House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans (FOPO) Minister's Appearance on Supplementary Estimates C
March 27, 2023
Table of contents
- Opening Remarks
- Departmental Information - 2022-2023 Supps C
- Issue Notes - New Funding
- Marine and Aviation Fuel Costs
- Funding for a Litigation Settlement
- Hurricane Fiona: Small Craft Harbour Program and Ghost Gear fund
- Great Lakes Fishery Commission
- Trans Mountain Expansion Project: Environmental Protections and Indigenous Concerns
- Aquatic Invasive Species
- Implementation of the Impact Assessment Act
- Issue Notes - Transfers
- Issues Notes - Technical Adjustment
- Issues Notes
- Questions and Answers
- FOPO Report - West Coast Fisheries
- Marine Cargo Spills - Government Response
- Fleet Renewal and Project Delays (lapsed funding)
- Marine and Aviation Fuel Costs
- Trans Mountain Expansion Project and Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund
- Aquatic Invasive Species Funding
- Recent Fisheries Management Decisions
- Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative
- Mackerel Closure and Inclusion as Transboundary Stock
- Closure of the Yellowtail Flounder and Winter Flounder Fisheries in the Gulf of St. Lawrence
- Review of the Precautionary Approach and Quota Decreases for Gulf of St. Lawrence Shrimp Fishers
- Aquaculture: Open-Net Pen Transition Plan in British Columbia
- Aquaculture: Discovery Islands Decision
- Sea Lice: Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Science Response
- Exports of Canadian Snow Crab to Japan
- Hurricane Fiona - Small Craft Harbour Program and Ghost Gear Fund
- Hurricane Fiona - Impacts on Real Property Assets
- Small Craft Harbours - Divestiture
- Executives at DFO: Second Language Level Proficiency
- Indigenous Employment
- Consulting Firms
- Recovery Efforts of Unidentified High Altitude Object in Lake Huron
- Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC)
- Funding for the Implementation of the Impact Assessment Act
- Canada’s Nature Legacy: Protecting Canada’s Nature, Parks and Wildlife
- Interdepartmental Maritime Integrated Command, Control and Communications (IMIC3) Program (DND to DFO)
- Quebec Fisheries Fund
- Marine Renewable Energy
- Question Period Cards
- Canadian Coast Guard
- FOPO Marine Cargo Container Spills Report
- Standing House Committee on Fisheries and Ocean’s Report on Science at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
- Scientific Processes and Excellence at Fisheries and Oceans Canada
- Fish Stock Rebuilding
- Fisheries Decision-making
- Fish Harvester Benefit and Grant Program
- NAFO 4T Winter and Yellowtail Flounder Decision
- Pacific Salmon
- Pinniped Predation on Salmon in Pacific Region
- Seal Predation
- Aquaculture - Open-Net Pen Transition Plan in British Columbia
- Aquaculture - Discovery Islands Salmon Aquaculture Licences Decision
- Sea Lice and Aquaculture
- North Atlantic Right Whale
- Fleet Renewal
- Major Projects
- Ghost Gear Program
- Small Craft Harbour Efforts to Address Climate
- Impacts of Hurricane Fiona
- Indigenous Moderate Livelihood Fishing in Atlantic Canada
- Culture Change Reconciliation
- Implementation of the Modernized Fisheries Act
- Aquatic Ecosystems Restoration Fund
- Aquatic Invasive Species
- Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing
- Foreign ownership
- Ocean Protection Plan
- Great Lakes Fishery Commission
- Transformation of the Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation
- Canada’s Leadership in Ocean Governance
- Tidal Energy Development
- Annex
Opening Remarks
Good morning, Mr. Chair. I’m pleased to be here today on the traditional unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishnaabeg People.
I’m happy to be joined by:
- Annette Gibbons, Deputy Minister
- Mario Pelletier, Commissioner, Canadian Coast Guard
- Richard Goodyear, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Deputy Minister
Mr. Chair, today, I’m appearing before the Committee to present the 2022-23 Supplementary Estimates C on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Canadian Coast Guard.
I will start by providing an overview of some key items, and then provide more detail where possible.
Following that, I’ll be happy to answer any questions you have.
Mr. Chair, in the Supplementary Estimates C, I’m seeking 104.2 million dollars for a number of important items, and this includes:
- 52.2 million dollars for increased marine and aviation fuel costs for the Canadian Coast Guard;
- 22.6 million dollars for a litigation settlement; and,
- 9.7 million dollars from the $100 million committed to the Small Craft Harbours Program and the Ghost Gear Fund, which is cleaning up and recovering lost and abandoned fishing gear, and for recovery efforts for essential harbours affected by Hurricane Fiona.
Canadians have faced a particularly challenging year.
The cost of running Canadian Coast Guard ships and helicopters has increased due to the international pressures of inflation and increased fuel costs.
This is not something we can predict, nor is it an expense we can afford to cut corners on. Mariners, coastal and Indigenous communities, and all Canadians rely on the Canadian Coast Guard to help keep them and their waters safe and clean.
Last year, Hurricane Fiona was one of the most devastating storms ever to hit Atlantic Canada and Eastern Quebec, and this is further highlighting the impact of climate change on coastal communities. It’s a new reality we must adapt to.
Hurricane Fiona damaged over 130 small craft harbours, devastating infrastructure and scattering fishing gear throughout local waters. Last October I visited PEI and saw some of this damage first hand. I heard directly from fish harvesters and those who live in coastal communities about the impact of Fiona on their livelihoods. It is incumbent upon our government to help clean up this overwhelming damage.
And, Mr. Chair, we were also required this year to settle a lawsuit related to past decisions in the amount of 22.6 million dollars. There is a non-disclosure clause in the settlement agreement, so I won’t be able to provide more information on this.
Mr. Chair, the funding I am seeking through the Supplementary Estimates “C” is essential to continue our work protecting Canada’s mariners and our marine environment. As well, it will ensure my department can fulfill its mandate for all Canadians.
Thank you.
Departmental Information - 2022-2023 Supps C
Briefing Deck
2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (C)
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
March 2023
Contents
- 2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (C) Overview
- 2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (C) Current status
- 2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (C) Items
- 2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (C) Items by Vote
- Next Steps
- Annex A - 2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (C) by Core Responsibility
- Annex B - 2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (C) by Standard Object
- Annex C - 2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (C) by Transfer Payment Program
- Annex D - 2022-23 Permanent Frozen Allotments
- Annex E - Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation - Appropriations
2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (C) Overview
- Supplementary Estimates serve two main purposes:
- To seek authority from Parliament to revise the Departments’ spending levels; and,
- To provide Parliament with information on changes in the estimated expenditures.
- This is the third and final Supplementary Estimates exercise scheduled for tabling in 2022-23.
- Supplementary Estimates (A) occurred in the spring with DFO submitting a single reallocation in that exercise.
- Supplementary Estimates (B) were tabled on November 17, 2022 and received Royal Assent on December 15, 2022.
- Supplementary Estimates (C) were tabled on February 15, 2023, with Royal Assent being determined according to House of Commons’ Order of Business.
- A summary of expected departmental 2022-23 frozen authorities will be published as an online annex upon tabling, indicating the amounts that will lapse in the year-end Public Accounts (see Annex D).
- In addition to DFO’s submission, the Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation (FFMC) required the inclusion of a single item in order to be compliant with their borrowing authorities
- The FFMC is a self-sustaining Crown Corporation, and their item is included as a stand-alone submission (see Annex E). Our Minister is responsible to ensure FFMC's accountability to Parliament.
2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (C) Current status
2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (C) - $104.2 million (including statutory)
- Eleven (11) items
- $99.9 million Vote 1
- $0.1 million Vote 5
- $2.5 million Vote 10
- $1.7 million Statutory
Voted and Statutory Authoritites | Previous Authorities to Date | Supplementary Estimates (C) | Proposed Authorities to Date |
---|---|---|---|
Operating Vote 1 | 2,141,265,256 | 99,920,203 | 2,241,185,459 |
Capital Vote 5 | 1,471,504,349 | 146,000 | 1,471,650,349 |
Grants and Contributions Vote 10 | 964,910,037 | 2,494,482 | 967,404,519 |
Total Voted Authorities | 4,577,679,642 | 102,560,685 | 4,680,240,327 |
Statutory | 189,724,012 | 1,675,316 | 191,399,328 |
Total Budgetary Expenditures | 4,767,403,654 | 104,236,001 | 4,871,639,655 |
* Represents all funding, voted or anticipated, including funding that is "frozen" (i.e., funding that is in DFO's reference levels, [Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.]
2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (C) Items
[Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.] / New Funding (7) - $101.7 million
- $52.2 million for increased marine and aviation fuel costs
- $22.6 million for a litigation settlement
- $9.7 million funding for the Small Craft Harbour Program and the Ghost Gear Fund for recovery efforts at harbours affected by Hurricane Fiona
- $8.7 million to support the work of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (Budget 2022)
- $4.5 million to continue strengthening environmental protections and addressing concerns raised by Indigenous groups regarding the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (horizontal item)
- $2.3 million to fight aquatic invasive species
- $1.7 million to implement the Impact Assessment Act (horizontal item)
Transfers with other government departments (2) - $1.1 million
- ($0.7 million) from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to the Department of Natural Resources in support of the administration and allocation of capacity funding to Indigenous groups for the Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund
- ($0.4 million) from various organizations to the Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs for an out-of-court settlement
Other Technical Adjustments (2) - $1.9 million
- $1.9 million reinvestment of revenue received from polluters or the Ship-Source Oil Pollution Fund for clean-up costs associated with oil spills
- Internal reallocation of resources ($0.8M) to support the disposal of small craft harbours
Notes: All amounts exclude Employee Benefit Plan (EBP), Shared Services Canada (SSC) and Accommodation Costs
Items (Voted Authorities) | Vote 1 - Operating | Vote 5 - Capital | Vote 10 - Grants & Contributions | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
[Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.] | ||||
Funding for increased marine and aviation fuel costs | $52,200,000 | 0 | 0 | $52,200,000 |
Funding for a litigation settlement | $22,600,363 | 0 | 0 | $22,600,363 |
Funding for the Small Craft Harbour Program and the Ghost Gear Fund for recovery efforts at harbours affected by Hurricane Fiona | $8,190,784 | 0 | $1,500,000 | $9,690,784 |
Funding to support the work of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (Budget 2022) | $8,725,811 | 0 | 0 | $8,725,811 |
Funding to continue strengthening environmental protections and addressing concerns raised by Indigenous groups regarding the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (horizontal item) | $4,479,870 | 0 | 0 | $4,479,870 |
Funding to fight aquatic invasive species | $1,412,938 | $146,000 | $750,000 | $2,308,938 |
Funding to implement the Impact Assessment Act (horizontal item) | $1,719,215 | 0 | 0 | $1,719,215 |
Transfers | ||||
Transfer from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to the Department of Natural Resources in support of the administration and allocation of capacity funding to Indigenous groups for the Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund | ($88,262) | 0 | ($595,918) | ($684,180) |
Transfer from various organizations to the Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs for an out-of-court settlement | ($400,000) | 0 | 0 | ($400,000) |
Other | ||||
Reinvestment of revenue received from polluters or the Ship-Source Oil Source Pollution Fund for clean up costs associated with oil spills | $1,919,884 | 0 | 0 | $1,919,884 |
Internal reallocation of resources to support the disposal of small craft harbours | ($840,400) | 0 | $840,400 | 0 |
Total Items - Voted Authorities | $99,920,203 | $146,000 | $2,494,482 | $102,560,685 |
Next Steps
- Final page proofs were received on January 17, 2023, with CFO approval and sign-off sent to TBS on January 24, 2023.
- Supplementary Estimates (C) were tabled in Parliament on February 15, 2023, with Royal Assent being determined according to House of Commons’ Order of Business.
- The Minister and departmental senior officials are appearing at the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans in March.
Core Responsibility | Vote 1 | Vote 5 | Vote 10 | Voted Authorities | EBP | Total Authorities |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marine Operations and Response | 55,260,660 | 0 | 0 | 55,260,660 | 274,260 | 55,534,920 |
Internal Services | 24,754,867 | 0 | 0 | 24,754,867 | 310,858 | 25,065,725 |
Aquatic Ecosystems | 10,885,088 | 146,000 | 154,082 | 11,185,170 | 592,220 | 11,777,390 |
Fisheries | 7,168,438 | 0 | 2,340,400 | 9,508,838 | 27,868 | 9,536,706 |
Marine Navigation | 1,851,150 | 0 | 0 | 1,851,150 | 470,110 | 2,321,260 |
Total | 99,920,203 | 146,000 | 2,494,482 | 102,560,685 | 1,675,316 | 104,236,001 |
Standard Object Name | Standard Object Number | Amount |
---|---|---|
Personnel * | (1) | 7,880,191 |
Transportation and Communications | (2) | 1,011,232 |
Information | (3) | 39,221 |
Professional and Special Services | (4) | 30,873,485 |
Rentals | (5) | 0 |
Purchased Repair and Maintenance | (6) | 1,079,484 |
Utilities, Materials and Supplies | (7) | 52,761,775 |
Acquisition of Land, Buildings, and Works | (8) | 0 |
Acquisition of Machinery and Equipment | (9) | 146,000 |
Public Debt Charges | (11) | 0 |
Other Subsidies and Payments | (12) | 7,950,131 |
Total Operating and Capital | 101,741,519 | |
Total Transfer Payments | (10) | 2,494,482 |
Total | 104,236,001 |
*Includes EBP
Transfer Payment Program | Amount |
---|---|
Grants in Support of Asset Disposal Programming | 840,400 |
Total Grants | 840,400 |
Contributions in Support of the Sustainable Management of Canada’s Fisheries | 1,500,000 |
Contributions in Support of Aquatic Species and Aquatic Habitat | 154,082 |
Total Contributions | 1,654,082 |
Total Transfer Payment Programs | 2,494,482 |
Initiative | Vote 1 | Vote 5 | Vote 10 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transferred or Reallocated | 131,531 | 0 | 0 | 131,531 |
Financial Management Transformation | 131,531 | 0 | 0 | 131,531 |
Reductions | 125,610 | 0 | 0 | 125,610 |
Small Craft Harbours Budget 2021 Divestitures | 125,610 | 0 | 0 | 125,610 |
Reprofiled | 0 | 204,251,834 | 41,700,778 | 245,952,612 |
Program Icebreaker | 0 | 61,188,705 | 0 | 61,188,705 |
Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative | 0 | 33,257,460 | 0 | 33,257,460 |
Vessel Life Extension 2020 - Phase 1 | 0 | 32,789,570 | 0 | 32,789,570 |
Small Craft Acquisition | 0 | 22,840,261 | 0 | 22,840,261 |
Trans Mountain Expansion Project | 0 | 22,620,000 | 0 | 22,620,000 |
Mid-Shore Multi-Mission Vessel Project | 0 | 19,377,353 | 0 | 19,377,353 |
Commercial Icebreakers (Light) | 0 | 7,968,582 | 0 | 7,968,582 |
Arctic and Offshore Patrol Ships | 0 | 4,209,903 | 0 | 4,209,903 |
Fish Funds | 0 | 0 | 41,700,778 | 41,700,778 |
Total Frozen Allotments | 257,141 | 204,251,834 | 41,700,778 | 246,209,753 |
Annex E - Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation 2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (C) - Appropriations (in dollars)
- During approval of Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation’s 2022/23 plan, the Corporation was found to not be compliant with section 101(1) in Part X of the Financial Administration Act (FAA) regarding its borrowing authority.
- A temporary Vote has been created to grant the necessary authority.
- Once Royal Assent is granted through Parliament, this transaction will restore the proper authorities to borrow from other than the Crown.
Previous Authorities to Date | Supplementary Estimates (C) | Proposed Authorities to Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Budgetary Voted (temporary Vote) 1c - Authorization to borrow money otherwise than from the Crown |
0 | 1 | 1 |
Total Voted Authorities | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Statutory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Budgetary Expenditures | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Page Proofs - Supps C DFO Details
- Detail by Organization for Supplementary Estimates (C), 2022-23, Department of Fisheries and Oceans
- Organization Summary
- Explanation of Requirements
- Listing of Transfer Payments
- Listing of Statutory Authorities - Budgetary
- Items for inclusion in the Proposed Schedule 1 to the Appropriation Bill (for the financial year ending March 31, 2023)
- Statutory Forecasts for Supplementary Estimates (C), 2022-23
- Expenditures by Purpose for Supplementary Estimates (C), 2022-23
- Budgetary Expenditures by Standard Object for Supplementary Estimates (C), 2022-23
- Horizontal Items for Supplementary Estimates (C), 2022-23
Supplementary Estimates C 2022-2023
- These Supplementary Estimates, which present requirements over and above our approved Main Estimates, are the third and final supplementary exercise for 2022-23.
- For this exercise, $104.2 million is being presented, consisting of $102.6 million in voted appropriations and $1.7 million in statutory appropriations.
- Voted appropriations are primarily comprised of funding for increased fuel costs; a litigation settlement; initial recovery efforts following hurricane Fiona; and transfers for the Great Lakes Fishery Commission.
- Statutory appropriations reflect updates to the employee benefit plans.
Background
These Supplementary Estimates (C) are presenting a total increase of $104.2 million, which is comprised of $102.6 million and $1.7 million in voted and statutory appropriations respectively.
- The $102.6 million increase in voted authorities is mainly attributed to:
- $52.2 million - Funding for increased marine and aviation fuel costs;
- $22.6 million - Funding for a litigation settlement;
- $9.7 million - Funding for the initial recovery efforts following Hurricane Fiona; and
- $8.7 million - Funding to support the work of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission.
In addition to those main increases, these Supplementary Estimates include another seven items valued at $9.3 million for other initiatives with lower funding requirements and technical adjustments such as transfers to other government departments.
In all, the sum of all items represents an increase to our spending levels, over and above what was approved in the Main Estimates.
Issue Notes - New Funding
Marine and Aviation Fuel Costs
- The funding submission from Fisheries and Oceans Canada was to support the Canadian Coast Guard’s existing Marine and Aviation programs and did not seek funds for new activities.
- The funding supplements Canadian Coast Guard fleet’s 2022-23 fixed budget for marine and aviation fuel due to increased costs over the last year. It ensures delivery of regular, existing and planned activities.
- The Department’s programs and services are fuel-intensive and are also critical to saving lives, protecting the marine environment, ensuring safe navigation through the placement of buoys and icebreaking, supporting post-pandemic economic recovery, and conserving and protecting Canada’s oceans, aquatic ecosystems and species.
- Internal reallocation was not feasible as these costs are in excess of what the Department can absorb without impacting operations and other programming. Without additional funding, significant compromises to the Department’s delivery of programs and services would have been necessary which would have impacted the ability to conduct our critical work, ensure the safety of mariners, and to protect the huge volume of economic activity in Canadian waters and shipping corridors.
Background
The Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) owns and operates the federal government’s civilian fleet and provides key maritime services to Canadians. The total maritime area of responsibility is nearly 5.3 million square kilometers of ocean and inland waters and along 243,000 kilometers of coastline, the longest of any country in the world.
As a Special Operating Agency within Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), the CCG ensures the safety of all mariners on our waters, protects the marine environment and supports economic growth through the safe and efficient movement of maritime trade in and out of Canada’s waters.
The fleet delivers critical programs and services to Canadian communities and businesses year-round. Many of these services are mandated through various legislation/Acts such as the Canada Shipping Act, 2001; the Oceans Act; and, the Wrecked, Abandoned or Hazardous Vessels Act. Fuel is required for these operations, such as search and rescue; community resupply for the North; on-water conservation and protection activities; science programming; buoy tending to ensure safe navigation and icebreaking as a critical activity to enable the economy. These activities are often fuel-intensive; the consumption of fuel and the paid price can vary from year to year due to factors such as ice conditions and crude oil market fluctuations.
Fuel prices have been steadily climbing due to post-pandemic recovery, inflation, and the war in Ukraine. As pandemic restrictions ease, more people are travelling, more goods are being transported, and more construction is underway - these activities create greater demand for fuel. Inflation is also a factor in that retailers raise prices, which leads to suppliers and transportation companies doing the same. Sanctions against Russia have also contributed to higher prices on the global market. Between April 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022, the cost of marine fuel increased from $0.86 to $1.58 per litre and from $1.36 to $1.67 per litre for aviation fuel. Since April 2022, the Department has paid $1.75 per litre for diesel fuel and $2.10 per litre for aviation fuel.
DFO/CCG have sought a fuel cost top-up five times between 2008 and 2015. In 2016, the Comprehensive Review exercise sought to stabilize the funding to maintain CCG operations and was tagged for an increase of $16 million annually in addition to the previously allocated fuel budget.
The cost of fuel has increased dramatically over the last year, affecting the CCG’s ability to meet its operational requirements. In the past, the fleet was able to operate within the allocated fuel budget; however, with growing fuel costs, it is now unable to do so without significant program impacts.
The 2022-23 Fleet Fuel Operating Budget (including Emergency Towing Vessels and Helicopters) was $62.9 million. However, based on current and projected market costs, as well as forecasted climate conditions (e.g., ice conditions), the 2022-23 Fleet Fuel forecast is $111.1 million for marine fuel and $4.0 million for aviation fuel. As a result of the increase in fuel prices, the budget was exhausted in November 2022. Internal reallocation was not feasible; these costs are in excess of what DFO could absorb without impacting operations elsewhere in the Department. To calculate the shortfall, a number of factors were considered. For instance, current and projected fuel costs were balanced with weather predictions which anticipate challenging ice conditions and additional pressures for icebreaking activities.
The Department requested an additional $52.2 million in funding in 2022-23 to supplement the fixed fuel budget to ensure that the fleet can operate at capacity and maintain continuity of vital services, particularly in the latter part of the fiscal year. The additional funding enables the Department to continue delivering essential services and meet its obligations to ensure safe and accessible waterways and the sustainable use and development of Canada’s oceans and waterways. The Department will continue to monitor the impact of fluctuations in fuel costs to determine a plan for next fiscal year and going forward.
Funding for a Litigation Settlement
- Funding of $22.6 million is to conclude an out-of-court settlement. This settlement has been negotiated and settlement amounts have been paid to the Plaintiffs.
- Further details on this settlement cannot be disclosed due to a non-disclosure clause in the settlement.
Background
In court, the Crown was found liable and appeals have been exhausted. A settlement has been negotiated and settlement amounts have been paid to the Plaintiffs. The entirety of this funding is for the settlement payment with no funding being retained for internal Departmental use.
Further details on this settlement cannot be disclosed due to a non-disclosure clause in the settlement.
Hurricane Fiona: Small Craft Harbour Program and Ghost Gear fund
- Hurricane Fiona caused widespread infrastructure damage, including damage to Fisheries and Oceans Canada-owned fishing harbours.
- The storm also caused substantial fishing gear-related debris, including heavy damage to harbour storage facilities. Several fisheries were active during the hurricane and have reported significant loss of set gear that could not be removed in advance.
- On October 4, 2022, the Prime Minister announced the $300 million Hurricane Fiona Recovery Fund.
- On October 17, in support of immediate recovery efforts, I announced that $100 million from the fund has been set aside to repair essential infrastructure at harbours and to retrieve lost fishing gear.
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada staff have worked with Harbour authorities and communities where impacted harbours are located to carry out initial repairs.
- Staff are also planning to execute longer term repairs at impacted harbours as required. This includes working with consultants and harbour authorities to determine the scope and budget of work.
- The Department has also funded 11 projects which resulted in the retrieval of almost 130 tons of ghost gear in impacted areas. Other similar efforts are being planned for in the coming months.
Background
On September 24, Hurricane Fiona hit Atlantic Canada and eastern Quebec, impacting various types of infrastructure including DFO-owned Small Craft Harbours, and producing substantial fishing gear-related debris, not only from fisheries and aquaculture operations that were active during the storm, but also as a result of heavy damage to harbour storage facilities, with gear and structures being swept into the ocean.
On October 17, Ministers Murray and Petitpas Taylor announced that $100 million from the new Hurricane Fiona Recovery Fund (HFRF) will be used to repair SCH infrastructure and to retrieve lost fishing and aquaculture gear. Specifically, $70 million to supplement the Small Craft Harbour Program to support recovery efforts at Small Craft Harbours damaged by Hurricane Fiona. Another $30 million was allocated to support retrieval and responsible disposal of lost fishing gear through the Ghost Gear Fund (GGF).
DFO’s Small Craft Harbours program has worked diligently to determine the impacts Fiona had on the Program’s infrastructure. Clean up activities have taken place and, for the most part, initial repairs have been completed. DFO staff are now working with Harbour Authorities and others to plan and execute and necessary longer term repairs at impacted harbours.
With respect to ghost gear, $1.5 million has already been allocated to support 11 partners for emergency clean-up and recovery efforts of the hardest hit areas, currently underway. Other projects are expected to be announced in the coming weeks.
Great Lakes Fishery Commission
- The Government of Canada is committed to preserving our freshwater resources and protecting the Great Lakes from invasive species, given their cultural, social and economic significance to both Canada and the United States.
- The Great Lakes Fishery Commission is vital to controlling sea lampreys, conducting research, and maintaining cooperation and coordination among Canadian and American agencies in the management of the Great Lakes fisheries.
- As part of Budget 2022, the Government invested incremental funding of $44.9 million over five years and $9 million ongoing, to fulfill Canada’s international treaty obligations under the Commission.
- This increased funding, which takes Canada’s annual support for the work of the Commission to over $19 million, demonstrates our commitment to improving the Great Lakes fishery, ensure continued Canadian sea lamprey control activities, supports the Great Lakes Fishery Commission’s research agenda, and its coordination of binational fisheries management across the Great Lakes.
- The first payment of this new funding has already been made and Departmental officials continue to work very closely with Commission staff to bolster Canadian efforts to eradicate sea lamprey in the Great Lakes and to ensure the Commission is able to plan and deliver on its important mandate.
If Pressed on Governance Change
- I know that the Commission’s Secretariat has been advocating for a governance change from Fisheries and Oceans Canada to Global Affairs Canada.
- This is a more complex matter than it appears on the surface, and we have been assessing the implications of a possible change in responsibility.
- Until a final decision is made, we will ensure that the work of the Commission and the ongoing delivery of critical sea lamprey control measures are not adversely impacted or needlessly disrupted.
- Our goal is to ensure that the Commission is best positioned to fulfill its mandate and receive the necessary support from our government to that end.
Background
The Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC) was established by the 1954 Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between Canada and the United States of America, with the objective of protecting and sustaining the Great Lakes fishery.
Pursuant to the 1954 Convention, the GLFC is funded by both the Canadian and U.S. federal governments, with Canada contributing 31 per cent towards the transboundary sea lamprey control work and 50 per cent of the Commission’s overall operations, with the U.S. funding the balance.
As part of Budget 2022, the Government invested incremental funding of $44.9 million over five years and $9 million ongoing, to fulfill Canada’s international treaty obligations under the Commission. This will ensure that Canada is able to meet its funding share under the bilateral treaty with the US - bringing Canada’s contribution up to over $19 million in 2022 and moving forward. This funding will help to augment Canadian sea lamprey control activities (primarily consisting of DFO’s Sea Lamprey Control Program), and support the GLFC’s scientific research and coordination of binational fisheries management across the Great Lakes.
In recent years, the GLFC secretariat, including its Executive Secretary, has been lobbying key stakeholders in the U.S. and Canada, including Members of Parliament, and U.S. Senators and Representatives, with their request for federal leadership and responsibility for the Commission to be moved from DFO to Global Affairs Canada (GAC). Such decisions are the prerogative of the Prime Minister.
On October 20, 2022, two new Commissioners, nominated by the Government of Ontario, were approved by the Governor in Council to represent Canada at the GLFC.
The funding announced in Budget 2022 was accessed through the Supplementary Estimates C process. The first payment of new funding (~$9.5 million) was made to the Commission in February 2023.
The GFLC’s 2022 Interim Meeting, originally scheduled for November 30, was postponed. The GLFC Secretariat now has the information it required to set the budget for the upcoming year and is actively working with Canadian and American Commissioners to schedule the interim meeting.
Discussion with the Secretariat continues regarding 2023 transfers (which comes from our 23-24 FY) to determine what funding is required for the Sea Lamprey Control Program and to deliver on other important aspects of the GLFC’s mandate.
Of note, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans (FOPO) adopted a motion on March 9th, 2023 as follows:
That, given the factual inaccuracy provided by Mr. Richard Goodyear, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Deputy Minister, in his testimony to the committee on December 2, 2022, and raised in correspondence to the committee dated December 14, 2022, from Mr. Gregory McClinchey, Policy and Legislative Affairs Director of the Great Lakes Fisheries Commission, and considering the harm done to Canada's relationship with the United States through Canada’s continued lack of fiscal accountability towards the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and the numerous bi-lateral initiatives that would be jeopardized by the termination of the Great Lakes Fisheries Convention, the committee report to the House on this inaccuracy and recall Mr. Goodyear to the committee to rectify his testimony.
Consequently, the committee has invited Mr. Richard Goodyear to appear on Monday, March 27, during its study of the Supp C and Main Estimates. The Department welcomes the opportunity to provide Committee members with an update of its progress on this file.
Trans Mountain Expansion Project: Environmental Protections and Indigenous Concerns
- In Budget 2022, Fisheries, Oceans, and the Canadian Coast Guard received $17 million in total funding over three years to continue to fulfill commitments made in the 2019 approval of the Trans Mountain Expansion project.
- $5.5 million will enable continued delivery of Trans Mountain Expansion accommodation measures (the Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund, the Terrestrial Cumulative Effects Initiative, and the Salish Sea Initiative) to 2024-25.
- $3.1 million provides one year bridge funding for the Canadian Coast Guard Marine Communications and Traffic Services Marine Mammal Desk.
- $7.3 million over three years will support capacity and administration functions to meet regulatory coordination requirements for Fisheries, Oceans, and the Canadian Coast Guard.
- Fisheries, Oceans, and the Canadian Coast Guard received $1.1 million to participate in the Indigenous Advisory and Monitoring Committee for two additional years through fiscal year 2023-24.
- Recommendation Five, an offset program for impacts to whales from underwater noise and vessel strikes, will continue under the Oceans Protection Plan.
Background
The Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMX) expands the existing pipeline system between Edmonton, Alberta, and Burnaby, British Columbia. It includes approximately 987 km of new pipeline; the reactivation of 193 km of existing pipeline; and an expansion of the Westridge Marine Terminal to accommodate 29 additional tankers per month (34 total).
In Budget 2022, Natural Resources Canada received $27.9 million over two years to support the TMX and Line 3 Indigenous Advisory and Monitoring Committees (IAMC). DFO received $17 million over three years to fulfill commitments enshrined in the 2019 approval of TMX.
DFO-CCG funding includes: $4.43 million to DFO and $2.88 million to CCG over three years to support capacity and administration functions including DFO’s regulatory role and whole of government coordination (2022-23 - 2024-25); to continue to deliver accommodation measures for an additional year through fiscal year 2024-25, $3 million for the Salish Sea Initiative, $2.32 million for the Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund and $0.17 million for the Terrestrial Cumulative Effects Initiative; $1.1 million in funding to support DFO-CCG participation in the TMX IAMC for two additional years to fiscal year 2023-24; and $3.14 million in funding to support one year (bridge funding) in fiscal year 2022-23 for the CCG Marine Traffic and Communication Services Marine Mammal Desk.
Trans Mountain Corporation indicates that the project will be operational in the third quarter of 2023, and that additional permits may be required in advance of line-fill and operation.
DFO has regulatory responsibilities under the Fisheries Act and Species at Risk Act for the protection of fish and fish habitat, including marine mammals. In collaboration with the proponent and Canada Energy Regulator (CER), DFO delivers regulatory review services for pipeline watercourse crossings.
DFO issued a Fisheries Act authorization for the expansion of the Westridge Marine Terminal on September 12, 2019. In January 2020, and again in November 2022, DFO issued an amended Fisheries Act authorization.
[Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.] the Government to implement a series of Indigenous accommodation measures and responses to recommendations from the CER.
DFO manages three accommodation measures: the Salish Sea Initiative, the Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund, and the Terrestrial Cumulative Effects Initiative (co-managed with Environment and Climate Change Canada and Natural Resources Canada); these are currently funded to March 2025. CCG manages the Co-Developing Community Response Initiative.
During CER’s review of the project, they found that there would be significant adverse effects to the Southern Resident killer whale (SRKW), Indigenous cultural use associated with the SRKW, and direct greenhouse gas emissions related to increases in marine shipping.
The CER made 16 recommendations to the [Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.] to avoid, mitigate, or lessen effects of project-related marine shipping.
Recommendation 5, call for an offset to the additional underwater noise and strike risk created by project-related marine vessels. The CER found that the offset approach could bring the adverse effects finding on SRKW to non-significant if and when project-related shipping effects have been effectively reduced to net-zero in each section of the shipping route.
The IAMC, established in 2017 when the project was first approved, provides advice to federal regulators and monitors project construction and operations. It includes 13 Indigenous members from the 129 communities impacted by the project (Indigenous Caucus) and six federal representatives.
Aquatic Invasive Species
- The 2022 Fall Economic Statement identified $36.6 million over five years starting in fiscal year 2022-23 for Fisheries and Oceans Canada for the expansion of the Aquatic Invasive Species Program.
- These resources will allow Fisheries and Oceans Canada to undertake new activities focused on detecting and responding to reports of imminent invasions, including at international borders, to prevent aquatic invasive species from entering and spreading in Canada. The new funding will also facilitate on-the-ground preventative action through new and existing partnerships to strengthen current operations and coordinate efforts nationally.
Background
Aquatic invasive species (AIS) are non-native organisms that pose a serious and growing threat to Canada’s freshwater and marine ecosystems, economy, and society. Preventing the introduction, establishment, and spread of AIS, including early detection and response activities, is the most effective and cost-efficient strategy for limiting their harm.
The Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations came into force in 2015 under the Fisheries Act to provide tools for federal action and partnerships with provincial and territorial governments, setting significant expectations regarding Canada’s collective ability to manage AIS. Six species are subject to prohibitions against their importation under the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations: Zebra and Quagga mussels and the four Asian carp species.
Budget 2017 provided $43.8 million in funding over five years and $10.8 million ongoing (i.e., permanent A-base funding) for national AIS management to: establish an AIS National Core Program; expand and make permanent the Department’s Asian Carp Program; and, expand the Sea Lamprey Control Program and increase Canada’s commitment to the Great Lakes Fisheries Commission from $8.1 million to $10.6 million ongoing.
The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development conducted an audit of DFO’s AIS efforts and released its findings on April 2, 2019. The report cited insufficient efforts from DFO and the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) in enforcing the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations at the international border, and preventing the introduction or spread of AIS (e.g., zebra mussels, tunicates, European Green Crab). In response, DFO, the CBSA, and other partners have developed new protocols, tools, and procedures to improve enforcement of the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations at international borders, among other initiatives undertaken under DFO’s management action plan related to the audit.
The new funding (i.e., B-base) announced in the Fall Economic Statement (2022) will give DFO flexibility in addressing short-term emergencies and for long-term monitoring and prevention, and strengthen relationships with provinces and territories, Indigenous peoples, and key stakeholders by addressing priorities in a collaborative fashion.
This funding is to be allocated to multiple DFO sectors including Aquatic Ecosystems (AIS National Core Program), Fisheries and Harbour Management (Conservation and Protection), Ecosystems and Oceans Science, and Strategic Policy; it expires in 2026-27 unless renewed.
Implementation of the Impact Assessment Act
- The Funding to Implement the Impact Assessment Act proposal was led by the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada and involved 12 partner departments and agencies, including Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Details were presented as part of the 2022 Fall Economic Statement.
- Over the next six years, the Department will receive $91.9 million in new funding starting in 2022-23, and $2.4 million ongoing after that.
- The funding will cover salary for 98 program full-time employees across the Department, on an annual basis over six years, and 14 program Full Time Equivalent’s ongoing.
- New resources will result in enhancing the Department’s participation in impact assessments and regional assessments, as well as deeper engagement and consultation with Indigenous peoples.
Background
The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada and 12 partner departments and agencies, including DFO, sought $1,281.9 million over six years, starting in 2022-23, to continue implementing the IAA and complete assessments started under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012.
Funding will enable the Department to ensure that the environmental, health, social, and economic implications of major development projects are rigorously assessed and that they meet Canadians’ standards and expectations for responsible development.
The funding will support staffing of 98 Full Time Equivalent’s over six years to support four different program areas (Ecosystems and Ocean Science, Fish and Fish Habitat Protection, Fisheries Management, and Environmental Response (Canadian Coast Guard), with 77 percent of positions in the regions.
Issue Notes - Transfers
Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund
- The Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund has been extended for one year to 2024-25, which has been well received by Indigenous communities. The extension does not, however, increase total contribution funding available (vote 10).
- The Trans Mountain Expansion accommodation measures, including the Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund, experienced delays to the co-development and implementation of measures due to COVID-19, combined with flooding, wildfires and limited capacity of Indigenous groups to engage simultaneously on multiple accommodation programs.
- Initially, Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund implementation focused on providing Indigenous groups funding for capacity building to enable their participation, with the majority of project-based funding still to be delivered in later years.
- To enable Indigenous communities continued participation in Trans Mountain Expansion initiatives, $16.2 million in Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund funding was re-profiled to 2022-23. This funding supported capacity building and project implementation for these Indigenous accommodation programs.
- It is anticipated approximately $15 million will be re-profiled to 2023-24. The exact amount will be confirmed at the end of fiscal 2022-23, once agreements with Indigenous communities have been approved and signed.
Background
The Government of Canada developed eight accommodation measures to address the concerns of Indigenous groups potentially impacted by the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMX). Of these eight, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is responsible for the Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund (AHRF), the Salish Sea Initiative (SSI), and works with other federal partners on the Terrestrial Cumulative Effects Initiative (TCEI).
The AHRF is part of the Government of Canada’s commitment to restore freshwater and marine ecosystems and to contribute to the sustainability of fish and fish habitat. Through AHRF the Government intends to build capacity in Indigenous communities to enable habitat restoration; to rehabilitate aquatic habitats and contribute to the mitigation of stressors; contribute to the long-term sustainability of aquatic ecosystems.
Through the AHRF, DFO is collaborating with 129 Indigenous groups in BC and Alberta to develop an initiative that will provide funding for community capacity and Indigenous-led aquatic habitat restoration activities in freshwater and marine ecosystems.
A total of $75 million is available between 2019 and 2025. Activities will occur in the Fraser River Watershed and inland watersheds along the Trans Mountain pipeline corridor in British Columbia and Alberta, as well as along the shipping corridor and the Salish Sea.
The first few years of AHRF have focused on providing capacity funding to Indigenous communities to develop restoration priorities within their traditional territories and participate in the collaborative development of a delivery model for the project implementation, or restoration, phase of the initiative. At the onset of the program in 2019, $10 million was available, in part to support the collaborative development of the AHRF. Phase II (project funding) proposal intake opened in December 2021. A total of $65 million in G&C funding is available to communities for this phase.
To enable Indigenous communities continued participation in TMX initiatives, $16.2 million in funding for the Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund was re-profiled to fiscal year 2022-23. This funding supported capacity building and project implementation for these Indigenous accommodation programs.
Once agreements with Indigenous communities have been approved and signed by the end of March 2023, an accurate amount to be reprofiled to next year 2023-24 will be calculated. At this time, it is anticipated that approximately $15 million will be reprofiled.
To allow Indigenous communities to build capacity and develop restoration projects, [Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.]
Transfer to CIRNAC Out of Court Settlement
- The Department is transferring $400,000 to Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs for an out-of-court settlement.
- Further details on this item cannot be disclosed as discussions are ongoing with implicated parties and a settlement has not yet been reached.
Background
The Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs is leading on this potential settlement and has asked several Departments to share the cost. Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s share is $400,000.
Further details on this item cannot be disclosed as discussions are ongoing with implicated parties and a settlement has not yet been reached.
Issues Notes - Technical Adjustment
Reinvestments of Revenue: Polluters and the Ship-Source Oil Pollution Fund
- The Polluter Pays Principle is a key concept in modern environmental law: owners are liable for oil pollution damage caused by their ships.
- The Canadian Coast Guard is responsible to respond to any reports of ship-source pollution and mystery-source spills in Canadian waters.
- Funds received from the polluters or the Ship-Source Oil Pollution Fund are reinvested in the Canadian Coast Guard Environmental Response program.
Background
The Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) has authority, pursuant to section 180 of the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 (CSA) to take appropriate measures in relation to a vessel that has, is, or may discharge a pollutant. These measures include taking charge of a response, monitoring the response activities of another party, and/or directing another person or vessel to respond or refrain from responding.
Canada’s compensation regime is based on the fundamental principle that the shipowner is primarily liable for oil pollution damage caused by the ship: the polluter pays principle. Established in 1989 under Part 7 of the Marine Liability Act, the Ship-Source Oil Pollution Fund (SOPF) facilitates the indemnification of claims for ship-source pollution in Canadian waters while protecting the taxpayer.
The SOPF covers all classes of ships that discharge persistent and non-persistent oil, including oil spills from unknown sources which are commonly referred to as “mystery spills”. The SOPF is notably available to pay compensation for reasonable claims for oil pollution response costs, or preventive measures taken to minimize damage caused by the discharge - or the risk of a discharge - of oil from any class of ship in Canadian waters.
Where a shipowner is not identified or able to pay, the CCG has the ability to submit a claim to the SOPF in order to recover reasonable expenses incurred by the department in responding to incidents of oil pollution in Canadian waters. As a Special Operating Agency within Fisheries and Oceans Canada, the CCG may request authority to spend revenue received from polluters and the SOPF. As part of Supplementary Estimates process, CCG is seeking authority to access the following revenues:
- MV Comanche ($1,798,523)
- Federal Leda ($1,030)
- Scotia River ($95,844)
- Tecumseh ($5,176)
- MV Go Getter ($2,284)
- Michael Marie III ($17,027)
The funds received as part of this process are reinvested in the CCG’s Environmental Response program whose mandate is to ensure appropriate response to all reports of ship-source pollution and mystery-source spills.
Small Craft Harbours: Divestiture
- Resources are being reallocated to support the divestiture of two harbours currently owned by the Department’s Small Craft Harbours Program.
- The harbours, located in Mattawa, Ontario and Cold Lake, Alberta will be divested to the Town of Mattawa and to the City of Cold Lake.
- The funds identified in the Supplementary Estimates C will allow the Department to provide funding to the Town of Mattawa and the City of Cold Lake.
- The funds are for repairs and upkeep of the harbours so that they remain safe and accessible for users.
- One of the main objectives of the Small Craft Harbours program is divesting harbours that are considered non-essential to the commercial fishing industry. Since 1995, the program has divested more than 1,100 non-core harbours.
- Divestiture of these non-core harbours provides economic stimulus and opportunities for communities, while also removing non-core infrastructure from the Department's portfolio, therefore reducing liability.
Background
The Small Craft Harbours (SCH) program owns a total of 973 harbours throughout Canada. Of these, 298 are considered non-core harbours because, while some fishing may take place from these locations, they are focused more on recreational and other users not linked to the commercial fishery. Thus, these non-core harbours are candidates for divestiture.
One of the main objectives of the SCH program is to divest of harbours that are considered non-essential to the commercial fishing industry. Since 1995, the program has divested more than 1,100 non-core fishing harbours.
In the Supplementary Estimates C, resources are being reallocated to support the divestiture of two harbours currently owned by the SCH program.
The Grant funding will go towards the disposal of a small craft harbour to the municipality of Mattawa (Ontario) and another to the City of Cold Lake (Alberta).
The Mattawa project, initially planned in Vote 1, has now been identified as part of the SCH Grant program for divestiture. The total funding requirement is $690,400 in Vote 10, necessitating the vote conversion.
The Cold Lake divestiture was originally planned at $350,000 as negotiated in 2011 but has now increased due to deterioration over the years, as well as the region requesting an additional $150,000 through these Supplementary Estimates to complete divestiture.
These divestitures provide economic stimulus and opportunities for communities, while also removing non-core infrastructure from the Department's portfolio and reducing liability.
The funds identified in the Supplementary Estimates C will allow the Department to provide funding to the Town of Mattawa and the City of Cold Lake. These funds are for repairs and upkeep of the harbours so that they remain safe and accessible for users.
Issues Notes
Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation
- The Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation was established in 1969 and is the Department’s sole Crown corporation.
- The Supplementary Estimates C includes a nominal $1 item providing the Corporation with authority to borrow other than from the Crown.
Background
The Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation (FFMC) was established under the Freshwater Fish Marketing Act (FFMA) in 1969 and was designed with exclusive monopoly right to purchase, process, and market freshwater fish inter-provincially and internationally. It is a self-sustaining Crown corporation and does not receive Parliamentary appropriations. It finances its operations and capital expenditure requirements from its revenues and borrowings, in accordance with its borrowing plan.
To provide the FFMC with authority to borrow from creditors other than the Crown, the Appropriation Act for the 2022-23 Supplementary Estimates C includes a Vote for FFMC. Passage of the Appropriation Act will satisfy the requirements of 101(1)(b) of the FAA, permitting the FFMC to borrow under its line of credit. The technical process for including this FFMC Vote in an Appropriation Act requires that the Vote be provided with a token amount of $1.
Questions and Answers
FOPO Report - West Coast Fisheries
How is DFO responding to the FOPO report, West Coast Fisheries: Sharing Risks and Benefits, which was tabled over three years ago?
- The Government of Canada’s response to the report, West Coast Fisheries: Sharing Risk and Benefits, outlines DFO’s position and planned approach. The response acknowledges:
- The Minister has the authority to consider social, economic and cultural factors in decision-making.
- Future policies and programs should not negatively impact conservation objectives, and may consider ways to support viability of fishing enterprises.
- The needs, rights and capacities of Indigenous harvesters and their communities must be respected.
- DFO is currently developing an engagement plan prior to proposing or amending licensing policies.
What has DFO done to implement the recommendations from FOPO’s report?
- The Department has taken immediate actions on some recommendations, and is developing an engagement plan to ensure a broad cross-section of fisheries perspectives are considered on the balance of the recommendations.
- DFO has conducted preliminary engagement with industry associations, the First Nations Fisheries Council, and fisheries advisory boards.
- DFO has also launched the Beneficial Ownership Survey to establish a baseline understanding of the current level of foreign ownership and concentration of access in select commercial fisheries. The results are anticipated to be available this spring.
- DFO has completed a comparative analysis of Atlantic and Pacific licensing policies, and the report is available on DFO’s website.
- DFO implemented a cost and earnings survey of fish harvesters in November 2022, and is currently analyzing the results, with plans to review and discuss the data with industry representatives in summer 2023.
- A survey is also being conducted on the annual prices harvesters receive for their landed catch. This work should also be completed by Fall 2023.
- A publicly accessible Marine Atlas was launched this February that shows ecological and human use data for Pacific and Atlantic Canada.
- An analysis has also been completed on policies, practices and terms of reference for establishing commercial fishery advisory boards. New best practices guidance is under development and will be available for stakeholder engagement this spring.
Marine Cargo Spills - Government Response
How will the Canadian Coast Guard respond to the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, Marine Cargo Container Spills Report?
- The Canadian Coast Guard has worked with Transport Canada, and other partner departments, to provide a comprehensive response to the Marine Cargo Container Spills report. This response was tabled on February 1, 2023.
- Building on work initiated under the first phase of the Oceans Protection Plan, the Canadian Coast Guard will continue protecting Canada’s environment by exploring and implementing tools and programs that enhance a coordinated pollution response system and developing a network of trained emergency responders from multiple levels of government, Indigenous Peoples, and coastal communities to strengthen marine emergency response, to meet today’s modern shipping issues.
Fleet Renewal and Project Delays (lapsed funding)
How many ships and helicopters does the Coast Guard plan to procure?
- Coast Guard has been working since 2005 to procure its future fleet of 31 large vessels, 95 small vessels and 26 helicopters.
How much funding has been committed to date?
- To date, over $35B has been committed to advance Coast Guard fleet renewal and sustain operations until new ships arrive.
What has been delivered so far?
- To date, Coast Guard has taken delivery of:
- 3 large vessels;
- 19 small vessels for the fleet renewal plan;
- 23 helicopters; and
- 4 Interim Icebreakers.
Why is it taking so long to get the new ships?
- When the National Shipbuilding Strategy (NSS) was launched in 2010, Canadian shipyards had never constructed vessels of this size and complexity before.
- The shipyards needed to ramp up capacity to meet the pace of deliveries that Canada needed. This required:
- Large multi-year modernization and infrastructure projects; and
- Unprecedented levels of hiring, to find the number of skilled tradespeople needed to build the ships.
- While this ramp-up period has taken longer than planned, the NSS is starting to hit it’s stride:
- Vancouver Shipyards have delivered all three Offshore Fisheries Science Vessels to Coast Guard;
- Irving Shipbuilding has delivered the first three Arctic and Offshore Patrol Ships for the Royal Canadian Navy; and
- The smaller shipyards across Canada have been busy building and delivering Coast Guard’s small vessels.
- While progress on the NSS has had its challenges, including impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, much progress has been made and we have come a long way.
What is Canada doing to improve ship delivery timelines?
- NSS partner departments are actively working to improve delivery timelines, including:
- Working with shipyards to improve their capacity and productivity levels;
- Working with shipyards to develop more accurate schedules;
- Engaging experts to track and report on shipyard performance; and
- Using contractual measures to incentivize shipyard performance.
- Both Canada and the shipyards now have over a decade of experience under our belt. We have confidence that all of these measures will result in positive improvements.
What is the status of the third NSS shipyard?
- After some initial delays in finalizing the qualification process, the Umbrella Agreement to formalize Chantier Davie as the third NSS shipyard is expected to be signed in spring 2023.
- Coast Guard is encouraged by this important milestone and is ready to get to work on our Icebreaker projects.
Why do costs keep increasing?
- As work advances on projects and NSS shipyards gain more experience, a number of key costing drivers become more certain with time. For example:
- Estimates for key pieces of equipment are replaced with actual amounts paid on invoices; and,
- Estimates for the number of labour hours required to build a ship are refined with more precision as work occurs in real time.
- There is also a need to reflect current economic drivers that could not have been foreseen at the time of the original costing, such as the impacts of the pandemic on global labour and supply chains, as well as high inflation. Initial cost estimates were established in a fundamentally different economic climate than we are currently experiencing today.
What is Canada doing to contain costs?
- We consistently challenge shipyard partners to find efficiencies and increase productivity.
- Some projects appear to take longer than anticipated because negotiators are working behind the scenes to ensure that contracts contains incentives to keep costs down and generate value for Canadians.
- While it has been challenging at times, we have accomplished a lot in the last 10 years and are now benefiting from gained experience.
Why did the Coast Guard lapse funds when funding is always required?
- A significant portion of project timelines have been extended, which did lead to lapsed funding in fiscal year 2021-22. However, all funding was carried forward to future years so no funding was lost to the projects.
- Significant contributors to this lapse were the schedules of:
- Arctic Offshore Patrol Ships
- Light and Medium Icebreakers
- Vessel Life Extension Programs
- Offshore Oceanographic Science Vessel
- The COVID-19 pandemic was a significant contributor to schedule loss in 2021/22, leading to the lapsed funding for these projects - continued testing, distancing and shut-downs of the shipyards contributed to overall production shortfalls, and in turn resulted in delays to pre-established spending plans. Other contributors were contracting issues with suppliers, supply chain issues, and overall labour market conditions.
- We continue to work with the shipyards and Public Services and Procurement Canada Schedule to improve the monitoring and oversight of schedules, and we are making progress.
Marine and Aviation Fuel Costs
How much fuel does the Department’s fleet consume each year?
- In a typical year of operations, the marine fleet consumes 59.0 million litres (including the Emergency Towing Vessels), and up to 1.9 million litres for the aviation fleet (Helicopters).
How is the fuel purchased/stored?
- The majority of marine and aviation fuel is procured using standing offers, with the exception of remote or rural locations. In these locations, fuel is purchased from a local supplier.
- Vessels/helicopters purchase fuel based on the annual fleet operational plan, but throughout the year, purchases are adjusted based on their operational schedule and tempo.
- There are more than 80 fueling locations for marine fuel across the country. Prices for each location are updated weekly using industry reference markers. Approximately 60 percent of the search and rescue stations have storage tanks for fuel; however, their use is limited to small vessels and lifeboats. Depending on class, large vessels can take on between 100,000 and 2,000,000 litres. DFO does not own any large-scale fuel storage facilities.
- Fuel for the helicopter fleet for the six bases across Canada, and for vessel-based operations and activities, is purchased by Transport Canada’s Air Services Directorate, who operates and maintains helicopters on Coast Guard’s behalf, and cost recovers through a Memorandum of Understanding.
What impacts or mitigation strategies were identified before submitting the funding request?
- The Canadian Coast Guard explored several mitigation strategies to operate within the allotted fuel operating budget, however, they all resulted in either significant reductions to programs such as icebreaking, or funds being reallocated from other Departmental priorities.
- When exploring potential scalability, a blanket approach (e.g., 50 percent reduction in fuel across the board) is generally not operationally feasible given the fuel demands of individual vessels. For example, the most fuel-intensive operations are generally the heavy icebreakers, which also undertake search and rescue operations. These vessels require the weight of a near-full fuel tank in order to break the ice effectively through critical economic seaways. Due to the fuel not only providing propulsion, but also the weight needed for effective ice breaking, they cannot be half-fueled.
- Many of the vessels are also multitasked, meaning that if a vessel becomes non-operational due to lack of funds for fuel, it has significant impacts on multiple programs across the Department. Limiting operations not only impacts Coast Guard operations; it reduces capacity related to the coverage of Marine Conservation Targets and Marine Protected Areas (MCT/MPA), fulfilling Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) commitments, and monitoring of ongoing commercial and recreational fisheries.
What is DFO doing to mitigate this pressure?
- The rising cost of fuel is likely to persist beyond the current fiscal year. Across the Government of Canada, the only comparable department impacted in the same way from high fuel costs would be National Defence and its Royal Canadian Navy fleet. National Defence has some protection against the current increase in fuel prices due to a built-in escalator; DFO does not have such protection but could consider this mechanism if high fuel costs persist in future years.
Trans Mountain Expansion Project and Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund
Why was additional time/funding required to support Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMX) Initiatives?
- DFO-CCG required more time to implement TMX initiatives. Some initiatives sunset in fiscal year 2021-22, and there were unforeseen challenges that have delayed or limited implementation such as the COVID-19 pandemic and extreme weather events in British Columbia.
- These events collectively brought about unique challenges that required Indigenous groups to re-prioritize resources to focus on ensuring the safety and wellbeing of their communities.
- At the same time construction of the TMX project has been delayed, and the pipeline is not expected to be completely constructed until late 2023.
Does the renewed Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund (AHRF) funding change the amount of funding available to Indigenous communities through accommodation measures?
- The renewed funding does not change the amount of funding available to Indigenous communities through TMX accommodation measures and initiatives.
- The renewed funding supports the Department’s administration of the initiatives which will enable Indigenous communities to access funding and implement projects for an additional year through fiscal year 2024-25.
How was the AHRF collaboratively developed?
- Communities were invited to participate in an engagement process that included working groups, meetings and other methods to inform the development of program governance, structure and delivery model.
- DFO and interested Indigenous communities collaboratively identified priority marine and freshwater habitat restoration activities.
- DFO and interested Indigenous communities undertook a joint planning exercise to determine funding amounts.
Does the renewed funding signal further delays in the construction of the TMX project?
- No, the renewed funding provides the Department additional time to continue to implement TMX initiatives, including TMX accommodation measures, responses to recommendations, and government capacity and coordination functions.
Aquatic Invasive Species Funding
What is DFO doing to respond to AIS at the international border, and how will the new funding support these efforts?
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is working closely with the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) to improve enforcement of the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations (AIS Regulations) at international borders, with a focus on preventing prohibited species from entering Canada.
- In March of 2021, DFO conducted emergency response activities in partnership with the CBSA and provincial and territorial governments to stop the importation and distribution of invasive mussel infested aquarium products across Canada. DFO continues to work with the CBSA to prevent illegal imports of such products into Canada.
- Through the summer and fall of 2022, DFO launched the Overland Watercraft Transportation Protection Pilot. At the Emerson Port of Entry in Manitoba, DFO and CBSA staff developed and tested the procedures and tools necessary for using the AIS Regulations and other legislative tools to improve biosecurity at international borders related to contaminated watercrafts.
- The 2022 Fall Economic Statement identified $36.6 million over five years starting in fiscal year 2022-23 to DFO for the expansion of the Aquatic Invasive Species Program.
- The new funding will allow DFO to better implement and enforce the AIS Regulations to prevent AIS from entering and spreading in Canada, particularly at international borders by, for example, increasing the number of dedicated AIS Fisheries Officers responsible for collaboration between DFO and the CBSA, establishing an accredited eDNA laboratory to efficiently detect AIS in commercial plant and animal products, and conduct analyses to effectively prioritize ports of entry, waterways, and pathways of concern for AIS introductions.
How will the new funding create new partnerships to facilitate on-the-ground preventative action against AIS?
- The new funding will improve relationships with provinces and territories, Indigenous peoples, and key stakeholders by providing funding that helps partners address their AIS priorities while meeting broader national objectives.
Recent Fisheries Management Decisions
How do the Fish Stock Provisions protect species that have been assessed as at risk?
- The Fish Stocks Provisions in the amended Fisheries Act came into force through amendments to the Fishery (General) Regulations on April 4, 2022.
- Under these amendments, DFO is legally required to implement measures to maintain all prescribed major fish stocks at or above the level necessary to promote the sustainability of the stock, and to develop rebuilding plans for major stocks that have fallen to or below their limit reference point.
- The limit reference point marks the boundary between the cautious and critical zones of a fishery within the Department’s Precautionary Approach Framework.
- There are currently 30 major fish stocks identified in the first batch, with 13 of those requiring rebuilding plans.
- DFO is currently in the process of prescribing a second batch of major stocks and undertook a public consultation in the fall of 2022.
Why did DFO decide to close the Atlantic mackerel commercial and bait fisheries on March 30, 2022?
- The mackerel stock is in the critical zone and, as a result, I made the difficult decision to close the commercial and bait fisheries for Atlantic mackerel. This measure was taken to rebuild this important forage stock, which plays a key role in the ecosystem.
- I recognize the importance of the Atlantic mackerel fishery and am optimistic that this stock can rebuild and be available for future generations.
- A new stock assessment took place on February 20 to 23, 2023. This assessment will help to inform our next steps.
- I recently received a letter from the Chair of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, and I would like to thank the committee for a thorough summary of Committee discussions and the Committee’s thoughtful recommendations. The Department is currently preparing a response to the Chair’s letter.
Why did DFO decide to close the southern Gulf spring herring commercial and bait fisheries on March 30, 2022?
- The Gulf spring herring stock has been in the critical zone since 2002. A number of management measures have been applied since then to arrest the stock’s decline.
- Closing fisheries reduces the pressure on this stock, giving it the best chance at rebuilding. As a forage stock, its health is critically important to the overall health of the ecosystem.
- The next scientific assessment of this stock will occur in 2024. Updated management measures will be considered following the assessment.
In April 2022, why did DFO reduce the Estuary and Gulf shrimp total allowable catch for both 2022 and 2023?
- The current environmental and ecosystem conditions in the estuary and Gulf of St-Lawrence are unfavourable for shrimp.
- While recognizing the economic challenges harvesters are facing, a cautious approach was needed to mitigate potential threats to conservation.
- Taking into account socio-economic factors, the reduction was implemented gradually over two years.
In spring of 2022, why did you decide to not implement the management strategy evaluation for Southwest Nova Scotia/Bay of Fundy herring, yet reduced the annual total allowable catch by 33 percent?
- I established a total allowable catch for 2022 that represented a 33 percent reduction from 2021. I took this action to protect this vulnerable fish stock while giving time to further evaluate a harvest strategy for the longer term.
- Looking forward, I will weigh the results of that evaluation and take a decision on this fishery this spring.
What is the Department undertaking, other than closing fisheries, to help Pacific salmon stocks?
- As we consider different stocks in decline, we are looking at not only harvest levels but also habitat conservation and restoration, as well as enhancement.
- Through the Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative, we are increasing our science and understanding of salmon ecosystems, investing in work with partners on integrated planning, and developing rebuilding plans for key stocks of concern.
- We are also renewing the British Columbia Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund (BCSRIF), which doubles our investment to support groups or applicants with ideas to address salmon declines.
- And recently, I announced that I will not be renewing aquaculture licenses in the Discovery Islands.
Why did you choose to close the directed fishery for Winter flounder and Yellowtail flounder in NAFO Division 4T?
- Winter flounder and yellowtail flounder stocks have been in the critical zone, as per the precautionary approach framework, since 2004 and 2009 respectively, and no signs of recovery have been observed in the most recent scientific assessments.
- In the directed yellowtail flounder fishery, significant amounts of bycatch of winter flounder have been reported. A combined approach is therefore needed to ensure the recovery of these stocks.
- This conservation-based closure recognizes the importance of these fisheries to coastal communities.
Why have you chosen to approve some fisheries for Pacific herring while others will not be permitted?
- Beyond direct human needs, Pacific herring fulfills a vital role in the ecosystem; its conservation for the long-term benefit of future generations will always be my primary objective.
- Decisions to open Pacific herring fisheries are based on the best available science and take into account the rights of First Nation communities.
- I recognize the importance of Pacific herring to Indigenous Peoples and will take those steps available to me to ensure Indigenous communities can exercise their fishing rights.
Why did DFO decide to reduce the TAC in 0A/0B Greenland halibut for the 2023/24 season?
- To balance both the health of the stock and the economic needs of Indigenous and industry interests, Canada has reduced the Subarea 0 total allowable catch levels for Greenland Halibut by 9.25 percent for the 2023 fishing season.
- This decision was made based on the consideration of advice of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Scientific Council (SC), which recommended that catches for the stock in NAFO Subareas 0 and 1 not exceed 29,640 t in 2023 and 2024.
Will there be a commercial fishery for Unit 1 Redfish for 2023/24?
- I have not yet made a decision on an appropriate access and allocation key for Unit 1 Redfish for the pending commercial fishery.
- Given this, and the additional work required to operationalize the commercial fishery, there will not be a commercial fishery for Unit 1 Redfish for 2023/24.
When will decisions be made on Snow crab fisheries in Atlantic Canada and Quebec?
- Snow crab fisheries in Atlantic Canada and Quebec begin as early as late March, depending on the ice conditions. As a result of less ice coverage in 2023, the season will likely begin at the earliest possible dates, as long as safety concerns are addressed.
- Consultations on these fisheries have now concluded and some Total Allowable Catch decisions have been announced, including increases in some areas such as Crab Fishing Area 12 in the Southern Gulf.
- As with all our fisheries decisions, the total allowable catch levels are based on the best available science and the application of the harvest decision rules, and in consultation with Indigenous groups, industry, processors and other stakeholders.
For Newfoundland and Labrador’s Snow crab fishery, will the Department reconsider its precautionary approach framework which significantly reduces opportunities for 3L inshore harvesters?
- The precautionary approach framework represents a best practice in fisheries management, helping to ensure sustainable harvest while providing predictability in decision making for harvesters.
- The precautionary approach for Newfoundland and Labrador Snow crab was achieved through extensive consultation and collaboration with harvesters.
- We know that some harvesters are upset with the results of the implementation of the precautionary approach framework. These views are important to the Department and we remain committed to working with harvesters on the implementation of the precautionary approach.
How will the Department allocate elvers to Maritimes harvesters in 2023?
- As an interim measure, this year the Department has reallocated approximately 14 per cent of existing elver licence holders' 2021 quota (excluding We'koqma'q First Nation) to support increased Indigenous participation in the fishery without increasing overall effort.
- The same approach was taken in the 2022 season and resulted in the Department reaching interim understandings with nine First Nations in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, which saw designated harvesters from these communities fishing commercially for elver.
- This year, the Department has again reached interim understandings with the same First Nations, and with the additional community of Glooscap. In these renewed understandings, the quotas allocated to both groups of First Nations are increasing, without increasing overall effort in the fishery because the full allocation set aside in 2022 to increase Indigenous participation in the commercial elver fishery was not used.
- For the 2023 season, the Kespukwitk District First Nations have been issued 450 kg of quota (up from 400 kg in 2022) and the Wolastoqey Nations in New Brunswick have been issued 750 kg of quota (up from 200 kg in 2022).
- DFO will closely monitor the fishery to support authorized harvesters, deter and disrupt unauthorized harvesting and to ensure that the amount of elver harvested remains within the overall authorized total allowable catch.
Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative
What has PSSI achieved since its launch two years ago?
- 2022-23 is the second year of the Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative, with numerous sub-initiatives now implemented focusing on immediate salmon rebuilding efforts and long term transformative actions to support Pacific salmon stocks.
- Most PSSI activities encompass Pacific salmon stocks across both British Columbia and Yukon. However, there are targeted efforts for the Yukon, including funding for projects led by Yukon First Nations and the joint Yukon Salmon Sub-Committee.
What is the total amount spent to date in 2022-23?
- Year-to-date expenditures for 2022-23 is $32.6M, with $24.6M for operational expenses, $3M for capital, and $5M for Grants and Contributions.
- $33M for major capital projects is reprofiled from 2022-23 into future years to meet the updated project timelines for Pacific salmon hatchery constructions, and retrofits to existing hatchery infrastructure.
- [Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.]
Mackerel Closure and Inclusion as Transboundary Stock
Given the recent (Feb 2023) assessment, what is the status of mackerel and next steps for addressing industry concerns?
- Atlantic mackerel has been in or near the critical zone for over a decade - and the 2023 Canadian stock assessment found that Atlantic mackerel declined further in the critical zone since the last assessment in 2021, with spawning stock biomass (SSB) at its lowest-observed values.
- An Atlantic Mackerel Science Working Group was established in 2020 and includes industry participants from each region. The working group has been used to identify additional sampling opportunities or sources of data that could contribute to a better understanding of mackerel stock dynamics. This group continues to be engaged to inform science planning.
Does the Minister intend to maintain the mackerel commercial and bait closure established in 2022?
- The most recent stock assessment took place February 20 to 23, 2023. This assessment will help inform our next steps.
- The previous assessment indicated the mackerel stock was in the critical zone and I made the difficult decision to close the commercial and bait fisheries for Atlantic mackerel. This measure was taken to rebuild this forage stock, which plays a key role in the ecosystem and is an important fishery for harvesters in Atlantic Canada and Quebec.
What was the economic impact of the closure of commercial and bait fisheries for Atlantic mackerel?
- We know that while mackerel represents an important fishery, economic dependence on the stock is relatively low. However, without fresh mackerel available, harvesters were forced to buy bait and that bait prices were also relatively high in 2022.
- In implementing the closure of this fishery, I understand the economic impact of this decision and I did not take it lightly.
- Atlantic mackerel has been in the critical zone for a decade. Despite significant reductions in total allowable catch and other measures meant to foster growth during this period, Atlantic mackerel did not respond and severe actions were required to rebuild the stock.
Will DFO compensate harvesters impacted by the closure?
- My department will not provide compensation for the closure of these fisheries. We will continue to work with stakeholders and Indigenous partners to ensure the recovery of these stocks and the resumption of activities.
What assurances is the department offering to ensure harvesters won’t lose their license when the fishery re-opens?
- Mackerel commercial licenses previously issued will continue to be recorded and tracked in DFO licensing systems with no yearly renewal or fee payment required as long as the fishery remains closed for conservation reasons.
- Future access to the fishery will be dependent, on the duration of the closure and the health of the stock when the closure is lifted. At that point in time, any new management decisions will be communicated.
- Fishing licenses are a privilege that provide an exclusive access to valuable public resources. As provided under subsection 16(2) of the Fishery (General) Regulations, the issuance of a document of any type, which includes fishing licenses, does not imply or confer any future right or privilege. All licenses are issued at the discretion of the Minister.
What are the implications of mackerel being a “transboundary stock”?
- A transboundary stock moves between the fisheries waters of two or more countries, meaning those countries need to cooperate to keep their fishing to sustainable levels.
- For Atlantic mackerel, Canada and the US cooperate informally to coordinate each country’s mackerel management.
What is DFO doing to address ongoing US harvesting of mackerel?
- Although the US commercial fishery for Atlantic mackerel remains open, the US did significantly reduce its allowable commercial catch in 2022 and has further reduced its 2023 limit.
- Canada and the US have good collaboration between scientists and fisheries managers on mackerel.
- In November, I met with Dr. Richard Spinrad, Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, and I expressed the importance of more closely aligning approaches to managing this stock. I also indicated our concerns about foregone catch in Canada going to the U.S. commercial industry.
- We will continue our collaborative efforts with the US on mackerel management and will explore additional ways to strengthen our approach.
Will your Department be following up on the November 2022 discussions of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans and the resulting recommendations?
- I recently received a letter from the Chair of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, and I would like to thank the committee for a thorough summary of Committee discussions and the Committee’s thoughtful recommendations.
- The Department is currently preparing a response to the Chair’s letter.
Closure of the Yellowtail Flounder and Winter Flounder Fisheries in the Gulf of St. Lawrence
Why has DFO decided to close the only remaining bait fishery in the Magdalen Islands? What is DFO going to do to ensure the supply of fresh bait that lobster fishers require?
- Winter flounder and Yellowtail flounder stocks have been in the critical zone for more than 15 years and have shown no signs of recovery.
- Rebuilding of these stocks, which have been in the critical zone of the precautionary approach for over a decade, is a priority for the Department.
- Urgent actions needs to be taken in the short term to give these stocks a chance to rebuild, and to ensure the sustainability and long-term prosperity of these fisheries.
What is DFO planning to do to compensate fishers affected by the closure of these fisheries?
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada recognizes the importance of these fisheries for coastal communities and has made the conservation of these stocks a priority.
- I am aware that many fishers are dependent on these fisheries and that their livelihood will be affected by these difficult decisions.
- A federal-provincial working group, co-chaired by DFO, is currently working with the provincial governments and gathering information from the industry across Atlantic Canada, in order to examine the issues related to baits and alternative baits.
Review of the Precautionary Approach and Quota Decreases for Gulf of St. Lawrence Shrimp Fishers
Shrimp fishers are facing an increase in operating costs and quota reductions, what is DFO going to do to ensure that fishers can continue to operate profitably?
- I am very concerned about the state of shrimp stocks in the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence.
- To consider the unfavourable environmental context that exists at present, the Department has initiated, in consultation with industry, a review of the precautionary approach implemented in 2012 for the management of these stocks.
- This review should be completed before the start of the 2024 season in order to establish sustainable and predictable harvest strategies for the resource that will make it possible to avoid undesirable outcomes.
- The Department is currently assessing whether administrative measures can be put in place to give fishers more flexibility and promote the economic viability of fishing enterprises.
Is DFO planning to give shrimp fishers privileged access to the Redfish fishery to compensate for their losses?
- I am sympathetic to the difficult situation shrimp fishers face.
- I am aware that the reopening of the commercial Redfish fishery has generated a great deal of interest, particularly among shrimpers.
- I am currently examining all the recommendations in order to make a decision regarding access to the Redfish fishery and allocations.
- The Department will work with industry representatives and Indigenous groups to agree on, as appropriate, an equitable distribution of allocations and to identify management measures.
- No date has been set for the reopening of the commercial Redfish fishery.
Aquaculture: Open-Net Pen Transition Plan in British Columbia
How is the transition plan being developed?
- In July 2022 I released a discussion framework that outlines a proposed vision for open-net pen aquaculture transition in British Columbia.
- The framework is being used to guide engagement with partners and stakeholders. Engagement started in July 2022 and will continue until the plan is released.
- The input received during engagement will inform the final transition plan.
What work has Fisheries and Oceans Canada done so far?
- We are making good progress.
- My discussion framework provides a vision and objectives for the plan, and I and my Department have met with hundreds of First Nations and stakeholders to discuss the content of the framework.
- The first and second rounds of engagement have been completed, and further in-depth consultation and engagement will continue this spring.
Will the transition plan consider support for affected workers and communities?
- The Government of Canada recognizes that the aquaculture sector is a key employer in many coastal and remote communities.
- As the transition plan is developed, and its full implications become apparent, DFO is working with other federal departments to explore options for transition support and investments in new models for aquaculture.
Aquaculture: Discovery Islands Decision
What was the decision and when was the decision made?
- On February 17, 2023, I announced my decision to not renew 15 aquaculture licenses in the Discovery Islands area of British Columbia.
What informed this decision and what was the consultation process?
- Since June 2022 I conducted extensive consultations with license holders and First Nations in the Discovery Islands area and more broadly to inform this decision.
- Pacific salmon have significant cultural, social, and ecological importance to First Nations and British Columbians.
- Given the unprecedented threats that wild Pacific salmon are facing, we must take action to conserve and protect them.
Will there be economic support?
- I acknowledge that this decision affects the local economy.
- The Government of Canada offers a strong suite of supports for workers and communities. There is already a strong partnership in place with British Columbia, including through the Canada-British Columbia Workforce and Labour Market Development Agreements.
- Additionally, Budget 2021 established a new regional development agency for British Columbia to support economic development and help develop businesses to create good jobs.
How will you reconcile these licensing decisions with your mandate commitment for transitioning from open-net pen salmon farming in BC?
- Many First Nations and British Columbians expect me to take timely, decisive action in the Discovery Islands to protect wild salmon.
- My licensing decision is grounded in what I heard in consultations.
- I remain committed to working with First Nations, industry, and other stakeholders to implement an transition plan that provides a future for environmentally sustainable aquaculture that minimizes or eliminates interactions with wild salmon.
Sea Lice: Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Science Response
Why were more sea lice experts not included in preparing the most recent Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Science Response on Sea Lice?
- The Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) is coordinating a multi-step process to provide advice on the impacts of sea lice on wild salmon populations.
- The first step was a CSAS Science Response Process which took place in June 2022. This meeting included DFO staff with expertise in both sea lice and aquaculture management, and an international expert on sea lice.
- This type of meeting is an efficient way for experts to generate science advice when the scope of the work is narrow, builds upon existing information, or when there is a need for science advice within a short timeframe.
- A full national CSAS peer review meeting is planned for 2024 and will be a comprehensive analysis including additional participants and multiple external experts.
If Science Response Processes are meant to provide science advice within a relatively short timeframe, why did it take so long to publish the document?
- Science advice generated through the CSAS Science Response process is compiled into reports that are then published on DFO’s website.
- Before they can be published, reports go through a series of steps to ensure the content reflects the peer review discussions and any associated consensus-based advice. The documents must also be formatted, translated, and prepared for publication.
How is self-reported industry sampling a reliable data source for sea lice monitoring?
- Aquaculture farms in BC are required to report on-farm sea lice counts to DFO as part of their aquaculture licence conditions. They are also required to report when thresholds are exceeded as well as when treatments occur. All data are reviewed frequently by Departmental officials, including a team of biologists and veterinarians. Additionally, DFO performs routine, random on-site audits to make sure the numbers reported are accurate.
Exports of Canadian Snow Crab to Japan
What is the government doing to promote Canadian exports of Snow Crab to Japan?
- I am aware of issues impacting Canada’s trade in snow crab, including our trade with Japan.
- I recognize that although there may be fluctuations with trade in snow crab with Japan over time, we must not lose sight of the almost three-fold increase in the dollar-value of trade we have seen in snow crab with the rest of the world over the past 10 years, having exported $1.4 billion in 2022.
- Regardless, Japan is an important market for Canadian snow crab - being the third largest importer after the United States and China - and my department is looking into this issue with Global Affairs Canada.
- In addition to Canada’s Ambassador to Japan raising this issue with counterparts in Japan, senior officials from my department have also met with the Deputy Head of the Japanese Embassy in February and raised this issue.
- We will continue to follow up with Japan to better understand the issue and to promote enhanced market access for Canadian snow crab to Japan.
What is the government doing to help the snow crab industry in Atlantic Canada, which is facing a possible loss of $100 million dollar worth of unsold snow crabs from last season?
- We understand the situation facing the snow crab industry. DFO continues to work with Global Affairs and Agriculture and Agri-food Canada to explore other markets for Canadian snow crab in addition to supporting market access and marketing initiatives related to Japan.
- As part of the Government's Indo-Pacific Strategy, we have invested $31.8 million for the creation of the Indo-Pacific Agriculture and Agri-Food Office (IPAAO) to increase and diversify Canada's agriculture and agri-food exports including fish and seafood positioning Canada as a preferred supplier to the region, and strengthening trade on both sides of the Pacific.
Hurricane Fiona - Small Craft Harbour Program and Ghost Gear Fund
What has DFO done to address the impacts of Hurricane Fiona on impacted Small Craft Harbours?
- Immediately following the storm, DFO staff worked with Harbour authorities and communities where impacted harbours are located to assess damages and carry out initial repairs.
- On October 4, 2022, the Prime Minister announced the $300 million Hurricane Fiona Recovery Fund.
- On October 17, in support of immediate recovery efforts, I announced that $100 million from the fund has been set aside to repair essential infrastructure at harbours and to retrieve lost fishing gear.
- Staff is also planning and preparing to execute longer term repairs at impacted harbours as required. This includes working with harbour authorities to determine the scope and budget of work. The Department has determined that only a few of the impacted small craft harbours will not be operational when fishing resumes in the spring, and all fish harvesters impacted will be accommodated.
What were the impacts to Canadian fisheries, specifically as it relates to gear loss, due to Hurricane Fiona?
- Hurricane Fiona produced substantial fishing gear-related debris from fisheries and aquaculture.
- Several fisheries were active during this period and have reported significant loss of set gear that could not be removed in advance of the storm.
- In total, 1,782 lost units of gear, 100 ft of nets, and 95,691 ft of lost rope were reported between September 23 and January 31, 2022.
- The Department has funded 11 projects which have resulted in the retrieval of almost 130 tonnes of ghost gear in impacted areas. Other similar efforts are being planned for the coming months.
Hurricane Fiona - Impacts on Real Property Assets
What were Fiona’s impacts on DFO/CCG infrastructure?
- Following Hurricane Fiona, the cost of repair and clean up at real property custodial sites amounted to ~$650K (revised from $370K due to moderate cost increases across all our impacted regions). The majority of damages have been repaired and work at the CCG College is well underway.
Small Craft Harbours - Divestiture
Resources in the Supplementary Estimates C have been reallocated for the Disposal of Small Craft Harbours. What does that mean?
- Resources are being reallocated to support the divestiture of two harbours currently owned by the Department’s Small Craft Harbours Program.
- The harbours, located in Mattawa, Ontario and Cold Lake, Alberta will be divested to the Town of Mattawa and to the City of Cold Lake.
- One of the main objectives of the Small Craft Harbours program is to divest harbours that are considered non-essential to the commercial fishing industry. Since 1995, the program has divested more than 1,100 non-core harbours.
- Divestiture of these non-core harbours provides economic opportunities for communities, while also removing non-core infrastructure from the Department's portfolio and therefore reducing liability.
What will the money be used for?
- The funds are intended for repair and upkeep of the harbours, ensuring that they remain safe and accessible to users after they have been divested.
Executives at DFO: Second Language Level Proficiency
What are the linguistic profiles of executive positions within Fisheries and Oceans Canada?
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada has a total of 372 executive positions, of which 280* are presently encumbered. Of these encumbered positions, 219 (78 per cent) are bilingual and 61 (22 per cent) are unilingual.
- *There are 287 executive employees; however, there are 280 executive positions that are encumbered.
How many executives meet the language profile of their positions?
- All executives are required to meet the linguistic profile of their position upon appointment and maintain it thereafter.
Indigenous Employment
How many Indigenous People are employed by the Department, specifically in the Arctic Region, and what is their level of seniority?
- Twenty-five percent of CCG employees and fourteen percent of DFO employees in the Arctic Region have self-identified as Indigenous.
- Department-wide, 16 of the Department’s 287* employees at the executive level (nearly six percent) have self-identified as Indigenous.
- Participation of Inuit, First Nations, and Métis peoples in the workforce is critical to Canada’s efforts toward reconciliation and increasing diversity.
- It is essential as part of Canada’s overall efforts toward reconciliation, and to increase diversity in the public service, which will ensure that quality programs are delivered by a workforce that is representative of the peoples and communities being served.
*There are 287 executive employees; however, there are 280 executive positions that are encumbered.
Consulting Firms
Why is DFO contracting firms to provide consulting services?
- DFO uses consulting firms for different purposes, especially when it does not have the expertise or immediate resources to perform the work.
- DFO adheres to Government of Canada procurement practices and standards, and we are continuously assessing contracts to ensure value for money.
Recovery Efforts of Unidentified High Altitude Object in Lake Huron
What has been the relationship with our American counterparts in the recovery efforts of the debris from the American downed unidentified flying object?
- The United States led recovery efforts through the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
- The Canadian Coast Guard’s Central Region supported the Government of Canada’s recovery efforts through the provision of a ship, the CCGS Griffon, two helicopters and a drone.
- The bi-national command centre assigned search areas to the Canadian Coast Guard and the United States Coast Guard within their own territorial waters.
- The key participating agencies in the bi-national command team included the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), the Canadian Coast Guard, the United States Coast Guard and the FBI.
How much has the Government of Canada spent to undertake this recovery effort?
- From the initiation of this activity on February 13th, to the suspension of the search on February 15th, the full costs incurred by the Canadian Coast Guard for the search was $176,000.
- These costs are attributed principally to the search efforts of the CCGS Griffon and the two helicopters.
- If pressed, there was no cost associated with the use of the drone.
What mandated activities were the Coast Guard unable to deliver as a result of redirecting its resources to this debris recovery activity?
- The CCGS Griffon is currently deployed in the Great Lakes to deliver icebreaking services.
- Due to a light ice year, the re-allocation of the CCGS Griffon did not affect Canada’s icebreaking program; the same is true of the two helicopters, which were redirected from their ice surveillance mission for this activity.
Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC)
How will the new funding secured under Budget 2022 be used?
- Budget 2022 provides the Department with $44.9 million over five years, starting in 2022-2023, and $9 million ongoing in order to directly support and ensure the Commissions’ continued success in contributing to the health and management of the Great Lakes fisheries.
- This increased funding takes Canada’s annual contribution to the Commission to over $19 million, and ensures that Canada is meeting its international treaty obligations to the Commission.
- This funding will help to:
- Continue Canadian sea lamprey control activities, including the purchase of lampricide treatment;
- Upgrade and refurbish critical infrastructure, primarily related to sea lamprey control; and,
- Support the GLFC’s fishery science research agenda and its coordination of binational fisheries management efforts across the Great Lakes.
What is the Department doing to ensure effective engagement with the Commission?
- Departmental officials at the highest level are actively engaged with the GLFC Secretariat to ensure there is a mutual understanding of plans and priorities, with a focus on renewing and improving the relationship.
- The Department is working very closely with Commission staff to bolster Canadian contributions to eradicate sea lamprey in the Great Lakes, and to ensure that the GLFC has the financial security to plan and deliver on its important mandate.
- The GLFC Secretariat now has the information it requires to set the budget for the upcoming year and is actively working with Canadian and American Commissioners to schedule the interim meeting.
Funding for the Implementation of the Impact Assessment Act
Why did DFO not seek additional resources earlier (i.e. in Budget 2018) to support its new and enhanced roles and responsibilities under the Impact Assessment Act?
- DFO sought limited funding to advance marine spatial planning in 2018 but otherwise, the Department decided to wait to seek additional resources when the level of effort required to fulfill these new and expanded responsibilities was better understood. With the experience gained since 2018, DFO was in a much better place to predict the implications on the Department of implementing the Impact Assessment Act.
Why does DFO need funding now, when it didn’t need funding earlier?
- In order to meet the timelines and expanded responsibilities required under the Impact Assessment Act up to now, DFO has been reallocating resources and deferring some activities in order to prioritize its contributions to impact and regional assessments. Some items that have been deferred or delayed include the development of internal guidance documents, training, and on-site visits.
- While DFO has been able to meet its obligations to provide expert advice to inform impact and regional assessments to date, continued reallocation of resources is not sustainable in the long term.
What results will DFO achieve with these resources?
- Resources allotted to DFO will feed into eight specific departmental results. Those results are directly linked to expertise provided by various DFO sectors to impacts assessments, for example:
- Provision of timely expert and scientific advice to support impact assessment and regional assessment processes
- DFO participation in Impact Assessment Crown consultation process as requested.
Canada’s Nature Legacy: Protecting Canada’s Nature, Parks and Wildlife
What are the key accomplishments that DFO has achieved with the “Canada’s Nature Legacy: Protecting our nature” initiative?
- The 2018 Canada’s Nature Legacy initiative was an essential core investment that helped to address long-standing unfunded pressures and enabled the transition to multi-species and ecosystem approaches with the goal of advancing Canada’s international and domestic biodiversity goals.
- For instance, in the last four years, DFO has increased the number of critical habitat orders from 13 species in 2018 to 56 species as of February 2023, and it has, in collaboration with stakeholders and partners, increased implementation of measures to achieve recovery objectives for 52 multi-species projects across Canada.
What is the difference between Canada’s Nature Legacy and the Enhanced Nature Legacy initiatives?
- The 2018 Nature Legacy (NL) initiative was an essential core investment that helped to address long-standing unfunded pressures and enabled the transition to multi-species and ecosystem approaches with the goal of advancing Canada’s international and domestic biodiversity goals.
- In 2021, DFO and its partners received additional funding under the Enhanced Nature Legacy initiative to supplement the NL by investing in new programming elements to address gaps in mapping, information management, and engagement.
Interdepartmental Maritime Integrated Command, Control and Communications (IMIC3) Program (DND to DFO)
What is IMIC3?
- IMIC3 is an information gathering and distribution system that supports planning and execution of maritime operations by providing coordination and decision-making aids and domestic maritime situational awareness.
Quebec Fisheries Fund
How does the Quebec Fisheries Fund support businesses in the Quebec fisheries sector that are affected by moratoria and fisheries closures?
- The program supports the development and testing of fishing gear designed to reduce North Atlantic right whale entanglements. This fishing gear helps make the snow crab and lobster fisheries more sustainable and the industry more resilient in light of new standards and regulations.
- The program supports innovative projects that put less pressure on and make optimal use of limited fishery resources.
- The program supports projects to develop new fisheries.
Marine Renewable Energy
What is the Minister doing to ensure that tidal energy projects are supported in the Bay of Fundy region?
- DFO recognizes the potential for tidal energy projects in the Bay of Fundy to provide clean energy and create economic opportunities.
- In the Maritimes Region, DFO has issued six Fisheries Act authorizations and Species at Risk Act (SARA) permits related to tidal power projects over the past five years. However, not all marine renewable energy (MRE) projects can be supported in all environments.
- The Minas Passage and Minas Basin are part of an ecologically and biologically-significant area, characterized by the world’s highest tides. There are currently 85 different fish species, multiple species of marine mammals, and marine invertebrates known to use this area. The Minas Passage acts as a major migratory corridor for many of these species, including numerous species of economic and cultural significance.
- DFO provides expert advice and information regarding a variety of research projects that are funded through organizations such as Net Zero Atlantic and Fundy Ocean Research Center for Energy (FORCE).
- DFO officials have also participated in numerous workshops, webinars and meetings with industry groups such as Marine Renewables Canada to clarify DFO’s regulatory role and provide feedback on study design.
- Internally, DFO has established an In-stream Tidal Working Group that is coordinated on an as-needed basis during project reviews and acts as a venue where tidal research projects can receive DFO’s expert advice.
- DFO will continue to consider issuing approvals for tidal energy demonstration projects in lower-risk areas of the Bay of Fundy, as well as lower-risk tidal energy devices in Minas Passage.
How does DFO communicate regulatory requirements under the Fisheries Act and Species at Risk Act to proponents?
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is responsible for the protection of fish, fish habitat, and aquatic species at risk under the Fisheries Act and the Species at Risk Act (SARA).
- The Department reviews applications from proponents of tidal energy projects on a case-by-case basis to ensure the conservation and protection of fish, fish habitat, and aquatic species at risk.
- DFO has communicated a clear regulatory pathway with projected timelines to support a staged approach for tidal energy developments that have the potential to impact marine life, including species at risk.
- DFO participates in one-window committees, attends meetings with perspective projects in advance of their applications, communicates the information requirements in workshops, meetings and seminars.
- DFO communicates regulatory requirements to proponents as early as possible in their project planning stage. With respect to the Minas Passage, DFO advised all tidal energy proponents on the regulatory requirements and specific issues and concerns regarding Minas Passage years before applications were submitted.
What is the Minister doing to ensure coordination and alignment within the federal government, with provinces / territories and with Indigenous people?
- A collaborative approach that draws upon the knowledge and expertise of subject matter experts, Indigenous groups, and stakeholders who are familiar with the ecology and biology of Canada’s productive marine environments is required to develop the marine renewable energy sector.
- DFO Maritimes Region’s Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Program has been working with the Province of Nova Scotia and the tidal energy sector on marine renewable energy projects, and continues to support a staged approach to tidal energy development that balances technology demonstration with effects monitoring and research.
- A staged approach allows proponents to demonstrate the ability to monitor for potential impacts and verify devices do not present a risk to fish prior to deploying multiple devices or platforms.
- Decisions on whether or not to issue a Fisheries Act authorization are guided by the best available scientific information and departmental objectives; and decisions are made in consultation with Indigenous partners. The precautionary principle is followed when there are uncertainties.
- This approach is meant to ensure that Canada’s aquatic ecosystems remain healthy for future generations while also developing a successful marine renewable energy industry.
- My department has coordinated a senior-level working group for non-designated projects to discuss the various federal regulatory requirements and how funding can be better aligned. In-stream tidal was used as a case study in this group.
- DFO is also working with Natural Resources Canada and the provinces to support future offshore wind development. Marine spatial planning will be used to support intergovernmental coordination in the development of this emerging sector.
Question Period Cards
Canadian Coast Guard
FOPO Marine Cargo Container Spills Report
Issue
The Canadian Coast Guard response to the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, Marine Cargo Container Spills Report.
Response
- The Canadian Coast Guard welcomes the recommendations of the Standing Committee related to marine cargo spills and has worked with partner departments to provide a comprehensive response to the Report.
- Improving and expanding services to Canadians to protect Canada’s environment and support economic prosperity is a key focus.
- The health and sustainability of our marine environment is linked not only to Canada’s prosperity but to global well-being. Improvements to our marine pollution response services are beneficial to all Canadians.
- The Government Response to the Marine Cargo Container Spills Report was tabled in the House on February 1, 2023.
If pressed on Zim Kingston
- The Zim Kingston incident was a complicated response operation that highlighted the many challenges of responding to marine container spills. We are committed to further enhancing our capabilities to respond to these kinds of incidents in the future.
- Investments from Budget 2022 that support the second phase of the Oceans Protection Plan will help strengthen the Canadian marine safety system to prepare for and respond to similar incidents.
Background
Zim Kingston
October 21, 2021, the ZIM KINGSTON reported having lost 40 containers when encountering adverse weather and heavy swells, approximately 38 nautical miles west of the entrance to the Juan de Fuca Strait, off the coast of Vancouver Island, BC. The ship later reported that 109 containers had been lost; two of which contained hazardous chemicals that were prone to combustion when exposed to water.
On October 23, 2021, damaged cargo still on board the ship caught fire. Sixteen (16) crew members were evacuated by the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) and 5 crew members stayed aboard to fight the fire. The owner of the vessel contracted two commercial tugs to assist in firefighting activities. Since it was known that two more containers containing hazardous chemicals that were prone to combustion remained in the damaged cargo, fire suppression and cooling of the remaining cargo tactics were used to reduce the risk of fire or explosion. The CCG’s Atlantic Raven was tasked to support fire suppression and towing operations.
The 109 containers went overboard in Cape Flattery. Containers drifted north and 4 containers beached at 4 locations on the northwest tip of Vancouver Island.
The containers were mostly general cargo (toys, games, sports equipment, furniture, electrical machinery, general household goods, footwear/clothing, photography/optical equipment and vehicle parts).
Two of the containers that fell overboard were known to contain hazardous materials - non marine polluting.
While the CCCG managed the overall response to the Zim Kingston incident, including the cargo debris cleanup, the owner of the vessel took a proactive role throughout the response and hired a salvage contractor to track and remove the beached containers. They also hired private industry, non-profit organizations and First Nations to support beach cleanup operations.
Sonar scans to locate the sunken containers have been conducted by the ship owner at Constance Bank anchorage and at Cape Flattery. No containers were found at Constance Bank. Results were inconclusive in identifying container-sized objects at Cape Flattery. The CCG continues to work with the ship’s representative to remediate reports of possible Zim Kingston debris.
Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans Report on Marine Cargo Container Spills
The Committee on Fisheries and Oceans (the committee) agreed to undertake a study of the effects of “cargo container spills on Canada’s marine environment with regard to:
- the environmental impacts of cargo container spills;
- improving response times and efficacy to cargo spills;
- addressing jurisdictional gaps to improve collaboration with volunteer, charitable organizations, provincial and territorial agencies, municipalities, and Indigenous communities during spill responses;
- improving polluter responsibility and financial accountability.”
From March 2022 to June 2022, the Committee held six meetings on the subject of Marine Cargo Container Spills with government officials and industry, Indigenous community, and non-profit organizations representatives.
As a result of those meetings, the Committee has made twenty-nine (29) recommendations directed at the Government of Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), and Transport Canada.
The scope of recommendations encompasses establishing marine debris monitoring and cleanup capacity; investing in research and monitoring to understand the impacts of polystyrene and other plastics; establishing marine cargo spill response capacity; expanding container ship regulations; building regulations for ships’ manifest information; establishing Hazardous and Noxious Substance spill response; establishing marine firefighting capacity; expanding emergency towing capacity; examining alternate funding mechanisms beyond the polluter-pays mechanism; championing the ban on the use of polystyrene foam in international fora; and collaborating with Indigenous communities to ensure they are active partners in marine cargo clean-up efforts.
The 29 recommendations include 5 on environmental impacts; 15 on incident response; 8 on cross jurisdiction collaboration; and, 1 on polluter responsibility and financial accountability.
The majority of recommendations were directed to DFO and Transport Canada. Input on a number of recommendations was also required from Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canada Border Services Agency (manifests) and Innovation Science and Economic Development (cellular and broadband for coastal communities).
Budget 2022 announced the intention to propose amendments to the Canada Shipping Act 2001 to enable the proactive management of marine emergencies and to cover more types of pollution.
Amendments to Canada Shipping Act 2001 would address a number of the Standing Committee’s recommendations.
Oceans Protection Plan renewal, launched in 2022, also includes new funding to enhance Hazardous and Noxious Substances preparedness and response and improving overall coordination for all marine spills.
The Government of Canada submitted its responses to the 29 recommendations to the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans on February 1, 2023.
The Government’s Response can be found at the following link on the House of Commons website.
Standing House Committee on Fisheries and Ocean’s Report on Science at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
Issue
Will the government fully implement the recommendations detailed in the Standing House Committee on Fisheries and Oceans Report on Science at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans?
Response
- Our government is committed to protecting Canada’s oceans and aquatic ecosystems and growing Canada’s fish and seafood sector, guided by scientifically sound advice.
- I appreciate the Committee’s efforts and the time invested in developing the report and its recommendations.
- My Department is reviewing the Committee’s recommendations to ensure that the best available science is used to inform Government decision-making.
Background
On March 6, 2023, [to be confirmed] the Standing House Committee on Fisheries and Oceans (FOPO) tabled its report on Science at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
Departmental staff are reviewing the report and will be preparing a government response to the recommendations in the report.
The report follows 14 meetings of the Committee between April 26, 2022 and February 13, 2023.
The committee heard from 57 witnesses, including Departmental officials, the Office of the Chief Science Advisor, Indigenous organizations, academics and fisheries scientists, fisheries and aquaculture organizations, conservation organizations, and others.
DFO officials were invited to appear before the Committee on two occasions, on April 26, 2022, (the first meeting of the study) and on October 7, 2022.
Scientific Processes and Excellence at Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Issue
How is DFO’s science considered in fisheries management decisions?
Response
- The Government of Canada is committed to rebuild a more resilient and inclusive future through continued collaboration and the use of science and evidence-based decision-making.
- The Department ensures high standards of scientific excellence, impartiality, and transparency in its scientific activities.
- My department is proud to have implemented a policy on science integrity which is fundamental to making the right decisions for Canada’s fisheries and oceans.
- I rely on that science on a daily basis and have every confidence in the integrity of Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s scientists.
If pressed on release of unpublished data
- The publication of scientific papers in external technical journals is a process between researchers and the science journals themselves.
- This approach generally results in the authors agreeing on the contents of the paper being submitted, as well as the journal being satisfied there was a rigorous review. I fully support this independent process.
Background
As a science-based department, scientific integrity is essential to the work at DFO and of its employees. Scientific integrity is critical to the decision-making process, from the planning and conduct of research to the production of advice and the application of advice to the departmental decision-making processes.
This Scientific Integrity Policy recognizes the importance of high quality science, free from political, commercial and client interference and the importance of this in the decision-making processes utilized by the Department. The policy applies to all who plan, produce, support or utilize science to make well-informed decisions.
The Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) coordinates the production of peer-reviewed science advice for DFO. Science advice is prepared both nationally and through DFO’s regional offices.
The CSAS provides a systematic process for the delivery of science advice to the department’s decision makers. Advice might relate to the state of an ecosystem, the impacts of a human activity, the effectiveness of a mitigation strategy or another subject related to DFO’s mandate.
Fish Stock Rebuilding
Issue
What is Canada doing to rebuild its key harvested fish stocks that have become depleted?
Response
- It is important to aim for healthy fish stocks to support resilient ecosystems and ensure economic returns over the long-term.
- This is why we require the development of formal rebuilding plans to promote the recovery of depleted harvested stocks on a priority basis.
- To support this objective, the Fish Stocks provisions in the Fisheries Act require rebuilding plans for all depleted fish stocks that are prescribed by regulation under the provisions.
If pressed
- Currently, 22 of 192 of Canada's key harvested stocks need rebuilding. Six of these stocks have rebuilding plans in place, and another 11 plans are in development. For those stocks without completed rebuilding plans, DFO has specific fishery management measures in place to limit fishing and not compromise their rebuilding.
- The Department uses the best available science to ensure that strict fishery management measures are applied and fishing does not compromise rebuilding.
- While fishing restrictions aimed at rebuilding fish stocks can have economic impacts during the rebuilding period, more significant impacts can result from delaying or not taking sufficient action to promote stock rebuilding.
- DFO is working to develop rebuilding plans for depleted stocks and to prescribe additional stocks under the Fish Stocks provisions. This work aligns with the recommendations put forth in Oceana Canada’s 2022 Fishery Audit.
Background
Status of Rebuilding Plans and Critical Zone Stocks
The Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) annually surveys 192 key harvested stocks in its Sustainability Survey for Fisheries.
Currently, 22 stocks of the 192 are in the critical zone, which means these stocks are below their limit reference point (LRP), which is the point at which serious harm is occurring to the stock. Stocks in the critical zone are considered depleted.
Under DFO's 2009 Precautionary Approach Policy, stocks in the critical zone require rebuilding plans.
DFO is working to ensure there are complete rebuilding plans for all priority stocks, in accordance with the Sustainable Fisheries Framework Work Plan that DFO publishes on its website annually.
DFO has completed rebuilding plans for six of the 22 stocks, and a further 11 plans are under development. One of the stocks (Northern shrimp SFA 7) in the critical zone is managed by the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) and is subject to moratorium and thus DFO will not be developing a rebuilding plan.
Fish Stocks Provisions
Amendments made to the Fisheries Act in 2019 include the Fish Stocks provisions which require the Minister of DFO and the Canadian Coast Guard to implement management measures to maintain major stocks listed in regulation at levels necessary to promote sustainability and to develop and implement rebuilding plans for depleted major fish stocks.
These provisions came into effect on April 4, 2022, when amendments to the Fishery (General) Regulations (FGR) were finalized which prescribed the first batch of major fish stocks to be subject to the provisions.
Schedule IX of the FGR sets out the first batch of 30 major stocks subject to the Fish Stocks provisions, of which 14 stocks are in the critical zone and will require rebuilding plans. These stocks were selected from the 180 key harvested stocks included in DFO's 2020 Sustainability Survey for Fisheries, with the exception of two Pacific salmon stocks (Chinook salmon - Okanagan and Coho Salmon - Interior Fraser) which were not on the survey at the time of prescription.
The FGR set out the required contents (e.g., stock status and trends, probable causes for the stock’s decline, measurable objectives aimed at rebuilding the stock) of rebuilding plans as well as timelines to develop rebuilding plans for stocks subject to the Fish Stocks provisions.
DFO is currently working on a section batch of 62 proposed major fish stocks to be prescribed under the Fish stocks provisions. Of these, three stocks are in the critical zone and would require rebuilding plans and 10 do not currently have Limit Reference Points. DFO is working to establish these reference points before the stocks would be prescribed. Once they are established, DFO can then determine whether they require rebuilding plans.
Investments for Rebuilding Plans
To support the development of rebuilding plans, the Government of Canada invested $940,000 over four years, starting in 2017-18. This funding was provided in response to the 2016 report “Sustaining Canada’s Major Fish Stocks—Fisheries and Oceans Canada” by the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development.
The Government of Canada also invested an additional $107.4 million over five years, starting in 2019 and $17.6 million ongoing to support the implementation of the Fish Stocks provisions of the amended Fisheries Act. A large portion these resources are being used to increase scientific capacity for stock assessment of Canada's fish stocks, including the development of reference points (like the limit reference point) to identify stock status and to inform the development of rebuilding plans.
Oceana 2022 Fishery Audit
On November 22, 2022, Oceana Canada released its sixth annual Fishery Audit assessing the health of fish stocks and fisheries management. The audit recommended DFO list all remaining Critical and Cautious zone stocks under the Fish Stocks provisions and complete rebuilding plans in a timely manner. As described above, DFO is on track to complete rebuilding plans for fish stocks subject to the Fish Stocks provisions and is working to prescribe an additional 62 stocks.
Fisheries Decision-making
Issue
How are fisheries management measures determined, including the total allowable catch?
Response
- As Minister, I am committed to making evidence-based fisheries decisions, using the best available science that upholds conservation as my first priority to protect fish stocks for current and future generations of Canadians.
- After conservation, Treaty and Indigenous rights are the most important considerations in determining fisheries management measures. I also consider international treaty obligations, socio-economic impacts, and ensuring benefits flow to coastal communities.
- The views of Indigenous partners, harvesters, and other stakeholders are also taken into account through formal advisory processes.
If pressed on harvest level reductions, particularly those related to missed surveys and stock assessments
- The conservation of stocks is my priority in order to provide sustainable opportunities for years to come. When faced with uncertainty, regardless of the cause, my decisions must ensure conservation.
- While recognizing the challenges harvesters and their communities face when quotas are reduced or when fisheries are closed, the Department does not have a standing mandate to offer financial compensation or priority access to other fisheries.
Background
The Government of Canada has federal jurisdiction over coastal and inland fisheries, and the Fisheries Act gives the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard authority over fish harvesting decisions. The Minister has the authority to determine: how much is fished, who gets to fish, when and how stocks can be fished.
The Department also has international fisheries responsibilities with more than 20 per cent of Canada’s fish stocks managed in cooperation with international counterparts.
Fisheries management decisions have a range of impacts on coastal communities and Canadians as a whole. These include:
- Commercial: Enabling continued prosperity from fish and seafood while supporting a stable and sustainable fishing industry;
- Environmental: Ensuring sustainable resource management and conservation objectives grounded in science;
- Indigenous and Cultural: Advancing reconciliation, supporting Indigenous and Treaty Rights, and working towards collaborative management; and
- Recreational: Promoting stewardship, public awareness about conservation, and generating important socio-economic benefits for coastal communities.
Decision(s) must adhere to the following key principles: 1.Conservation, 2. Legally-binding agreements, 3. Indigenous and Treaty rights, and 4. Orderly management.
Decision-making is informed by:
- Science advice: Peer reviewed science advice on stock status, total allowable catch (TAC), and other conservation measures;
- Socio-economic considerations: Analysis of short- and long-term impacts of fisheries decisions on the fishing industry and reliant communities;
- Fishery policies: such as the Sustainable Fisheries Framework which includes the precautionary approach; and
- Indigenous and cultural considerations: through formal consultation and less formal engagement processes, including the consideration of Indigenous knowledge offered voluntarily; and Consultations with Indigenous Partners, and Relevant Stakeholders: A broad set of advisory processes involving, Indigenous partners (co-managers), fishing industry participants, the provinces, and relationships with commercial, recreational, and environmental groups.
The Sustainable Fisheries Framework (SFF) is the foundation for an ecosystem approach to fisheries, which aims to consider the impacts of fishing on all components of the aquatic environment. The SFF continues to evolve as new legislation, policies, and tools are created. The SFF consists of various policies and tools: Precautionary Approach Framework (includes the development of Rebuilding Plans), Specific Policies (e.g., sensitive benthic areas; new fisheries for forage species; by-catch), Sustainable Fisheries Survey and Integrated Fisheries Management Plans (IFMPs).
The Precautionary Approach involves taking cautious decisions to avoid serious harm to the resource in the absence of scientific information or when scientific information is uncertain, unreliable or inadequate. This approach is widely accepted as an essential part of sustainable fisheries management. Applying the precautionary approach to fisheries management decisions entails establishing a harvest strategy that:
- identifies three stock status zones - healthy, cautious, and critical - according to upper stock and limit reference points;
- sets the removal rate at which fish may be harvested within each stock status zone; and
- adjusts the removal rate according to fish stock status variations, based on pre-agreed decision rules.
Fisheries management decisions and harvest strategies are designed to promote and maintain fish stocks within the healthy zone. In the cautious zone, decisions and strategies promote stock rebuilding to the healthy zone. In the critical zone, stock growth is promoted and removals are kept to the lowest possible level.
Fish Harvester Benefit and Grant Program
Issue
What is Fisheries and Oceans Canada doing to help the fishing sector through COVID-19?
Response
- In 2020 we launched the Fish Harvester Benefit and Grant Program, to support self- employed fish harvesters and self-employed crew.
- To date, the Program has issued about $162 million to help the fishing sector through COVID-19.
- DFO, assisted by Employment and Social Development Canada, recently launched an outreach effort to remind individuals who have overpayment obligations about repayment.
If pressed on reminder outreach
- Over the course of the Program, some individuals received funds in excess of their entitlements, and will have to repay their overpayment amounts.
- Some had losses less than they had forecast; others were ineligible for the Program. All had a right to appeal their overpayments.
- The Program has extended the waiver period on interest charges a further three months, until March 31, 2023 to assist individuals with overpayment obligations.
Background
The Fish Harvester Benefit and Grant (FHBG) Program was part of the Government of Canada’s COVID response strategy. Since its launch in 2020, it has provided support for non-deferrable business expenses and income support to self-employed fish harvesters and self-employed crew.
The FHBG Program has been delivered in two-phases:
- Phase One (2020) involved the issuance of: 1) one-time grant payments to provide emergency business expense support to address the non-deferrable business costs of self- employed fish harvesters; and 2) the first part of the benefit payment (60 per cent) to provide income assistance to eligible self-employed fish harvesters and self-employed crew.
- Phase Two (2021) involved confirming that the applicant-attested information provided in phase one aligned with Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) data. A phase-two application was required by all applicants who received payment in phase one. If eligible, and with the successful submission of the phase two application, the Program issued the second part of the benefit payment (the remaining 40 per cent).
The benefit payment covered up to 75 per cent of income losses beyond a 25 per cent threshold for the 2020 tax year when compared to 2018 or 2019. The maximum benefit is $10,164.
During phase one, applicants attested to their income, estimated losses, and employment status. The Program issued payments in phase one based on the attested information from applicants.
Prior to the launch of phase two, the Program received Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) data and was able to compare attested information with tax filing information that applicants had provided to CRA. The Program deferred to information filed with CRA.
During this validation process, in some cases it was found that attested information did not align with the information that applicants had previously filed with CRA, meaning that in some cases individuals had received FHBG funds for which they were not eligible
For example, individuals who attested to being self-employed, but who had filed information with CRA indicating that they were employees, received overpayment letters pertaining to for their phase-one payment, since wage-earning employees were not eligible for the Program.
Sometimes applicants’ income losses as reflected in CRA data were found not meet the minimum loss threshold required for the benefit. Other times individual income losses reflected in CRA data were simply less than forecast in an applicant’s attestation.
In all cases, there was a right to appeal overpayment findings.
In February 2022, the Program waived interest charges on overpayment amounts owing until January 1, 2023. The Program extended the waiver period by a further three months. The revised interest waiver period will end on March 31, 2023.
At the end of January, the Program launched a reminder outreach effort to recipients of Program funds who have repayment obligations.
This effort has involved DFO sending reminder emails, letters, and account statements to individuals. In February, Service Canada started making reminder telephone calls to individuals with overpayments amounts owing. Individuals are encouraged to make repayment before March 31 to avoid interest charges.
This follow-up work to make reasonable efforts to recover Program overpayments is a requirement under the Directive on Public Money and Receivables.
Approximately 6,600 individuals have some level of overpayment owing. The total overpayment amount owing is approximately $33.6 million.
NAFO 4T Winter and Yellowtail Flounder Decision
Issue
Why did the Department decide to close the winter and yellowtail flounder fisheries?
Response
- My Department recently announced the closure of the winter and yellowtail flounder fisheries in NAFO division 4T.
- Based on science, this decision was made to help rebuild the stocks, which have remained in the critical zone since 2004 and 2009, respectively.
- The Department is committed to developing a rebuilding plan for yellowtail flounder.
If pressed on the rebuilding plan
- Rebuilding these stocks would be to the benefit of all Canadians, including harvesters, sectors closely involved with the fishing industry, and Indigenous and coastal communities.
- A rebuilding plan for 4T winter flounder is on track to be completed this spring.
If pressed on compensation
- The Department is not resourced to financially compensate harvesters when there are downturns in their fishery.
- Affected harvesters are encouraged to work with their regional office to identify other opportunities.
Background
Yellowtail and winter flounder harvested in NAFO Division 4T are primarily used as bait in the lobster fishery ensuring a fresh bait source for the lobster fishing industry that operates in the Magdalen Islands.
Winter and yellowtail flounder have remained in the critical zone of the Precautionary Approach Framework since 2004 and 2009 respectively; their spawning biomasses were at 24 per cent and 39 percent of its limit reference point in 2020, No signs of recovery have been observed in the most recent scientific assessments.
While the commercial fishery accounts only for a small proportion of the stock’s total mortality, it is important to limit and maintain fishing removals at the lowest possible level as this is one of the only controllable factors to ensure the species conservation.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) recognizes the importance of these fisheries to coastal communities, and therefore makes the conservation of these stocks a priority. Hence the Department’s to significantly reduce the TAC from 300 t to 150 t for winter flounder in 2022 and from 225 to 150 t for yellowtail flounder in 2021.
A rebuilding plan for winter flounder, that is consistent with the Fisheries Act’s new fish stock provisions (FSP’s), is being finalized and will be delivered this coming spring (2023).
The yellowtail flounder was recently proposed for a listing under “Batch 2” of the Fisheries Act’s FSP’s. The FSP’s came into force on April 4, 2022, which requires DFO, according to section 6.2 (1), to develop and implement a rebuilding within 24 months when a stock has fell below its limit reference point (i.e., critical zone) to promote the growth of this stock.
DFO plans to develop and implement a rebuilding plan for yellowtail flounder.
The affected harvesters (8) have proposed a number of options to help supplement the loss of this quota, including access to other fishing opportunities in the area. The Department is reviewing their request.
Pacific Salmon
Issue
Why are we not doing more to recover Pacific salmon?
Response
- Pacific salmon are in a decline, with many runs on the verge of collapse due to climate change impacts, pollutants, changes in land and water use, and other stressors.
- The Government is taking decisive steps under the Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative.
- We are collaborating with Indigenous peoples, provincial/territorial governments, harvesters, environmentalists, and other stakeholders to protect and rebuild Pacific salmon.
If Pressed on the Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative
- Year 1 of the Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative was focused on engagement with Indigenous peoples, partners and stakeholders regarding program design and implementation.
- Year 2 initiatives are underway and focus on salmon rebuilding, including prioritizing stocks requiring urgent support. We are implementing specific activities, using tools and data solutions to create positive change in protecting salmon.
- Total expenditure in Year 1 was $15.4 million. The next phase of the BC Salmon Restoration Fund has been launched as part of Year 2.
If Pressed on Flooding
- In response to flooding in southwestern BC in 2021, an Emergency Recovery Unit was established under the Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative to lead Departmental responses to major events.
- In collaboration with First Nations and the Province of BC, we are working to address impacts to fish and fish habitat in the most heavily affected areas of the Fraser Valley.
- Flood recovery action plans are collaboratively being implemented by First Nations, the Province of BC, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada through flood response tables established in the Nicola and Lower Fraser River watersheds.
If Pressed on Discovery Islands
- Given the unprecedented threats that wild Pacific salmon are facing, we must take action to conserve and protect them.
- The Discovery Islands has unique environmental characteristics, including the migration of wild salmon in many of its channels. It was identified as an area to examine in the Cohen Commission report.
- Following extensive consultations, I have decided not to renew licences for 15 open-net pen Atlantic salmon aquaculture sites in the Discovery Islands area.
- The decision was not an easy one, but many First Nations and British Columbians expect timely, decisive action in the Discovery Islands to protect wild salmon.
Background
Budget 2021 provided a transformational investment starting in 2021-22, to Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) to stabilize and conserve wild Pacific salmon populations as part of the Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative (PSSI).
The PSSI was launched by the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard in June 2021, with the goal of stemming the severe and ongoing decline of key Pacific salmon stocks on Canada’s West Coast and restoring them to a sustainable level for future generations of Canadians. The long-term initiative is unprecedented in both value and scope, and the work will require the efforts of not only the Department, but of those whose lives and interests are affected by the state of Pacific salmon.
This investment is to implement initiatives over the next five years (2021/22 - 2025/26) organized under four pillars: Conservation and Stewardship (habitat and rebuilding-related work); Salmon Enhancement (hatcheries-related work); Harvest Transformation (harvest-related work); and, Integration and Coordination (internal and external integration of planning and collaboration with others).
Under the Conservation and Stewardship pillar, recent work underway includes BC Flood Recovery and the renewal of the British Columbia Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund, Pacific high seas inspection for illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, and Pacific salmon rebuilding planning.
Through the Salmon Enhancement pillar, the Department has focused on development and engagement on a new policy framework for salmon enhancement, which will guide DFO’s work on hatchery investments to support conservation priorities.
The Harvest Transformation pillar’s activities include recent longer-term conservation-based closures for commercial fisheries, preparations of the Pacific Salmon Commercial Licence Retirement Program, and engagement on the mass marking and mark selective fisheries.
Lastly, work advancing under the Integration and Collaboration pillar is intended to advance integration and collaboration with Indigenous peoples, harvest groups, environmental groups and others to support Pacific salmon conservation. This included the creation of the PSSI Secretariat and ongoing engagement with First Nations, as well as BC, Yukon, and other stakeholders, on approaches for collaborative processes moving forward.
The 2018 Fall Economic Statement reiterated the Government’s commitment to the sustainability of wild Pacific salmon, supporting stock assessment and rebuilding efforts through a renewed Fisheries Act for priority fish stocks, and announcing the launch of the first iteration of the British Columbia Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund (BCSRIF).
The federal-provincial joint BCSRIF was officially launched on March 15, 2019 originally allocating $142.85 million over five years: $100 million from Canada and $42.85 million from BC. The second phase of the BCSRIF was announced in August 2022, with an additional $100M funded via PSSI. This brings the total funding of BCSRIF to $285 million ($85 million from BC), with an extended program end date of March 31, 2026.
As part of the Government’s commitment to protecting wild Pacific salmon, on February 17, 2023, the Minister announced that licenses for Atlantic salmon farms in the Discovery Islands would not be reissued as an enhanced precautionary approach.
Pinniped Predation on Salmon in Pacific Region
Issue
What is the Department doing about the predation by pinnipeds on Pacific salmon?
Response
- The Department is aware of concerns about the impacts of predators on salmon. However, there is uncertainty regarding the factors that may be contributing to salmon stock declines.
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada scientists continue conducting research on the role of seals and sea lions in a changing marine ecosystem, including pinniped predation of fish stocks.
- Our priority is to ensure that the best available information is utilized when making management decisions to ensure sustainability of a healthy and productive aquatic ecosystem.
If pressed
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada bases management decisions on the precautionary approach. This utilizes the best available information, including peer-reviewed science and Indigenous Knowledge.
- The Department is not considering a pinniped cull at this time.
Background
Context
The rebound in pinniped populations to historic levels has coincided with the recent decline in salmon populations, leading several First Nations groups to request management action to address the large numbers of pinnipeds and their perceived impacts on salmon populations.
Attention to this issue has grown significantly in recent years among these groups. This has included calls for increased harvests, culls, and/or sterilization to reduce the size of pinniped populations. The issue is divisive; there has also been vocal opposition to pinniped removals from environmental groups and animal rights advocacy groups.
There are concerns among numerous commercial and recreational fishing groups and numerous Indigenous groups in Pacific Region that pinnipeds, particularly Steller and California sea lions, and harbour seals, are impacting economically valuable and culturally important fish stocks.
There is a high degree of scientific uncertainty regarding the extent of pinniped predation on wild salmon stocks, including Steelhead. While seals and sea lions do eat salmon, salmon represent a small proportion on average of their diet. Seals and sea lions also eat predators of salmon and herring, such as hake.
Seals and sea lions are an important food source for Transient killer whales, also known as Biggs killer whales, whose numbers have been increasing in inshore waters along the British Columbia (BC) Coast in recent years. This population of killer whale has been listed as Threatened under the Species at Risk Act (SARA) since 2003.
In Canada, Steller sea lions are listed under SARA as a species of special concern based on its sensitivity to human disturbance while on land and vulnerability to catastrophic events (such as major oil spills) due to its highly concentrated breeding aggregations.
Management Approach
Government of Canada’s approach to the management of the harvest of pinnipeds (i.e. seals and sea lions) on the west coast focuses on a sustainable and humane Indigenous harvest for food, social, and ceremonial purposes and continuing ongoing scientific research to further Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s (DFO) understanding of the salmon-pinniped interaction. DFO does not undertake any active management of pinnipeds beyond this in the Pacific region.
DFO is not considering a cull at this time and commercial fisheries are not a tool to manage population levels.
There continues to be a wide variation amongst technical experts on the interpretation of scientific results, the potential efficacy of potential mitigation actions (such as lethal removals), and the level of acceptable risk associated with possible actions.
Commercial Pinniped Fishery Interests
There are currently no commercial fisheries for pinnipeds on the west coast. Any proposals for a potential commercial pinniped fishery are assessed under the New Emerging Fishery Policy (NEFP). Over the past three years, DFO has received three proposals for a commercial pinniped fishery with the objective to reduce pinniped population levels. All proposals were assessed under the NEFP and remain unapproved.
As a proponent driven process, additional information is required to consider further assessment against the NEFP and address the feedback provided by DFO. The objective of such proposals should focus on commercial benefits and should not be linked to salmon conservation. None of the proposals were submitted by a First Nation.
Science
DFO is working to evaluate seal and sea lion diets in Pacific Region. Estimating the amount of prey consumed by seals requires a number of different types of data that are difficult to obtain given that marine mammals are a wide ranging, diving predator and distributed in remote locations.
DFO Science is conducting research on the population dynamics and diets of pinnipeds to better understand pinniped-salmon interaction. This work includes updating assessments (including trends and current status) for Pacific harbour seal, Steller sea lion, and overwintering California sea lion populations, based on aerial survey data. DFO Science is also analyzing data collected from scat samples to better understand the diet composition for these three species. Research indicates that there is a large degree of uncertainty about the role of pinnipeds in salmon abundance trends.
Private Members Bill C-251 “An Act respecting the development of a federal framework on the conservation of fish stocks and management of pinnipeds”, was introduced in the House of Commons on February 9, 2022. Following a vote on June 15, the bill was defeated and will not be referred to the House of Commons FOPO; accordingly, the bill will not proceed for further consideration.
The Government of Canada opposed Bill C-251 for several reasons, including that the Bill lacked a scientific basis for the requirement of the proposed measures and their efficacy; the Bill duplicates existing authorities under the Fisheries Act and Marine Mammal Regulations, and finally the Bill could have threatened the Canadian fish and seafood industry’s access to key export markets.
DFO’s fish and seafood trade with key partners, including the United States (US), needs to be supported by management decisions that are based on the best available scientific evidence and internationally recognized practices and provisions aimed at ensuring the sustainable use and conservation of marine species.
If enacted, Bill C-251 would have risked violation of international legal obligations under the US Marine Mammal Protection Act import provisions, the Canada-US-Mexico Agreement, and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Seal Predation
Issue
Is seal predation having an impact on Canada’s commercial fish stocks and how is the Government addressing the issue?
Response
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada scientists are actively involved in research to better understand the role of pinnipeds in marine ecosystems, including the potential impacts of seals on commercial fish stocks.
- My Department hosted a Seal Summit last fall to engage scientists, the commercial fishing industry, Indigenous groups, provincial and territorial representatives, and stakeholders on market development solutions.
- The Department will work with harvesters to enable participation in the seal harvest provided that conservation and humane harvest principles are upheld.
If pressed on species-specific impacts
- My Department has documented impacts of grey seals on fish stocks in the Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. However their research has largely found that seal predation is a less important factor in fish stock declines in other areas.
- In British Columbia, Fisheries and Oceans Canada is working with partners to conduct more research to evaluate the impact of seal and sea lion predation on fish stocks, including Pacific salmon.
Background
Currently, DFO manages commercial harvests for grey, hooded, and harp seals in the Atlantic region; there are currently no fisheries for seals or sea lions in the Pacific region.
There is concern from the fishing industry on both the east and west coast regarding the potential impacts of seal and sea lion predation on commercially valuable fish stocks. There are currently active DFO research projects in Maritimes, Quebec, Newfoundland and Pacific regions to look at diet of key seal and/or sea lion species. The Department is also investing in a new research program on the West Coast and is working with partners on the potential impacts of seals and sea lions on fish populations.
Scientific evidence to date suggests that grey seals are having an impact on the recovery of cod and other groundfish in the Southern Gulf of St Lawrence. Conversely, there is no scientific evidence to date to demonstrate that harp seals are significantly impacting commercially valuable fish stock off the coast of Newfoundland. The impact of Pacific seals or sea lions on commercially important fish stocks on the west coast of Canada has not been evaluated and is currently unknown.
The Department uses the best available scientific information to make appropriate seal related management decisions.
Aquaculture - Open-Net Pen Transition Plan in British Columbia
Issue
How does the government intend to transition marine finfish aquaculture in British Columbia?
Response
- Given the unprecedented threats that wild Pacific salmon are facing, we must take action to conserve and protect them.
- That is why we are developing a responsible plan to transition from open net-pen salmon aquaculture in British Columbia coastal waters and drive toward technological innovation that places Canada at the forefront of modern, sustainable aquaculture.
- I envision a transition that progressively minimizes or eliminates interactions between farmed and wild salmon in British Columbia, while also taking into account social, cultural, and economic objectives.
If pressed on progress towards transition plan:
- We are making good progress. Engagement is well underway, and I look forward to continued in-depth consultation and engagement through the spring of 2023.
- Once a transition plan is finalized and published, we will continue to collaborate and engage with partners and stakeholders on its implementation.
Background
On June 22, 2022, the Minister announced next steps towards development of a plan for transitioning from open-net pen salmon aquaculture in coastal British Columbia.
The Government of Canada previously undertook engagement in 2020 and 2021 and collected views on transitioning the salmon aquaculture sector in British Columbia.
On July 29, 2022, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) released a discussion framework which outlines a proposed vision for transitioning from open-net pen salmon aquaculture in British Columbia. The framework will help guide engagement with the Government of British Columbia, First Nations, industry, local governments, stakeholders, and British Columbians.
Engagement on the discussion framework will run until early 2023. A “what we heard” report on phase two of engagement, which comprised intensive engagement and the development of plan elements, will be circulated in February 2023 to inform and guide continued engagement through the spring of 2023.
The feedback and input received during this engagement will be instrumental in the development of the final transition plan, expected to be completed in the spring of 2023.
Aquaculture - Discovery Islands Salmon Aquaculture Licences Decision
Issue
Why have you made the decision to close 15 salmon farms in the Discovery Islands area of British Columbia?
Response
- Given the unprecedented threats that wild Pacific salmon are facing, we must take action to conserve and protect them.
- Following extensive consultations, I have decided not to renew licences for 15 open-net pen Atlantic salmon aquaculture sites in the Discovery Islands area.
- The decision was not an easy one, but many First Nations and British Columbians expect timely, decisive action in the Discovery Islands to protect wild salmon.
If pressed on justification for decision
- My belief is that the Discovery Islands has unique environmental characteristics, including the migration of wild salmon in many of its channels. It was identified as an area to examine in the Cohen Commission report.
- Additionally, social and cultural factors pertaining to aquaculture licensing in the Discovery Islands are challenging and so significant that they warrant an alternative management approach in the area.
- However, I am mindful of the impact these decisions will have. Officials will continue to consider these impacts as we work towards a plan to transition open-net pen aquaculture in British Columbia.
If pressed on the economic impact of the decision
- I acknowledge that many may disagree with my decision.
- The Government of Canada offers a strong suite of supports for workers and communities. There is already a strong partnership in place with British Columbia, including through the Canada-British Columbia Workforce and Labour Market Development Agreements.
- Additionally, Budget 2021 established a new regional development agency for British Columbia to support economic development and help develop businesses to create good jobs.
If pressed on the judicial review application
- As this matter is now before the court, I cannot comment on the matter.
Background
In November 2009, Canada established the Commission of Inquiry into the Decline of Sockeye Salmon in the Fraser River to investigate the decline of Sockeye salmon stocks and to provide recommendations (the Cohen Commission).
The final report of the Cohen Commission was released October 2012. The report did not find any single factor leading to decreased Sockeye salmon stocks.
The report made 75 recommendations, the majority of which focused on Pacific salmon fisheries management, fisheries science, salmon habitat protection, and the implementation of the Wild Salmon Policy. Action has been taken to address all 75 of the recommendations.
In response to the Cohen Commission’s Recommendation 19, DFO considered the risk to Fraser River Sockeye salmon from diseases that occur in Atlantic salmon farms. The scientific risk assessments focused on farms located in the Discovery Islands area.
The nine peer-reviewed, scientific risk assessments concluded that the transfer of these pathogens pose, at most, a minimal risk to migrating Fraser River Sockeye salmon in the area.
The risk assessments were published in November 2019, which was linked to the expiration date of the annual licences in the Discovery Islands.
On December 17, 2020, then Minister Bernadette Jordan announced her intention to phase out existing salmon farming licences in the Discovery Islands by June 30, 2022.
In January 2021, Mowi, Cermaq, and Grieg Seafood each filed an application for judicial review of the decision in the Federal Court.
On April 22, 2022, the Federal Court released its decision on judicial review applications, deeming the December 2020 policy decision to be a licensing decision and quashing it because it failed to comply with procedural fairness requirements.
The Federal Court decision meant that individualized decisions had to be made on whether to renew salmon aquaculture licences in the Discovery Islands, which were all due to expire on June 30, 2022.
On June 22, 2022, Minister Murray announced next steps towards development of a plan for transitioning from open-net pen salmon aquaculture in coastal British Columbia. At the same time, the Minister made a decision to approve a two-year reissuance of marine finfish licences across British Columbia, with the exception of the Discovery Islands. Following the Federal Court’s decision, the Minister directed the Department not to reissue licences for 15 Atlantic salmon facilities in the Discovery Islands, and to issue six-month licences for two remaining chinook facilities.
Consultations with five licence holders and seven First Nations in the area were subsequently conducted to inform a decision on reissuance or non-reissuance for all 17 licences, which the Minister intended to make in January 2023.
In January 2023, the Minister granted a one-month licence renewal to a small chinook salmon facility whose licence would have expired otherwise, with fish present in the water. In February 2023, the chinook facility was a granted a six-month licence renewal. Another facility no longer required a licence as it was being decommissioned.
On February 17, 2023, the Minister announced her decision to not renew licences for 15 open-net pen Atlantic salmon aquaculture sites in the Discovery Islands.
On March 20, 2023, Mowi, Cermaq, Grieg, as well as the We Wai Kai and Wei Wei Kum First Nations filed an application for a judicial review of the decision. Grieg Seafood has also filed a second separate motion.
Sea Lice and Aquaculture
Issue
What is the government doing to prevent the proliferation of sea lice?
Response
- I am committed to conserving and protecting wild salmon.
- In British Columbia, the Department continues to implement measures to ensure that sea lice present no more than a minimal risk to wild salmon.
- Information on sea lice is constantly evolving. My department actively supports internal and collaborative research, and uses this and other external information to best manage sea lice.
If pressed on sea lice Science Response process
- I have every confidence in the integrity of my Department’s scientists and the rigorous peer review process that is used to generate science advice.
- Science advice at the Department is generated through the Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, which ensures that appropriate peer review has taken place and advice is shared with Canadians on the Department’s website.
- This is the first of two planned peer-review processes advancing our understanding of sea lice interactions in BC. A comprehensive risk assessment, is planned for 2024 and will result in a Science Advisory Report.
If pressed on sea lice on the east coast
- On the east coast, my department continues to work collaboratively with provincial partners who have the jurisdiction to manage sea lice.
Background
Sea lice are naturally occurring parasites in Canada’s coastal waters. While sea lice generally do not harm adult fish, they can harm small juvenile salmon as they emerge from river systems when they are quite small and without complete scale development for protection.
Farmed fish are free of sea lice when they enter the ocean, but can pick them up in the marine environment. If not properly managed, sea lice levels can become elevated and wild juvenile salmon can be exposed to higher than natural levels during the spring out-migration period.
Over the last couple of decades, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) scientists have worked to build understanding and knowledge about sea lice, their relationship to the marine environment and fish, along with improved understanding of treatments and methods used to reduce their abundance on farmed fish, to inform improvements in management measures.
One of the methods used to control sea lice is a Health Canada approved drug called SLICE. Due to some localized resistance to this drug, there is a push for the use of alternative methods to manage sea lice, including mechanical, thermal, freshwater, and other non-chemical treatments.
DFO is exploring options to encourage innovation, including in non-chemical options to treat sea lice.
In British Columbia (BC), the Department requires sea lice management, treatment, and mitigation measures at farms when sea lice levels are high. These measures have been very effective; most years, more than 90 per cent of sites are below the regulatory thresholds for sea lice during the out-migration period (March 1 to June 30). Any evidence of population-level harm to wild salmon resulting from salmon farms would prompt the immediate revision of aquaculture licences to ensure the conservation of wild salmon stocks.
On the east coast, where the provinces are the lead regulators, information on sea lice management practices is not readily available to DFO, as sea lice monitoring is provincially mandated. Each province regulates the industry differently and relies on individual companies to submit management plans, which are not made public.
In January 2023, DFO Science published new Science Advice on the association between sea lice from Atlantic salmon farms and sea lice infestations on juvenile wild Pacific salmon in BC.
The Science Response Report revealed a statistically nonsignificant association between sea lice infestation on Atlantic salmon farms and sea lice levels on wild juvenile Pacific salmon populations in BC.
The study used data from multiple Atlantic salmon farms, reported to DFO by industry and subject to DFO auditing, and sea lice counts on wild fish collected and publicly available by a third party company for the industry sampled at specific distances from nearby farms in the four study areas.
Analyses undertaken as part of the study include varying degrees of uncertainty and were limited by not taking into account certain factors, such as the influence of hydrodynamic processes in the vicinity of salmon farms and alternative sources of sea lice, which could potentially influence sea lice counts.
Although concerns raised in media articles allege that industry under reports sea lice counts, DFO undertakes audits of the reported sea lice counts.
DFO Science intends to continue to assess risks associated with farmed sea lice, which will continue to inform DFO’s approach to managing sea lice on farmed salmon in BC.
The have been several recent media reports from some Canadian university academics critiquing the interim science advice provided in the CSAS Science Response on sea lice.
Following-up on this interim science advice, a more comprehensive sea lice risk assessment that focuses on the impacts of sea lice on both coasts is planned for 2024.
North Atlantic Right Whale
Issue
What is the government doing to help protect North Atlantic right whales?
Response
- Our government is committed to protecting and recovering endangered North Atlantic right whales by addressing entanglement and ship strike threats.
- In 2023 we will continue to prioritize entanglement prevention through fishing area closures where and when right whales are detected, right whale surveillance and ongoing efforts to address ghost gear.
- We will also continue to work with harvesters to develop a made in Canada approach on whalesafe fishing gear, including a path forward on rope-on-demand fishing gear.
If pressed on economic impacts on harvesters
- The Department works closely with harvesters to implement management measures that protect endangered North Atlantic right whales while allowing for economically sustainable fisheries.
- Canada’s robust and adaptive right whale protection measures are key to demonstrating the sustainability of Canada’s seafood exports.
If pressed on recent entanglement cases in the United States:
- We thank our American marine mammal response counterparts for the two recent successful disentanglements.
- These cases highlight the importance of Canada’s mandatory gear marking and lost gear reporting regimes. Lessons learned from entanglement cases inform management measures going forward.
If pressed on 2022 red-listing of Canadian lobster and Snow crab by Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch
- My department shared information on the significant action taken to protect endangered right whales from fishing gear entanglements with Seafood Watch.
- Unfortunately, all fisheries in the United States and Canada were looked at from the same lens.
- My department will continue to work with partners and industry to apply our adaptive measures to prevent fishing gear entanglements of right whales.
Background
In January 2023, two North Atlantic Right Whales were successfully disentangled by marine mammal response experts in the United States.
- Gear removed from EG 1218 (Argo) originated from Lobster Fishing Area 33 off the southern coast of Nova Scotia. This is the first North Atlantic right whale entanglement confirmed to be connected to Canada’s lobster fishery in over five years.
- In this particular case, the harvester had reported their lost fishing gear to DFO as is required by their conditions of licence.
- Officials are still examining the gear removed from EG 3812 (Nimbus). The origin of gear has not yet been determined. Prior to entanglement, Nimbus was last seen swimming gear-free in August 2022 in the Gulf of St. Lawrence.
There were no reported NARW mortalities and 4 new entanglements (first sighting and gear present) in Canadian waters in 2022.
The Annual NARW Advisory Committee meeting was held on November 22, 2022 followed by a targeted meeting with Indigenous groups on November 25, 2022.
Closure statistics from 2022, as of November 15, 2022:
- 55,229 km2 total cumulative closure area
- 29,267 km2 in total seasonal closures
As of November 15, 2022, there were 1,173 recorded detections of right whales in Canadian waters. Of these detections 136 individual whales have been identified.
On October 25, 2022 the North Atlantic Right Whale Consortium released the most recent population estimate of 340 whales, which indicates a slowing in decline.
The first North Atlantic right whale of 2022 was detected on May 3. The single right whale was sighted by surveillance aircraft in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, north of the Magdalen Islands. The detection triggered a 15-day fishing closure in crab fishing area 12.
In February 2022, the Minister announced the 2022 NARW fisheries management measures. DFO’s measures remain unchanged from 2021. The measures for 2022 will take effect in the Gulf of St. Lawrence as soon as the Gulf crab fisheries open this year (as early as April 1).
In 2022 DFO continued to apply adaptive measures to preventing fishing gear entanglements, such as:
- Changes to the open and closure dates of fisheries.
- Season-long closure protocol (Nov 15) in the Gulf of St. Lawrence;
- Dynamic closure protocol in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Bay of Fundy, and critical habitat areas (Grand Manan Basin and Roseway Basin);
- Case by case measures to address sightings of 3 whale or more aggregations or a mother and calf anywhere in Atlantic Canada and Quebec that is not subject to temporary closure areas and critical habitat;
- Maintaining targeted provisions for waters shallower than 20 fathoms (36.5 metres or 120 feet); and
- Focused surveillance using acoustic underwater technology (hydrophones), aircraft and vessels to confirm the presence of whales.
The Department is working with partners and industry in Atlantic Canada and Quebec to identify gear solutions for preventing injury to right whales, including implementing requirements for lower breaking strength gear modifications in non-tended fixed gear fisheries and supporting more widespread use of on-demand gear. The Department is finalizing the approach for 2024 and beyond, to ensure that gear modification requirements are implemented in a way that considers fishery-specific conditions, and is safe, effective and adaptive to new information as it becomes available.
In 2021, the Department launched the Whalesafe Gear Adoption Fund, a two-year $20 million contribution program to support the purchase, adoption, testing and manufacture of whalesafe fishing gear, including lower breaking strength modifications and ropeless/rope on demand systems. This program supports 34 projects across Quebec and Atlantic Canada.
The 2021 Action Plan for the NARW was finalized and published on the Public Registry in spring 2021. The Action Plan addresses aII threats identified in the species’ Recovery Strategy, incIuding vessel collisions, entanglement in fishing gear, disturbance from vessel presence, noise, contaminants, habitat degradation, and changes in food supply.
- Since 2018, DFO has invested over $5.7 million to further enhance the Marine Mammal Response Program, which responds to marine mammals in distress, including disentanglement of NARWs. This funding is part of the $167.4 million Whales Initiative in Budget 2018.
- The NARW was listed as Endangered in the Species at Risk Act (SARA) in 2005. It is predicted the species could become extinct in 30 years if the mortality rate is not significantly reduced. The population is in decline with an estimated 340 individuals, including less than 80 fertile females.
Fleet Renewal
Issue
How much is the Coast Guard’s Fleet Renewal costing and when will they become operational?
Response
- Fleet Renewal efforts under the National Shipbuilding Strategy remain a key priority to ensure the Canadian Coast Guard can continue supporting the safety, accessibility, and security of Canadian waters.
- Significant progress has been made:
- To date, the Canadian Coast Guard has taken delivery of three large vessels, 19 small vessels, 23 helicopters and four Interim Icebreakers.
- Over $20 billion in contracts have been awarded under the National Shipbuilding Strategy for the Canadian Coast Guard and National Defence procurements.
- However, the Canadian Coast Guard’s large vessel projects have suffered from delays and increased costs, which is a concern for all Canadians.
- Interim measures, such as acquiring four commercial icebreakers and life extensions for existing vessels, are in place to ensure essential services continue until new vessels are delivered.
If pressed on icebreakers
- Icebreakers are essential to Canada’s economy by supporting safe, year-round trade and the safe passage of goods.
- Canada is investing in six Program and two Polar Icebreakers to ensure continuation of essential icebreaking services. The Canadian Coast Guard is also procuring up to 16 Multi-Purpose Vessels with icebreaking capability.
- One Polar Icebreaker will be built at Vancouver Shipyards. The Program Icebreakers and other Polar will be built at Chantier Davie, once the third shipyard process is finalized (expected in spring 2023).
Background
Renewal of the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) fleet is underway. Funded replacement plans are currently in place for the large vessel fleet, including:
- Three Offshore Fisheries Science Vessels, which were all delivered in 2019 and 2020;
- One Offshore Oceanographic Science Vessel (OOSV);
- Two Polar Icebreakers;
- Up to 16 Multi-Purpose Vessels (MPV);
- Two Arctic and Offshore Patrol Ships (AOPS) (CCG variants of ships currently in construction for the Department of National Defence); and
- Up to six Program Icebreakers (PIB).
Construction work is currently underway on the OOSV following cut steel in March 2021. Ancillary contract work is ongoing on the MPV project at Vancouver Shipyards (VSY) following the August 2020 contract award. Additionally, pre-construction work is advancing on the Polar Icebreaker at VSY, following the awarding of the Construction Engineering (CE) and Long Lead Items (LLI) contracts in December 2022. Work on the Program Icebreakers and the other Polar Icebreaker is expected to begin following the addition of Chantier Davie to the National Shipbuilding Strategy (NSS), which is expected by spring 2023. Detailed costing for these projects will be released once negotiations and contract awards for engineering and construction have occurred with the shipyard.
Media attention has occurred over the last several years detailing the increasing costs and ongoing delays with the procurement of CCG’s large vessel fleet. CCG has been working closely with shipyards and internal stakeholders to manage and address ongoing issues.
CCG is also renewing its small fleet. 19 new small vessels have already been delivered under the NSS, including two new Channel Survey and Sounding Vessels and 14 new Search and Rescue Lifeboats that have joined the fleet in the past few years. An additional three Search and Rescue Lifeboats will be constructed at Hike Metal Products, in Wheatley, Ontario and three in Chantier Naval Forillon, in Gaspé, Quebec. In addition, design work is ongoing on a new Near-Shore Fishery Research Vessel.
CCG has completed the renewal of its helicopter fleet with delivery of sixteen new light-lift helicopters and seven new medium-lift helicopters.
The CCG is putting in place interim measures and investing in vessel life extension work to ensure continued delivery of critical services until new ships are delivered. This includes:
- A comprehensive Vessel Life Extension program to maintain the current fleet operational as new ships are being built;
- Acquisition of three interim icebreakers- the first, CCGS Captain Molly Kool, came into service December 2018. The second, CCGS Jean Goodwill, joined the CCG fleet in late 2020. The third ship, CCGS Vincent Massey, was delivered in October 2022; and,
- Acquisition of one light icebreaker. The contract to procure the light icebreaker was awarded to Atlantic Towing Ltd. on September 22, 2021. The icebreaker arrived in Canada in January 2022 and the contract for its conversion work is expected to be competitively awarded in spring 2023.
Announcements:
- On May 22nd, 2019, the Prime Minister announced a renewal of the CCG fleet with up to 18 new large ships built in Canadian shipyards, helping the CCG continue to deliver its important services, and creating good, middle class jobs across the country.
- Total funding for the 18 large ships is $15.7 billion, which represents early estimates of project budgets including construction, logistics and support, contingency, project management and infrastructure costs. The costs of each ship class will be announced following contract negotiations.
- Irving Shipbuilding will build two non-combat AOPS, which will be adapted for the CCG to perform a range of critical mission, including Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organizational patrols.
- Vancouver Shipyards will build up to 16 MPV to support a variety of missions, including light icebreaking, aids to navigation, environmental response, and offshore search and rescue.
- Canada will also proceed through a competitive process with the design of a new class of smaller ships, the new Mid-Shore Multi-Mission ship, which would complement the work of the large fleet in shallow areas and deliver mid-shore science activities.
- On August 2, 2019, the Government of Canada announced that six new PIB would be constructed for the CCG. The Government also announced its intention to expand the NSS with the addition of the third Canadian Shipyard to build the PIB.
- The Request for Proposal was released to Chantier Davie in late July 2020 and concluded in July 2021. Canada announced the commencement of Umbrella Agreement (UA) negotiations on June 8, 2022. It is expected that the UA will be finalized by the end of 2022.
- On May 6, 2021, Canada announced the procurement of two Polar Icebreakers for the CCG. One will be built at Vancouver Shipyards (the Polar Icebreaker had previously been removed from VSY’s UA and replaced with the 16 MPV) and the other is expected to be constructed at Chantier Davie, once it qualifies to become the third shipyard under the NSS.
Major Projects
Issue
How does Fisheries and Oceans Canada approach its role in assessing the environmental impact of development projects?
Response
- Protecting fish and fish habitat is a top priority for this government, which is why we ensure that proposed projects are thoroughly assessed before they are built.
- Careful consideration of projects during impact assessment, including applying the strong legislative framework in the modernized Fisheries Act and other applicable legislation, ensures protection of fish and their habitats.
- We remain engaged in project reviews and will continue to work with proponents, other levels of government, Indigenous groups, and stakeholders, as appropriate.
If pressed
- Mary River Project (Baffinland): My department will continue to work with Baffinland, the Nunavut Impact Review Board, and other relevant partners to assess operations at the Mary River site as they evolve. This will include consideration of new science with respect to potential impacts to fish, marine mammals, and their habitats.
- Roberts Bank Terminal 2: My department has submitted its advice for the environmental assessment and will continue working on the next steps for the project as necessary.
Background
General DFO Role and Authorities
The Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Program administers and ensures compliance with the fish and fish habitat protection provisions of the Fisheries Act and certain relevant provisions under the Species at Risk Act for development projects taking place in and around fish habitat.
The Minister may issue authorizations under paragraphs 34.4(2)(b) and/or 35(2)(b) of the Fisheries Act following a site-specific review for works, undertakings, or activities that pose, respectively, a risk of death of fish by means other than fishing or the harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction of fish habitat. The authorization, when appropriate, may contain conditions for offsetting, monitoring, and reporting.
The Program is also responsible for meeting the duty to consult, and when appropriate, accommodate, in relation to potential impacts on Aboriginal and Treaty rights related to authorizations or permits that may be issued under the Fisheries Act or the Species at Risk Act.
The Department also has specific legislative responsibilities in relation to federal environmental assessment regimes including, among others, the Impact Assessment Act, and regimes in the territories and under land claims agreements.
As a federal authority for impact assessments, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) provides expert information or knowledge in relation to its mandate. Under regimes in the territories and under land claims agreements DFO may also be a decision maker for a project.
Mary River Project
Mary River Iron Ore Project is an approved iron ore mine operated by Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation (the Proponent). The project has been subject to several environmental assessment processes as development plans at the site have evolved.
A recent project expansion proposal was rejected by the Government in November 2022. The proponent has since applied for a permanent ability to ship at 6 million tonnes per annum (mtpa), which they are calling the sustaining operations proposal.
On February 9, 2023, the proponent also announced that it would be moving to develop the southern rail line and port at Steensby Inlet. This proposal received an environmental assessment approval in December 2012 but was never constructed. Additional regulatory approvals, including under the Fisheries Act, are expected to be required prior to construction.
A joint workshop between the North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission Scientific Committee Working Group on the Population Status of Narwhal and Beluga in the North Atlantic and the Canada Greenland Joint Commission on Conservation and Management of Narwhal and Beluga Scientific Working Group was held in December 2022. DFO was represented at the meeting by DFO science sector. The report produced at the conclusion of the workshop suggests that increased ship traffic, the majority of which is attributable to the Mary River project, is by far the most likely cause for the large, population displacement of narwhals that has been observed and that the model predicts there will be almost no narwhal left in Eclipse Sound in 2023.
Roberts Bank Terminal 2
The Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project includes the construction and operation of a new three-berth marine container terminal located at Roberts Bank in Delta, British Columbia, approximately 35 km south of Vancouver.
The project has been subject to a lengthy environmental assessment process undertaken by an independent review panel. The project is expected to have a number of significant adverse environmental effects on matters pertaining to DFO’s mandate including on, Southern Resident killer whales, juvenile Chinook salmon, Dungeness crab, eulachon, orange sea pen and forage fish.
The project is also expected to have significant adverse effects on the rights of, and current use of lands and resources by a number of First Nations. Under the current legislative timeline, an environmental assessment decision on the project is required no later than April 23, 2023. If the project is allowed to proceed, DFO would then be required to consider issuing an authorization under the Fisheries Act. This authorization, if issued, would concurrently need to meet the requirements of the Species at Risk Act.
Ghost Gear Program
Issue
Why is Canada not doing more to combat ghost gear?
Response
- Canada continues to demonstrate leadership to address ghost fishing gear in our oceans, in Canada and internationally.
- We continue to invest in the Ghost Gear Fund - including $10 million through Budget 2022 - to support new gear technologies, ghost gear retrieval, and responsible disposal projects.
- Ghost gear is estimated to make up to 70 per cent of all macro-plastics in the world’s ocean by weight and has a direct impact on fish stocks and marine ecosystems.
If pressed on why a project was not funded
- Since 2020, $26.7 million has been distributed to support 91 projects and increasing capacity at 36 harbour authorities, through the Ghost Gear Fund.
- The Department tracks lost gear reports submitted by harvesters to help inform retrieval efforts.
- Over 1,641 tonnes of lost fishing gear and more than 323 kilometres of rope has been retrieved in Canada, since July 2020.
If pressed on measures to retrieve gear lost at sea following Hurricane Fiona
- We encourage our harvesters to report their lost gear through the Fishing Gear Reporting System.
- $1.5M in emergency funding has been allocated towards immediate cleanup and recovery efforts of the hardest hit areas through 11 Ghost Gear Fund projects.
- A call for proposals to support ghost gear efforts to reduce the impacts from Hurricane Fiona in 2023-2024, with DFO providing up to $28.4M in funding, closed on January 6, 2023. Proposals are currently being evaluated, and the results will be communicated by the end of February 2023.
Background
Impacts of Ghost Gear
The term 'ghost gear' refers to any fishing gear that has been abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded (for example nets, line, rope, traps, pots, and floats). Other common terms include abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear or ‘ALDFG’ and derelict fishing gear or ‘DFG’. It is a form of marine pollution that can be fatal to fish, marine mammals and other marine life, poses a navigation hazard, and may break down into other forms of pollution such as microplastics.
The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that ghost gear represents approximately 10 percent of marine debris by volume. There is growing international attention on the problem of ghost gear, as well as other forms of marine litter. For example, the FAO has recognized ghost gear as a major global problem since the 1980s. The 1995 FAO code of conduct for responsible fisheries and related technical guidelines include advice to minimize ghost gear and the responsibility to recover lost gear.
Ghost fishing gear can cause large-scale damage to marine ecosystems through habitat disturbance and causes direct harm to the welfare and conservation of marine animals via entanglement and/or ingestion.
Canadian Context
The Canadian code of conduct for responsible fishing operations includes an expectation (guideline 2.8) for fish harvesters to “make every effort to retrieve lost fishing gear, reporting all lost gear.” The Department collaborates with conservation groups and partners to rescue sea life that has been entangled by sea-based marine debris, and with the fishing industry to retrieve gear on an ad hoc basis. The Ghost Gear Program allows for a dedicated program to tackle the issue of ghost gear domestically and abroad.
The current regulatory/licensing regime is prescriptive in terms of types, quantities and identification of fishing gear that a harvester can have on board their vessel and/or fish. Additionally, the location where a harvester can fish is very prescriptive. While these measures were intended to ensure compliance with quotas and allocations, they impede the ability of a harvester to retrieve gear which they are not permitted to use and/or is located in areas they are not authorized to fish. An assessment of DFO legislation is currently underway to ensure that any potential impediments to addressing and reducing ghost gear domestically are identified and addressed.
Canada has been pushing to strengthen measures in internationally managed fisheries. There is support for this but also recognition that for small island developing states and other developing states that the measures need to also come with increased capacity domestically - both policy, social and operational (e.g. reception centres, reporting, etc.).
New requirements will be in place in 2023 for low breaking strength gear to be used in some fisheries in Atlantic Canada and Quebec. This gear is designed to operate safely and effectively under normal fishing conditions, and the implementation of these gear modifications during adverse weather and extreme sea conditions may result in gear loss. Industry members have highlighted concerns about the cost of lost gear, as well as the bycatch risks associated with additional ghost gear.
Mandatory lost gear reporting has been a requirement in all commercial conditions of licence in Canada since 2020. All incidents of gear being lost as a result of the new gear requirements will be recorded by the Department. While DFO's Ghost Gear Program is not funded or designed to manage the implications of lower breaking strength gear modifications, it is positioned to help inform retrieval efforts as the need may arise resulting from low breaking strength gear implementation.
Sustainable Fisheries Solutions and Retrieval Support Contribution Program (Ghost Gear Fund):
Through Budget 2022 under the Zero Plastic Waste agenda, the Ghost Gear Fund received $10 million to continue retrieval activities and the testing of fishing gear to reduce gear loss for fiscal year 2022-2023.
A call for proposals was issued on May 4, 2022 for this round of funding and closed on June 6, 2022. Contribution agreements were negotiated with the 42 successful applicants, and projects are currently underway.
All applications for funding were assessed based on the eligibility criteria provided on the Ghost Gear Fund website, using an assessment grid that enabled reviewers to prioritize projects whose applications best address priority pillars of action. Projects were selected based on the rank using the assessment grid, as well as ensuring there was a national distribution of efforts. High scoring criteria included harvester participation, Indigenous participation, level of experience, and removal of ghost gear within the first year.
All successful projects fall into at least one of four eligible categories: gear retrieval, responsible disposal, acquisition and piloting of available gear technology, and international leadership.
Hurricane Fiona Response
Hurricane Fiona impacted infrastructure and communities across Atlantic Canada and Eastern Quebec, including DFO-owned fishing harbours managed by the Small Craft Harbours Program (SCH), and produced substantial fishing gear-related debris from fisheries and aquaculture operations that were active during the storm and as a result of heavy damage to harbour storage facilities.
The $300M Hurricane Fiona Relief Fund (HFRF) was announced October 4, 2022 and will be administered by the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) to fund losses not covered under other government and private sector measures, with $30M going towards ghost gear clean up and retrieval.
- In 2022-23, $1.5M in additional funds was made available to the Ghost Gear Fund to undertake immediate critical gear clean-up activities in the fall of 2022 through 11 Ghost Gear Fund projects.
- A call for proposals to support ghost gear efforts to reduce the impacts from Hurricane Fiona in 2023-2024, with DFO providing up to $28.4M in funding, closed on January 6, 2023. Proposals are currently being evaluated, and the results will be communicated by the end of February 2023.
Small Craft Harbour Efforts to Address Climate
Issue
What is the government doing to ensure Small Craft Harbours remain operational and safe to fish harvesters in the face of climate change?
Response
- DFO's Small Craft Harbours (SCH) Program is responsible for the maintenance and operation of 973 fishing harbours located throughout Canada.
- Climate change has led to an increased need for repairs and dredging of small craft harbours.
- Moving forward, it is a priority for us to ensure that small craft harbours are operational and safe for users by being more resilient against extreme weather.
If pressed
- The design standards and dredging practices used by the SCH Program have evolved over the years, incorporating climate and coastal data as a means to adapt to the changing climate.
- We have found that harbours that have undergone recent repairs withstood Hurricane Fiona better than harbours where recent repairs had not taken place.
- This reinforces the need to ensure that Canada’s fishing harbours are well maintained in order to withstand major weather events moving forward.
If pressed on status of projects in Nunavut
- In 2019, my department, through the Small Craft Harbours program, agreed to build two harbours in Nunavut, one in Arctic Bay and the other in Clyde River. The Clyde River project is progressing as planned.
- In Arctic Bay, I understand that submissions for the project were above budgeted amounts. The Department remains committed to working with our partners on this project and at this time, officials are determining next steps.
Background
As of February 2023, the Small Craft Harbours (SCH) program was responsible for 973 harbours:
- 675 core fishing harbours; and
- 298 non-core fishing harbours.
Small craft harbours provide key support to the commercial fishing industry. The SCH program keeps the harbours that are critical to the fishing industry open and in good repair.
In Budget 2021, the Government announced it would provide $300 million over two years to repair, renew, and replace small craft harbours.
Hurricane Fiona impacted 142 of the 184 small craft harbours that were in its path. Since the passing of Fiona, the Prime Minister announced the $300 million Hurricane Fiona Recovery Fund, on October 4, 2022.
On October 17, 2022, The DFO and ACOA Ministers announced that to support immediate recovery efforts, $100 million from the fund had been set aside to repair essential infrastructure at harbours and to retrieve lost fishing gear.
Approximately 90 per cent of the Canadian fish harvest is landed at harbours operated through the SCH program.
For SCH, climate change has meant reduced formation of shore ice and more coastal erosion and flooding. Main impacts for SCH network are on harbour infrastructure and sedimentation within harbours.
For the program, this creates an increased need to address repairs at harbours in a timely manner as well as increased dredging pressures.
The SCH Program has already begun to adapt its conception standards to this reality, as well as to enhance its regional dredging program.
The SCH Program is delivered in cooperation with Harbour Authorities, local non-profit organizations representing the interests of local commercial fishers and the broader community.
Each year, more than 5,000 volunteers assist the SCH Program.
The SCH Program's annual regular budget has been stable at about $90 million (includes salaries and administrative costs) since 2007-08. Since 2008-09, the Government of Canada has provided the SCH Program with more than $1.3 billion in temporary funding.
Impacts of Hurricane Fiona
Issue
What is DFO’s response to gear loss and harbour damage caused by Hurricane Fiona?
Response
- Hurricane Fiona impacted various types of infrastructure, including DFO-owned fishing harbours. The storm produced substantial fishing gear-related debris, including heavy damage to harbour storage facilities.
- The $300 million Hurricane Fiona Recovery Fund was announced October 4, 2022 to fund losses not covered under other government and private sector measures.
- $100 million has been confirmed for the recovery of lost fishing gear and repairs of small craft harbours damaged by Hurricane Fiona.
If pressed
- I am in touch with departmental officials and am following the evolution of the work being carried out.
- I know that DFO staff is working diligently to ensure small craft harbours are operational and safe for fish harvesters, and that lost fishing gear is recovered and properly disposed of.
If pressed on work at Small Craft Harbour locations
- Since the passing of the storm, DFO staff has worked with Harbour authorities and communities where impacted harbours are located to carry out initial repairs.
- Staff are also planning and preparing to execute longer term repairs at impacted harbours as required. This includes working with consultants and harbour authorities to determine the scope and budget of work.
Background
On September 24, 2022, Hurricane Fiona hit Atlantic Canada and eastern Quebec, impacting various types of infrastructure including DFO-owned small craft harbours, and producing substantial fishing gear-related debris, not only from fisheries and aquaculture operations that were active during the storm, but also as a result of heavy damage to harbour storage facilities, with gear and structures being swept into the ocean.
On October 17, 2022, Ministers Murray and Petitpas Taylor announced that $100 million from the new Hurricane Fiona Recovery Fund will be used to repair SCH infrastructure and to retrieve lost fishing and aquaculture gear. Specifically, $70M to supplement the SCH Program to support recovery efforts at small craft harbours damaged by Hurricane Fiona. Another $30M was allocated to support retrieval and responsible disposal of lost fishing gear through the Ghost Gear Fund.
The SCH Program has worked diligently to determine the impacts Fiona had on the Program's infrastructure. Clean up activities have taken place and, for the most part, initial repairs have been completed. DFO staff are now working with Harbour Authorities and others to plan and execute and necessary longer term repairs at impacted harbours.
With respect to ghost gear, $1.5 million has already been allocated to support 11 partners for emergency clean-up and recovery efforts of the hardest hit areas, currently underway. Other projects are expected to be announced in the coming weeks.
Indigenous Moderate Livelihood Fishing in Atlantic Canada
Issue
What is the Government doing to ensure that Indigenous peoples can exercise their right to fish on Canada's East Coast?
Response
- Through an array of collaborative arrangements and nation-to-nation agreements, DFO works with Treaty Nations to uphold the Treaty Right, advance reconciliation, and protect fishery resources for the benefit of all.
- DFO programs have enabled benefits to communities of over $170 million in annual landings and over $100 million in secondary economic benefits.
- While we have seen successes, we recognize that there are limitations with the current approaches.
- DFO intends to work in collaboration with Treaty Nations to determine the new path forward in a manner that meets the needs of communities.
If pressed on access acquisition
- The Department prefers to use a voluntary license relinquishment approach, also known as willing buyer-willing seller, to acquire fishing access for Indigenous rights-based fishing as it promotes conservation, transparency, and stability in the fishery.
- As needed, my department will also consider alternate access and allocation mechanisms to support rights-based fishing.
- Discussions are ongoing with industry to find ways to ensure that voluntary license relinquishment is delivering the access needed in a timely and affordable manner.
Background
The Supreme Court of Canada formally recognized a Right of Indigenous people in Atlantic Canada to hunt and fish for a moderate livelihood in 1999. This Treaty Right touches 35 Indigenous communities (Mi’kmaq and Wolastoqiyik First Nations in New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, and the Gaspé, Region of Quebec) as well as the Peskotomuhkati Nation at Skutik in New Brunswick.
Over the past 23 years, DFO has provided over $630 million in fishing licences, vessels, gear and training to help increase and diversify participation in commercial fisheries, and to advance the implementation of the right to fish in pursuit of a moderate livelihood, for the 35 rights-holding Mi'kmaq, Wolastoqey First Nations and the Peskotomuhkati Nation at Skutik (total of 35 Treaty Nations).
Since 2000, these investments have resulted in meaningful economic benefits which continue to increase year over year. The cumulative revenue (landed value and diversification) for Treaty Nations’ commercial fishing enterprises is now over $2 billion.
DFO has been negotiating Rights Reconciliation Agreements (RRA) with Treaty Nations, with the objective of addressing and recognizing their historic treaty right (affirmed by the Marshall decisions) and to ensure a stable and predictable fishery for the benefit of all Canadians.
The RRA process was launched in 2017 and provided a mandate to negotiate enhanced fisheries collaborative management, fisheries governance and increased fisheries access, all while recognizing but not defining the Moderate Livelihood right.
To date, there are three RRAs with four First Nations (25 per cent of the total Treaty communities' population) and the potential for more RRAs before the mandate expires in April 2023.
In 2021, a new pathway to rights implementation was announced through the development of Moderate Livelihood Fishing Plans (MLFPs).
MLFPs are conducted within established commercial seasons, include other restrictions similar to those of regular commercial licences, and are harvested exclusively by community members for their own benefit. Of note, these are understandings, not agreements. Treaty Nations produce a community-based fishing plan and DFO produces an authorization parallel to the plan.
To date, since 2021, 10 understandings with 15 Treaty communities have been reached for lobster and/or elver, and there is an interest in continuing these understandings for the 2023 fishing seasons.
DFO is currently planning for the next phase of moderate livelihood implementation, which will involve working collaboratively with Treaty Nations to determine the new path forward.
There are several active litigations related to the Treaty right, including a claim by a Treaty community challenging DFO's implementation of the right, and a judicial review by an industry group challenging the legality of one of the RRAs.
In October 2020, the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard and the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations appointed Allister Surette as Federal Special Representative, as a neutral third party to: gather the different perspectives on the issues contributing to the Indigenous-Industry conflict; seek to build understanding and find common ground in order to reduce tensions between Treaty Nations and industry; and identify opportunities to improve relationships. Mr. Surette submitted his final report and recommendations in March 2021. DFO has made progress in implementing some of the recommendations.
The Department continues to have regular and frequent meetings at various levels with non-Indigenous fishing industry stakeholders to answer questions about moderate livelihood fishing and provide industry an opportunity to share its views. However, non-indigenous industry remains critical of being excluded from discussions with Treaty Nations and lack of transparency regarding Canada’s long-term approach to rights-based fishing.
The Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans released the report entitled “Peace on the Water: Advancing the Full Implementation of Mi’kmaq, Wolastoqiyik and Peskotomuhkati Rights-Based Fisheries” on July 12, 2022. A Government Response will be publicly provided in February, 2023.
Culture Change Reconciliation
Issue
What is the Department doing to eliminate systemic racism against Indigenous peoples?
Response
Reconciliation is a core pillar of our work, as is recognizing and respecting Indigenous rights.
We recognize that there is more work to be done but we are taking practical and sustained actions as the basis for change and culture shift.
We are implementing strategies to support and promote Indigenous employment and recruitment in our workforce, including learning activities and tools to facilitate ongoing training for all our employees.
Background
With regards to employee education and training, the Canada School of Public Service has prepared an anti-racism event series to facilitate discussions within the public service around issues of racist practices and systemic barriers that exist for marginalized and racialized groups in Canada.
Regular events and discussions are facilitated and are open to public servants at all levels, as well as events designed specifically for managers and executives. Other learning products, such as orientation kits and job aids, have also been made available to support this learning series.
The reconciliation curriculum offered by the Canadian School of Public Service also provides public servants access to resources, self-directed and classroom courses, workshops, and events on the history, culture, rights, and perspectives of Indigenous peoples in Canada.
At DFO, employees in program areas involved in working with Indigenous partners are encouraged to participate in various opportunities to increase cultural awareness, such as through relationship competency development training, Indigenous perception training, and Blanket Exercise Workshops to ensure its members understand treaty rights and appreciate the perspectives of Indigenous peoples. DFO regularly promotes new learning activities and tools to facilitate ongoing education and training for the Government of Canada workforce.
The Department also recognizes the importance of making information on rights-based fisheries easily accessible to stakeholders and the general public. DFO launched a public webpage entitled “Fishing in pursuit of a moderate livelihood”, which includes historical information on the Peace and Friendship Treaties in the Maritimes and Gaspé, as well as on the Marshall decisions, which affirmed the rights originating from these treaties.
In September 2022, DFO also launched a public webpage entitled “Food, social and ceremonial fisheries” detailing the right through which Indigenous harvesters may fish for food, social, and ceremonial purposes as protected under Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. These webpages will be maintained and kept up to-date to inform Canadians and Government of Canada employees of important context related to rights-based fisheries.
DFO has also completed an employment systems review, which identified systemic and attitudinal barriers to employment opportunities for designated Employment Equity groups, including Indigenous peoples. The Department has begun to address some of the identified barriers with the development of the 2022-2027 Employment Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Action Plan.
Implementation of the Modernized Fisheries Act
Issue
What is the status of the implementation of a modernized Fisheries Act?
Response
- The Government of Canada continues to deliver on its promise to implement a modernized Fisheries Act which supports sustainable, stable, and prosperous fisheries.
- We must protect and conserve Canada’s fish and fish habitat for future generations.
- That is why we committed $284.2 million over five years to support modernization efforts including protection for all fish and fish habitat, evidence-based decision making, improved enforcement and transparency, and collaboration.
- This includes $50 million for the Indigenous Habitat Participation Program, which supports the participation of Indigenous peoples in project reviews, monitoring, and policy, furthering our Government’s commitment to reconciliation.
- Program renewal options are being assessed for continuing this work as funding expires in March 2023.
Background
The Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard’s mandate letter was published December 16, 2021. It included a commitment to work to support sustainable, stable, prosperous fisheries through the continued implementation of the modernized Fisheries Act, which restores lost protections, rebuilds fish populations, and incorporates modern safeguards so that fish and fish habitats are protected for future generations and Canada’s fisheries can continue to grow the economy and sustain coastal communities.
To support ongoing implementation of the modernized Fisheries Act, important engagement activities continue into their second year with Indigenous peoples, partners, stakeholders, and the public on development of policies, frameworks, instruments, and guidance. These include:
- a proposed regulation, which would streamline the approval process for prescribed classes of works and waters to enhance regulatory efficiency while improving protection of fish and fish habitat;
- a framework for the establishment of Ecologically Significant Areas which, if implemented through regulation, would provide long-term protection and conservation for key areas of fish and fish habitat that are sensitive, highly productive, rare, or unique;
- an update of the position statement explaining how the Department would interpret the prohibition in the Act against causing the death of fish by means other than fishing;
- a position statement explaining how the Department would interpret the fish and fish habitat protection provisions with respect to existing facilities and structures;
- a draft guidance document for the consideration of cumulative effects on fish and fish habitat, providing clarity on how cumulative effects will be considered by the Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Program in the project authorization decision process;
- a draft framework for identifying fish habitat restoration priorities to select and target restoration activities more effectively, to optimize restoration resources, and improve outcomes for fish and fish habitat; and
- a new set of interim Codes of Practice specifying procedures, practices, or standards for avoiding the death of fish or the harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction of fish habitat. The first six interim Codes of Practice are being finalized through the Canada Gazette process.
Additional future rounds of engagement will be undertaken on implementation of the fish and fish habitat protection provisions of the Fisheries Act, including: the Department’s approach to engagement, consideration of cumulative effects in decision making, and additional codes of practice aimed at avoiding impacts to fish and fish habitat.
In 2018, the Government allocated $284.2 million over five years (2018-19 to 2022-23) to implement the changes to the Fisheries Act. Part of this allocation includes a new $50 million grants and contributions program also covering the period 2018-19 to 2022-23 that will provide for increased participation of Indigenous peoples in the conservation and protection of fish and fish habitat. The Indigenous Habitat Participation Program supports Indigenous participation in consultation on project authorization decisions under the Fisheries Act, participation in the development of policy and regulatory initiatives, and collaborative projects and capacity building for communities.
Aquatic Ecosystems Restoration Fund
Issue
What is the Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Fund?
Response
- Budget 2022 announced $2 billion for the renewal of the Oceans Protection Plan, including $75 million over five years for the Aquatic Ecosystems Restoration Fund.
- The fund projects address impacts on Canadian coastal and upstream aquatic environments.
- The program focusses on priority activities and areas with the greatest benefit to aquatic ecosystems, and prioritizes Indigenous partnerships.
- The fund received 130 applications seeking $263 million in support. The proposals are currently being reviewed by the Department.
Background
In 2021, the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard was mandated to renew and expand the Coastal Restoration Fund (CRF), a $75 million five-year program launched in 2017 as part of the Oceans Protection Plan (OPP) to preserve and restore marine ecosystems. The CRF provided funding for over 60 projects on all coasts and sunsetted in March 2022.
The renewal of the program was made possible through Budget 2022, where the Government announced $2 billion in funding over nine years for the renewal of the OPP (2.0); this includes $75 million over five years for the Aquatic Ecosystems Restoration Fund (AERF).
Through contribution funding, AERF projects will address impacts on Canadian coastal aquatic environments (e.g. climate change, new contaminants, algae bloom, agricultural runoff).
This new program supports DFO’s commitment to continue to protect and restore our oceans and coasts by:
- contributing to strategic planning and addressing restoration priorities;
- supporting restoration and rehabilitation of aquatic habitats and their long-term sustainability;
- educating the public on the impacts of human behaviour on aquatic habitats;
- supporting co-benefits of aquatic restoration activities (such as nature based solutions to climate change);
- encouraging and building local community capacity; and,
- supporting Indigenous groups through strategic partnerships.
The program supports projects on all of Canada’s coasts, with an expanded geographic scope to include upstream inland aquatic restoration.
To meet its objectives, the program engaged Indigenous organizations, non-profit and community-based organizations, as well academic researchers and institutions to support coordinated approaches for projects.
Given the success of the CRF program, the AERF has been built on the existing framework and has expanded its approach to help address impacts to coastal and marine environments on Canada’s coasts.
The program will focus on priority areas that have the greatest strategic value, prioritizing activities with the greatest benefit to specific coastal ecosystems threats, and activities that address the root causes of impacts on coastal areas.
The AERF is continuing to engage with Indigenous groups in the protection of Canada's coastal areas.
As part of its call for proposal, the program received 130 applications for a total of $263 million. Funding decisions are expected by end of March 2023.
Aquatic Invasive Species
Issue
What is the Government doing to prevent the spread of aquatic invasive species?
Response
- Our government understands the importance of protecting Canadian waters and is focused on coordinating efforts to prevent the spread of aquatic invasive species.
- Aquatic invasive species pose a serious threat to aquatic ecosystems, and preventing negative impacts to Canada’s biodiversity, economy, and society is a priority for this Government.
- My department works with provinces, territories, Parks Canada and the Canada Border Services Agency to enforce the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations, with a focus on preventing prohibited species from entering Canada.
If pressed - Zebra and Quagga Mussels
- In western Canada, zebra mussels are established in the Lake Manitoba watershed. We collaborate with prairie provincial governments on response preparedness.
- In British Columbia, my department supports the Province by generating scientific advice and risk assessments, and committing funding to support its invasive mussel defense program in 2022-23.
- In eastern Canada, zebra mussels are established in the St. Lawrence River and were newly detected in Quebec in Lake Massawippi in 2021, and Lake Temiscouata in 2022. We are working with the Provinces of Quebec and New Brunswick and local stakeholders to contain the further spread of the species.
If pressed - Invasive Smallmouth Bass in Miramichi Watershed
- Smallmouth bass poses a serious threat in the Southwest Miramichi River Watershed.
- My department issued an authorisation to the North Shore Micmac District Council under the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations to use a pesticide to eradicate Smallmouth Bass from the watershed.
- Eradication was completed in a section of the Southwest Miramichi River in 2022, and DFO will continue to consult with Indigenous communities and stakeholders, and to collaborate with partners on potential eradication efforts in the lake, as needed.
If pressed - European Green Crab
- We are concerned by the significant impacts that European Green Crab, found on both coasts of Canada, can have on estuarine and marine ecosystems, fisheries, and aquaculture industries.
- We collaborate with numerous partners including Indigenous governments and communities, provincial governments, and U.S. state and federal governments to address the threats that this species poses.
- My department will continue to lead management activities on both Atlantic and Pacific coasts to mitigate the spread and the impacts of this invasive species.
If pressed - Asian Carps
- In 2017, our government invested $16 million over five years and $4 million ongoing in the Asian Carp Program to ensure Canada’s Great Lakes are protected from the harmful impacts of Asian carps.
- Our government takes a comprehensive preventative approach to addressing the threat of these species, especially Grass carp, and works collaboratively with U.S., Ontario, and Quebec government partners.
- Asian carps have not established in the Canadian waters of the Great Lakes thanks to organized surveillance and response efforts.
If pressed - Goldfish
- Goldfish, a non-indigenous species, have been released into Canadian waters where they may reproduce and impact ecosystems and native fish species.
- Introducing fish in areas where they are not native is illegal under the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations, and we will continue to promote education and outreach with the public to prevent introductions of aquatic invasive species.
- The presence of Goldfish in freshwater systems in Canada is an issue that my department is continuing to monitor and research.
If pressed - Vase tunicate
- Vase tunicate is an invasive species present on the Atlantic coast. Once established, it has negative impacts on aquaculture (e.g. mussels and oysters).
- Until 2021, vase tunicate had only been detected once in Quebec (2006, port of the Magdalen Islands). Since then we have detected vase tunicate in two marinas in the same area.
- We are working with local partners to prevent the spread of the species throughout the Magdalen Islands’ archipelago.
Background
Aquatic Invasive Species
The Canadian portion of the Sea Lamprey Control Program (SLCP) was established through the Department in 1954, following ratification of the Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries. The Convention established the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC) as part of a binational commitment to control Sea Lamprey for the protection of Great Lakes fish and fisheries.
The Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations came into force in 2015 under the Fisheries Act to provide tools for federal action and partnerships with provincial and territorial governments, setting significant expectations regarding Canada's collective ability to manage Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS).
Budget 2017 provided $43.8 million in funding over five years and $10.8 million ongoing for national AIS management to: establish a national core program; expand and make permanent the Department's Asian Carp Program; and, expand the SLCP and increase Canada's commitment to the GLFC. Budget 2017 increased Canada's commitment to the GLFC, the coordinating body for the SLCP, from $8.1 million to $10.6 million ongoing.
The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development conducted an audit of DFO’s AIS efforts to date and released its findings on April 2, 2019. In response, DFO, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), and other partners have developed new protocols, tools, and procedures to improve enforcement of the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations at international borders.
Budget 2022 identifies an additional $45 million over five years, and $9 million ongoing to enable DFO and the GLFC to increase efforts to control Sea Lamprey, further facilitate collaborative fishery management, and provide additional support to Great Lakes research.
The 2022 Fall Economic Statement identified $36.6 million in funding over five years from 2022-23 to 2026-27 for DFO for the expansion of the Aquatic Invasive Species Program.
Zebra and Quagga Mussels
Zebra and Quagga mussels can have significant economic impacts on recreational boaters, municipal and industrial water supplies, and power generation infrastructure. Both species are subject to import prohibitions under the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations.
Since the 1980s, Zebra mussels have spread as far as Lake Manitoba, while Quagga mussels are found in the southern Great Lakes. They are found in certain areas of the St. Lawrence River, and were recently detected in Lake Memphremagog (2020), Lake Massawippi (2021), and Lake Temiscouata (2022), the latter being located in the headwaters of the St. John's River watershed.
In March 2021, prohibited invasive Zebra mussels were found in moss ball products, a type of aquarium plant product made of green algae. DFO led national emergency response activities with the CBSA and provincial and territorial partners to stop the import and distribution of infested moss ball products across Canada. DFO collaborated with e-commerce platforms to block the sale of moss balls by third party sellers on their platforms.
DFO provides funding for a number of initiatives focusing on invasive mussels:
- DFO contributed $500,000 over four years in 2018 to invasive mussel prevention.
- DFO contributed $1,300,000 over four years starting in 2019 through the Canada Nature Fund for Aquatic Species at Risk
- DFO has committed over $475,000 to BC’s invasive mussel defense program in 2022-23 through a Memorandum of Understanding with the Province of BC.
Miramichi Lake and River
Smallmouth bass is a predator and competitor of Atlantic salmon discovered in 2008 in the area.
DFO maintains barriers to prevent Smallmouth bass from escaping Miramichi Lake and annually invests approximately $50,000 on different physical methods for capturing Smallmouth bass.
DFO authorised the chemical eradication project in 2021; however, the proponent was met with opposition from community groups and cottage owners throughout 2021 and 2022.
On September 8, 2022, the proponent completed the first phase of the chemical eradication project by applying rotenone in the Southwest Miramichi River, downstream from Lake Miramichi. However, the second phase of the project was postponed indefinitely because of sustained opposition from the public.
DFO continues to operate a fish barrier at the Miramichi lake discharge to prevent the spread of Smallmouth bass into the Miramichi River system, and will review other proposals that may be submitted to control smallmouth bass in Miramichi lake using pesticides.
European Green Crab
European Green Crab (EGC) consumes and/or competes with indigenous species such as shellfish, crab, and lobster and disrupts estuarine habitats such as eelgrass and saltmarsh.
DFO continues to provide funding and works with multiple partners in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) to control EGC, including the Fish, Food and Allied Workers Union, the Marine Institute, the Three Rivers Mi’kmaq band, and the Mi’kmaq Alsumk Mowimsikik Koqoey Association to control EGC.
In BC, EGC were first discovered in 1998. DFO has partnered with multiple Indigenous and stewardship groups and others to determine the extent of the invasion, seek evidence of establishment, and develop and implement management and response plans, including providing subject matter expertise, and funding from the BC Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund to the Coastal Restoration Society ($2.0 million) and Council of the Haida Nation ($1.2 million).
AIS as Bait
Although it may appear desirable to use AIS for bait, food, or other purposes, it also means increased risks of introduction into new areas, and risks propagating the species, leading to unintended, negative consequences on native fish and fish habitat.
Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing
Issue
What is the Government doing to tackle international illegal fishing practices?
Response
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada works with international partners to develop and strengthen fisheries management and compliance measures that regulate high seas fishing activity.
- We have committed nearly $12 million to develop new surveillance technologies, including our Dark Vessel Detection project.
- On November 12, 2022, Prime Minister Trudeau announced a further $84.3 million over five years under the Shared Ocean Fund, which will support increased maritime cooperation and reinforce a healthy marine environment in the Indo-Pacific.
If pressed
- Canada continues to work with key international partners to address the threat of illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing.
- This includes conducting fisheries enforcement operations on the high seas to detect and deter this type of activity.
- In addition, Canada, along with the United States and the United Kingdom, launched the Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing Action Alliance at the recent UN Oceans Conference, to drive global efforts to tackle illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing.
Background
Illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing is estimated to account for up to 30 per cent of fish landings worldwide and removes as much as $30 billion from the world's economy annually. It is increasingly linked to crimes of convergence such as drug trafficking and human slavery, and therefore poses a serious risk to global security, in addition to contributing to the decline of marine habitat.
Much of the high seas beyond national jurisdiction are under- or un-monitored. These areas are particularly susceptible to activities of IUU fishing.
Canada's economy (75,000 jobs in the primary fishing and aquaculture sector) and natural resources (especially straddling and highly migratory fish stocks) are put at serious risk by IUU fishing.
Canada is a member of seven regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs), where Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is the Government's engagement lead. Beyond securing Canada's access to fish stocks managed by these organizations, DFO officials also work to ensure strong and effective management measures, based on the best available science, are adopted. Overall, Canada's objective is to prevent overfishing and activities that could undermine the sustainability of those internationally managed species (including those caught incidentally). A fundamental component of RFMOs' work to improve compliance with adopted management measures is the implementation of a robust monitoring, control and surveillance scheme, including high seas boarding and inspection regime.
The High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy has agreed to a headline commitment of 100 per cent sustainable management of ocean under national jurisdiction, by 2025. For Canada, this will be pursued through the development of a national blue economy strategy. A key pillar of a sustainable ocean economy revolves around Ocean Wealth, of which sustainable ocean food to support global food security, is a key component. From a fisheries perspective, the goal of eliminating IUU fishing is integral to achieving the overall objectives of sustainable ocean food, and therefore a sustainable ocean economy. Canada has been involved in negotiations at the World Trade Organization (WTO) to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14.6 of eliminating subsidies that contribute to IUU fishing and prohibit certain forms of fisheries subsidies which contribute to overcapacity and overfishing, while recognizing the need for appropriate and effective special and differential treatment (S&DT) for developing and least developed countries. In June of 2022, these efforts culminated with the adoption of the landmark WTO Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies, which prohibits subsidies that contribute to IUU fishing and subsidies for fishing or fishing-related activities on the high seas and outside the competence of a relevant RFMO, and disciplines subsidies for fishing on overfished stocks.
DFO is continuing to implement the commitments outlined in the G7 Charlevoix Blueprint for Healthy Oceans, which included $11.6M in funding for developing new satellite based technologies to track illegal fishing, funding to develop an intelligence sharing network, and work with non-governmental organisations to combat IUU fishing around the world.
Canada's surveillance and inspection presence is robust and IUU fishing is mitigated through international cooperation and joint enforcement missions. Canada is active in multilateral operations to combat IUU fishing and protect migratory fish stocks in the Atlantic and Pacific, including the deployment of aircraft and inspection personnel to international waters.
Canada ratified the Port State Measures Agreement in 2019, which has as its objective, preventing IUU fishing vessels from landing their catches in the ports of member states.
In June of 2022, at the UN Oceans Conference in Lisbon, Portugal, Canada, along with the United States and the United Kingdom, launched the IUU Fishing Action Alliance to drive global efforts at addressing IUU fishing through greater transparency, the use of technology, and supporting State and non-State partnerships.
Foreign ownership
Issue
How is the Department addressing concerns of foreign ownership in commercial fisheries?
Response
- I am aware of the concerns expressed about the degree of foreign ownership of Canadian fishing enterprises and the concentration of fisheries access.
- My department has launched a study to identify those benefitting from commercial fisheries access. This information will be used to develop a baseline understanding of the extent of foreign control and concentration in our fisheries.
- Careful consideration of the potential impacts on existing commercial licence holders are required before any policy changes can be considered.
If pressed on foreign ownership restrictions in Atlantic Canada
- On the East coast, Fisheries and Oceans Canada has a long-standing policy that requires all Atlantic midshore and offshore licence holders be at least 51 per cent Canadian-owned.
- In early 2021, my department enhanced the application of this policy to ensure that prospective licence holders meet the 51 per cent requirement at all levels of their corporate structure.
Background
The issue of foreign ownership of Canadian enterprises, and Canadian fishing corporations specifically, was highlighted as part of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans’ (FOPO) report “West Coast Fisheries: Sharing Risks and Benefits.” The report included 20 recommendations that called for significant changes to the current fisheries management and licensing regime, including a recommendation that “no future sales of fishing quota and/or licences be to non-Canadian beneficial owners.” The Government Response was supportive of the report’s overall goal of economically viable and sustainable fisheries, and of considering social and cultural factors in their management. The Response also committed Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) to further assess the recommendations, engage a broad range of stakeholders to support ongoing policy improvement efforts, and to undertake a comparative analysis of fisheries policies and regulations in effect on Canada’s East and West Coasts.
In the spring of 2020, DFO launched an analysis of its existing foreign ownership policies and the impacts of any potential changes. During the preliminary stages of this analysis, the Department concluded that it lacks the information required to quantify the concerns put forth by the Standing Committee and some stakeholders. In February of 2021, the Department contracted the Forensic Accounting Management Group (FAMG), under Public Services and Procurement Canada, to develop a survey (the Beneficial Ownership Survey) that would identify who is benefitting from commercial fishing licences and quota, and validate the concerns identified by Parliamentarians.
During the summer of 2021, the Department engaged key stakeholders from all regions to introduce them to the Beneficial Ownership Survey’s intent, objectives, and timelines. Feedback from key industry stakeholders was supportive of the Department’s desire to better understand its licence holders and industry participants.
The Beneficial Ownership Survey opened on January 30, 2022 and was mandatory for most commercial licence holders and vessel owners, with the exclusion of Atlantic inshore and communal commercial harvesters. The Survey closed on April 30, 2022 and DFO is now contacting all participants that have not yet submitted to ensure any outstanding surveys are promptly submitted.
Analysis will take place through summer and fall of 2022, at which point the findings will be published on DFO’s website and shared with key stakeholders. Following the public release of the survey’s findings, DFO will engage key stakeholders, including the Canadian Independent Fish Harvesters Federation, to discuss the findings’ impacts and any potential policy solutions, if required. Careful consideration of the potential impacts on existing licence holders across all commercial fisheries, as well as Canada’s international trade obligations, will be required before any policy changes could be introduced, or regulatory amendments considered.
In February of 2021, DFO strengthened the application of its foreign ownership restrictions in Atlantic Canada. Under the “Enhanced Application of Foreign Ownership Restrictions”, the requirement to be at least 51 per cent Canadian is applied to the full corporate structure of prospective licence holders for all future licence re-issuances in the mid-shore, offshore, and exempted fleet fisheries in Atlantic Canada and Quebec, where this policy applies.
Ocean Protection Plan
Issue
What is Canada doing to protect our oceans?
Response
- In response to increased maritime traffic, Budget 2022 provides an additional $2 billion over nine years to renew and expand the Oceans Protection Plan, which was launched by Canada in 2016 through a $1.5 billion investment.
- This additional investment will strengthen marine safety, protect and restore marine and coastal ecosystems, and create stronger partnerships with Indigenous and coastal communities.
- These measures will help grow the economy while protecting the environment, and ensure that all Canadians can have confidence in our marine safety system.
Background
Marine traffic continues to increase in support of Canada’s growing economy, and the Government is taking additional steps to strengthen marine safety, protect marine ecosystems, and create stronger partnerships with Indigenous and coastal communities.
The renewal of the Oceans Protection Plan (OPP) was announced by the Prime Minister on July 19, 2022.
Budget 2022 announced an additional $2 billion to protect Canada’s coasts and waterways during our economic recovery and beyond. This new funding is in addition to the $1.5 billion initially announced in 2016 and brings the total invested in support of the plan to $3.5 billion. The OPP is the largest investment ever made to protect Canada’s coasts and waterways, while also growing our economy.
Critical new investments for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) and the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) in the renewal of OPP include $1.1 billion over nine years, starting in 2022-23, and $68 million ongoing.
The renewed and expanded plan will help make further progress to:
- Enhance the protection and restoration of vulnerable marine ecosystems and wildlife;
- Improve the efficiency, safety, and sustainability of Canada’s marine supply chains and mitigate their impacts on the environment, including by advancing research on marine pollution, ecosystems, and wildlife;
- Better manage marine traffic navigation off our coasts and marine incidents of all types; and
- Advance partnerships and training opportunities for Indigenous and coastal communities to incorporate their expertise and experiences in various aspects of marine safety and ecosystem protection.
The implementation of the OPP is a whole-of-government effort, with responsibilities shared across Transport Canada, DFO, CCG, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Natural Resources Canada, and Health Canada.
Since the last appearance of DFO senior officials and Minister Murray before the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans to discuss 2022-23 Supplementary Estimates (B) on December 2, 2022, two important DFO announcements related to OPP Renewal were made:
- On February 6, 2023, Minister Murray announced $46.5 million in funding over five years to Ocean Networks Canada, an initiative of the University of Victoria, to enhance their world-class ocean monitoring system. Ocean Networks Canada’s research helps to provide real-time, open data to better understand our changing oceans.
- On December 17, 2022, Minister Murray announced an investment of $75 million over the next five years for the Aquatic Ecosystems Restoration Fund to support projects that conserve and restore priority coastal and upstream aquatic areas.
Under the first phase of OPP (2017-2022), DFO and the CCG had the following accomplishments:
- Improved access to high-quality, real-time or near real-time data on our marine environment.
- Funded oil spill research, especially on Canadian oil products, to better understand how oil behaves and breaks down in different marine conditions.
- Funded over 60 projects to restore coastal aquatic habitats through the Coastal Restoration Fund.
- Funded 154 projects as part of the Small Craft Harbours Abandoned and Wrecked Vessels Removal Program to help protect Canada’s marine environment and improve marine safety in Canada’s small craft harbours.
- Established 24/7 Regional Operations Centers in the Coast Guard’s Western, Atlantic and Central and Arctic regions to enhance marine awareness, environmental response and search and rescue capacity.
- Opened five new CCG search and rescue stations in Victoria, and Tahsis (British Columbia), and St. Anthony, Old Perlican and Twillingate (Newfoundland and Labrador).
- Increased the presence of CCG icebreakers in the north during the Arctic season.
- Provided more than $12 million in funding to over 40 Indigenous communities to buy search and rescue boats and equipment, improving their ability to participate in marine emergency response as members of the CCG Guard Auxiliary.
- Co-launched the Coastal Nations CCG Auxiliary, the first Indigenous led CCG Auxiliary organisation, who now have units in eight First Nations communities along the British Columbia coast.
Since the launch of the OPP in 2016, the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change have impacted our economy, our marine environment, and the resiliency of our supply chain.
As risks associated with marine traffic and impacts to marine ecosystems evolve, further strengthening and expanding OPP implementation across the country is required to ensure Canada’s marine safety and environmental protection system is able to withstand disruption and to adapt to changes in the sector.
Great Lakes Fishery Commission
Issue
What is the Government doing to protect the Great Lakes?
Response
- Our Government is committed to preserving our freshwater resources and protecting the Great Lakes from invasive species.
- The Great Lakes Fishery Commission is vital to controlling sea lampreys, conducting scientific research, and maintaining cooperation among Canadian and American agencies to manage and sustain the Great Lakes transboundary fisheries.
- In Budget 2022, we announced new funding of $44.9 million over five years, and $9 million ongoing to ensure that Canada meets its international treaty obligations to the GLFC and for the Commission’s continued success.
If pressed
- I know that the Commission’s Secretariat has been advocating for a portfolio change from Fisheries and Oceans Canada to Global Affairs Canada for quite some time.
- This is a complex matter and we are assessing the implications of a possible change in responsibility.
- Throughout this process, we will ensure that the work of the Commission and the ongoing delivery of critical sea lamprey control measures are not adversely impacted or needlessly disrupted.
If pressed on other GoC efforts
- The Government of Canada has a number of programs in place to protect, monitor and restore the Great Lakes water quality and ecosystem health - domestically and in partnership with the United States.
- In addition to this established and ongoing programming, our Government has made several recent announcements to deepen this commitment:
- $12.5 million was recently announced by the Minister of Transport to further reduce the spread of aquatic invasive species in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River region by investing in innovative solutions to ballast water management; and,
- As part of the Great Lakes Protection Initiative, $3.9 million was announced in September to address environmental challenges affecting the Great Lakes.
Background
The Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC) was established by the 1954 Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between Canada and the United States of America, with the objective of protecting and sustaining the Great Lakes fishery.
The 1954 Convention charges the commission with five major duties:
- develop a binational research program aimed at sustaining Great Lakes fish stocks;
- coordinate or conduct research consistent with that program;
- recommend measures to governments that protect and improve the fishery;
- formulate and implement a comprehensive sea lamprey control program; and
- publish or authorize publication of scientific and other information critical to sustaining the fishery.
The GLFC is made up of eight Commissioners (four each from Canada and the United States) and one US Alternate Commissioner. The GLFC operates under the direction of the Commissioners, and functionally operates independently from government.
Canada and the US government support the Commission through a cost-sharing arrangement that reflects the distribution of territorial waters and the value of each nation’s fishery. Canada agreed at the inaugural meeting under the 1954 Convention to contribute 31 per cent of funding for the transboundary sea lamprey control work, and 50 per cent of other research and administrative costs (e.g. secretariat/salaries). The US provides the remaining funding.
As part of Budget 2022, the Department successfully brought forward a proposal seeking additional incremental funding of $44.9 million over five years and $9 million ongoing for the GLFC, to ensure that Canada meets its bilateral treaty requirement with the US - bringing Canada’s contribution up to over $19 million in 2022 and moving forward. This funding will help to augment Canadian sea lamprey control activities, and support the GLFC’s scientific research and binational fisheries management coordination across the Great Lakes.
In recent years, the GLFC has been lobbying key stakeholders in the US and Canada, including Members of Parliament (MPs), and US Senators and Representatives, with their request for federal a leadership and responsibility for the GLFC to be moved from Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) to Global Affairs Canada (GAC).
DFO and GAC, with support from the Privy Council Office and the Department of Justice, have been assessing the implications of a possible change in federal leadership and fiscal responsibility for the GLFC. The deployment of the sea lamprey control program would presumably remain with DFO, though how it would receive its funding, now and into the future, is less clear. There is complexity to what the GLFC is proposing, splitting functions and authorities related to the GLFC between two portfolios, and also lack of clarity on what it would accomplish.
On October 20, 2022, two new Commissioners, nominated by the Government of Ontario, were approved by the Governor in Council to represent Canada at the GLFC.
[Information was severed in accordance with the Access to Information Act.] The first payment of new funding (~$9.5 million) was made to the Commission in February 2023.
The GFLC’s 2022 Interim Meeting, originally scheduled for November 30, was postponed as the US Section did not have all of their four Commissioners in place and since Canada’s funding level to the Commission for the upcoming 2023 fiscal year had not been finalized.
The GLFC Secretariat now has the information it requires to set the budget for the upcoming year and is actively working with Canadian and American Commissioners to schedule the interim meeting.
Discussions with the Secretariat continue regarding 2023 transfers (which comes from our 23-24 FY) to determine what funding is required for the Sea Lamprey Control Program and to deliver on other important aspects of the GLFC’s mandate.
On February 22, 2023, the Minister of Transport, the Honourable Omar Alghabra, announced $12.5 million in funding to launch the Ballast Water Innovation Program as part of Canada’s Oceans Protection Plan. The program, which is a central component of the Government of Canada’s efforts to advance the implementation and enforcement of the 2021 Ballast Water Regulations, will play an important role in further reducing the spread of aquatic invasive species in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River region by investing in innovative solutions to ballast water management and ensuring these management systems are optimized for unique water environments in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River region.
On September 23, 2022, Terry Duguid, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, announced an investment of more than $3.9 million over three years in thirty-nine new projects in Ontario through the Great Lakes Protection Initiative, part of the Government of Canada’s Freshwater Action Plan. Through the Great Lakes Protection Initiative, the Government of Canada takes action to address the most significant environmental challenges affecting Great Lakes water quality and ecosystem health by delivering on Canada’s commitments under the Canada-United States Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
Transformation of the Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation
Issue
Are there any updates on the transformation of the Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation?
Response
- Our government recognizes the important role that the Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation has played in the lives of freshwater fish harvesters, including those in remote and northern Indigenous communities, for more than 50 years.
- We are committed to transforming the Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation so that it remains competitive in today’s open market and continues to meet the needs of harvesters into the future.
- Until transformation is complete, the Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation will operate under its current mandate.
If pressed
- Our government recognizes the significant challenges facing the commercial freshwater fishing and fish marketing industry. These include changing market conditions, the effects of climate change, and the residual effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- I know that the Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation is working tirelessly to provide stability to the fish harvesters it serves.
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada will engage with provincial and territorial colleagues, as well as Indigenous governments and organizations, as this process advances.
Background
Headquartered in Winnipeg, Manitoba, the Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation (FFMC) is a federal Crown Corporation established in 1969.
Enabled under the Freshwater Fish Marketing Act (FFMA), the FFMC has the exclusive right to market and trade freshwater fish in interprovincial and export markets in designated products supplied by commercial fishers in participating jurisdictions. The FFMC was established to operate on a self-sustaining basis without government appropriations.
Over the past 12 years, the FFMC operating environment has experienced significant change. Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba withdrew from the Act in favour of an open market in 2011, 2012 and 2017 respectively, while Alberta closed its commercial in-land fishery in 2014. The Northwest Territories is the only remaining participating jurisdiction under the Act. However, many harvesters from Manitoba and Saskatchewan continue to sell their fish to the FFMC through contracts.
In order to remain competitive in the open market, FFMC has developed strategies to operate more effectively, including by shifting from a supply-driven marketing model, to one that is driven by customer demand; diversifying revenue; and, aggressively targeting new sales markets.
Recognizing the need to adapt to the new operating environment, in 2018, a ministerial advisory panel was established to explore ways to transform FFMC to remain modern and competitive in the open market.
Based on the Ministerial Advisory Panel’s advice, an Interlocutor was appointed to engage with harvesters and other stakeholders in the freshwater fishery as part of the transformation process. In March of 2020, the Interlocutor convened the Interim Committee of Inland Fish Harvesters to advise him in his recommendation to the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans, and the Canadian Coast Guard.
In September of 2020, the Interlocutor submitted a report of findings and recommendations for the Minister’s consideration. The report recommended that Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) commit to continue working with the Interim Committee to explore transformation of the FFMC to a harvester-led governance and ownership model, and to provide support to the Interim Committee to secure administrative and technical expertise to allow it to formalize its role in representing fish harvesters in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and the Northwest Territories. On January 21, 2021, the former Minister announced receipt of the Interlocutor’s report.
Throughout 2021, DFO worked with the Interim Committee to secure administrative and technical expertise to formalize its role in representing fish harvesters in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and the Northwest Territories.
In August of 2021, the Interim Committee established itself as the Freshwater Fish Harvesters Association, Inc. (FFHAI), a not-for-profit corporation.
In November 2021, DFO concluded negotiations with the FFHAI to provide financial support for it to secure secretarial support and technical expertise, research potential co-operative governance models, gather information on the FFMC’s activities, begin to assess the FFMC’s assets and liabilities, and engage freshwater harvesters. In March 2022, the FFHAI submitted a proposal to DFO on its vision to transform the FFMC into a harvester-led entity.
A number of other parties have also expressed interest in being involved in the future of the FFMC.
Canada’s Leadership in Ocean Governance
Issue
What is Canada doing internationally to advance responsible ocean governance and marine conservation?
Response
- Canada champions responsible oceans governance and the protection of our oceans. We are proud of our recent key accomplishments.
- Canada was pivotal in encouraging the global community to adopt an ambitious Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and the commitment to protect 30 per cent of the world's oceans by 2030.
- Canada was a leader in the successful conclusion of the historic high seas treaty, which is integral to achieving global marine conservation.
If pressed
- Canada was a key player in the successful negotiations to address harmful fisheries subsidies at the World Trade Organization in 2022. We are working to ratify this agreement as soon as feasible.
- Further, under the Indo-Pacific Strategy, Canada will implement the Shared Oceans Fund ($84.3 million over five years) to promote a healthy marine environment in the Indo-Pacific region while supporting action against illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing.
Background
The world’s oceans are facing increasing impacts from climate change, species decline and loss, ecosystem degradation and loss, aquatic invasive species, and harmful effects from waste and other pollutants. Canada collaborates nationally with federal, provincial, territorial, and Indigenous partners, and with other maritime nations in international fora to conserve marine ecosystem functions and protect the biodiversity of our oceans.
Canada is a member of seven regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs), where Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) works to secure Canada’s access to fish stocks managed by these organizations and to ensure strong and effective management measures, based on the best available science, are adopted. Overall Canada’s objective is to prevent overfishing and other activities that could undermine the long-term sustainability of those internationally managed species.
In July of 2020, Canada joined the Global Ocean Alliance (GOA), a coalition of countries led by the United Kingdom that committed to the ambitious global target to protect at least 30 per cent of the world’s oceans by 2030 through the establishment and effective management of marine protected areas (MPAs) and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs). Including Canada, to date, 75 countries have now joined the Alliance. Membership in this alliance is a key part of Canada’s advocacy for international action to increase conservation and protection of the world’s oceans by 2030. In addition to supporting the implementation of the 30by30 target, the Alliance aims to maintain a spotlight on ocean issues within the Convention on Biological Diversity and other international fora.
The Prime Minister is a member of the High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy, where Canada works with international partners to set an ambitious agenda on protection and sustainable use of our oceans. On December 2, 2020, the Prime Minister endorsed the High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy’s Transformations for a Sustainable Ocean Economy: A Vision for Protection, Production and Prosperity, which included support for a global target to protect 30 per cent of the ocean by 2030. This endorsement affirms the Government of Canada’s support towards sustainably managing 100 per cent of Canada’s ocean area by 2025. Canada is currently developing its Blue Economy Strategy to fulfill this commitment.
On June 9, 2022, Canada and Chile co-sponsored the launch of the Americas for the Protection of the Ocean Declaration at the Summit of the Americas. The Declaration established a regional coalition for collaboration, cooperation and coordination of marine protected areas and other marine conservation measures in the Pacific. This regional collaboration instrument provides an opportunity for Canada to work with Chile and other partners in the region (the United States, Mexico, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru) to advance the global 30by30 target. Canada is collaborating with Chile to finalize the development of the workplan and to guide he implementation of the Declaration’s objectives.
The 15th Conference of the Parties (COP15) to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) that took place in Montreal from December 7 to 19, 2022, successfully adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) including four goals and 23 new targets, replacing the Aichi targets and setting out a new plan to transform society's relationship with biodiversity and ensure the 2050 vision of living in harmony with nature is fulfilled. COP15 in Montreal provided a unique opportunity to showcase Canada's commitment to an ambitious GBF and biodiversity targets, in alignment with its domestic nature conservation and recovery commitments, such as the target to conserve 30 per cent of its land and waters by 2030.
Following CBD COP15, Canada successfully co-hosted the Fifth International Marine Protected Areas Congress (IMPAC5) with host First Nations - Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh - as well as, the International Union for Conservation of Nature, the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society and the Province of British Columbia from February 3 to 9, 2023. Throughout IMPAC5, the Government of Canada and partners announced several important initiatives, including the unveiling of Canada’s proposed pathway to 2025 (17 marine areas) being considered for the path towards conserving 25 per cent of our oceans by 2025. IMPAC5 culminated with the Leadership Forum which convened ministers and senior officials of national and sub-national governments and international organizations, Indigenous leaders, young professionals, civil society, philanthropic foundations, academia, and industry who share Canada’s ambition for ocean conservation. IMPAC5 and the Leadership Forum provided an opportunity for Canada to showcase its journey to achieve the 10 per cent Aichi target for marine conservation and share the lessons learned with countries striving to increase their level of ocean protection.
Canada actively participated in the negotiations of a new legally-binding treaty under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ), which concluded on March 4th, 2023. The treaty establishes the governance structure and management mechanisms to implement the environmental and conservation objectives of UNCLOS through area-based conservation and management, environmental impact assessments, and capacity-building. The treaty provisions respect the competence of the global and regional frameworks and instruments such as RFMOs and aim to strengthen cooperation among them, including via sharing scientific information and technical expertise. Following the legal technical review of the final text, delegations will reconvene in New York for a half-day to formally adopt the treaty in its six official languages (likely in June 2023 around the same time as the 33rd Meeting of States Parties to UNCLOS). Following the adoption, the treaty will be open for signature. Sixty ratifications will be required before the treaty comes into force. The BBNJ treaty will be integral to achieving global marine conservation goals while complementing Canada’s domestic conservation action.
Canada is a member of the International Seabed Authority Council and is actively engaged in the negotiations on seabed mineral exploitation regulations to ensure effective protection of the marine environment. At IMPAC5 on February 8, 2023, Canada reiterated its position on domestic seabed mining, stating that Canada does not current have a domestic legal framework that would permit seabed mining and will not authorize seabed mining in areas under our jurisdiction in the absence of a rigorous regulatory regime.
As part of the Indo-Pacific Strategy, Canada will lead the Shared Ocean Fund ($84.3M over 5 years), which will increase maritime cooperation and create a healthy marine environment in the Indo-Pacific while supporting measures against illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. This new initiative will help support ocean management, reinforce a healthy marine environment in the Indo-Pacific region through Canadian government support for a range of enhanced measures against illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing.
After more than 20 years of negotiations, the WTO Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies was adopted at the 12th Ministerial Conference (MC12) on June 17, 2022. The agreement partially addresses the requirements of United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14.6 that aims to address harmful fisheries subsidies, such as those contributing to IUU fishing. Although further negotiations are required to achieve all aspects of UN SDG 14.6, this agreement is a major step forward for ocean sustainability as it targets harmful subsidies that contribute to the unsustainable harvesting of global fish stocks. Canada was a key participant throughout these negotiations and was able to advance exclusively Canadian policies within the agreed-upon text (i.e., subsidy prohibitions in unregulated areas and for unregulated species on the high seas). Canada is currently undergoing domestic ratification processes related to the agreement.
Tidal Energy Development
Issue
Why does the Government of Canada not support the development of renewable tidal energy?
Response
- The Department remains committed to working with industry and federal partners to advance the responsible development of marine renewable energy, including tidal energy.
- At the same time, DFO must fulfill its regulatory mandate of ensuring healthy and sustainable aquatic ecosystems and minimizing the impacts of ocean-based projects on fish and fish habitat, including vulnerable aquatic species protected under the Species at Risk Act which are found at locations where tidal energy projects are proposed.
- We have supported several tidal energy projects already, but must evaluate each project on its own merits and consider its potential environmental risks.
Background
In May 2022, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) received an application from Sustainable Marine Energy Canada Ltd. (SMEC), for a Fisheries Act authorization and Species at Risk Act (SARA) permit in relation to a proposed in-stream tidal energy project.
SMEC is proposing to deploy and operate a floating tidal energy device (i.e. platform) with six 3-bladed turbines at the Fundy Ocean Research Center for Energy (FORCE) test site in the Minas Passage, approximately 7 km west of Parrsboro in Cumberland county, Nova Scotia.
In 2020, Natural Resources Canada provided SMEC $28.5 million to advance tidal energy technology. It is DFO’s understanding that the funding was approved based on the deployment of 9 Megawatt (MW) or approximately twenty-one (21) platforms.
The current proposed deployment is separate from an earlier deployment of a test platform in Grand Passage, which was authorized by the Department to test and develop the company’s Environmental Effects Monitoring Program (EEMP). In addition, DFO has issued several Fisheries Act authorizations related to tidal power projects over the past five years.
Grand Passage differs from the Minas Passage because Grand Passage is not a major migratory corridor for fish and the flow speeds are considerably lower than in the Minas Passage.
The Minas Passage and Minas Basin are part of an ecologically and biologically significant area, characterized by the world’s highest tides. There are currently 85 different fish species, multiple species of marine mammals, and marine invertebrates known to use this area. The Minas Passage acts as a major migratory corridor for many of these species, including numerous species of economic and cultural significance.
SMEC has communicated a plan for a 5 MW deployment to install three, six, and eventually 12 floating platforms in the Minas Passage. Each platform would have six tidal turbines as a minimum pathway in order to receive funding from their investors.
DFO continues to communicate a clear regulatory path with projected timelines to support a staged approach to tidal energy development. This means installing only one platform with an acceptable monitoring program first. Under this staged approach to in-stream tidal energy development, the Department has authorized the test platform in Grand Passage.
This staged approach is important before a project that has a higher risk of impacts to fish can proceed to the next stage of development (i.e. large or high-risk tidal array).
At this time there is no environmental effects monitoring equipment that is capable of collecting information and data to inform the risk mortality, injury, or behavioral disturbance.
Where the proponent has communicated that they have withdrawn their application DFO’s review of the project is currently paused. Should SMEC propose and alternative approach DFO staff will continue our review.
DFO considers a variety of factors when reviewing in-stream tidal energy projects, including turbine specifications and project design, project location, avoidance and mitigation measures, relevant scientific literature, and the ability to monitor for potential effects.
Decisions on whether or not to issue a Fisheries Act authorization are guided by the best available scientific information and departmental objectives, and decisions are made in consultation with Indigenous partners. The precautionary principle is followed when there are uncertainties.
Annex
Scenario Note: Minister’s Appearance Before the House Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans (FOPO)
Topic
Supplementary Estimates C, 2022-2023 and Main Estimates 2023-2024
Date and Time
March, 27, 2023 (11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.)
- Supplementary Estimates C, from 11:00 to 12:00
- Main Estimates, from 12:00 to 1:00
Location
Room 420, Wellington Building, 197 Sparks Street (TBC)
Overview
The Minister and officials have been invited to appear at the House Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans (FOPO) to discuss the 2022-23 Supplementary Estimates C (Supps C) and the 2023-24 Main Estimates (Mains). The meeting will take place in an hybrid format on March 27, 2023, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. The Minister will provide opening remarks on Supplementary Estimates C (five minute duration) followed by responses to rounds of questions from Committee members on Supps C for the first hour and then it is anticipated she will provide 5 minute opening remarks on the Main Estimates at the beginning of the second hour. FOPO recently passed a motion recalling the Chief Financial Officer for the second hour to rectify his testimony related to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission at the last Supplementary Estimates B appearance. Supps C must be concurred by the House of Commons by March 26th, whereas Mains must be reviewed by FOPO and reported back by May 31st.
The Committee has been very active since the return of Parliament in September hearing testimonies from departmental officials on their study of Science at Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO); North Atlantic Right Whales; Mackerel; and Climate Change and Resilient Infrastructure. Since January, DFO officials appeared before Committee on March 9, in response to the Committee’s study on Pinnipeds. Future and upcoming studies are anticipated to include: foreign ownership and corporate concentration of fishing licenses and quota; illegal, unregulated and unreported fishing; Pacific Salmon stocks; and an update on actions taken since publication of the Committee’s 2019 report on “West Coast Fisheries: Sharing Risks and Benefits” (42nd Parliament - Report 21). Opposition members requested a briefing on aquaculture in the Province of British Columbia (BC). A technical briefing was scheduled is anticipated for March 23rd.
Please see Annex A below for information on the membership and rounds of questioning.
Motion
- Motion for the meeting is not yet available. It will be included in the meeting invite.
- The Motion requesting the CFO to appear follows:
Dave Epp moved, - That, given the factual inaccuracy provided by Mr. Richard Goodyear, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Deputy Minister, in his testimony to the committee on December 2, 2022, and raised in correspondence to the committee dated December 14, 2022, from Mr. Gregory McClinchey, Policy and Legislative Affairs Director of the Great Lakes Fisheries Commission, and considering the harm done to Canada's relationship with the United States through Canada’s continued lack of fiscal accountability towards the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and the numerous bi-lateral initiatives that would be jeopardized by the termination of the Great Lakes Fisheries Convention, the committee report to the House on this inaccuracy and recall Mr. Goodyear to the committee to rectify his testimony.
Witnesses
In person:
- Minister, the Honourable Joyce Murray
- Deputy Minister, Annette Gibbons
- CFO, Richard Goodyear
- Commissioner of the Canadian Coast Guard, Mario Pelletier
In the second hour you will be joined by
- Niall O’Dea, Senior Assistant Deputy Minister, Strategic Policy
Supporting Role - In the command center (war room):
- Aquatic Ecosystems and Fisheries Management, SADM, Alix Dostal
- Aquatic Ecosystems and Fisheries Management, ADM, Adam Burns
- Ecosystems and Oceans Science, ADM, Arran McPherson
- People and Culture, ADM and Chief Security Officer, Tom Balfour
- Internal Audit, Chief Audit Executive, Leslie Levita
- Chief Digital Officer, SADM, Marc Brouillard
- Arctic RDG, Gabe Nirlungnayug
- Ontario RDG, Michelle Langan
- Pacific RDG, Rebecca Reid
- Maritimes RDG, Doug Wentzell
- Newfoudland-Labrador RDG, William McGillivray
- Gulf RDG, Serge Doucet
- Quebec RDG, Sylvain Vézina
- Canadian Coast Guard, Deputy Commissioner, Operations, Chris Henderson,
- Canadian Coast Guard, Deputy Commissioner, Shipbuilding and Material, Andy Smith
- Chier Financial Officer, DG, Luc Robitaille
- Legal Services, Legal Counsel, Sarah Daigneault
- Public Affairs, DG, Joe De Mora
- Strategic Policy, DG Bonny Wong-Fortin & Manager of Parliamentary Affairs J-P Perron
Parliamentary Analysis of the Committee
Last fall, during the Supplementary B appearance, there were a few questions raised pertaining to the estimates; however, the majority of the questions included the following topics:
- DFO workforce and growth (including associated funding);
- Fleet renewal;
- Zim Kingston incident and recommendations from the FOPO Marine Cargo Spills study;
- Enforcement for illegal lobster fishing;
- Collaboration with the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration;
- Pangnirtung Fisheries in Nunavut;
- Licensing;
- Support and compensation for fish harvesters;
- Fisheries closures (mackerel, herring, cod) and management decisions;
- Ghost gear and plastic waste;
- BC shellfish and seaweed growers;
- Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative (PSSI);
- North Atlantic right whales (NARW) and Southern Resident Killer whales (SRKW);
- Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS);
- Open net-pen transition in BC; and
- Great Lakes Fisheries Committee (GLFC).
DFO-related lines of questioning in QP since September:
CPC questions have focused on:
- Hurricane Fiona support and rebuilding (Sept. 26-27-28, Oct. 5-21);
- Lobster fishing (Sept. 26-27); and,
- Mackerel reopening (Nov. 18).
NDP questions have focused on:
- Fish farms (Nov. 17); and,
- Ship recycling regulations (Dec. 2).
BQ questions have focused on:
- North Atlantic Right Whales (Dec. 2);
- Compensation for herring and mackerel (Dec. 9); and,
- COP15 on biodiversity (Nov. 28, Dec. 5-6).
Liberal questions have focused on:
- Hurricane Fiona Support (Dec. 1);
- North Atlantic right whales (Sept. 22);
- Vessels transitioning in BC waters (Nov. 28);
- Joint Marine Pollution contingency Plan (Dec. 13); and,
- Seal predation (Nov. 3).
Line of questioning from Parliamentary Returns since September 2022:
CPC written questions have focused on the southern resident killer whales at the Pender Island bluffs; license buy-backs; spawning biomass of North Atlantic mackerel in the Gulf of St. Lawrence; non-core commercial groundfish licences in the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador (N.L).; federal government contracts on professional and special services; and, the amount of northern cod that was caught and reported as bycatch for last three years. Recent whole of government questions focused on expenses for fleet vehicle; expenditures on appearance fees; expenditures on consulting services by the Government and expenditures on office equipment for ministerial exempt staff.
NDP written question have focused on the Pacific Integrated Commercial Fisheries Initiative; consultations undertaken as part of the Government’s intention to transition away from open-net pen aquaculture in British Columbia; recent whole of government questions have focused on the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) return to office decisions; and, the total number of contracts awarded by the Government. The NDP also has two petitions on the risk to workers for ship recycling.
Annex A
Rounds of questioning
- Five minutes are allotted for the opening statement.
- Questioning of witnesses:
- First round: six minutes for the first questioner from each party as follows: Conservative Party, Liberal Party, Bloc Québécois, New Democratic Party.
- For the second, and subsequent rounds, the order and time for questioning is as follows:
- Conservative Party, five minutes
- Liberal Party, five minutes
- Bloc Québécois, two and a half (2.5) minutes
- New Democratic Party, two and a half (2.5) minutes
- The total time allocated per round of questioning includes the member’s questions and the witness’ responses. There is no time limit on responses from witness(es); however, succinct answers are preferred.
Structure of the Committee
The Committee is composed of twelve members (additional information on each member can be found below):
- Six Liberal members (Ken McDonald is the Chair), Mike Kelloway, Parliamentary Secretary for Fisheries and Oceans also sits as a Liberal member of Committee;
- Four Conservative (CPC) members (Mel Arnold is Vice-Chair, Clifford Small is Fisheries Critic, Rick Perkins and Richard Bragdon);
- One Bloc Québécois (BQ) member (Caroline Desbiens is Vice-Chair and Fisheries Critic); and,
- One New Democratic Party (NDP) member (Lisa Marie Barron, Fisheries Critic).
Committee Members
Ken McDonald (Committee Chair)
- Affiliation: Liberal Party of Canada
- Region: Avalon, Newfoundland and Labrador
- Biography:
- Diploma in accounting from the College of the North Atlantic.
- Mayor of the town of Conception Bay South.
- Served on FOPO in the 42nd and 43rd Parliament, including as Chair.
Mel Arnold (Vice Chair)
- Affiliation: Conservative Party of Canada
- Region: North Okanagan—Shuswap, British Columbia
- Biography:
- Small business owner, former president of the BC Wildlife Federation, former Governance Committee Chair of the Canadian Wildlife Federation.
- Appointed to BC's Species at Risk Task Force and served as a member of the City of Salmon Arm Environmental Advisory Committee.
- Served on FOPO in the 42nd Parliament; Former Vice-Chair of FOPO, 43rd Parliament.
Caroline Desbiens (Vice-Chair)
- Affiliation: Bloc Québécois
- Region: Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix, Quebec
- Biography:
- Holds a bachelor's degree in industrial relations.
- Singer-songwriter and ambassador of Québec culture for 25 years.
- Previously a general manager of the Hôtel du Capitaine de l'Îsle-aux-Coudres.
- A member of the Quebec Sovereignty Council from 2010 to 2014.
- Named 2013's Patriot of the Year by the Société nationale des Québécoises et des Québécois de la Capitale-Nationale.
- First elected to the House of Commons of Canada in the 2019 election.
- Current member of the Canada-Italy Interparliamentary Group, as well as numerous other interparliamentary groups and parliamentary associations.
- BQ Fisheries Critic
Lisa Marie Barron (Fisheries Critic)
- Affiliation: New Democratic Party of Canada
- Region: Nanaimo—Ladysmith, British Columbia
- Biography:
- Previously a school district board trustee and public school employee.
- Has resided in Nanaimo for 26 years and has also resided on the east coast.
- Also Deputy Critic, Mental Health and Addictions, where she will collaborate with Critic MP Gord Johns.
- Elected in the 2021 election with a very slim margin against CPC and Green candidates (1,000 votes, urban riding).
- NDP Fisheries Critic
Mike Kelloway
- Affiliation: Liberal Party of Canada
- Region: Cape Breton—Canso, Nova Scotia
- Biography:
- A lifelong resident of Cape Breton, he has a Bachelor of Community Studies at Cape Breton University and a Masters degree in Education from the University of Calgary.
- Worked as a youth worker, entrepreneur and College lecturer. Also a special project administrator at the Nova Scotia Community College.
- Elected MP for Cape Breton-Canso in 2019
- Previous roles in 43rd parliament were Standing Committee for Health, the Standing Committee for Justice, and the Atlantic, Rural and National Caucus interparliamentary group.
- Parliamentary Secretary for the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans and Canadian Coast Guard.
Ken Hardie
- Affiliation: Liberal Party of Canada
- Region: Fleetwood—Port Kells, British Columbia
- Biography:
- Studied economics at the University of British Columbia and graduated from the Executive Management Development Program at Simon Fraser University.
- Previously worked as a broadcaster and senior public affairs manager in public safety and regional development.
- Served on FOPO and the House Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communications in the 42nd Parliament.
- Moved a motion at FOPO to study the state of the Pacific Salmon.
- Vocal in the study on BC flooding and mitigation measures about the extent and impacts of the damage, DFO actions, funding, state of fish and fish passage, and exchanges with US counterparts and B.C. government.
Robert Morrissey
- Affiliation: Liberal Party of Canada
- Region: Egmont, Prince Edward Island
- Biography:
- Strong economic background, with 20 years in provincial politics, including several ministerial portfolios.
- Worked in private sector as a consultant specializing in government relations, fisheries, and the labour market.
- Served on FOPO since the 42nd Parliament (2019).
- Also a member of Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities.
- Longtime member of FOPO
Serge Cormier
- Affiliation: Liberal Party of Canada
- Region: Acadie—Bathurst, New Brunswick
- Biography:
- Appointed Chief of Staff for various Government of New Brunswick departments.
- Served as a policy analyst in the Office of the Official Opposition and as an assistant to former Premier Brian Gallant.
- Son of an inshore fish harvester.
- Served as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard and Minister of National Defence in the 42nd Parliament; has been a FOPO member since then.
Brendan Hanley
- Affiliation: Liberal Party of Canada
- Region: Yukon, Yukon
- Biography:
- Northern physician with over 25 years of experience working with rural, remote, and Indigenous populations. He worked in emergency medicine and as a family practitioner in Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut.
- Has a medical degree from the University of Alberta, a diploma in tropical medicine and hygiene from the University of Liverpool, and a Masters in Public Health degree from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
- Experience with Doctors without Borders, practicing overseas in Africa and Asia.
- Was Yukon's Chief Medical Officer of Health since 2008, and guided the territory during the COVID-19 pandemic until his election in 2021.
- Hanley is the Yukon Liberals' first new federal representative in more than two decades.
- Also a member of the House Standing Committee on Health.
Rick Perkins
- Affiliation: Conservative Party of Canada
- Region: South Shore—St. Margarets, Nova Scotia
- Biography:
- Retail business leader who has worked in the public and private sectors, in Nova Scotia, Ontario and Alberta and founded several small businesses.
- Government and Parliamentary experience:
- Elected September 20, 2021 when he won former Minister Jordan's NS seat.
Richard Bragdon
- Affiliation: Conservative Party of Canada
- Region: Tobique—Mactaquac, New Brunswick
- Biography:
- Has worked as a realtor, vice president of a non-profit, pastor, and as an executive director of an agricultural firm
- Elected Conservative Party of Canada National Council Member for New Brunswick
- Previously been a member of FOPO and former fisheries critic (2020-21). Previous committee vice-chair (2020-21)
Clifford Small (Fisheries Critic)
- Affiliation: Conservative Party of Canada
- Region: Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame, Newfoundland and Labrador
- Biography:
- Raised in Wild Cove, White Bay, Newfoundland.
- Graduated from the College of the North Atlantic in electrical engineering technology
- Worked in engineering design until 1994 when he joined the family fishing business. Following that, he opened three restaurants.
- First elected in 2021 defeating Liberal incumbent Scott Simms; first Conservative MP in Newfoundland since 2006.
Main Estimates 2023-24: Overall Summary of Items
Name of the Initiative | Description and Expected Results | Funding |
---|---|---|
Key Increases: Represents large planned increases to yearly funding profile, in comparison to the 2022-23 Main Estimates | ||
CCG Fleet Renewal - Polar Icebreaker Project | DFO is seeking access to an additional $314 M to support the renewal of the CCG fleet and related interim measures. | New funding $314 M |
Hurricane Fiona (Small Craft Harbour Program and Ghost Gear Fund) | DFO is seeking $100 M over two years, beginning in 2022-23, to supplement the Small Craft Harbour Program to support recovery efforts at Small Craft Harbours damaged by Hurricane Fiona. | New funding 2022-23: $9.8 M and 2023-24: $89 M |
Oceans Protection Program |
Budget 2022 provided an additional $2 billion over nine years to renew and expand the Oceans Protection Plan (OPP), which was launched by the Government of Canada in 2016 through a $1.5 billion investment. The 2023-2024 Main Estimates include new funding of $134.1 million for the OPP Renewal for DFO and CCG, with an additional amount of $12.96 million for the Employee Benefit Plan, for a total of $146.9 million. The overall goal of the next phase of the OPP is to reduce the negative impacts of marine traffic. |
2023-24: $146.9 M |
High Arctic Marine Conservation |
Continuation of partnership with the Qikiqtani Inuit Association on new marine conservation initiatives, most notably Sarvarjuaq [sar-var-joo-ack] and Qikiqtait [kick-ick-tait]. Inuit-led conservation is essential to future marine protection and achieving success. |
2023-24: $31.0M |
Implementation of the Impact Assessment Act |
Funding will cover salary and operating expenses for new employees to enhance the Department’s participation in impact assessments and regional assessments, as well as deeper engagement and consultation with Indigenous peoples. Over the next six years, DFO will receive $82.1 million in new funding starting in 2022-23, and $2.1 million ongoing after that funding will enable the Department to fulfill its obligations under the Impact Assessment Act. |
2023-24: $16.2 M From 2022-23 to 2027-28: $82.1 M and $2.1 M ongoing |
Conservation Targets | Canada protects 14.66 per cent of its ocean territory, and is taking action towards achieving its conservation targets of conserving 25 per cent of Canada’s oceans by 2025 and 30 per cent by 2030 through collaboration with partners and historic financial investments. This includes 14 marine protected areas established by DFO under the Oceans Act and 60 marine refuges. |
2023-24: $142.0M $660M over five years, starting in 2020-21 |
Key Decreases: Represents large planned decreases to yearly funding profiles, in comparison to the 2022-23 Main Estimates |
||
Small Craft Harbour Sunsetting Fund (Budget 2021) |
In Budget 2021, the Government announced it would provide $300 million over two years to repair, renew, and replace small craft harbours. Funding is scheduled to come to an end at the end of 2022-23 (as per original funding profile). |
2023-24 planned decrease: $149.6M |
Indigenous Programs |
As it takes time to negotiate agreements, funds must often be redistributed to future years. As part of 2023-24 Main Estimates, only limited redistributions were required, compared to previous years, which has resulted in the year-over-year decrease. The Government is committed to developing treaties and other reconciliation agreements with Indigenous partners which takes significant time. |
2023-24 planned decrease: $86.9M |
Implementation of the Modernized Fisheries Act | Government committed $284 M over five years (2018-19 to 2022-23) to support modernization efforts, including restoring lost protections for all fish and fish habitat. As this funding sunsets, ongoing resource needs are being assessed in order to continue delivering this vital work. | 2023-24 planned decrease: $75.5M |
Fish Funds |
Quebec Fisheries Fund: QFF is a contribution fund of over $40 M, over five years (2019 to 2024). This reprofiling of funds is necessary to comply with the provisions of the Bilateral Agreement for the Implementation of the Quebec Fisheries Fund, especially following numerous delays caused by the pandemic and the slowdown in the supply chain. It will also extend the program by two years (2024-2025 and 2025-2026) to support the development of a healthy and sustainable fisheries and aquaculture industry. The reprofiling of funds is also necessary so that beneficiaries can be reimbursed for project costs incurred after March 31, 2024. Atlantic Fisheries Fund: AFF is a fund of over $400 million over seven years (2017-18 to 2023-24) The AFF is jointly funded by the federal government and the Atlantic provinces. A two-year budget reprofile, or as it is commonly referred to, a program extension, is required to allow the projects approved up until March 31, 2024 to be completed. |
2023-24 planned decrease: $37.7M (The re-profiles account for $14M of the $37.7M planned decrease. The balance reflects the planned funding profile). |
Protecting Canada’s Nature, Park and Wildlife | Budget 2018 announced an investment of $1.3 billion over five years for Environment and Climate Change Canada, Parks Canada Agency, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada to support Canada’s biodiversity and protect species at risk under the “Protecting Canada’s Nature, Parks and Wild Spaces” initiative. This funding sunsets in March 2023. | 2023-24 planned decrease: $37.0M |
Funding to conserve Canada’s lands and freshwater, protect species, advance Indigenous reconciliation and increase access to nature (Nature Legacy) |
Budget 2021 announced an Enhanced Nature Legacy, providing DFO with $173 million in funding over five years. This included an additional $29.5 million for the Canada Nature Fund for Aquatic Species at Risk. This funding sunsets in March 2026. DFO is committed to halt and reverse the loss of biodiversity in Canada by protecting nature and key species, working with partners to protect waters and aquatic habitats, and enabling Indigenous-led conservation. |
2023-24 planned decrease: $15.8M |
New Funding: Represents other planned influx of funding with a lower dollar value than the key increases |
||
Ghost Gear Program |
In 2022, through funding for advancing a circular economy for plastics in Canada, the Ghost Gear Program was renewed for five years (fiscal years 2022-2023 through 2026-2027, with $25 million in funding) and has a mandate commitment to create a Canadian National Ghost Gear Strategy that addresses long-term prevention, mitigation and response for Ghost Gear. A call for proposals to support ghost gear efforts to reduce the impacts from Hurricane Fiona in 2023-24 (with the Department providing up to $28.4 M in funding) closed on January 6th. Applicants were informed of the results of their applications via e-mail in early March. |
2023-24: $6 M |
Net-Pen Transition: Indigenous Partners and Stakeholders | Funding to support engagement through capacity building for Indigenous partners for the development of a plan to transition from open-net pen salmon aquaculture in BC coastal waters. |
2023-24: $1.4 M From 2022-23 to 2023-24: $11.8 M |
Haida Nations Initiative - Advance Reconciliation | In 2021, Canada, Haida Nation, and BC signed the “Changing Tide” agreement, which establishes an incremental process by which the parties can negotiate reconciliation agreements on priority topics identified by the Haida Nation. |
2023-24: $1.3 M From 2022-23 to 2024-25: $7 M |
Great Lake Fisheries Commission (GLFC) |
Through Budget 2022, the Government invested an incremental $44.9 M over five years and $9 M ongoing to fulfill Canada’s international treaty obligations under the Convention on GLFC with the US. This increased funding, which takes Canada’s annual support for the work of the Commission to over $19 M, demonstrates our commitment to improving the GLFC, ensures continued Canadian sea lamprey control activities, supports the GLFC’s research agenda, and its coordination of binational fisheries management across the Great Lakes. |
2023-24: $8.9 M From 2022-23 to 2026-27: $44 M with $9 M ongoing |
Trans Mountain Expansion Project - Canada Energy Regulator’s Recommendations |
Budget 2022, allocated $17 M in total funding over three years (includes funding of $400K and $900K respectively for SSC and PSPC, and DFO $15.7M). $5.5 M will enable continued delivery of Trans Mountain Expansion accommodation measures (the Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund, the Terrestrial Cumulative Effects Initiative, and the Salish Sea Initiative) to 2024-25. $3.1 M provides one year bridge funding for the CCG Marine Communications and Traffic Services Marine Mammal Desk. $7.3 M over three years will support capacity and administration functions to meet regulatory coordination requirements for the DFO. DFO will also receive $1.1 M to participate in the Indigenous Advisory and Monitoring Committee for two additional years through fiscal year 2023-24. |
2023-24: $2.6 M From 2022-23 to 2024-25: $15.7 M |
Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) |
The 2022 Fall Economic Statement identified $36.6 M over five years starting in fiscal year 2022-23 for DFO to support the expansion of the AIS Program. These resources will allow DFO to undertake new activities focused on detecting and responding to reports of imminent invasions, including at international borders to prevent AIS from entering and spreading in Canada, and facilitating on-the-ground preventative action through new and existing partnerships to strengthen current operations and coordinate efforts nationally. |
2023-24: $7.1 M From 2022 to 2025: $35 M |
Transfers: Represents a transfer of resources between two or more federal departments to meet Government of Canada objectives |
||
Interdepartmental Maritime Command, Control and Communications Program (DND to DFO) |
The Interdepartmental Maritime Integrated Command, Control and Communications Project was created to improve information sharing between federal departments in the area of domestic maritime security. Up until 2022, all funding was managed by the Department of Defense; however, in 2022, the Canadian Coast Guard began receiving its share of operational funding of $4.7 M per annum. |
2023-24: $4.7 M From 2022-23 to 2026-27: $23.5 M and $4.7 M ongoing |
Canadian Positioning, Navigation and Timing Board (various Department to Department of Industry) |
DFO is transferring $80K in 2023-24 to the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada in support of the Canadian Positioning, Navigation and Timing Board. The Canadian Positioning, Navigation and Timing Board is a cross-government organization comprised of subject matter experts and executives from the Government of Canada and Canada’s air navigation service provider who have a shared interest in satellite-based positioning, navigation and timing for critical applications and services. |
2023-24: $80K |
Financial Management Transformation (various Departments to TBS) |
DFO will be contributing $150K per year, over the next five year period to support the Comptroller General in achieving this goal. The Financial Management Transformation of the Office of the Comptroller General, is responsible for the government-wide direction and stewardship of financial management systems. SAP was declared as the system of choice for the Government of Canada in 2012. |
2023-24: $150K |
Greening Government Fund (various Departments to TBS) |
DFO is contributing the following amounts to the Greening Government Fund: $485,823 in fiscal year 2023-24, $597,936 in fiscal year 2024-25, and $421,033 in fiscal year 2025-26. This initiative provides project funding to federal government departments and agencies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in their operations, and promotes and shares innovative approaches to reducing GHGs. |
2023-24: $486K |
Reprofiles: Represents the movement of funds between fiscal years that are affecting the 2023-24 Main Estimates | ||
Pacific Salmon Program |
The Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative aims to conserve and restore wild Pacific salmon stocks and their ecosystems through a series of immediate and long-term activities. Year one (2021-22) of PSSI was focused on engagement with Indigenous peoples, partners, and stakeholders regarding early program design and implementation. Year two (2022-23) initiatives are underway and focus on salmon rebuilding, including prioritizing stocks that need urgent support. |
2023-24: $9.1 M 2024-25: $12.2 M 2025-26: $14.0 M |
Indigneous Habitat Participation Program (IHPP) |
The Indigenous Habitat Participation Program (IHPP) is a grants and contributions program that supports the increased participation of Indigenous peoples in the conservation and protection of fish and fish habitat. As this funding sunsets, ongoing resource needs are being assessed in order to continue delivering this vital work. In the meantime, almost $9 M in IHPP funding was reprofiled to 2023-24 to support Indigenous communities. This funding will support capacity building and project implementation for these Indigenous accommodation programs. |
2023-2024: $8.9 M |
Trans Mountain Expansion Project |
Aquatic Ecosystems (AE) To enable Indigenous communities continued participation in these initiatives, $75.1 M in Vote 10 funding for the Aquatic Habitat Restoration Fund, Salish Sea Initiative, and Terrestrial Cumulative Effects Initiative was re-profiled in fiscal year 2021-22. The remaining balance of the $75.1M for 2023-24 is $5M. Further reprofiling of funds is anticipated in the future to provide contribution funding (Vote 10) during fiscal year 2024-25, should funding remain available. Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) The CCG is responsible for implementation of three initiatives under the Trans Mountain Expansion Co-Developing Community Response Accommodation Measure: 1) Co-Developing Community Response; 2) Collaborative Situation Awareness Portal; and, 3) Pacheedaht Multi-Purpose Marine Response Facility). DFO reprofiled approximately $23 M in remaining Vote 5 funding for this initiative over up to three additional years. |
AE CCG 2024-25: $16.9 M 2025-26: $5.1 M |
Advancing Reconciliation | Spending on the implementation of treaties and other constructive reconciliation agreements varies from year to year, depending on the stage of negotiations, timing of one-time payments, and other influences. The Department is committed to getting these arrangements right through consultations and negotiation and, as such, the conclusion of agreements can take time to complete. | 2023-24: $4.4 M |
Vessel Life Extension 2020 |
A multi-year re-profile is being sought in order to properly reflect the latest expenditure plan. More specifically, DFO is seeking to reprofile $32.8 M from year 2022-23; $1.8 M in year 2023-24 and $31 M in year 2024-25. As work on vessel life extension was delayed due to factors such as supply chain impacts on materials required for the work and health measures at shipyards during the COVID-19 pandemic, this will ensure a better realignment of funds. |
2023-24: $1.8 M From 2022-23 to 2024-25: $31 M |
Small Craft Acquisition Program |
As the increase in funds for this project has been significant and the timeline to initiate procurement for this fiscal year has been limited, the project team developed a realistic procurement schedule that factors in Public Service and Procurement Canada support requirements, procurement timelines, and supply chain limitations. A funding reprofile was requested to reprofile funds into fiscal year 23/24 ($11.7 M) and fiscal year 24/25 ($11.1 M). |
2023-24: $11.7 M 2024-25: $11.1 M |
Additional Questions and Answers
Canadian Coast Guard Efforts - British Columbia Communities
What is DFO/CCG’s current role in communities affected by the Discovery Islands decision? How does the CCG/DFO currently work in these communities?
- Since 2022, Coast Guard has been working with the Nanwakolas Tribal Council in the planning and execution of Search and Rescue (SAR) and Environmental Response (ER) operational drills. Coast Guard has attended several Coastal Nation Guardian Gatherings and built positive relationships with local responders.
- Coast Guard has issued contracts to members of the Nanwakolas Nation, on projects including response and monitoring. Coast Guard responders apply Indigenous knowledge to inform planning and limit the potential impacts of operations.
- Coast Guard is planning for 2 to 3 Geographic Response Strategy exercises with Nanwakolas for the next fiscal year (FY 2023-24). These include on-water exercises that build bilateral relationships and strengthen Coast Guard's understanding of the Nation's priorities and interests.
- Further, Coast Guard works closely with the North Vancouver Island sub-committee under the Reconciliation Framework Agreement to advance collaborative response planning with federal, provincial, and First Nations governments.
What is the department’s plan to assist communities in a sustainable economic transition?
- Coast Guard collaborates with local First Nations in the Campbell River/Discovery Islands area, namely the Kwiakah and the Nanwakolas Council members: We wai kum, K’omoks, Tlowitsis, Mamalilikula, Da’naxda’xw Awaetlala.
- Transition support for First Nations and communities with economic reliance on non-renewed aquaculture licenses (with near-term focus on Discovery Islands), includes the planned repurposing of a former fish farm as the base for a First Nation Guardian program, and collaborative response and monitoring initiatives utilizing First Nations’ traditional knowledge.
Recent Fisheries Management Decisions
Why did DFO decide to close the Atlantic mackerel commercial and bait fisheries on March 30, 2022?
- The mackerel stock is in the critical zone and, as a result, I made the difficult decision to close the commercial and bait fisheries for Atlantic mackerel. This measure was taken to rebuild this important forage stock, which plays a key role in the ecosystem.
- I recognize the importance of the Atlantic mackerel fishery and am optimistic that this stock can rebuild and be available for future generations.
- A new stock assessment took place on February 20 to 23, 2023. This assessment will help to inform our next steps.
- I recently received a letter from the Chair of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, and I would like to thank the committee for a thorough summary of Committee discussions and the Committee’s thoughtful recommendations. The Department is currently preparing a response to the Chair’s letter.
Why did DFO decide to close the southern Gulf spring herring commercial and bait fisheries on March 30, 2022?
- The Gulf spring herring stock has been in the critical zone since 2002. A number of management measures have been applied since then to arrest the stock’s decline.
- Closing fisheries reduces the pressure on this stock, giving it the best chance at rebuilding. As a forage stock, its health is critically important to the overall health of the ecosystem.
- The next scientific assessment of this stock will occur in 2024. Updated management measures will be considered following the assessment.
In April 2022, why did DFO reduce the Estuary and Gulf shrimp total allowable catch for both 2022 and 2023?
- The current environmental and ecosystem conditions in the estuary and Gulf of St-Lawrence are unfavourable for shrimp.
- While recognizing the economic challenges harvesters are facing, a cautious approach was needed to mitigate potential threats to conservation.
- Taking into account socio-economic factors, the reduction was implemented gradually over two years.
In spring of 2022, why did you decide to not implement the management strategy evaluation for Southwest Nova Scotia/Bay of Fundy herring, yet reduced the annual total allowable catch by 33 percent?
- I established a total allowable catch for 2022 that represented a 33 percent reduction from 2021. I took this action to protect this vulnerable fish stock while giving time to further evaluate a harvest strategy for the longer term.
- Looking forward, I will weigh the results of that evaluation and take a decision on this fishery this spring.
What is the Department undertaking, other than closing fisheries, to help Pacific salmon stocks?
- As we consider different stocks in decline, we are looking at not only harvest levels but also habitat protection and restoration, as well as enhancement.
- We are increasing our science and understanding of salmon ecosystems and investing in work with partners on integrated planning and developing rebuilding plans for key stocks of concern.
- We are also doubling the British Columbia Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund (or BCSRIF) to support groups or applicants with ideas to address salmon declines.
- And recently, I announced that I will not be renewing aquaculture licenses in the Discovery Islands.
Why did you choose to close the directed fishery for Winter flounder and Yellowtail flounder in NAFO Division 4T?
- Winter flounder and yellowtail flounder stocks have been in the critical zone, as per the precautionary approach framework, since 2004 and 2009 respectively, and no signs of recovery have been observed in the most recent scientific assessments.
- In the directed yellowtail flounder fishery, significant amounts of bycatch of winter flounder have been reported. A combined approach is therefore needed to ensure the recovery of these stocks.
- This conservation-based closure recognizes the importance of these fisheries to coastal communities.
Why have you chosen to approve some fisheries for Pacific herring while others will not be permitted?
- Beyond direct human needs, Pacific herring fulfills a vital role in the ecosystem; its conservation for the long-term benefit of future generations will always be my primary objective.
- Decisions to open Pacific herring fisheries are based on the best available science and take into account the rights of First Nation communities.
- I recognize the importance of Pacific herring to Indigenous Peoples and will take those steps available to me to ensure Indigenous communities can exercise their fishing rights.
Why did DFO decide to reduce the TAC in 0A/0B Greenland halibut for the 2023/24 season?
- To balance both the health of the stock and the economic needs of Indigenous and industry interests, Canada has reduced the Subarea 0 total allowable catch levels for Greenland Halibut by 9.25 percent for the 2023 fishing season.
- This decision was made based on the consideration of advice of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Scientific Council (SC), which recommended that catches for the stock in NAFO Subareas 0 and 1 not exceed 29,640 t in 2023 and 2024.
Will there be a commercial fishery for Unit 1 Redfish for 2023/24?
- I have not yet made a decision on an appropriate access and allocation key for Unit 1 Redfish for the pending commercial fishery.
- Given this, and the additional work required to operationalize the commercial fishery, there will not be a commercial fishery for Unit 1 Redfish for 2023/24, and the experimental and index fisheries will be extended for another year.
EX Performance Pay
What is the process for Executive Performance Pay?
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Canadian Coast Guard encourages excellence in performance by setting clear objectives, evaluating results achieved, recognizing and rewarding performance, and providing a framework for consistency in performance management.
- To be eligible to receive performance pay and in range salary movement, employees must meet the criteria as proscribed in the Treasury Board Secretariat’s Directive on Performance and Talent Management for Executives. A Deputy Minister Performance and Talent Management Panel Review Discussion also takes place annually to ensure consistency and fairness in the application of ratings and talent mapping.
What percentage of an Executive’s salary does this performance pay represent?
- In accordance with the Treasury Board Secretariat’s Directive, performance pay for executives includes a combination of two elements: individual at-risk pay (performance bonus) and an in-range salary increase (base salary). Performance pay is calculated as a portion of the Executive’s base pay, and cannot exceed the limits established by the Treasury Board Secretariat.
- Performance pay, if eligible, is dependent on both an Executive's level (for example EX-01 to EX-05) and their assessed performance rating. Specifically, at-risk pay (performance pay) will vary between six per cent to 26per cent of their salary, and in-range salary increases vary from three per cent to seven per cent until the executive reaches the maximum salary allowed for their level.
In total, what is the salary implications for DFO’s executive performance pay?
- Performance pay spending limits are prescribed by the Treasury Board Secretariat, may not be exceeded, and are calculated as a percentage of executive payroll for the given year. We anticipate that this ratio will be similar in 2022-23 as it has been in the past, representing between 11 to 12 per cent of our executive payroll.
- For fiscal year 2022-23, Executive compensation is estimated to cost $56 million, of which $5.7 million, or 11 per cent, is the estimated cost for performance pay. Of note, Executive compensation only represents 4.7 per cent of the Department’s total salary expenditures of $1.2 billion.
Return to Work
What is DFO’s implementation of the common hybrid work model?
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Canadian Coast Guard have employees working in over 400 hundred locations from coast to coast to coast. Due to the operational nature of our work, we have employees working in office settings, in the field, in remote locations, on ships, lighthouses, and more, and many cannot fulfill their duties working remotely.
- As for employees who can work remotely, they are required to work on site a minimum of two days a week, in accordance with the Treasury Board Secretariat’s direction.
How may DFO employees will be following the common hybrid work model?
- Of our 15,446 employees, 8,942 (58 per cent) are now working on a hybrid schedule.
How is the Department reviewing and approving exception requests?
- The Department established a Senior Management Compliance and Coherence Committee to establish departmental direction, review exception requests, and monitor the implementation of the new common hybrid work model to ensure consistency and fairness in approving exceptions.
How many exception requests have been received?
- To date, 619 exception requests have been received, representing about 4 per cent of our workforce.
Security
What are the process, practices, and government standards related to security revocation?
- The Policy on Government Security establishes security screening as the fundamental practice that maintains a foundation of trust within government, between government and Canadians, and between Canada and other countries. Security screening, and thus security clearances or status, is a means to assess an individual's reliability and loyalty to Canada.
- Security screening is conducted in accordance with the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) Standard on Security Screening, which also establishes the authorities and processes to grant, deny or revoke a security clearance or status. In addition, the Standard details the evaluation, decision making and review of cause processes that may lead to a decision to revoke a security status.
What led to the revocation for spying or acting on behalf of a foreign government in 2017?
- The Department received a Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Security Assessment about the individual which contained information of significant national security risk.
How did the Department handle the situation?
- A review for cause of the individual’s personnel security file was conducted, in accordance with the TBS Standard on Security Screening, resulting in a decision to revoke their security status.
What information was compromised?
- There has not been any indication of departmental information being compromised.
Great Lakes Fishery Commission - Background
Establishment of the Commission
- The GLFC was established by the 1954 Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between the United States of America and Canada (“the Convention”), with the objective of protecting and sustaining the Great Lakes fishery.
- Along with scientific research and the coordination of binational fisheries management, the GLFC carries out sea lamprey control activities directly through DFO and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Funding
- Pursuant to the Convention, the GLFC is funded by both the Canadian and U.S. federal governments, with the respective amounts reflecting the distribution of territorial waters and the value of each nation’s fishery at the time the Commission was set up.
- As decided at the GLFC’s first meeting in 1956, for implementation of the Sea Lamprey Control Program (SLCP), the U.S. and Canada contribute 69 per cent and 31 per cent of the Commission's budget, respectively.
- To support the GLFC’s science research efforts, coordination of binational fisheries management, communications program, and other matters undertaken at the Secretariat office, Canada and the U.S. contribute equal amounts.
Budget Decision-Making
- The Commission operates on an annual decision making process, whereby the Secretariat brings forward a budget proposal each year for consideration by the Government of Canada and the Government of the U.S. (as represented by their respective Commissioners).
- The budget is challenged, discussed, negotiated, and ultimately agreed to between the treaty parties (i.e. the Governments of the U.S. and Canada) each year. This process is the same as other bilateral and multilateral fisheries commissions to which Canada is a Party (nine in total covering fisheries in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans).
- On an annual basis, DFO and the Secretariat jointly prepare a workplan, in line with and made pursuant to the Commission’s approved budget, covering Canadian funding to the GLFC in support of its mandate (e.g., purchase of lampricide, sea lamprey control, science program, communication, and facilitation of collaborative fishery management).
- Specifically for Canadian sea lamprey control delivery, DFO retains funds to deploy the operational program in fulfillment of the Convention and the approved workplan.
Governance
- The GLFC is made up of eight Commissioners, four appointed from each Party.
- U.S. Commissioners are appointed by the President for six-year terms, while Canadian Commissioners are appointed by the Governor in Council and serve at pleasure.
- Traditionally, Canada appoints two Commissioners at the federal level, at least one of whom is typically a senior DFO official, with the other two nominated by the Government of Ontario.
- The GLFC operates under a consensus based approach to decision-making, with the U.S. and Canadian Section (a Section is comprised of their respective four Commissioners) each having one vote; Commissioners do not have individual votes. A decision or recommendation of the Commission shall be made only with the approval of both Sections.
- Commissioners provide direction to the Commission’s Secretariat, including on measures to protect and restore the fishery and mitigate aquatic invasive species, specifically sea lamprey. Commissioners represent Canada and have the authority bestowed upon them to set the Commission’s agenda, decide on priorities, and approve its budget in collaboration and consensus with U.S. Commissioners.
- Date modified: