear entanglements, such as:

In 2021, the Department launched the Whalesafe Gear Adoption Fund, a two-year $20 million contribution program to support the purchase, adoption, testing and manufacture of whalesafe fishing gear, including lower breaking strength modifications and ropeless/rope on demand systems. This program supports 34 projects across Quebec and Atlantic Canada.

The 2021 Action Plan for the NARW was finalized and published on the Public Registry in spring 2021. The Action Plan addresses aII threats identified in the species’ Recovery Strategy, including vessel collisions, entanglement in fishing gear, disturbance from vessel presence, noise, contaminants, habitat degradation, and changes in food supply.

Since 2018, DFO has invested over $5.7 million to further enhance the Marine Mammal Response Program, which responds to marine mammals in distress, including disentanglement of NARWs. This funding is part of the $167.4 million Whales Initiative in Budget 2018.

The NARW was listed as Endangered in the Species at Risk Act (SARA) in 2005. It is predicted the species could become extinct in 30 years if the mortality rate is not significantly reduced. The population is in decline with an estimated 340 individuals, including less than 80 fertile females.

Fleet Renewal

Issue

How much is the Coast Guard’s Fleet Renewal costing and when will they become operational?

Response

If pressed on icebreakers

Background

Renewal of the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) fleet is underway. Funded replacement plans are currently in place for the large vessel fleet, including:

Construction work is currently underway on the OOSV following cut steel in March 2021. Ancillary contract work is ongoing on the MPV project at Vancouver Shipyards (VSY) following the August 2020 contract award. Additionally, pre-construction work is advancing on the Polar Icebreaker at VSY, following the awarding of the Construction Engineering (CE) and Long Lead Items (LLI) contracts in December 2022.Work on the Program Icebreakers and the other Polar Icebreaker is expected to begin following the addition of Chantier Davie to the National Shipbuilding Strategy (NSS), which is expected by spring 2023. Detailed costing for these projects will be released once negotiations and contract awards for engineering and construction have occurred with the shipyard.

Media attention has occurred over the last several years detailing the increasing costs and ongoing delays with the procurement of CCG’s large vessel fleet. CCG has been working closely with shipyards and internal stakeholders to manage and address ongoing issues.

CCG is also renewing its small fleet. 19 new small vessels have already been delivered under the NSS, including two new Channel Survey and Sounding Vessels and 14 new Search and Rescue Lifeboats that have joined the fleet in the past few years. An additional three Search and Rescue Lifeboats will be constructed at Hike Metal Products, in Wheatley, Ontario and three in Chantier Naval Forillon, in Gaspé, Quebec. In addition, design work is ongoing on a new Near-Shore Fishery Research Vessel.

CCG has completed the renewal of its helicopter fleet with delivery of sixteen new light-lift helicopters and seven new medium-lift helicopters.

The CCG is putting in place interim measures and investing in vessel life extension work to ensure continued delivery of critical services until new ships are delivered. This includes:

Announcements

Major Projects

Issue

How does Fisheries and Oceans Canada approach its role in assessing the environmental impact of development projects?

Response

If pressed Mary River Project (Baffinland)

If pressed Roberts Bank Terminal 2

Background

General DFO Role and Authorities

The Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Program administers and ensures compliance with the fish and fish habitat protection provisions of the Fisheries Act and certain relevant provisions under the Species at Risk Act for development projects taking place in and around fish habitat.

The Minister may issue authorizations under paragraphs 34.4(2)(b) and/or 35(2)(b) of the Fisheries Act following a site-specific review for works, undertakings, or activities that pose, respectively, a risk of death of fish by means other than fishing or the harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction of fish habitat. The authorization, when appropriate, may contain conditions for offsetting, monitoring, and reporting.

The Program is also responsible for meeting the duty to consult, and when appropriate, accommodate, in relation to potential impacts on Aboriginal and Treaty rights related to authorizations or permits that may be issued under the Fisheries Act or the Species at Risk Act.

The Department also has specific legislative responsibilities in relation to federal environmental assessment regimes including, among others, the Impact Assessment Act, and regimes in the territories and under land claims agreements.

As a federal authority for impact assessments, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) provides expert information or knowledge in relation to its mandate. Under regimes in the territories and under land claims agreements DFO may also be a decision maker for a project.

Mary River Project

Mary River Iron Ore Project is an approved iron ore mine operated by Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation (the Proponent). The project has been subject to several environmental assessment processes as development plans at the site have evolved.

A recent project expansion proposal was rejected by the Government in November 2022. The proponent has since applied for a permanent ability to ship at 6 million tonnes per annum (mpta), which they are calling the sustaining operations proposal. 

On February 9, 2023, the proponent also announced that it would be moving to develop the southern rail line and port at Steensby Inlet. This proposal received an environmental assessment approval in December 2012 but was never constructed. Additional regulatory approvals, including under the Fisheries Act, are expected to be required prior to construction.

A joint workshop between the North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission Scientific Committee Working Group on the Population Status of Narwhal and Beluga in the North Atlantic and the Canada Greenland Joint Commission on Conservation and Management of Narwhal and Beluga Scientific Working Group was held in December 2022. DFO was represented at the meeting by DFO science sector. The report produced at the conclusion of the workshop suggests that increased ship traffic, the majority of which is attributable to the Mary River project, is by far the most likely cause for the large, population displacement of narwhals that has been observed and that the model predicts there will be almost no narwhal left in Eclipse Sound in 2023.

Roberts Bank Terminal 2

The Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project includes the construction and operation of a new three-berth marine container terminal located at Roberts Bank in Delta, British Columbia, approximately 35 km south of Vancouver.

The project has been subject to a lengthy environmental assessment process undertaken by an independent review panel. The project is expected to have a number of significant adverse environmental effects on matters pertaining to DFO’s mandate including on, Southern Resident killer whales, juvenile Chinook salmon, Dungeness crab, eulachon, orange sea pen and forage fish.

The project is also expected to have significant adverse effects on the rights of, and current use of lands and resources by a number of First Nations. Under the current legislative timeline, an environmental assessment decision on the project is required no later than April 23, 2023. If the project is allowed to proceed, DFO would then be required to consider issuing an authorization under the Fisheries Act. This authorization, if issued, would concurrently need to meet the requirements of the Species at Risk Act.

Ghost Gear Program

Issue

Why is Canada not doing more to combat ghost gear?

Response

If pressed on why a project was not funded

If pressed on measures to retrieve gear lost at sea following Hurricane Fiona

Background

Impacts of ghost gear

The term 'ghost gear' refers to any fishing gear that has been abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded (for example nets, line, rope, traps, pots, and floats). Other common terms include abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear or ‘ALDFG’ and derelict fishing gear or ‘DFG’. It is a form of marine pollution that can be fatal to fish, marine mammals and other marine life, poses a navigation hazard, and may break down into other forms of pollution such as microplastics.

The UN food and agriculture organization (FAO) estimates that ghost gear represents approximately 10 percent of marine debris by volume. There is growing international attention on the problem of ghost gear, as well as other forms of marine litter. For example, the FAO has recognized ghost gear as a major global problem since the 1980s. The 1995 FAO code of conduct for responsible fisheries and related technical guidelines include advice to minimize ghost gear and the responsibility to recover lost gear.

Ghost fishing gear can cause large-scale damage to marine ecosystems through habitat disturbance and causes direct harm to the welfare and conservation of marine animals via entanglement and/or ingestion.

Canadian context

The Canadian code of conduct for responsible fishing operations includes an expectation (guideline 2.8) for fish harvesters to ‘make every effort to retrieve lost fishing gear, reporting all lost gear’. The department collaborates with conservation groups and partners to rescue sea life that has been entangled by sea-based marine debris, and with the fishing industry to retrieve gear on an ad hoc basis. The Ghost Gear Program allows for a dedicated program to tackle the issue of ghost gear domestically and abroad.

The current regulatory/licensing regime is prescriptive in terms of types, quantities and identification of fishing gear that a harvester can have on board their vessel and/or fish. Additionally, the location where a harvester can fish is very prescriptive. While these measures were intended to ensure compliance with quotas and allocations, they impede the ability of a harvester to retrieve gear which they are not permitted to use and/or is located in areas they are not authorized to fish. An assessment of DFO legislation is currently underway to ensure that any potential impediments to addressing and reducing ghost gear domestically are identified and addressed.

Canada has been pushing to strengthen measures in internationally managed fisheries. There is support for this but also recognition that for small island developing states and other developing states that the measures need to also come with increased capacity domestically – both policy, social and operational (e.g. reception centres, reporting, etc).

New requirements will be in place in 2023 for low breaking strength gear to be used in some fisheries in Atlantic Canada and Quebec. This gear is designed to operate safely and effectively under normal fishing conditions, and the implementation of these gear modifications during adverse weather and extreme sea conditions may result in gear loss. Industry members have highlighted concerns about the cost of lost gear, as well as the bycatch risks associated with additional ghost gear.

Mandatory lost gear reporting has been a requirement in all commercial conditions of licence in Canada since 2020. All incidents of gear being lost as a result of the new gear requirements will be recorded by the Department. While DFO’s Ghost Gear program is not funded or designed to manage the implications of lower breaking strength gear modifications, it is positioned to help inform retrieval efforts as the need may arise resulting from low breaking strength gear implementation.

Sustainable Fisheries Solutions and Retrieval Support Contribution Program (Ghost Gear Fund)

Through Budget 2022 under the Zero Plastic Waste agenda, the Ghost Gear Fund received $10 million to continue retrieval activities, and the testing of fish gear to reduce gear loss for fiscal year 2022-2023.

A call for proposals was issued on May 4th, 2022 for this round of funding and closed on June 6th, 2022. Contribution agreements were negotiated with the 42 successful applicants, and projects are currently underway.

All applications for funding were assessed based on the eligibility criteria provided on the Ghost Gear Fund website, using an assessment grid that enabled reviewers to prioritize projects whose applications best address priority pillars of action. Projects were selected based on the rank using the assessment grid, as well as ensuring there was a national distribution of efforts. High scoring criteria included harvester participation, indigenous participation, level of experience, and removal of ghost gear within the first year.

All successful projects fall into at least one of four eligible categories: gear retrieval, responsible disposal, acquisition and piloting of available gear technology, and international leadership.

Hurricane Fiona Response

Hurricane Fiona impacted infrastructure and communities across Atlantic Canada and Eastern Quebec, including DFO-owned fishing harbours, managed by the Small Craft Harbours Program (SCH), and produced substantial fishing gear-related debris from fisheries and aquaculture operations that were active during the storm and as a result of heavy damage to harbour storage facilities.

The $300M Hurricane Fiona Relief Fund (HFRF) was announced October 4, 2022 and will be administered by the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) to fund losses not covered under other government and private sector measures, with $30M going towards Ghost Gear clean up and retrieval.

Small Craft Harbour Efforts to Address Climate

Issue

What is the government doing to ensure Small Craft Harbours remain operational and safe to fish harvesters in the face of climate change?

Response

If pressed

If pressed on status of projects in Nunavut

Background

As of February 2023, the Small Craft Harbours (SCH) program was responsible for 973 harbours:

Small craft harbours provide key support to the commercial fishing industry. The SCH program keeps the harbours that are critical to the fishing industry open and in good repair.

In Budget 2021, the Government announced it would provide $300 million over two years to repair, renew, and replace small craft harbours.

Hurricane Fiona impacted 142 of the 184 small craft harbours that were in its path. Since the passing of Fiona, the Prime Minister announced the $300 million Hurricane Fiona Recovery Fund, on October 4, 2022.

On October 17, 2022, The DFO and ACOA Ministers announced that to support immediate recovery efforts, $100 million from the fund had been set aside to repair essential infrastructure at harbours and to retrieve lost fishing gear.

Approximately 90 per cent of the Canadian fish harvest is landed at harbours operated through the SCH program.

For SCH, climate change has meant reduced formation of shore ice and more coastal erosion and flooding. Main impacts for SCH network are on harbour infrastructure and sedimentation within harbours.

For the program, this creates an increased need to address repairs at harbours in a timely manner as well as increased dredging pressures.

The SCH Program has already begun to adapt its conception standards to this reality, as well as to enhance its regional dredging program.

The SCH Program is delivered in cooperation with Harbour Authorities, local non -profit organizations representing the interests of local commercial fishers and the broader community.

Each year, more than 5,000 volunteers assist the program.

The SCH Program's annual regular budget has been stable at about $90 million (includes salaries and administrative costs) since 2007-08. Since 2008-09, the Government of Canada has provided the SCH Program with more than $1.3 billion in temporary funding.

Impacts of Hurricane Fiona

Issue

What is DFO’s response to gear loss and harbour damage caused by Hurricane Fiona?

Response

If pressed

If pressed on work at Small Craft Harbour locations

Background

On September 24, Hurricane Fiona hit Atlantic Canada and eastern Quebec, impacting various types of infrastructure including DFO-owned Small Craft Harbours, and producing substantial fishing gear-related debris, not only from fisheries and aquaculture operations that were active during the storm, but also as a result of heavy damage to harbour storage facilities, with gear and structures being swept into the ocean.

On October 17, Ministers Murray and Petitpas Taylor announced that $100 million from the new Hurricane Fiona Recovery Fund will be used to repair SCH infrastructure and to retrieve lost fishing and aquaculture gear. Specifically, $70M to supplement the Small Craft Harbour Program to support recovery efforts at Small Craft Harbours damaged by Hurricane Fiona. Another $30M was allocated to support retrieval and responsible disposal of lost fishing gear through the Ghost Gear Fund.

The Small Craft Harbours program has worked diligently to determine the impacts Fiona had on the Program’s infrastructure. Clean up activities have taken place and, for the most part, initial repairs have been completed. DFO staff are now working with Harbour Authorities and others to plan and execute and necessary longer term repairs at impacted harbours.

With respect to ghost gear, $1.5 million has already been allocated to support 11 partners for emergency clean-up and recovery efforts of the hardest hit areas, currently underway. Other projects are expected to be announced in the coming weeks.

Indigenous Moderate Livelihood Fishing in Atlantic Canada

Issue

What is the Government doing to ensure that Indigenous peoples can exercise their right to fish on Canada’s East Coast

Response

If pressed on access acquisition

Background

The Supreme Court of Canada formally recognized a Right of Indigenous people in Atlantic Canada to hunt and fish for a moderate livelihood in 1999. This Treaty Right touches 35 Indigenous communities (Mi’kmaq and Wolastoqiyik First Nations in New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, and the Gaspé, Region of Quebec) as well as the Peskotomuhkati Nation at Skutik in New Brunswick.

Over the past 23 years, DFO has provided over $630 million in fishing licences, vessels, gear and training to help increase and diversify participation in commercial fisheries, and to advance the implementation of the right to fish in pursuit of a moderate livelihood, for the 35 rights-holding Mi’kmaq, Wolastoqey First Nations (FNs) and the Peskotomuhkati Nation at Skutik (total of 35 Treaty Nations).

Since 2000, these investments have resulted in meaningful economic benefits which continue to increase year over year. The cumulative revenue (landed value and diversification) for Treaty Nations’ commercial fishing enterprises is now over $2 billion.

DFO has been negotiating Rights Reconciliation Agreements (RRA) with Treaty Nations, with the objective of addressing and recognizing their historic treaty right (affirmed by the Marshall decisions) and to ensure a stable and predictable fishery for the benefit of all Canadians.

The RRA process was launched in 2017 and provided a mandate to negotiate enhanced fisheries collaborative management, fisheries governance and increased fisheries access, all while recognizing but not defining the Moderate Livelihood right.

To date, there are three RRAs with four FNs (25 per cent of the total Treaty communities’ population) and the potential for more RRAs before the mandate expires in April 2023.

In 2021, a new pathway to rights implementation was announced through the development of Moderate Livelihood Fishing Plans (MLFPs).

MLFPs are conducted within established commercial seasons, include other restrictions similar to those of regular commercial licences, and are harvested exclusively by community members for their own benefit. Of note, these are understandings, not agreements. Treaty Nations produce a community-based fishing plan and DFO produces an authorization parallel to the plan.

To date, since 2021, ten understandings with 15 Treaty communities have been reached for lobster and/or elver, and there is an interest in continuing these understandings for the 2023 fishing seasons.

DFO is currently planning for the next phase of moderate livelihood implementation, which will involve working collaboratively with Treaty Nations to determine the new path forward.

There are several active litigations related to the Treaty right, including a claim by a Treaty community challenging DFO’s implementation of the right, and a judicial review by an industry group challenging the legality of one of the Rights Recognition Agreements.

In October 2020, the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard and the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations appointed Allister Surette as Federal Special Representative, as a neutral third party to: gather the different perspectives on the issues contributing to the Indigenous-Industry conflict; seek to build understanding and find common ground in order to reduce tensions between Treaty Nations and industry; and identify opportunities to improve relationships. Mr. Surette submitted his final report and recommendations in March 2021. DFO has made progress in implementing some of the recommendations.

The Department continues to have regular and frequent meetings at various levels with non-Indigenous fishing industry stakeholders to answer questions about moderate livelihood fishing and provide industry an opportunity to share its views. However, non-indigenous industry remains critical of being excluded from discussions with Treaty Nations and lack of transparency regarding Canada’s long-term approach to rights-based fishing.

The Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans released the report entitled “Peace on the Water: Advancing the Full Implementation of Mi’kmaq, Wolastoqiyik and Peskotomuhkati Rights-Based Fisheries” on July 12, 2022. A Government Response will be publicly provided in February, 2023.

Culture Change Reconciliation

Issue

What is the Department doing to eliminate systemic racism against Indigenous peoples?

Response

Background

With regards to employee education and training, the Canada School of Public Service has prepared an anti-racism event series to facilitate discussions within the public service around issues of racist practices and systemic barriers that exist for marginalized and racialized groups in Canada.

Regular events and discussions are facilitated and are open to public servants at all levels, as well as events designed specifically for managers and executives. Other learning products, such as orientation kits and job aids, have also been made available to support this learning series.

The reconciliation curriculum offered by the Canadian School of Public Service also provides public servants access to resources, self-directed and classroom courses, workshops, and events on the history, culture, rights, and perspectives of Indigenous peoples in Canada.

At DFO, employees in program areas involved in working with Indigenous partners are encouraged to participate in various opportunities to increase cultural awareness, such as through relationship competency development training, Indigenous perception training, and Blanket Exercise Workshops to ensure its members understand treaty rights and appreciate the perspectives of Indigenous peoples. DFO regularly promotes new learning activities and tools to facilitate ongoing education and training for the Government of Canada workforce.

The Department all recognizes the importance of making information on rights-based fisheries easily accessible to stakeholders and the general public. DFO launched a public webpage entitled “Fishing in pursuit of a moderate livelihood”, which includes historical information on the Peace and Friendship Treaties in the Maritimes and Gaspé, as well as on the Marshall decisions, which affirmed the rights originating from these treaties.

In September 2022, DFO also launched a public webpage entitled “Food, social and ceremonial fisheries” detailing the right through which Indigenous harvesters may fish for food, social, and ceremonial purposes as protected under Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. These webpages will be maintained and kept up to-date to inform Canadians and Government of Canada employees of important context related to rights-based fisheries.

DFO has also completed an employment systems review, which identified systemic and attitudinal barriers to employment opportunities for designated Employment Equity groups, including Indigenous peoples. The Department has begun to address some of the identified barriers with the development of the 2022-2027 Employment Equity, Diversity and Inclusion action plan.

Implementation of the Modernized Fisheries Act

Issue

What is the status of the implementation of a Modernized Fisheries Act?

Response

Background

The Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard’s mandate letter was published December 16, 2021. It included a commitment to work to support sustainable, stable, prosperous fisheries through the continued implementation of the modernized Fisheries Act, which restores lost protections, rebuilds fish populations, and incorporates modern safeguards so that fish and fish habitats are protected for future generations and Canada’s fisheries can continue to grow the economy and sustain coastal communities.

To support ongoing implementation of the modernized Fisheries Act, important engagement activities continue into their second year with Indigenous peoples, partners, stakeholders, and the public on development of policies, frameworks, instruments, and guidance. These include:

Additional future rounds of engagement will be undertaken on implementation of the fish and fish habitat protection provisions of the Fisheries Act, including: the Department’s approach to engagement, consideration of cumulative effects in decision making, and additional codes of practice aimed at avoiding impacts to fish and fish habitat.

In 2018, the Government allocated $284.2 million over five years (2018-19 to 2022-23) to implement the changes to the Fisheries Act. Part of this allocation includes a new $50 million grants and contributions program also covering the period 2018-19 to 2022-23 that will provide for increased participation of Indigenous peoples in the conservation and protection of fish and fish habitat. The Indigenous Habitat Participation Program supports Indigenous participation in consultation on project authorization decisions under the Fisheries Act, participation in the development of policy and regulatory initiatives, and collaborative projects and capacity building for communities.

Aquatic Ecosystems Restoration Fund

Issue

What is the Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Fund?

Response

Background

In 2021, the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans (DFO) and the Canadian Coast Guard was mandated to renew and expand the Coastal Restoration Fund (CRF), a $75 million five-year program launched in 2017 as part of the Oceans Protection Plan (OPP) to preserve and restore marine ecosystems. The CRF provided funding for over 60 projects on all coasts and sunsetted in March 2022.

The renewal of the program was made possible through Budget 2022, where the Government announced $2 billion in funding over nine years for the renewal of the OPP (2.0); this includes $75 million over five years for the Aquatic Ecosystems Restoration Fund (AERF).

Through contribution funding, AERF projects will address impacts on Canadian coastal aquatic environments (e.g. climate change, new contaminants, algae bloom, agricultural runoff).

This new program supports DFO’s commitment to continue to protect and restore our oceans and coasts by:

The program supports projects on all of Canada’s coasts, with an expanded geographic scope to include upstream inland aquatic restoration.

To meet its objectives, the program engaged Indigenous organizations, non-profit and community-based organizations, as well academic researchers and institutions to support coordinated approaches for projects.

Given the success of the CRF program, the AERF has been built on the existing framework and has expanded its approach to help address impacts to coastal and marine environments on Canada’s coasts.

The program will focus on priority areas that have the greatest strategic value, prioritizing activities with the greatest benefit to specific coastal ecosystems threats, and activities that address the root causes of impacts on coastal areas.

The AERF is continuing to engage with Indigenous groups in the protection of Canada's coastal areas.

As part of its call for proposal, the program received 130 applications for a total of $263 million. Funding decisions are expected by end of March 2023.

Aquatic Invasive Species

Issue

What is the Government doing to prevent the spread of aquatic invasive species?

Response

If pressed - Zebra and Quagga Mussels

If pressed - Invasive Smallmouth Bass in Miramichi Watershed

If pressed - European Green Crab

If pressed - Asian Carps

If pressed - Goldfish

If pressed - Vase tunicate

Background

Aquatic Invasive Species

The Canadian portion of the Sea Lamprey Control Program (SLCP) was established through the Department in 1954, following ratification of the Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries. The Convention established the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC) as part of a binational commitment to control Sea Lamprey for the protection of Great Lakes fish and fisheries.

The Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations came into force in 2015 under the Fisheries Act to provide tools for federal action and partnerships with provincial and territorial governments, setting significant expectations regarding Canada’s collective ability to manage AIS.

Budget 2017 provided $43.8 million in funding over five years and $10.8 million ongoing for national AIS management to: establish a national core program; expand and make permanent the Department’s Asian Carp program; and, expand the SLCP and increase Canada’s commitment to the GLFC. Budget 2017 increased Canada’s commitment to the GLFC, the coordinating body for the SLCP, from $8.1 million to $10.6 million ongoing.

The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development conducted an audit of DFO’s AIS efforts to date and released its findings on April 2, 2019. In response, DFO, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), and other partners have developed new protocols, tools, and procedures to improve enforcement of the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations at international borders.

Budget 2022 identifies an additional $45 million over five years, and $9 million ongoing to enable DFO and the GLFC to increase efforts to control Sea Lamprey, further facilitate collaborative fishery management, and provide additional support to Great Lakes research.

The 2022 Fall Economic Statement identified $36.6 million in funding over five years from 2022-23 to 2026-27 for DFO for the expansion of the Aquatic Invasive Species Program.

Zebra and Quagga Mussels

Zebra and Quagga mussels can have significant economic impacts on recreational boaters, municipal and industrial water supplies, and power generation infrastructure. Both species are subject to import prohibitions under the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations.

Since the 1980s, Zebra mussels have spread as far as Lake Manitoba, while Quagga mussels are found in the southern Great Lakes. They are found in certain areas of the St Lawrence river, and were recently detected in Lake Memphremagog (2020), Lake Massawippi (2021), and Lake Temiscouata (2022), the latter being located in the headwaters of the St John’s River watershed.

In March 2021, prohibited invasive Zebra mussels were found in moss ball products, a type of aquarium plant product made of green algae. DFO led national emergency response activities with the CBSA and provincial and territorial partners to stop the import and distribution of infested moss ball products across Canada. DFO collaborated with e-commerce platforms to block the sale of moss balls by third party sellers on their platforms.

DFO provides funding for a number of initiatives focusing on invasive mussels:

Miramichi Lake and River

Smallmouth Bass is a predator and competitor of Atlantic Salmon discovered in 2008 in the area.

DFO maintains barriers to prevent Smallmouth Bass from escaping Miramichi Lake and annually invests approximately $50,000 on different physical methods for capturing Smallmouth Bass.

DFO authorised the chemical eradication project in 2021; however, the proponent was met with opposition from community groups and cottage owners throughout 2021 and 2022.

On September 8, 2022, the proponent completed the first phase of the chemical eradication project by applying rotenone in the Southwest Miramichi river, downstream from Lake Miramichi., however the second phase of the project was postponed indefinitely because of sustained opposition from the public.

DFO continues to operate a fish barrier at the Miramichi lake discharge to prevent the spread of smallmouth bass into the Miramichi river system, and will review other proposals that may be submitted to control smallmouth bass in Miramichi lake using pesticides.

European Green Crab

European Green Crab (EGC) consumes and/or competes with indigenous species such as shellfish, crabs, and lobsters and disrupts estuarine habitats such as eelgrass and saltmarsh.

DFO continues to provide funding and works with multiple partners in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) to control EGC, including the Fish, Food and Allied Workers Union, the Marine Institute, the Three Rivers Mi’kmaq band, and the Mi’kmaq Alsumk Mowimsikik Koqoey Association to control EGC.

In BC, EGC were first discovered in 1998. DFO has partnered with multiple Indigenous and stewardship groups and others to determine the extent of the invasion, seek evidence of establishment, and develop and implement management and response plans, including providing subject matter expertise, and funding from the BC Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund to the Coastal Restoration Society ($2.0 million) and Council of the Haida Nation ($1.2 million).

AIS as Bait

Although it may appear desirable to use AIS for bait, food, or other purposes, it also means increased risks of introduction into new areas, and risks propagating the species, leading to unintended, negative consequences on native fish and fish habitat.

Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing

Issue

What is the Government doing to tackle international illegal fishing practices?

Response

If pressed

Background

Illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing is estimated to account for up to 30 per cent of fish landings worldwide and removes as much as $30 B from the world’s economy annually. It is increasingly linked to crimes of convergence such as drug trafficking and human slavery, and therefore poses a serious risk to global security, in addition to contributing to the decline of marine habitat.

Much of the high seas, beyond national jurisdiction, are under- or un-monitored. These areas are particularly susceptible to activities of IUU fishing.

Canada’s economy (75,000 jobs in the primary fishing and aquaculture sector) and natural resources (especially straddling and highly migratory fish stocks) are put at serious risk by IUU fishing.

Canada is a member of seven regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs), where Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is the government’s engagement lead. Beyond securing Canada’s access to fish stocks managed by these organizations, DFO officials also work to ensure strong and effective management measures, based on the best available science, are adopted. Overall Canada’s objective is to prevent overfishing and activities that could undermine the sustainability of those internationally managed species (including those caught incidentally). A fundamental component of RFMOs’ work to improve compliance with adopted management measures is the implementation of a robust monitoring, control and surveillance scheme, including high seas boarding and inspection regime.

The High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy has agreed to a headline commitment of 100 per cent sustainable management of ocean under national jurisdiction, by 2025. For Canada, this will be pursued through the development of a national blue economy strategy. A key pillar of a sustainable ocean economy revolves around Ocean Wealth, of which sustainable ocean food to support global food security, is a key component. From a fisheries perspective, the goal of eliminating IUU fishing is integral to achieving the overall objectives of sustainable ocean food, and therefore a sustainable ocean economy. Canada has been involved in negotiations at the World Trade Organization (WTO) to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14.6) of eliminating subsidies that contribute to IUU fishing and prohibit certain forms of fisheries subsidies which contribute to overcapacity and overfishing, while recognizing the need for appropriate and effective special and differential treatment (S&DT) for developing and least developed countries. In June of 2022, these efforts culminated with the adoption of the landmark WTO Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies, which prohibits subsidies that contribute to IUU fishing and subsidies for fishing or fishing-related activities on the high seas and outside the competence of a relevant RFMO, and disciplines subsidies for fishing on overfished stocks.

DFO is continuing to implement the commitments outlined in the G7 Charlevoix Blueprint for Health Oceans, which included $11.6M in funding for developing new satellite based technologies to track illegal fishing, funding to develop an intelligence sharing network, and work with non-governmental organisations to combat IUU fishing around the world.

Canada’s surveillance and inspection presence is robust and IUU fishing is mitigated through international cooperation and joint enforcement missions. Canada is active in multilateral operations to combat IUU fishing and protect migratory fish stocks in the Atlantic and Pacific, including the deployment of aircraft and inspection personnel to international waters.

Canada ratified the Port State Measures Agreement in 2019, which has as its objective, preventing IUU fishing vessels from landing their catches in the ports of member states.

In June of 2022, at the United Nations Oceans Conference in Lisbon, Portugal, Canada, along with the United States and the United Kingdom, launched the IUU Fishing Action Alliance to drive global efforts at addressing IUU fishing through greater transparency, the use of technology, and supporting State and non-State partnerships.

Foreign ownership

Issue

How is the Department addressing concerns of foreign ownership in commercial fisheries?

Response

If pressed on foreign ownership restrictions in
Atlantic Canada

Background

The issue of foreign ownership of Canadian enterprises, and Canadian fishing corporations specifically, was highlighted as part of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans’ (FOPO) report “West Coast Fisheries: Sharing Risks and Benefits.” The report included 20 recommendations that called for significant changes to the current fisheries management and licensing regime, including a recommendation that “no future sales of fishing quota and/or licences be to non‑Canadian beneficial owners.” The Government Response was supportive of the report’s overall goal of economically viable and sustainable fisheries, and of considering social and cultural factors in their management. The Response also committed Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) to further assess the recommendations, engage a broad range of stakeholders to support ongoing policy improvement efforts, and to undertake a comparative analysis of fisheries policies and regulations in effect on Canada’s East and West Coasts.

In the spring of 2020, DFO launched an analysis of its existing foreign ownership policies and the impacts of any potential changes. During the preliminary stages of this analysis, the Department concluded that it lacks the information required to quantify the concerns put forth by the Standing Committee and some stakeholders. In February of 2021, the Department contracted the Forensic Accounting Management Group (FAMG), under Public Services and Procurement Canada, to develop a survey (the Beneficial Ownership Survey) that would identify who is benefitting from commercial fishing licences and quota, and validate the concerns identified by Parliamentarians.

During the summer of 2021, the Department engaged key stakeholders from all regions to introduce them to the Beneficial Ownership Survey’s intent, objectives, and timelines. Feedback from key industry stakeholders was supportive of the Department’s desire to better understand its licence holders and industry participants.

The Beneficial Ownership Survey opened on January 30, 2022 and was mandatory for most commercial licence holders and vessel owners, with the exclusion of Atlantic inshore and communal commercial harvesters. The Survey closed on April 30, 2022 and DFO is now contacting all participants that have not yet submitted to ensure any outstanding surveys are promptly submitted.

Analysis will take place through summer and fall of 2022, at which point the findings will be published on DFO’s website and shared with key stakeholders. Following the public release of the survey’s findings, DFO will engage key stakeholders, including the Canadian Independent Fish Harvesters Federation, to discuss the findings’ impacts and any potential policy solutions, if required. Careful consideration of the potential impacts on existing licence holders across all commercial fisheries, as well as Canada’s international trade obligations, will be required before any policy changes could be introduced, or regulatory amendments considered.

In February of 2021, DFO strengthened the application of its foreign ownership restrictions in Atlantic Canada. Under the “Enhanced Application of Foreign Ownership Restrictions”, the requirement to be at least 51 per cent Canadian is applied to the full corporate structure of prospective licence holders for all future licence re-issuances in the mid-shore, offshore, and exempted fleet fisheries in Atlantic Canada and Quebec, where this policy applies.

Ocean Protection Plan

Issue

What is Canada doing to protect our oceans?

Response

Background

Marine traffic continues to increase in support of Canada’s growing economy, and the Government is taking additional steps to strengthen marine safety, protect marine ecosystems, and create stronger partnerships with Indigenous and coastal communities.

The renewal of the Oceans Protection Plan (OPP) was announced by the Prime Minister on July 19, 2022.

Budget 2022 announced an additional $2 billion to protect Canada’s coasts and waterways during our economic recovery and beyond. This new funding is in addition to the $1.5 billion initially announced in 2016 and brings the total invested in support of the plan to $3.5 billion. The OPP is the largest investment ever made to protect Canada’s coasts and waterways, while also growing our economy.

Critical new investments for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) and the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) in the renewal of OPP include $1.1 billion over nine years, starting in 2022-23, and $68 million ongoing.

The renewed and expanded plan will help make further progress to:

The implementation of the OPP is a whole-of-government effort, with responsibilities shared across Transport Canada, DFO, CCCG, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Natural Resources Canada, and Health Canada.

Since the last appearance of DFO Senior Officials and Minister Murray before the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans to discuss 2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (B) on December 2, 2022, two important DFO announcements related to OPP Renewal were made:

Under the first phase of OPP (2017-2022), DFO and the CCG had the following accomplishments:

Co-launched the Coastal Nations CCG Auxiliary, the first Indigenous led CCG Auxiliary organization, who now have units in eight First Nations communities along the British Columbia coast.

Since the launch of the OPP in 2016, the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change have impacted our economy, our marine environment, and the resiliency of our supply chain.

As risks associated with marine traffic and impacts to marine ecosystems evolve, further strengthening and expanding OPP implementation across the country is required to ensure Canada’s marine safety and environmental protection system is able to withstand disruption and to adapt to changes in the sector.

Great Lakes Fishery Commission

Issue

What is the Government doing to protect the Great Lakes?

Response

If pressed

If pressed on other Government of Canada efforts

Background

The Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC) was established by the 1954 Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between Canada and the United States of America, with the objective of protecting and sustaining the Great Lakes fishery.

The 1954 Convention charges the commission with five major duties:

The GLFC is made up of eight Commissioners (four each from Canada and the United States [US]) and one US Alternate Commissioner. The GLFC operates under the direction of the Commissioners, and functionally operates independently from government.

Canada and the US government support the Commission through a cost-sharing arrangement that reflects the distribution of territorial waters and the value of each nation’s fishery. Canada agreed at the inaugural meeting under the 1954 Convention to contribute 31 per cent of funding for the transboundary sea lamprey control work, and 50 per cent of other research and administrative costs (e.g. secretariat/salaries). The US provides the remaining funding.

As part of Budget 2022 , the Department successfully brought forward a proposal seeking additional incremental funding of $44.9 million over five years and $9 million ongoing for the GLFC, to ensure that Canada meets its bilateral treaty requirement with the US - bringing Canada’s contribution up to over $19 million in 2022 and moving forward. This funding will help to augment Canadian sea lamprey control activities, and support the GLFC’s scientific research and binational fisheries management coordination across the Great Lakes.

In recent years, the GLFC has been lobbying key stakeholders in the US and Canada, including Members of Parliament (MPs), and US Senators and Representatives, with their request for federal a leadership and responsibility for the GLFC to be moved from Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) to Global Affairs Canada (GAC).

DFO and GAC, with support from the Privy Council Office and the Department of Justice, have been assessing the implications of a possible change in federal leadership and fiscal responsibility for the GLFC. The deployment of the sea lamprey control program would presumably remain with DFO, though how it would receive its funding, now and into the future, is less clear. There is complexity to what the GLFC is proposing, splitting functions and authorities related to the GLFC between two portfolios, and also lack of clarity on what it would accomplish.

On October 20, 2022, two new Commissioners, nominated by the Government of Ontario, were approved by the Governor in Council to represent Canada at the GLFC.

[Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.] The first payment of new funding (~$9.5 million) was made to the Commission in February 2023.

The GFLC’s 2022 Interim Meeting, originally scheduled for November 30, was postponed as the US Section did not have all of their four Commissioners in place and since Canada’s funding level to the Commission for the upcoming 2023 fiscal year had not been finalized.

The GLFC Secretariat now has the information it requires to set the budget for the upcoming year and is actively working with Canadian and American Commissioners to schedule the interim meeting.

Discussions with the Secretariat continue regarding 2023 transfers (which comes from our 23-24 FY) to determine what funding is required for the Sea Lamprey Control Program and to deliver on other important aspects of the GLFC’s mandate.

On February 22, 2023, the Minister of Transport, the Honourable Omar Alghabra, announced $12.5 million in funding to launch the Ballast Water Innovation Program as part of Canada’s Oceans Protection Plan. The program, which is a central component of the Government of Canada’s efforts to advance the implementation and enforcement of the 2021 Ballast Water Regulations, will play an important role in further reducing the spread of aquatic invasive species in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River region by investing in innovative solutions to ballast water management and ensuring these management systems are optimized for unique water environments in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River region.

On September 23, 2022, Terry Duguid, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, announced an investment of more than $3.9 million over three years in thirty-nine new projects in Ontario through the Great Lakes Protection Initiative, part of the Government of Canada’s Freshwater Action Plan. Through the Great Lakes Protection Initiative, the Government of Canada takes action to address the most significant environmental challenges affecting Great Lakes water quality and ecosystem health by delivering on Canada’s commitments under the Canada-United States Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.

Transformation of the Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation

Issue

Are there any updates on the transformation of the Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation?

Response

If pressed

Background

Headquartered in Winnipeg, Manitoba, the FFMC is a federal Crown corporation established in 1969.

Enabled under the Freshwater Fish Marketing Act (Act, FFMA), the FFMC has the exclusive right to market and trade freshwater fish in interprovincial and export markets in designated products supplied by commercial fishers in participating jurisdictions. The FFMC was established to operate on a self-sustaining basis without government appropriations.

Over the past 12 years, the FFMC operating environment has experienced significant change. Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba withdrew from the Act in favour of an open market in 2011, 2012 and 2017 respectively, while Alberta closed its commercial in-land fishery in 2014. The Northwest Territories is the only remaining participating jurisdiction under the Act. However, many harvesters from Manitoba and Saskatchewan continue to sell their fish to the FFMC through contracts.

In order to remain competitive in the open market, FFMC has developed strategies to operate more effectively, including by shifting from a supply-driven marketing model, to one that is driven by customer demand; diversifying revenue; and, aggressively targeting new sales markets.

Recognizing the need to adapt to the new operating environment, in 2018, a ministerial advisory panel was established to explore ways to transform FFMC to remain modern and competitive in the open market.

Based on the Ministerial Advisory Panel’s advice, an Interlocutor was appointed to engage with harvesters and other stakeholders in the freshwater fishery as part of the transformation process. In March of 2020, the Interlocutor convened the Interim Committee of Inland Fish Harvesters to advise him in his recommendation to the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans, and the Canadian Coast Guard.

In September of 2020, the Interlocutor submitted a report of findings and recommendations for the Minister’s consideration. The report recommended that Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) commit to continue working with the Interim Committee to explore transformation of the FFMC to a harvester-led governance and ownership model, and to provide support to the Interim Committee to secure administrative and technical expertise to allow it to formalize its role in representing fish harvesters in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and the Northwest Territories. On January 21, 2021, the former Minister announced receipt of the Interlocutor’s report.

Throughout 2021, DFO worked with the Interim Committee to secure administrative and technical expertise to formalize its role in representing fish harvesters in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and the Northwest Territories.

In August of 2021, the Interim Committee established itself as the Freshwater Fish Harvesters Association, Inc. (FFHAI), a not-for-profit corporation.

In November 2021, DFO concluded negotiations with the FFHAI to provide financial support for it to secure secretarial support and technical expertise, research potential co-operative governance models, gather information on the FFMC’s activities, begin to assess the FFMC’s assets and liabilities, and engage freshwater harvesters. In March 2022, the FFHAI submitted a proposal to DFO on its vision to transform the FFMC into a harvester-led entity.

A number of other parties have also expressed interest in being involved in the future of the FFMC.

Canada’s Leadership in Ocean Governance

Issue

What is Canada doing internationally to advance responsible ocean governance and marine conservation?

Response

If pressed

Background

The world’s oceans are facing increasing impacts from climate change, species decline and loss, ecosystem degradation and loss, aquatic invasive species, and harmful effects from waste and other pollutants. Canada collaborates nationally with federal, provincial, territorial, and Indigenous partners, and with other maritime nations in international fora to conserve marine ecosystem functions and protect the biodiversity of our oceans.

Canada is a member of seven regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs), where Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) works to secure Canada’s access to fish stocks managed by these organizations and to ensure strong and effective management measures, based on the best available science, are adopted. Overall Canada’s objective is to prevent overfishing and other activities that could undermine the long-term sustainability of those internationally managed species.

In July of 2020, Canada joined the Global Ocean Alliance (GOA), a coalition of countries led by the United Kingdom that committed to the ambitious global target to protect at least 30 per cent of the world’s oceans by 2030 through the establishment and effective management of marine protected areas (MPAs) and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs). Including Canada, to date, 75 countries have now joined the Alliance. Membership in this alliance is a key part of Canada’s advocacy for international action to increase conservation and protection of the world’s oceans by 2030. In addition to supporting the implementation of the 30by30 target, the Alliance aims to maintain a spotlight on ocean issues within the Convention on Biological Diversity and other international fora.

The Prime Minister is a member of the High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy, where Canada works with international partners to set an ambitious agenda on protection and sustainable use of our oceans. On December 2, 2020, the Prime Minister endorsed the High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy’s Transformations for a Sustainable Ocean Economy: A Vision for Protection, Production and Prosperity, which included support for a global target to protect 30 per cent of the ocean by 2030. This endorsement affirms the Government of Canada’s support towards sustainably managing 100 per cent of Canada’s ocean area by 2025. Canada is currently developing its Blue Economy Strategy to fulfill this commitment.

On June 9, 2022, Canada and Chile co-sponsored the launch of the Americas for the Protection of the Ocean Declaration at the Summit of the Americas. The Declaration established a regional coalition for collaboration, cooperation and coordination of marine protected areas and other marine conservation measures in the Pacific. This regional collaboration instrument provides an opportunity for Canada to work with Chile and other partners in the region (the United States, Mexico, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru) to advance the global 30by30 target. Canada is collaborating with Chile to finalize the development of the workplan and to guide he implementation of the Declaration’s objectives.

The 15th Conference of the Parties (COP15) to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) that took place in Montreal, December 7-19, 2022, successfully adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) including four goals and 23 new targets, replacing the Aichi targets and setting out a new plan to transform society’s relationship with biodiversity and ensure the 2050 vision of living in harmony with nature is fulfilled. COP15 in Montreal provided a unique opportunity to showcase Canada’s commitment to an ambitious GBF and biodiversity targets, in alignment with its domestic nature conservation and recovery commitments, such as the target to conserve 30 per cent of its land and waters by 2030.

Following CBD COP15, Canada successfully co-hosted the Fifth International Marine Protected Areas Congress (IMPAC5) with host First Nations – Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh – as well as, the International Union for Conservation of Nature, the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society and the Province of British Columbia from February 3 to 9, 2023. Throughout IMPAC5, the Government of Canada and partners announced several important initiatives, including the unveiling of Canada’s proposed pathway to 2025 (17 marine areas) being considered for the path towards conserving 25 per cent of our oceans by 2025. IMPAC5 culminated with the Leadership Forum which convened ministers and senior officials of national and sub-national governments and international organizations, Indigenous leaders, young professionals, civil society, philanthropic foundations, academia, and industry who share Canada’s ambition for ocean conservation. IMPAC5 and the Leadership Forum provided an opportunity for Canada to showcase its journey to achieve the 10 per cent Aichi target for marine conservation and share the lessons learned with countries striving to increase their level of ocean protection.

Canada actively participated in the negotiations of a new legally-binding treaty under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ), which concluded on March 4th, 2023. The treaty establishes the governance structure and management mechanisms to implement the environmental and conservation objectives of UNCLOS through area-based conservation and management, environmental impact assessments, and capacity-building. The treaty provisions respect the competence of the global and regional frameworks and instruments such as RFMOs and aim to strengthen cooperation among them, including via sharing scientific information and technical expertise. Following the legal technical review of the final text, delegations will reconvene in New York for a half-day to formally adopt the treaty in its six official languages (likely in June 2023 around the same time as the 33rd Meeting of States Parties to UNCLOS). Following the adoption, the treaty will be open for signature. Sixty ratifications will be required before the treaty comes into force. The BBNJ treaty will be integral to achieving global marine conservation goals while complementing Canada’s domestic conservation action.

Canada is a member of the International Seabed Authority Council and is actively engaged in the negotiations on seabed mineral exploitation regulations to ensure effective protection of the marine environment. At IMPAC5 on February 8, 2023, Canada reiterated its position on domestic seabed mining, stating that Canada does not current have a domestic legal framework that would permit seabed mining and will not authorize seabed mining in areas under our jurisdiction in the absence of a rigorous regulatory regime.

As part of the Indo-Pacific Strategy, Canada will lead the Shared Ocean Fund ($84.3M over 5 years), which will increase maritime cooperation and create a healthy marine environment in the Indo-Pacific while supporting measures against illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. This new initiative will help support ocean management, reinforce a healthy marine environment in the Indo-Pacific region through Canadian government support for a range of enhanced measures against illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing.

After more than 20 years of negotiations, the WTO Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies was adopted at the 12th Ministerial Conference (MC12) on June 17, 2022. The agreement partially addresses the requirements of United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14.6 that aims to address harmful fisheries subsidies, such as those contributing to IUU fishing. Although further negotiations are required to achieve all aspects of UN SDG 14.6, this agreement is a major step forward for ocean sustainability as it targets harmful subsidies that contribute to the unsustainable harvesting of global fish stocks. Canada was a key participant throughout these negotiations and was able to advance exclusively Canadian policies within the agreed-upon text (i.e., subsidy prohibitions in unregulated areas and for unregulated species on the high seas). Canada is currently undergoing domestic ratification processes related to the agreement.

Tidal Energy Development

Issue

Why does the Government of Canada not support the development of renewable tidal energy?

Response

Background

In May 2022, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) received an application from Sustainable Marine Energy Canada Ltd. (SMEC), for a Fisheries Act authorization and Species at Risk Act (SARA) permit in relation to a proposed in-stream tidal energy project.

SMEC is proposing to deploy and operate a floating tidal energy device (i.e. platform) with six 3-bladed turbines at the Fundy Ocean Research Center for Energy (FORCE) test site in the Minas Passage, approximately 7 km west of Parrsboro in Cumberland county, Nova Scotia.

In 2020, Natural Resources Canada provided SMEC $28.5 million to advance tidal energy technology. It is DFO’s understanding that the funding was approved based on the deployment of 9 Megawatt (MW) or approximately twenty-one (21) platforms.

The current proposed deployment is separate from an earlier deployment of a test platform in Grand Passage, which was authorized by the Department to test and develop the company’s Environmental Effects Monitoring Program (EEMP). In addition, DFO has issued several Fisheries Act authorizations related to tidal power projects over the past five years.

Grand Passage differs from the Minas Passage because Grand Passage is not a major migratory corridor for fish and the flow speeds are considerably lower than in the Minas Passage.

The Minas Passage and Minas Basin are part of an ecologically and biologically significant area, characterized by the world’s highest tides. There are currently 85 different fish species, multiple species of marine mammals, and marine invertebrates known to use this area. The Minas Passage acts as a major migratory corridor for many of these species, including numerous species of economic and cultural significance.

SMEC has communicated a plan for a 5 Megawatt (MW) deployment to install three, six, and eventually twelve floating platforms in the Minas Passage. Each platform would have six tidal turbines as a minimum pathway in order to receive funding from their investors.

DFO continues to communicate a clear regulatory path with projected timelines to support a staged approach to tidal energy development. This means installing only one platform with an acceptable monitoring program first. Under this staged approach to in-stream tidal energy development, the Department has authorized the test platform in Grand Passage.

This staged approach is important before a project that has a higher risk of impacts to fish can proceed to the next stage of development (i.e. large or high-risk tidal array).

At this time there is no environmental effects monitoring equipment that is capable of collecting information and data to inform the risk mortality, injury, or behavioral disturbance.

Where the proponent has communicated that they have withdrawn their application DFO’s review of the project is currently paused. Should SMEC propose and alternative approach DFO staff will continue our review.

DFO considers a variety of factors when reviewing in-stream tidal energy projects, including turbine specifications and project design, project location, avoidance and mitigation measures, relevant scientific literature, and the ability to monitor for potential effects.

Decisions on whether or not to issue a Fisheries Act authorization are guided by the best available scientific information and departmental objectives, and decisions are made in consultation with Indigenous partners. The precautionary principle is followed when there are uncertainties.

Date modified: